Abstract
Introduction:
Testicular cytofunctional defects are among the most hazardous effects of cancer chemotherapies. Propolis mitigates the fertility problems associated with gonadotoxic agents through its redox stabilizing, anti-apoptotic, and cytoprotective properties due to presence of bioactive agents identified in our study by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis including, flavonoids, terpenes, aliphatic and aromatic compounds, and amino acids. Herein, we investigated the potential reversal effects of aqueous propolis on busulfan-induced reproductive abnormalities in adult rats.
Methods:
Thirty rats were randomly assigned to five experimental groups, with six animals per group, for duration of 6 weeks. The control group received only the vehicle daily through oral gavage. The DMSO group was given a single intraperitoneal injection of DMSO. The busulfan group received a single intraperitoneal injection of busulfan at a dose of 20 mg/kg body weight, followed by daily oral gavage. The propolis group was administered propolis daily via oral gavage at a dose of 100 mg/kg body weight. In the busulfan + propolis group, rats received a single intraperitoneal injection of busulfan at 20 mg/kg body weight, combined with daily oral gavage of propolis at a dose of 100 mg/kg body weight.
Results and discussion:
Busulfan exposure led to a decrease in serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone, testosterone, and estradiol 17β, along with an increase in luteinizing hormone. It negatively affected sperm outcomes, causing a decline in sperm count and the percentages of live, normal, and motile sperm, while increasing the percentages of dead and abnormal sperm. Furthermore, busulfan disrupted the testicular defense system, as indicated by elevated testicular malondialdehyde levels and reductions in testicular nitric oxide and reduced glutathione levels, catalase and superoxide dismutase activities, as well as serum total antioxidant capacity. Marked histopathological changes were observed, in concomitant with strong immunoreactivity for proliferating cell nuclear antigen and caspase-3 in germ cells. Propolis supplementation effectively mitigated all these abnormalities in busulfan-intoxicated rats. Propolis is suggested as a potential complementary adjuvant for managing busulfan-induced reproductive dysfunction, owing to its reproductive hormone-modulating, redox-stabilizing, sperm-protective, and anti-apoptotic properties.
1 Introduction
Advancements in early detection and enhanced cancer treatment protocols have led to a significant rise in the number of young male cancer survivors (Miller et al., 2022). Fertility has emerged as a crucial aspect of quality of life for adult cancer patients (). Accordingly, preventing iatrogenic infertility resulting from chemotherapy has become a critical priority (). Busulfan, one of the most spermicidal agents commonly utilized in treating lymphoma and chronic leukemia, is known to cause various side effects, including impairments to the reproductive system (; Li et al., 2023). Experimental animal studies have shown that busulfan induces disturbances in testicular redox homeostasis, marked histological deterioration, and impaired semen parameters, along with disruptions in the sexual hormone profile (; Rostami et al., 2022; ; Li et al., 2023). Furthermore, busulfan administration resulted in a marked reduction in the proliferation/apoptosis ratio, characterized by decreased gene expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and increased gene expression of caspase-3 ().
Currently, semen cryopreservation prior to initiating cancer therapy remains the only reliable approach to safeguarding male fertility for the future (Liu et al., 2021). However, a considerable number of male cancer patients refrain from sperm cryopreservation for various reasons, including financial constraints, particularly given the need to fund potentially costly life-saving cancer treatments (Ledesma et al., 2023). Among these challenges, the importance of inexpensive natural materials emerges as an available option to address reproductive problems associated with cancer chemotherapy. Propolis, commonly referred to as bee glue, is a dark-brown, resin-like substance created by honeybees. It is typically formed by blending beeswax and bee saliva with exudates gathered from tree buds, sap flows, or other botanical sources (Hwang et al., 2020; Sforcin, 2016). It is rich in redox stabilizers, including flavonoids, cinnamic acid, gallic acid, stilbenes, catechins, and hydroxybenzoic acids, supporting its use in managing oxidative stress-related gonadal dysfunction (Kurek-Górecka et al., 2013; Moskwa et al., 2020; Wezgowiec et al., 2020; Laaroussi et al., 2021). A wide variety of literature confirmed the ability of propolis in counteracting the reproductive abnormalities associated with gonadal disruptors. Propolis mitigated the pathophysiological effects of cadmium on the testis by reducing histological damage to Leydig cells, Sertoli cells, and germ cells, enhancing the antioxidant capacity of the testis, restoring the balance of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and testosterone output (). In nicotinamide-streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats, propolis supplementation alleviated testicular damage by reducing the immuno-expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen and enhancing DNA integrity in spermatogenic cells (). It also reduced caspase-3 activity and enhanced the proliferative rate in spermatogonial cells exposed to tert-butyl hydroperoxide and co-incubated with propolis ().
Thus, we hypothesize that propolis may enhance testicular cytofunctional characteristics in gonadotoxic chemotherapy models. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the impact of propolis on pituitary-gonadal hormone regulation, testicular antioxidant capacity, semen quality, and the immunoexpression of PCNA and caspase-3 in rats with busulfan-induced infertility.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Busulfan preparation and propolis extraction
To prepare the busulfan solution, busulfan (Sigma-Aldrich Company, Catalog No. B2635, United States) was initially dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). An equal volume of sterile water was then added, resulting in a final busulfan concentration of 20 mg/mL (Khosoroshahi et al., 2013). Propolis was procured from a local market. A total of 25 g of propolis powder was mixed with 250 mL of water at 40°C and kept on a shaker for 7 days in a dark room. Once fully dissolved, the suspension was filtered using clean filter paper, and the residue was re-extracted. The filtration process was repeated daily for 7 days. The final extract was dried using a rotary evaporator at 30°C–40°C (Matienzo and Lamorena, 2004).
2.2 Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis
The chemical composition of propolis sample was analyzed using GC-MS. A 7890 N series gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies), coupled with an Agilent 5,975 mass spectrometer selective detector (MSD) and fitted with an HP-5ms capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm, 0.25 μm film thickness, Agilent Technologies), was employed for the analysis. The analysis was conducted at the Analytical Chemistry Unit (ACAL), Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Egypt. The extract was injected into the Agilent 7890-5975C GC/MSD system and desorbed at 250°C for 2 min. The injection port operated in splitless mode, with helium (99.999% purity) serving as both the vial pressurization and carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The oven temperature program began at 40°C, held for 2 min, and then increased at a rate of 10°C/min to 150°C, held for 6 min. It was further ramped at 10°C/min to 220°C, held for 6 min, and finally increased at 15°C/min to 280°C, where it was held for 15 min. The mass spectrometer operated in electronic impact mode at 70 eV, with the source temperature set at 230°C. Mass spectra were scanned in the range of m/z 30–600 amu at 1-s intervals. The chemical components of the propolis samples were identified using the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NISTW8N08) database. The mass spectral patterns were matched with the Wiley mass spectral library software (version 7n.1), installed on the computer linked to the GC/MS system, to determine the names, molecular weights, and structures of the detected compounds.
2.3 Experimental design
A total of 30 adult male Wistar albino rats, weighing 200 ± 10 g, were used in this experiment. The animals were procured from the Laboratory Animal House, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University. The rats were acclimatized for 1 week prior to the experiment, during which they were provided with water and a standard commercial pellet diet. The animals were housed under controlled conditions, maintaining a temperature of 26°C ± 2°C, relative humidity of 40%–60%, and a 12-h light/dark cycle. After the acclimatization period, the rats were randomly divided into five experimental groups, each consisting of six animals. Control group received only the vehicle daily via oral gavage. DMSO group administered a single dose of DMSO intraperitoneally at dose of 0.2 mL (a 1:1 mixture of dimethyl sulfoxide and distilled water). The busulfan group received a single intraperitoneal injection of busulfan at a dose of 20 mg/kg body weight (Kean et al., 2002). Propolis group propolis was given orally via oral gavage at a dose of 100 mg/kg body weight daily (). Busulfan + Propolis group received a single intraperitoneal injection of busulfan at a dose of 20 mg/kg body weight daily via oral gavage along with propolis at a dose of 100 mg/kg body weight (Kaya et al., 2019). After 6 weeks of the experiment, the rats in all groups were sacrificed under sodium thiopental anesthesia while fasting.
