ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Obstetric and Pediatric Pharmacology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1655866
Comparative study between Calcium gluconate with Diosmin, Cabergoline, and 1 Cabergoline with Diosmin in prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in 2 high-risk women undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) procedures
Provisionally accepted- 1Minia University Faculty of Pharmacy, Minya, Egypt
- 2Fayoum University, Faiyum, Egypt
- 3Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- 4Tanta University Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta, Egypt
- 5Minia University Faculty of Medicine, Menia Governorate, Egypt
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Ovarian Hyper-stimulation Syndrome (OHSS) is the main iatrogenic problem 19 linked to ovarian stimulation with reproductive medications. Increased vascular permeability is 20 considered the cause of OHSS. It leads to excess fluid flowing from blood vessels into surrounding 21 tissue. Serious consequences include imbalances in electrolytes and impairment of the heart, liver, 22 and kidneys. 23 Objectives: This study aims to the comparison of the efficacy of calcium gluconate and diosmin 24 combination, cabergoline alone, and a combination of cabergoline and diosmin in preventing 25 OHSS in high-risk individuals undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) procedures. 26 Methods: A prospective, randomized, single-blind, interventional study was carried out on 180 27 high-risk females for OHSS. They were divided into three groups, each with 60 women: Group A 28 received IV infusion of calcium gluconate and diosmin. Group B received cabergoline alone. 29 Group C received cabergoline and diosmin. Patients were regularly evaluated using clinical 30 examinations and ultrasound to check for signs of OHSS. The main outcome was the frequency 31 of moderate to severe OHSS. Secondary outcomes were the rates of clinical pregnancy, 32 miscarriage, and live birth. 33 Results: The research demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the prevalence of 34 mild OHSS among the three groups (p-value =0.91for each). Nevertheless, the three groups 35 showed a notable difference in the occurrence of moderate OHSS (p = 0.044) respectively. Notably, 36 severe ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome wasn't observed in Group C. However, 13.3% of 37 patients in Group B and 6.6% in Group A were affected with a highly significant difference (p = 38 0.007). The chemical & clinical pregnancy rates across the three groups did not demonstrate any 39 statistically significant differences, (p-value of 0.53), (p-value of 0.17) correspondingly). 40 Conclusion: Our study found that using cabergoline and diosmin together in high-risk females 41 undergoing ICSI procedures was significantly more successful in preventing OHSS compared to 42 using calcium gluconate and diosmin or cabergoline alone. This combination did not impact 43 miscarriage, pregnancy rate, or the likelihood of multiple pregnancy.
Keywords: Ovarian hyperstimulation, cabergoline, Calcium Gluconate, Diosmin, hCG
Received: 28 Jun 2025; Accepted: 06 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 M. Abdallah, Kamal, J. Alarfaj, A. Elmasry, Hussien, Sarhan, Mosbeh, Saber and Sadek. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Marwa Kamal, mka05@fayoum.edu.eg
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.