Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Translational Pharmacology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1655254

PART II -IMIDAZOLINES & RHINITIS MEDICAMENTOSA: How can we tackle the Rebound Dilemma?

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Hull York Medical School, Hull, United Kingdom
  • 2University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Rhinitis medicamentosa is the state of chronic congestion experienced from the prolonged or excessive use of nasal vasoconstrictors, typically used in the treatment of nasal congestion. Although a minor ailment, nasal congestion is a bothersome symptom for many allergic and non-allergic rhinitis sufferers. To alleviate symptoms, patients turn to over-the-counter topical nasal decongestants, with imidazolines often being the active ingredient of choice, as they provide rapid and long-lasting symptom relief, via vasoconstriction within the nasal mucosa. When used correctly, nasal vasoconstrictors are considered safe. However, misuse and deviation away from the recommended frequency of dose or maximum length of treatment can result initially in acute rebound congestion and if continued, rhinitis medicamentosa (RM). The pathophysiology and mechanisms of RM have not been fully elucidated and are complicated by difficulties in determining where the underlying disease ends, and RM begins. RM is characterised by the presence of chronic nasal congestion which responds less effectively and for progressively shorter periods to nasal vasoconstrictor treatments. Consequently, patients try to relieve symptoms by taking the nasal vasoconstrictor more frequently or at higher doses, which ultimately exacerbates the congestion further and creates a dependency on the nasal vasoconstrictor. Why RM develops is unclear, hypothesised mechanisms include structural, functional and inflammatory changes in the nasal mucosa, changes in receptor sensitivity or innervation pathways. To which extent this is solely in response to the use of imidazoline derivates or related to the presence of preservatives in topical nasal treatments is yet to be determined. Although treatment options exist for RM, prevention may be the best medicine. Provision of better education around the use of nasal vasoconstrictions, coupled with preservative free formulations and lowest possible dose delivery, may help to reduce the likelihood of developing the disease from the outset, reducing the burden on both the patient and healthcare providers.

Keywords: Nasal Decongestants1, Imidazonlines2, Oxymetazoline3, Sympathomimetic4, Nasal Decongestants/adverse effects5, Imidazoline receptor6, Rhinitis medicamentosa7, Rebound8

Received: 04 Jul 2025; Accepted: 15 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Stinson and Sadofsky. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Laura Sadofsky, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.