2.4 Sample collection
At the end of the 42-day experimental period, all animals were weighed and sacrificed under sodium thiopental anesthesia in a fasting state. Blood samples were immediately collected from each rat’s orbital sinus and placed in EDTA tubes. The blood samples were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min to separate the serum, which was then frozen at −80°C for subsequent biochemical analyses. The testes were carefully dissected and promptly rinsed with normal saline. The right testis was processed to obtain tissue homogenate, with the resulting supernatant stored at −80°C, while the left testis was fixed in a 10% formalin solution for histological analysis.
2.5 Measurement of pituitary-gonadal reproductive hormones and redox parameters
Luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone, and estradiol 17β (E2) levels were determined using ELISA kits procured from Calbiotech Inc., United States (catalog numbers: LH231F, FS232F, TE373S, and ES380S, respectively). Malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), reduced glutathione (GSH), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and total protein were measured using colorimetric kits (catalog numbers: MD 25 29, NO 25 33, CA 25 17, SD 25 21, GR 25 11, TA2512, TP 20 20) and provided by Biodiagnostic Company (Egypt). All redox parameters were normalized to total protein levels in the testicular homogenate. Hormonal measurements were performed using an ELISA reader (ELx800UV, BioTek Instruments, Inc., United States), while other biochemical analyses were conducted using a spectrophotometer (S1200, Unico, United States).
2.6 Semen analysis
To determine sperm count, the entire epididymis was minced in PBS medium and incubated at 37°C for 5 min. The sperm concentration was evaluated manually using a hemocytometer (Narayana et al., 2002). For evaluation of the viability of spermatozoa, fixed-smears were stained with Eosin (Carl Roth Gmbh + Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany)–Nigrosine (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, United States) stain and examined at a ×400 magnification. A total of 300 spermatozoa were examined where colored/stained head spermatozoa were calculated as dead, and unstained ones as viable (Hussein et al., 2022). The percentage of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa was determined according to the method of Menkveld (2010). Motility was assessed using a percentage-based rating scale, as described by Kempinas et al. (1998). The integrity of sperm DNA was assessed using acridine orange (Varghese et al., 2011).
2.7 Histological inspection
Testis tissues were cut into slices approximately 3–4 mm thick and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. The samples were then dehydrated through a series of graded ethanol concentrations, cleared in xylene, and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin blocks were sectioned using a microtome at a thickness of 4–6 μm and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) to examine the general tissue structure. The H&E-stained sections were observed under a Leica microscope (CH9435 Heerbrugg, Leica Microsystems, Switzerland).
2.8 PCNA and caspase-3 immunohistochemical analysis
Immunohistochemical analysis for PCNA and caspase-3 was performed following previously published protocols. Briefly, fixed rat testis samples were dehydrated in an ascending ethanol series and cleared in xylene. The tissues were embedded in paraffin, sectioned at a thickness of 5 μm, deparaffinized, and rehydrated. To block endogenous peroxidase activity, sections were incubated in 1% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min, rinsed, and incubated overnight in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing a rat monoclonal antibody against PCNA (Dako, Milan, Italy) at a concentration of 1:250 in 10% bovine serum albumin (BSA). For caspase-3 analysis, sections were incubated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Beverly, MA). Secondary antibodies, goat anti-mouse IgG (1:500) and goat anti-rabbit IgG, respectively, were applied in 10% BSA. The conventional avidin-biotin complex method was used to detect the reaction. Peroxidase activity was developed using a filtered solution of 5 mg of 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB; Sigma) dissolved in 15 mL of 0.05 M Tris buffer (pH 7.6) with 0.03% H2O2. Finally, the sections were mounted in a synthetic medium and examined under an Olympus light microscope, with imaging performed using accompanying software.
2.9 Statistical analysis
The data were presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical differences among groups were determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s post hoc test. All analyses were performed using SPSS software for Windows, version 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, United States). A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3 Results
3.1 Bioactive components of propolis using GCMS
The GC–MS analysis of propolis identified 40 bioactive phytochemical compounds (Table 1). The predominant compounds detected were 2-hexadecanoyl glycerol (22.98%), beta-monosterine (9.87%), and tectochrysin (8.16%).
TABLE 1
| No | Chemical compound | Retention time (min) | Percent | Molecular formula | Molecular weight (g/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Methyl 4-hydroxy-2-methoxy-3,5,6-trimethylbenzoate | 8.81 | 0.763 | C15H18O5 | 278.30 |
| 2 | 2,2,4,4,6,6,8,8-Octamethyl-1,3,5,7,2,4,6,8-tetraoxatetrasilocane | 10.091 | 0.311 | C18H38O8Si4 | 478.76 |
| 3 | Butyl alcohol-2-d1 | 10.194 | 1.215 | C4H9OH | 74.12 |
| 4 | 1,3-Benzodiazol | 10.447 | 0.733 | C7H4N2 | 132.12 |
| 5 | L-Cystine | 10.634 | 0.314 | C6H12N2O4S2 | 240.31 |
| 6 | 2-[(trimethylsilyl)oxy]-4-methylacetophenone | 10.938 | 0.343 | C11H14O2Si | 218.36 |
| 7 | 4-Nitrochalcone | 10.997 | 0.479 | C14H11N1O3 | 239.25 |
| 8 | 2-Hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-acetic acid ethyl ester | 11.385 | 0.169 | C14H18O5 | 270.29 |
| 9 | 4-hydroxy-3-(2-oxo-2h-1-oxa-3-phenanthryl)-2(1h)-quinolinone | 11.812 | 0.16 | C18H11N3O3 | 309.30 |
| 10 | Nonanoic acid, methyl ester | 12.057 | 0.734 | C10H20O2 | 172.27 |
| 11 | 2′,6′-Dihydroxyacetophenone, bis(trimethylsilyl) ether | 12.995 | 0.188 | C14H18O4Si2 | 294.44 |
| 12 | 7-Methoxy-2,3-diphenyl-4H-chromen-4-one | 13.092 | 0.273 | C18H18O3 | 278.34 |
| 13 | Acetic acid, 2-phenylethyl ester | 13.61 | 0.944 | C14H18O2 | 222.29 |
| 14 | N-(2-Hydroxybenzyl)alanine | 14.464 | 0.621 | C9H13NO3 | 81.21 |
| 15 | Acetic acid, hydroxy-, ethyl ester | 17.413 | 1.003 | C6H12O3 | 130.16 |
| 16 | -curcumene | 17.879 | 3.74 | C18H24 | 244.37 |
| 17 | 1-Amino-3-(3,5-diiodo-2-methoxyphenyl) pyrido[1,2-a]benzimidazole-2,4-dicarbonitrile | 18.727 | 0.947 | C13H8N4I2O | 404.02 |
| 18 | D3-glycine | 19.671 | 0.716 | C2H5N3O3 | 103.13 |
| 19 | (2-Oxido-1,3,2-dioxathiolan-4-yl) methanol | 20.441 | 0.336 | C5H10O4S | 166.20 |
| 20 | Guaiol | 21.223 | 0.773 | C15H24O | 224.35 |
| 21 | 3-O-Methyl-D-glucose | 22.116 | 12.545 | C7H14O7 | 178.19 |
| 22 | Asparagine | 22.343 | 0.448 | C4H8N2O3 | 132.12 |
| 23 | -Eudesmol | 22.453 | 2.682 | C15H24O | 224.35 |
| 24 | Griseoviridin | 22.698 | 1.192 | C16H18N2O4 | 302.33 |
| 25 | 3-ethyl-5- (2-ethylbutyl)- octadecane | 23.293 | 0.408 | C18H38 | 254.49 |
| 26 | Guanosine | 23.546 | 0.216 | C11H15N5O5 | 283.24 |
| 27 | Palmitic acid, methyl ester | 26.405 | 4.693 | C16H32O2 | 256.42 |
| 28 | Atomoxetine | 29.083 | 0.737 | C18H24N2O | 274.40 |
| 29 | Octadecanoic acid, methyl ester | 29.542 | 1.325 | C18H36O2 | 284.48 |
| 30 | Pinostrobin chalcone | 34.834 | 7.793 | C15H14O3 | 242.27 |
| 31 | 5-Methylindol | 35.564 | 0.986 | C9H9N | 133.17 |
| 32 | Pinocembrin | 35.72 | 3.843 | C15H14O5 | 270.27 |
| 33 | 2-Hexadecanoyl glycerol | 35.862 | 22.976 | C18H36O3 | 294.48 |
| 34 | Methyl-n-octadecylamine | 36.257 | 0.662 | C19H41N | 281.53 |
| 35 | Tectochrysin | 36.806 | 8.162 | C15H12O3 | 244.25 |
| 36 | Apigenin 7-methyl ether | 37.22 | 1.409 | C15H12O5 | 286.25 |
| 37 | L-Alanine, N-propoxycarbonyl-, hexyl ester | 37.492 | 0.809 | C14H19NO3 | 251.31 |
| 38 | Chrysin | 37.731 | 2.014 | C15H14O4 | 252.27 |
| 39 | Beta-monostearin | 37.88 | 9.865 | C18H36O4 | 342.5 |
| 40 | Glycyl-D-asparagine | 38.152 | 1.024 | C6H11N3O4 | 173.17 |
Phytochemical compounds in propolis according to GC–MS analysis.
