ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1652092
This article is part of the Research TopicEvidence-Based Research and Clinical Application of Adverse Reactions and Management Strategies for Cancer Treatment DrugsView all 10 articles
Prognostic Value of Inflammatory Markers and Different Treatment Regimens in Neuroendocrine Cervical Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Ganzhou cancer hospital, Ganzhou, China
- 2Department of Radiotherapy, Ganzhou Cancer Hospital, Ganzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma (NECC) is a rare and highly aggressive gynecological tumor, with poor prognosis and limited standardized treatment options. Inflammation plays a significant role in tumor progression, and systemic inflammatory markers such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) have shown prognostic value in other malignancies. However, their role in NECC remains unclear. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 25 NECC patients treated at our hospital between 2014 and 2024. Patients were divided into three groups based on treatment regimens: paclitaxel plus cisplatin combined with radiotherapy, etoposide plus cisplatin combined with radiotherapy, and radiotherapy alone. Baseline characteristics, inflammatory markers, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Log-rank tests were used to compare survival differences.The median survival time was significantly longer in the etoposide plus cisplatin plus radiotherapy group (1,000 days) compared to the paclitaxel plus cisplatin plus radiotherapy group (776 days) and the radiotherapy-alone group (347 days, P = 0.037). The radiotherapy-alone group had significantly higher neutrophil counts (median = 5.46×10⁹/L, P = 0.006), platelet counts (median = 282.5×10⁹/L, P = 0.017), NLR (median = 4.68, P < 0.05), and PLR (median = 231.93, P < 0.05), while LMR (median = 1.89, P < 0.05) was lower. For postoperative patients, the median survival time was 1,453 days for the surgery plus etoposide plus cisplatin plus radiotherapy group, compared to 987 days for the surgery plus paclitaxel plus cisplatin plus radiotherapy group (P = 0.048).Combined chemotherapy with etoposide plus cisplatin and radiotherapy significantly improves survival outcomes in NECC patients compared to radiotherapy alone. This regimen may be particularly beneficial for postoperative patients and those with high-risk factors such as lymphovascular space invasion. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and establish standardized treatment protocols for NECC.
Keywords: Neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma, Inflammatory markers, prognosis, clinical research, Retrospective study
Received: 23 Jun 2025; Accepted: 21 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kuang, Wang, Yu, Shen, Peng, Li, Cheng and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jing Huang, Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Ganzhou cancer hospital, Ganzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.