3.2 Propolis restored the reproductive hormones profile in busulfan-exposed rats
No significant differences were observed in serum levels of LH, FSH, testosterone, and E2 between the control group and the DMSO group. However, busulfan exposure in rats caused a significant reduction in FSH, testosterone, and E2 levels, accompanied by a marked increase in LH compared to the control group. A similar trend was observed when comparing the busulfan group with the DMSO group, except for FSH levels, which showed no significant difference between these groups. In the propolis group, a significant decrease in LH, testosterone, and E2 levels was noted compared to both the control and DMSO groups. FSH levels were significantly lower in the propolis group compared to the control group but showed no significant change when compared to the DMSO or busulfan groups. No significant differences were found in any of the measured reproductive hormones between the propolis group and the busulfan group, except for LH levels, which were significantly lower in the propolis group. Co-administration of propolis with busulfan significantly increased FSH, LH, testosterone, and E2 levels compared to the busulfan group, although these levels remained significantly lower than those of the control group, except for testosterone, which was restored to control levels (Table 2).
TABLE 2
| Group Parameter | Control | DMSO | Busulfan | Propolis | Busulfan + propolis | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LH level (mU/mL) | 1.580 ± 0.163c | 1.790 ± 0.018c | 2.379 ± 0.181b | 0.930 ± 0.044d | 2.924 ± 0.150a | 0.000 |
| FSH level (ng/mL) | 3.125 ± 0.132b | 2.650 ± 0.050bc | 2.250 ± 0.112c | 2.524 ± 0.185c | 4.800 ± 0.389a | 0.000 |
| Testosterone level (ng/mL) | 3.450 ± 0.225a | 3.024 ± 0.295a | 1.960 ± 0.243b | 2.075 ± 0.248b | 3.212 ± 0.198a | 0.000 |
| E2 level (Pg/mL) | 12.220 ± 1.196b | 11.900 ± 0.781b | 3.200 ± 0.569c | 3.360 ± 0.912c | 20.237 ± 1.641a | 0.000 |
Effects of propolis on the plasma levels of reproductive hormones in busulfan intoxicated rats.
FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; E2, estradiol-17β.
Data are expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 8).
abc different letters indicate significant difference at P<0.05.
3.3 Propolis mitigated the negative effects of busulfan on sperm quantity and quality in rats
All measured semen parameters showed no significant differences between the control and DMSO groups, except for the percentage of live and normal sperm, which was significantly lower in the DMSO group compared to the control. Busulfan exposure had detrimental effects on semen quality, as evidenced by a significant reduction in sperm count, and the percentages of live, normal, and motile sperm, alongside a marked increase in dead and abnormal sperm percentages compared to both the control and DMSO groups. Propolis supplementation resulted in a significant decrease in the percentages of dead, live, normal, abnormal, and motile sperm, with no significant change in sperm count compared to the control and DMSO groups. However, in comparison to the busulfan group, propolis supplementation significantly improved semen quality, demonstrated by increased sperm count, and the percentages of live, normal, and motile sperm, together with a reduction in the percentages of dead and abnormal sperm. In busulfan-intoxicated rats, propolis administration significantly enhanced semen characteristics, as evidenced by increased sperm count, and the percentages of live, normal, and motile sperm, along with decreased percentages of dead and abnormal sperm. Despite these improvements, the percentages of live, normal, and motile sperm in the busulfan + propolis group remained significantly lower than those of the control group, though sperm count and the percentage of abnormal sperm were normalized (Table 3).
TABLE 3
| Group Parameter | Control | DMSO | Busulfan | Propolis | Busulfan + propolis | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sperm count (106/mL) | 44.000 ± 10.060ab | 51.750 ± 9.716a | 3.000 ± 0.577c | 34.600 ± 4.130ab | 25.600 ± 2.441b | 0.001 |
| Dead sperm (%) | 71.804 ± 6.940b | 64.000 ± 2.160b | 139.690 ± 6.545a | 24.625 ± 4.284c | 35.000 ± 2.887c | 0.000 |
| Alive sperm (%) | 188.750 ± 12.286a | 162.500 ± 10.120b | 47.308 ± 3.784d | 72.000 ± 2.000c | 77.000 ± 6.633c | 0.000 |
| Normal sperm (%) | 264.400 ± 6.470a | 236.000 ± 9.513b | 40.833 ± 1.537d | 68.571 ± 11.686c | 70.000 ± 3.652c | 0.000 |
| Abnormal sperm (%) | 29.500 ± 2.156b | 36.750 ± 2.005b | 48.800 ± 6.012a | 12.500 ± 1.890c | 30.000 ± 4.472b | 0.000 |
| Motility (%) | 75.000 ± 2.739a | 71.667 ± 4.410a | 13.000 ± 2.000d | 58.333 ± 5.578b | 40.833 ± 3.270c | 0.000 |
Effects of propolis on the semen parameters in busulfan intoxicated rats.
Data are expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 8).
abcd different letters indicate significant difference at P<0.05.
3.4 Propolis improved the testicular redox balance in busulfan-exposed rats
No significant differences were observed in the studied redox parameters between the control and DMSO groups, except for a significant decrease in testicular NO levels in the DMSO group compared to the control. Busulfan exposure caused a notable disturbance in the oxidant/antioxidant balance, as evidenced by a significant increase in testicular MDA levels in concomitant with significant decreases in testicular NO and GSH levels, CAT and SOD activities, and serum TAC compared to the control group. A similar pattern was observed between the busulfan and DMSO groups, except for testicular NO levels, which remained unchanged between these groups. Propolis administration resulted in a significant decrease in testicular NO levels, SOD and CAT activities, and serum TAC, combined with a significant increase in testicular GSH levels, with no significant change in testicular MDA levels compared to the control group. A similar pattern was observed between the propolis and DMSO groups, except for testicular NO levels, which showed no significant difference between these groups. No significant differences in redox parameters were detected between the propolis and busulfan groups, except for a significant increase in testicular GSH levels in the propolis group compared to the busulfan group. Supplementation with propolis in busulfan-intoxicated rats markedly improved redox status, as indicated by a significant decrease in testicular MDA levels and significant increases in testicular NO and GSH levels, CAT and SOD activities, and serum TAC compared to the busulfan group. All studied redox parameters returned to control levels, except for testicular CAT activity, which remained significantly lower than control levels (Table 4).
TABLE 4
| Group Parameter | Control | DMSO | Busulfan | Propolis | Busulfan + propolis | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testicular MDA level (nMol/mg protein) | 0.130 ± 0.015b | 0.111 ± 0.006b | 0.220 ± 0.024a | 0.176 ± 0.022ab | 0.143 ± 0.013b | 0.014 |
| Testicular NO level (µmol/mg protein) | 9.268 ± 1.306a | 4.569 ± 0.608b | 3.453 ± 0.439b | 4.344 ± 0.673b | 8.482 ± 1.300a | 0.001 |
| Testicular CAT activity (U/mg protein) | 1.040 ± 0.040a | 0.926 ± 0.236a | 0.125 ± 0.008c | 0.127 ± 0.005c | 0.554 ± 0.065b | 0.000 |
| Testicular SOD activity (mg/mg protein) | 0.152 ± 0.004a | 0.154 ± 0.003a | 0.0513 ± 0.006b | 0.064 ± 0.004b | 0.128 ± 0.022a | 0.000 |
| Testicular GSH level (mg/mg protein) | 0.620 ± 0.033b | 0.604 ± 0.039b | 0.364 ± 0.040c | 0.750 ± 0.042a | 0.630 ± 0.034b | 0.000 |
| Plasma TAC (mM/L) | 0.871 ± 0.106a | 0.668 ± 0.140ab | 0.229 ± 0.095c | 0.357 ± 0.144bc | 0.715 ± 0.033a | 0.003 |
Effects of propolis on the testicular redox parameters and plasma total antioxidant capacity in busulfan intoxicated rats.
MDA, malondialdehyde; NO, nitric oxide; CAT, catalase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; GSH, reduced glutathione; TAC, total antioxidant capacity.
Data are expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 8).
abcd different letters indicate significant difference at P<0.05.
3.5 Histological features of testis were enhanced by propolis supplementation in busulfan-exposed rats
Figures 1A,B illustrate the testes in both the control and DMSO groups, displaying the normal structure of seminiferous tubules. Numerous interstitial Leydig cells were present between the tubules, which were lined with stratified germinal epithelium. The spermatogenic cells were observed at various stages of development, including large primary spermatocytes, round spermatids, elongated spermatids, and late-stage sperm attached to the apices of Sertoli cells. In contrast, testicular sections from the busulfan group showed significant histopathological alterations, such as shrunken tubules surrounded by edema, cellular vacuolation, widened inter-tubular spaces, and disrupted spermatogenesis. Many tubules exhibited aggregated cells in their core, degenerated sperm, and dilated blood vessels (Figure 1C). In the propolis extract group, seminiferous tubules were lined with uniformly arranged spermatogenic cells. Several tubules contained aggregated cells in their core, and sperm bundles were present in the lumens of seminiferous tubules (Figure 1D). In the Busulfan + Propolis group, marked improvement was observed. Most seminiferous tubules appeared normal with active spermatogenesis at varying stages (Figure 1E) indicating amelioration of many busulfan-induced alterations.
FIGURE 1
3.6 Propolis alleviated the intense PCNA and caspase-3 immunoexpression observed in the testes of busulfan-challenged rats
Immunohistochemical analysis of PCNA expression in testicular sections revealed that spermatogonia, primary spermatocytes, secondary spermatocytes, and spermatids in the control, DMSO, and Propolis groups exhibited minimal to no PCNA staining (Figures 2A,B,D). In contrast, the Busulfan group demonstrated strong immunoreactivity for PCNA (Figure 2C), while the Busulfan + Propolis group showed moderate PCNA immunoreactivity (Figure 2E).
FIGURE 2
Figure 4 depicts testicular sections immunostained for caspase-3, a marker of programmed cell death. The control and DMSO groups displayed no immunoreactivity for caspase-3 (Figures 3A,B). In the Busulfan group, strong immunoreactivity for caspase-3 was observed, characterized by brownish staining in spermatogonia and spermatocytes (Figure 3C). The Propolis group showed mild caspase-3 immunoreactivity, with brownish staining observed in some spermatocytes compared to the control (Figure 3D). The Busulfan + Propolis group demonstrated moderate caspase-3 immunoreactivity, with brownish staining visible in some spermatogonia and spermatocytes (Figure 3E).
FIGURE 3
3.7 The busulfan-induced genotoxicity and morphological alterations were counteracted by propolis intervention in the sperms of rats
The DNA integrity assay using Acridine Orange stain revealed that the control, DMSO, and Propolis groups predominantly exhibited green spermatozoa, indicating intact DNA (Figures 4A,B,D). In the Busulfan group, green spermatozoa with intact DNA were still observed; however, a notable increase in spermatozoa with fragmented DNA, represented by orange and yellow fluorescence, was evident. The proportion of spermatozoa with green heads was significantly lower compared to those with yellow or orange-red heads (Figure 4C). In the Busulfan + Propolis group, both green spermatozoa with intact DNA and fragmented DNA spermatozoa (orange and yellow) were present, with an increased proportion of spermatozoa with green heads compared to the Busulfan group (Figure 4E). The control, DMSO, and Propolis groups showed normal epididymal sperm structures, including a well-defined midpiece and single long tail (Figures 5A,B,D). In contrast, the Busulfan group exhibited significant sperm abnormalities, such as bent necks, headless sperm, and curved tails (Figure 5C). The Busulfan + Propolis group demonstrated a marked reduction in sperm abnormalities compared to the Busulfan group (Figure 5E). In the control, DMSO, and Propolis groups, live epididymal spermatozoa were characterized by unstained heads (Figures 6A,B,D). The Busulfan group displayed a mixture of live spermatozoa with unstained heads and dead spermatozoa with pink-stained heads (Figure 6C). The Busulfan + Propolis group showed an increased number of live spermatozoa with unstained heads compared to the Busulfan group (Figure 6E).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
4 Discussion
Busulfan intoxication causes a significant disruption in pituitary-gonadal hormone levels, consistent with the findings of Rostami et al. (2022). This disruption is attributed to decreased secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone, downregulation of gonadotropic receptors, and the loss of functional Leydig cells (Whirledge et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2023; Khamis et al., 2023). Busulfan-induced redox imbalance likely compromises the functional integrity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis (Spiers et al., 2015). The reduction in FSH impairs the release of androgen-binding protein, destabilizing intratubular testosterone concentrations (Mohlala et al., 2023). This further affects the synthetic capacity of Leydig cells by disrupting the function of proteins such as the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, which mediates cholesterol transport into mitochondria (Leisegang and Henkel, 2018). The loss of testosterone’s negative feedback on LH secretion results in elevated LH levels ().
The restoration of hormonal balance in the pituitary-gonadal axis aligns with findings in cadmium-intoxicated rats (). The elevated testosterone levels were linked to the upregulation of LH receptor expression and enhanced activity of steroidogenic enzymes (Nna et al., 2020). The elevation in serum FSH levels may be linked to propolis’s ability to reduce oxidative stress and enhance antioxidant capacity in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland (). In addition, propolis may provide energy to the hypothalamus, facilitating the production of GnRH, which stimulates the anterior pituitary to release FSH from gonadotroph cells (). Our GC-MS analysis revealed that propolis contains amino acids like glycine and flavonoids such as apigenin, which have been shown to enhance the expression of genes associated with testosterone synthesis (Ommati et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2024).
The adverse effects of busulfan on semen quality align with the findings of Kim and his colleagues (2023). These effects are attributed to the inhibition of the meiotic process in spermatogenic cells and stem cell self-renewal, induction of apoptosis, excessive free radical production, cytological damage to seminiferous tubules, disruption of the blood-testis barrier, and degeneration of sperm cytoskeleton (Li et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2024; Yue et al., 2024). The low sperm viability and motility may be owed to the low level of ATP (). The deficiency in testosterone as a primary androgen responsible for spermatogenesis is a key factor in disruption in semen profile (Smith and Walker, 2014). The plasma membrane of the sperm is particularly vulnerable to oxidative insult due to its high content of polyunsaturated fatty acids and limited antioxidant enzyme activity (Leisegang and Henkel, 2018; Mohlala et al., 2023). The busulfan-evoked lipid peroxidation leads to damage to the axoneme, an essential component for sperm motility, in addition to increased morphological abnormalities and reduced sperm viability, ultimately inhibiting spermatogenesis and resulting in a decreased sperm count (Hussain et al., 2023; ). It also evoked DNA fragmentation in germ cells in corresponding to a previous report ().
The improvement in sperm measurements corroborates a previous peer-reviewed article (Seven et al., 2020) due to rebalance of pituitary-gonadal axis, improvement in steroidogenesis, increase in energy resources availability for germ cell development and reduction in intra-testicular oxidative insult and apoptosis of germ cells (Nna et al., 2020). Propolis had the ability to enhance sperm motility by augmenting the overall mitochondrial respiratory efficiency of spermatozoa in vitro (). The preservation of genomic material in spermatozoa is similar to the observation of as confirmed by the ability of propolis to protect against DNA strand break under free radical attack ().
Our study’s findings demonstrate the significant protective effects of propolis against busulfan-induced reproductive dysfunction, evidenced by the restoration of hormonal profiles, improvement in sperm quality, mitigation of oxidative stress, and alleviation of histopathological changes. However, a closer examination of the propolis-alone group revealed certain statistically significant differences in reproductive hormones (decreased LH, testosterone, and E2) and sperm parameters (decreased percentages of dead, live, normal, abnormal, and motile sperm) compared to the control group. At first glance, these observations might appear contradictory to propolis’s overall therapeutic role. We contend that these findings reflect the complex, context-dependent, and adaptogenic properties of propolis, rather than inherent reproductive toxicity in healthy animals.
Propolis, a rich mixture of bioactive compounds including flavonoids, phenolic acids, and terpenes, is known to exert diverse pharmacological actions (Hossain et al., 2022). Its constituents can interact with various physiological pathways, including those involved in endocrine regulation. For instance, some flavonoids present in propolis, such as chrysin, have been investigated for their potential to influence aromatase activity, an enzyme crucial for estrogen synthesis from androgens (). Such interactions can subtly modulate the intricate feedback loops governing the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, leading to a new physiological equilibrium rather than a pathological state. These shifts in hormone levels in a non-stressed system may represent a re-calibration by propolis’s active components to optimize endocrine balance, as opposed to inducing dysfunction.
Similarly, the alterations in sperm parameters observed in the propolis-alone group, where there was a reduction in both dead and abnormal sperm alongside a slight decrease in live, normal, and motile sperm, can be interpreted within the context of physiological adaptation and quality control. Propolis possesses potent antioxidant and anti-apoptotic properties (Mohamed et al., 2022). In a healthy testis, there is a natural, ongoing process of germ cell turnover and quality assurance, which involves a degree of physiological apoptosis to eliminate defective cells (). It is plausible that propolis, by enhancing the cellular antioxidant defense and mitigating basal cellular stress, subtly influences this intrinsic quality control mechanism. This could lead to a more “pruned” population of spermatozoa, where fewer defective cells are present, even if it results in a minor adjustment in other parameters in an otherwise healthy system. This suggests a potential for optimizing sperm quality rather than causing outright damage.
The critical distinction lies in the adaptogenic nature of propolis, a characteristic shared by many traditional medicinal compounds. Adaptogens are substances that help the body adapt to various stressors and normalize physiological functions. Their effects are often highly dependent on the organism’s prevailing homeostatic state (Panossian and Wikman, 2010; Panossian et al., 2021). In a diseased or severely stressed system, such as the busulfan-induced reproductive dysfunction model, propolis’s robust redox-stabilizing, anti-inflammatory, and cytoprotective properties become paramount. Here, propolis acts as a potent restorative agent, actively counteracting the overwhelming damage, oxidative stress, and inflammation caused by busulfan, effectively bringing perturbed parameters back towards normal physiological levels (). Conversely, in a healthy, non-stressed system, propolis’s influence shifts from “restoration” to subtle “modulation” or “optimization” of existing physiological pathways. These modulations, while statistically distinct from the control baseline, do not necessarily equate to toxicity but rather represent an adaptive response to the presence of its bioactive compounds, guiding the system towards an optimized homeostatic set point (Sforcin and Bankova, 2011; ).
Therefore, the apparent contradiction resolves when considering propolis’s capacity to function differently based on the physiological context. Its effects are not merely unidirectional but are instead dynamically adjusted to the needs of the organism, promoting either repair in compromised states or fine-tuning in healthy ones.
A wide range of experimental models for testicular dysfunction highlights the redox-disrupting effects of busulfan (Qian et al., 2020; ). This disruption is attributed to busulfan’s ability to reduce electron flow through respiratory chain complex I, accelerate the production of intracellular reactive oxidants, downregulate enzymatic antioxidants, and suppress redox-related transcription factors (Rigobello et al., 1999; Li et al., 2018; ). The depletion of testicular antioxidants arises from the heightened demand to neutralize reactive free radicals, which diminishes the cell’s capacity to counteract oxidative damage effectively, leaving these cells vulnerable to cytological injury (Kwon et al., 2019).
Redox rebalance in the testicular tissue of busulfan-intoxicated rats following propolis administration is corresponding to the findings of . According to our GC-MS analysis, this response can be explained by presence of flavonoids and phenolic compounds which possess potent antioxidant ability by donating electrons to reactive oxidants, chelating metal ions, and stimulating antioxidant and detoxifying enzymes (Ozkan et al., 2017; ). The amino acids found in propolis confer antioxidant shield. For instance, glycine is incorporated as an essential building block in biosynthesis of GSH, and L-cystine acts as an important player in Nrf2-involved redox signaling (Howard et al., 2010; ). Flavonoids such chrysin and chalcones possess free radical scavenging properties (Iqbal et al., 2014; Mani and Natesan, 2018). The improvement in the activity of redox stabilizers advantages the testicular functionality. NO plays a crucial role in enhancing testicular blood flow, promoting testosterone synthesis, and supporting spermatogenesis (Middendorff et al., 1997; ; ). GSH improves the morphology of seminiferous tubules and facilitates spermatogenesis (; ). SOD and CAT safeguard spermatozoa from oxygen free radicals and protect their lipid membranes from peroxidation ().
Histopathological deteriorations associated with busulfan are in consistent with the findings of , confirming its cytotoxic nature and its ability to arrest spermatogenesis. The absence of favorable growth factors, a supportive hormonal milieu, intact junctions, and appropriate signaling pathways after chemotherapy administration underlies the disruption of spermatogenesis (). Busulfan exerts toxic effects on tissues through the irreversible alkylation of intracellular biomolecules (Nasimi et al., 2016). The reactive oxygen species generated by busulfan can damage critical biomolecules such as DNA and lipids. The widening of inter-tubular spaces often attributed to the shrinkage of seminiferous tubules (Rostami et al., 2022). The later could be due to progressive detachment of Sertoli cells, and loss of the structural integrity of the basal compartment, leading to a sort of tubular atrophy (Vasiliausha et al., 2016). The detachment of germ cells into the tubular lumen indicates a disruption in inter-Sertoli junctional complexes (Ibrahim et al., 2021). Busulfan also induces significant vacuolation within spermatogonial tubules, reflecting the inhibition of the meiotic process in spermatogonial cells and impairing cytoplasmic extrusion mechanisms (Malekinejad et al., 2011; Yue et al., 2024). These cellular vacuolations may represent debris and spaces left by the extensive death of germ cells (). Inflammatory responses triggered by busulfan result in edema surrounding the seminiferous tubules, which subsequently interferes with testicular venous drainage and leads to inter-tubular capillary congestion (Mitchell, 2015).
The improvement in the histological features of the testes in busulfan-compromised rats co-administered with propolis aligns with findings in a rat model exposed to another chemotherapeutic agent, doxorubicin (). The cytoprotective properties of propolis against testicular dysfunction stem from its antioxidant properties, anti-apoptotic activity, and its ability to promote cell viability (Seven et al., 2021; ; ).
Our findings, along with previous studies (Sönmez et al., 2016; ), demonstrate an increase in the immuno-expression of caspase-3 and PCNA in germ cell layer. Busulfan upregulates the adaptor protein, leading to significant alterations in mitochondrial membrane potential and the release of cytochrome C from the mitochondria into the cytoplasm, which activates apoptosis-related gene expression (Lindsten et al., 2000; ; Zhivotovsky and Kroemer, 2004). Busulfan triggers both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathway through tumor suppressor P53 and Fas receptor induction (; ). Consistent with our outcomes, busulfan induces oxidative stress in the testis, which may contribute to oxidative damage to DNA histones and disrupt DNA repair enzyme expression, ultimately triggering apoptosis (Sifuentes-Franco et al., 2018). Exposure to busulfan causes DNA cross-linking, DNA–protein crosslinking, and single-strand breaks, which block DNA replication and transcription, inhibiting cell proliferation (). The elevated testicular levels of the proliferative marker in busulfan-treated rats, compared to control rats, may represent a compensatory response to impaired spermatogenesis (Westernströer et al., 2014), similar to findings reported with another gonadotoxic chemotherapy, cisplatin (). However, this response appears insufficient to repair the testicular damage induced by busulfan exposure.
The decreased immuno-expression of caspase-3 in the testes of busulfan-intoxicated rats following propolis intervention aligns with findings by Seven and his coauthors (2020). The bioactive compounds in propolis, such as flavonoids, have been shown to inhibit apoptosis by downregulating Bax and caspase-3 expression while upregulating Bcl-2 expression (Zhang et al., 2025). The reduced the expression of proliferation marker PCNA in the testis of busulfan + propolis group is in harmony with a previous peer-reviewed article (Sönmez et al., 2016). Our findings highlight the potential of propolis to restore the balance between proliferation and apoptosis within the testicular microenvironment, which plays a crucial role in maintaining normal spermatogenesis (Zakariah et al., 2022).
The comprehensive GC-MS analysis of the propolis extract used in this study revealed a rich and diverse phytochemical profile (Table 1), comprising fatty acid esters, aromatic compounds, amino acid derivatives, saccharides, and notably, a significant proportion of flavonoids and terpenes. This intricate chemical composition underpins the multifaceted biological activities observed, particularly the potent antioxidant and anti-apoptotic effects that mitigate busulfan-induced reproductive dysfunction (Ye et al., 2020; Ileriturk et al., 2021; ).
The primary drivers of the observed antioxidant and anti-apoptotic effects are predominantly attributed to the high concentrations of flavonoids and certain phenolic compounds identified in our propolis sample, along with contributions from terpene derivatives and specific amino acids (; ).
Specifically, our analysis identified several key flavonoids, including Pinostrobin chalcone (7.793%), Tectochrysin (8.162%), Pinocembrin (3.843%), Apigenin 7-methyl ether (1.409%), and Chrysin (2.014%). These flavonoids are renowned for their robust free radical scavenging capabilities, ability to chelate metal ions, and direct modulation of antioxidant enzyme activities (Lan et al., 2016; Ileriturk et al., 2021; ; ; Ijaz et al., 2024). Furthermore, flavonoids like chrysin have been extensively studied for their anti-apoptotic properties. They can intervene in apoptotic pathways by modulating the expression of pro-apoptotic proteins (e.g., caspase-3, as indicated by our immunohistochemistry results) and anti-apoptotic proteins (e.g., Bcl-2 family members), and by mitigating oxidative stress, thereby preserving cellular integrity and viability (Soliman et al., 2022; Şimşek et al., 2023). Tectochrysin and pinocembrin also contribute significantly, with studies demonstrating their ability to reduce oxidative damage and protect cells from apoptosis induced by various toxins (Ijaz et al., 2024; ).
Beyond flavonoids, other identified compounds also contribute to the observed effects. The presence of Beta-monostearin (9.865%) and 2-Hexadecanoyl glycerol (22.976%), which are glycerol derivatives, can play a role in membrane stability and cellular signaling, indirectly supporting cytoprotection (Showalter et al., 2020). Terpene derivatives such as α-Curcumene (3.74%) and α-Eudesmol (2.682%) also possess notable antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities, which would synergistically contribute to the overall protective effects against busulfan-induced damage by reducing oxidative burden and inflammatory responses (Liju et al., 2011; ). Additionally, the identification of amino acids like L-Cystine (0.314%), Asparagine (0.448%), and Glycyl-D-asparagine (1.024%) is noteworthy. L-Cystine, in particular, is a precursor to GSH, a master endogenous antioxidant, and its presence suggests a potential contribution to the restoration of reduced glutathione levels observed in our study, thereby directly bolstering the testicular defense system (Justin Margret and Jain, 2024). The significant presence of 3-O-Methyl-D-glucose (12.545%), a monosaccharide derivative, directly contributes to protecting cells from stress-induced damage and supporting their viability (Zou et al., 2024).
In conclusion, propolis reversed the hypergonadotropic-hypogonadism induced in busulfan-challenged rats by improving the deteriorated testicular architecture, enhancing sperm count and quality, restoring the testicular antioxidant defense system, and reestablishing the dynamic equilibrium of the reproductive hormonal axis. This study highlights propolis as a promising candidate for mitigating the cytotoxic effects of busulfan on testicular homeostasis. However, the differences in testicular architecture between rodents and primates, including humans, should be carefully considered before translating these findings to clinical applications. While this study comprehensively demonstrates the ameliorative effects of aqueous propolis on busulfan-induced reproductive dysfunction at the physiological, biochemical, and histopathological levels, a more in-depth exploration of the underlying molecular mechanisms, particularly through techniques such as Western blotting for protein expression (e.g., PCNA, Caspase-3, StAR, AR) and quantitative real-time PCR for gene expression, was beyond the scope of the current research due to resource and infrastructure limitations. Future studies are warranted to fully elucidate these molecular pathways.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
All experimental procedures adhered to the animal care guidelines set by the New Valley Research Ethics Committee, New Valley University (approval number: NVREC 0616-20231) New Valley, Egypt. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.
Author contributions
EA: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review and editing. BE: Writing – review and editing. HH: Writing – review and editing, Methodology. NA: Investigation, Conceptualization, Visualization, Data curation, Validation, Formal Analysis, Supervision, Writing – review and editing, Methodology. SR: Methodology, Writing – review and editing. AW: Methodology, Writing – review and editing. HA: Writing – review and editing, Methodology. RM: Methodology, Writing – review and editing. HA-T: Writing – review and editing, Methodology. ZM: Writing – review and editing, Methodology. JB: Methodology, Writing – review and editing. HW: Writing – review and editing, Methodology.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University the Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2025R213), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AbarikwuS. O.Mgbudom-OkahC. J.OnuahC. L. (2022). The protective effect of rutin against busulfan-induced testicular damage in adult rats. Drug Chem. Toxicol.45, 1035–1043. 10.1080/01480545.2020.1803905
2
Abd El-HayR. I.HamedW. H.Mostafa OmarN.Refat El-BassounyD.GawishS. A. (2023). The impact of busulfan on the testicular structure in prepubertal rats: a histological, ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study. Ultrastruct. Pathol.47, 424–450. 10.1080/01913123.2023.2234470
3
Abd‐ElrazekA. M.El‐dashH. A.SaidN. I. (2020). The role of propolis against paclitaxel‐induced oligospermia, sperm abnormality, oxidative stress and DNA damage in testes of male rats. Andrologia52, e13394. 10.1111/and.13394
4
AbdElrazekD. A.HassanN. H.IbrahimM. A.HassanenE. I.FarrohK. Y.AbassH. I. (2024). Ameliorative effects of rutin and rutin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles on testicular oxidative stress and histological damage induced by cyclophosphamide in male rats. Food Chem. Toxicol.184, 114436. 10.1016/j.fct.2024.114436
5
AbdullahF.Nor-AshikinM. N. K.AgarwalR.KamsaniY. S.Abd MalekM.BakarN. S.et al (2021). Glutathione (GSH) improves sperm quality and testicular morphology in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Asian J. Androl.23, 281–287. 10.4103/aja.aja_81_20
6
AcharyaB.ChaijaroenkulW.Na‐BangchangK. (2021). Therapeutic potential and pharmacological activities of β‐eudesmol. Chem. Biol. Drug Des.97, 984–996. 10.1111/cbdd.13823
7
AfzaliA.AmidiF.KorujiM.NazariH.GilaniM. A. S.SanjbadA. S. (2022). Astaxanthin relieves busulfan-induced oxidative apoptosis in cultured human spermatogonial stem cells by activating the Nrf-2/HO-1 pathway. Reprod. Sci.29, 374–394. 10.1007/s43032-021-00651-x
8
Ali Abed WahabB.Ain SalehenN.AbdullaM. A.Aj JabbarA.Abdel Aziz IbrahimI.AlmaimaniG.et al (2023). Pinostrobin attenuates azoxymethane-induced colorectal cytotoxicity in rats through augmentation of apoptotic Bax/Bcl-2 proteins and antioxidants, SAGE Open Med.11.20503121231216585. 10.1177/20503121231216585
9
AlsyaadK. M. (2024). Ameliorative impacts of propolis against testicular toxicity promoted by doxorubicin. Vet. World17, 421–426. 10.14202/vetworld.2024.421-426
10
AmrA.KarimA. E. A.AugustyniakM.WakilA. E.El-SamadL. M.HassanM. A. (2024). Efficacy of propolis and royal jelly in attenuating cadmium-induced spermatogenesis and steroidogenesis dysregulation, causing infertility in rats. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.31, 53052–53073. 10.1007/s11356-024-34673-0
11
AnandS.BhartiyaD.SriramanK.MallickA. (2016). Underlying mechanisms that restore spermatogenesis on transplanting healthy niche cells in busulphan treated mouse testis. Stem Cell Rev. Rep.12, 682–697. 10.1007/s12015-016-9685-1
12
AntonssonB. (2001). Bax and other pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family killer-proteins and their victim the mitochondrion. Cell Tissue Res.306, 347–361. 10.1007/s00441-001-0472-0
13
AsadiA.GhahremaniR.AbdolmalekiA.RajaeiF. (2021). Role of sperm apoptosis and oxidative stress in male infertility: a narrative review. Int. J. Reprod. Biomed.19, 493–504. 10.18502/ijrm.v19i6.9371
14
AsadiN.BahmaniM.KheradmandA.Rafieian-KopaeiM. (2017). The impact of oxidative stress on testicular function and the role of antioxidants in improving it: a review. J. Clin. Diagn. Res.11, IE01. 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23927.9886
15
AshourA. M. (2024). Propolis attenuates diabetes-induced testicular injury by protecting against DNA damage and suppressing cellular stress. Front. Pharmacol.15, 1416238. 10.3389/fphar.2024.1416238
16
AyadA. S.BenchaabaneS.DaasT.SmaggheG.Loucif-AyadW. (2025). Propolis stands out as a multifaceted natural product: meta-analysis on its sources, bioactivities, applications, and future perspectives. Life15, 764. 10.3390/life15050764
17
BahmyariS.AlaeeS.KhodabandehZ.Talaei-KhozaniT.DaraM.MehdinejadianiS.et al (2024). The effects of Wharton’s jelly MSCs secretomes for restoring busulfan-induced reproductive toxicity in male mice. Hum. Exp. Toxicol.43, 09603271241269019. 10.1177/09603271241269019
18
BalamF. H.AhmadiZ. S.GhorbaniA. (2020). Inhibitory effect of chrysin on estrogen biosynthesis by suppression of enzyme aromatase (CYP19): a systematic review. Heliyon6, e03557. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03557
19
BaykalirB. G.SevenP. T.GurS.SevenI. J. (2018). The effects of propolis on sperm quality, reproductive organs and testicular antioxidant status of male rats treated with cyclosporine-A. Anim. Reprod.13, 105–111. 10.21451/1984-3143-AR736
20
BelmehdiO.El MenyiyN.BouyahyaA.El BaabouaA.El OmariN.GalloM.et al (2023). Recent advances in the chemical composition and biological activities of propolis. Food Rev. Int.39, 6078–6128. 10.1080/87559129.2022.2089164
21
BlumenfeldZ. (2012). Chemotherapy and fertility. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.26, 379–390. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.11.008
22
CedikovaM.MiklikovaM.StachovaL.GrundmanovaM.TumaZ.VetvickaV.et al (2014). Effects of the czech propolis on sperm mitochondrial function. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med.2014, 248768. 10.1155/2014/248768
23
ChenK.WuL.LiuQ.TanF.WangL.ZhaoD.et al (2023). Glutathione improves testicular spermatogenesis through inhibiting oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage, and apoptosis induced by copper deposition in mice with Wilson disease. Biomed. Pharmacother.158, 114107. 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.114107
24
ChenX.LiangM.WangD. (2018). Progress on the study of the mechanism of busulfan cytotoxicity. Cytotechnology70, 497–502. 10.1007/s10616-018-0189-5
25
Christin-MaitreS.YoungJ. (2022). “Androgens and spermatogenesis. 64th international meeting of clinical endocrinology,” in Hormones & Fertility. Editor KlotzH. P. (Elsevier), 153–218.
26
DaiW.ChenQ. M. (2023). Fresh medium or L-cystine as an effective Nrf2 inducer for cytoprotection in cell culture. Cells12, 291. 10.3390/cells12020291
27
DarwishS. F.MageedS. S. A.MahmoudA. M.El-DemerdashA. A.DoghishA. S.AzzamR. K.et al (2025). Pinocembrin protects against cisplatin-induced liver injury via modulation of oxidative stress, TAK-1 inflammation, and apoptosis. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.502, 117433. 10.1016/j.taap.2025.117433
28
DemirS.KazazI. O.KerimogluG.DemirE. A.ColakF.BiyikA. F.et al (2023). Propolis ameliorates ischemia/reperfusion-induced testicular damage by reducing oxidative stress. Rev. Int. Androl.21, 100364. 10.1016/j.androl.2023.100364
29
DemirS.MenteseA.UstaZ. T.AlemdarN. T.DemirE. A.AliyaziciogluY. (2024). Alpha-pinene neutralizes cisplatin-induced reproductive toxicity in male rats through activation of Nrf2 pathway. Int. Urol. Nephrol.56, 527–537. 10.1007/s11255-023-03817-5
30
DemirS.TuranI.AliyaziciogluR.YamanS. O.AliyaziciogluY. (2018). Primula vulgaris extract induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human cervix cancer cells. J. Pharm. Anal.8, 307–311. 10.1016/j.jpha.2018.05.003
31
DrizinJ. H.WhitcombB. W.HsiehT. C.GormanJ. R. (2021). Higher reproductive concerns associated with fertility consultation: a cross-sectional study of young adult male cancer survivors. Support. Care Cancer29, 741–750. 10.1007/s00520-020-05527-5
32
DuarteF. M. (2024). Protective potentialities of propolis towards spermatogonial oxidative damage. Portugal: Universidade da Beira Interior.
33
El‐GuendouzS.LyoussiB.MiguelM. G. (2019). Insight on propolis from mediterranean countries: chemical composition, biological activities and application fields. Chem. Biodivers.16, e1900094. 10.1002/cbdv.201900094
34
El MenyiyN.AboulaghrasS.BakrimS.MoubachirR.TahaD.KhalidA.et al (2023). Genkwanin: an emerging natural compound with multifaceted pharmacological effects. Biomed. Pharmacother.165, 115159. 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115159
35
El-MigdadiF.BanihaniI.BanihaniS. A. (2005). Clinico-hormonal correlation of oligospermic patients in the below sea level environment (Jordan Valley). Neuro. Endocrinol. Lett.26, 13–18.
36
ElrashidyR. A.HasanR. A. (2020). Stromal cell-derived factor-1α predominantly mediates the ameliorative effect of linagliptin against cisplatin-induced testicular injury in adult male rats. Cytokine136, 155260. 10.1016/j.cyto.2020.155260
37
EmilA. B.HassanN. H.IbrahimS.HassanenE. I.EldinZ. E.AliS. E. (2024). Propolis extract nanoparticles alleviate diabetes-induced reproductive dysfunction in male rats: antidiabetic, antioxidant, and steroidogenesis modulatory role. Sci. Rep.14, 30607. 10.1038/s41598-024-81949-z
38
EzimO. O.AbarikwuS. O. (2023). Exogenous ascorbate administration elevates testicular oxidative damage and histological injuries in rats after busulfan treatment. Andrologia2023, 5209480. 10.1155/2023/5209480
39
FotouhG. I. A.Abdel-DayemM. M.IsmailD. I.MohamedH. H. (2018). Histological study on the protective effect of endogenous stem cell mobilization in busulfan-induced testicular injury in albino rats. J. Microsc. Ultrastruct.6, 197–204.
40
FurukawaS.UsudaK.AbeM.HayashiS.OgawaI. (2007). Busulfan-induced apoptosis in rat placenta. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol.59, 97–103. 10.1016/j.etp.2007.05.004
41
GuzelmericE.SipahiH.ÖzhanY.HamitoğluM.HelvacıoğluS.DüzG.et al (2023). Comprehensive estrogenic/anti-estrogenic, anticancer, mutagenic/anti-mutagenic, and genotoxic/anti-genotoxic activity studies on chemically characterized black poplar and Eurasian aspen propolis types. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.226, 115241. 10.1016/j.jpba.2023.115241
42
HandayaniN.GofurA. (2019). “Does propolis extract alleviate male reproductive performance through gonadotropic hormone levels and sperm quality?,” in IOP conference series: earth and environmental science (IOP Publishing).
43
HossainR.QuispeC.KhanR. A.SaikatA. S. M.RayP.OngalbekD.et al (2022). Propolis: an update on its chemistry and pharmacological applications. Chin. Med.17, 100. 10.1186/s13020-022-00651-2
44
HowardA.TahirI.JavedS.WaringS. M.FordD.HirstB. H. (2010). Glycine transporter GLYT1 is essential for glycine‐mediated protection of human intestinal epithelial cells against oxidative damage. J. Physiol.588, 995–1009. 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.186262
45
HussainT.KandeelM.MetwallyE.MurtazaG.KalhoroD. H.YinY.et al (2023). Unraveling the harmful effect of oxidative stress on male fertility: a mechanistic insight. Front. Endocrinol.14, 1070692. 10.3389/fendo.2023.1070692
46
HusseinH. A.HassaneenA. S.AliM. E.SindiR. A.AshourA. M.FahmyS. M.et al (2022). The impact of rumen-protected l-arginine oral supplementation on libido, semen quality, reproductive organ biometry, and serum biochemical parameters of rams. Front. Vet. Sci.9, 899434. 10.3389/fvets.2022.899434
47
HwangS.HwangS.JoM.LeeC. G.RheeK. J. (2020). Oral administration of Korean propolis extract ameliorates DSS-induced colitis in BALB/c mice. Int. J. Med. Sci.17, 1984–1991. 10.7150/ijms.44834
48
IbrahimH. F.SafwatS. H.ZeitounT. M.El MullaK. F.MedwarA. Y. (2021). The therapeutic potential of amniotic fluid-derived stem cells on busulfan-induced azoospermia in adult rats. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med.18, 279–295. 10.1007/s13770-020-00309-w
49
IjazM. U.AlviK.HamzaA.AnwarH.Al-GhanimK. A.RiazM. N. (2024). Curative effects of tectochrysin on paraquat-instigated testicular toxicity in rats: a biochemical and histopathological based study. Heliyon10, e25337. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25337
50
IleriturkM.BenzerF.AksuE. H.YildirimS.KandemirF. M.DoganT.et al (2021). Chrysin protects against testicular toxicity caused by lead acetate in rats with its antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and antiapoptotic properties. J. Food Biochem.45, e13593. 10.1111/jfbc.13593
51
IqbalH.PrabhakarV.SangithA.ChandrikaB.BalasubramanianR. (2014). Synthesis, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity of ring-A-monosubstituted chalcone derivatives. Med. Chem. Res.23, 4383–4394. 10.1007/s00044-014-1007-z
52
Justin MargretJ.JainS. K. (2024). L-Cysteine upregulates testosterone biosynthesis and blood–testis barrier genes in cultured human Leydig cells and thp-1 monocytes and increases testosterone secretion in human Leydig cells. Biomolecules14, 1171. 10.3390/biom14091171
53
KayaE.YılmazS.CeribasiS. (2019). Protective role of propolis on low and high dose furan-induced hepatotoxicity and oxidative stress in rats. J. Vet. Res.63, 423–431. 10.2478/jvetres-2019-0054
54
KeanL. S.DurhamM. M.AdamsA. B.HsuL. L.PerryJ. R.DillehayD.et al (2002). A cure for murine sickle cell disease through stable mixed chimerism and tolerance induction after nonmyeloablative conditioning and major histocompatibility complex–mismatched bone marrow transplantation. Blood99, 1840–1849. 10.1182/blood.v99.5.1840
55
KempinasW. D. G.SuarezJ. D.RobertsN. L.StraderL.FerrellJ.GoldmanJ. M.et al (1998). Rat epididymal sperm quantity, quality, and transit time after guanethidine-induced sympathectomy. Biol. Reprod.59, 890–896. 10.1095/biolreprod59.4.890
56
KhamisT.HegazyA. A.El-FatahS. S. A.AbdelfattahE. R.AbdelfattahM. M. M.FericeanL. M.et al (2023). Hesperidin mitigates cyclophosphamide-induced testicular dysfunction via altering the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis and testicular steroidogenesis, inflammation, and apoptosis in male rats. Pharmaceuticals16, 301. 10.3390/ph16020301
57
KhosoroshahiA. F.SolimaniradJ.JameieS. B.BakhtiariM.KrujiS. M.RoshangarL.et al (2013). An investigation into the effect of exogenous melatonin on spermatogenesis of pinealectomised busulfan induced oligospermic adult rats. J. Kermanshah. Univ. Med. Sci.16, e77335.
58
KimK. H.ParkM. J.ParkN. C.ParkH. J. (2023). Effect of n-acetyl-l-cysteine on testicular tissue in busulfan-induced dysfunction in the male reproductive system. World J. Mens. Health41, 882–891. 10.5534/wjmh.220100
59
Kurek-GóreckaA.Rzepecka-StojkoA.GóreckiM.StojkoJ.SosadaM.Świerczek-ZiębaG. (2013). Structure and antioxidant activity of polyphenols derived from propolis. Molecules19, 78–101. 10.3390/molecules19010078
60
KwonD. H.ChaH. J.LeeH.HongS. H.ParkC.ParkS. H.et al (2019). Protective effect of glutathione against oxidative stress-induced cytotoxicity in RAW 264.7 macrophages through activating the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor-2/heme oxygenase-1 pathway. Antioxidants8, 82. 10.3390/antiox8040082
61
LaaroussiH.BakourM.OusaaidD.Ferreira-SantosP.GenishevaZ.El GhouiziA.et al (2021). Protective effect of honey and propolis against gentamicin‐induced oxidative stress and hepatorenal damages. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev.2021, 9719906. 10.1155/2021/9719906
62
LanX.WangW.LiQ.WangJ. (2016). The natural flavonoid pinocembrin: molecular targets and potential therapeutic applications. Mol. Neurobiol.53, 1794–1801. 10.1007/s12035-015-9125-2
63
LedesmaB.CampbellK.MuthigiA.IlaV.NassauD. E.IbrahimE.et al (2023). Semen cryopreservation in men with cancer: identifying patterns and challenges. J. Fertil. Preserv.3, 1–7. 10.32371/jfp/246156
64
LeisegangK.HenkelR. (2018). The in vitro modulation of steroidogenesis by inflammatory cytokines and insulin in TM3 Leydig cells. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol.16, 26–11. 10.1186/s12958-018-0341-2
65
LiB.HeX.ZhuangM.NiuB.WuC.MuH.et al (2018). Melatonin ameliorates busulfan-induced spermatogonial stem cell oxidative apoptosis in mouse testes. Antioxid. Redox Signal.28, 385–400. 10.1089/ars.2016.6792
66
LiH. T.ZhongK.XiaY. F.SongJ.ChenX. Q.ZhaoW.et al (2023). Puerarin improves busulfan-induced disruption of spermatogenesis by inhibiting MAPK pathways. Biomed. Pharmacother.165, 115231. 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115231
67
LijuV. B.JeenaK.KuttanR. (2011). An evaluation of antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antinociceptive activities of essential oil from Curcuma longa. L. L. Indian J. Pharmacol.43, 526–531. 10.4103/0253-7613.84961
68
LindstenT.RossA. J.KingA.ZongW. X.RathmellJ. C.ShielsH. A.et al (2000). The combined functions of proapoptotic Bcl-2 family members bak and bax are essential for normal development of multiple tissues. Mol. Cell.6, 1389–1399. 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00136-2
69
LiuX.LiuB.LiuS.XianY.ZhaoW.ZhouB.et al (2021). Male cancer patient sperm cryopreservation for fertility preservation: 10-year monocentric experience. Basic Clin. Androl.31, 24–29. 10.1186/s12610-021-00140-w
70
MalekinejadH.MirzakhaniN.RaziM.CheraghiH.AlizadehA.DardmehF. (2011). Protective effects of melatonin and Glycyrrhiza glabra extract on ochratoxin A—induced damages on testes in mature rats. Hum. Exp. Toxicol.30, 110–123. 10.1177/0960327110368416
71
ManiR.NatesanV. (2018). Chrysin: sources, beneficial pharmacological activities, and molecular mechanism of action. Phytochemistry145, 187–196. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2017.09.016
72
MatienzoA. C.LamorenaM. (2004). “Extraction and initial characterization of propolis from stingless bees (Trigona biroi Friese),” in Asian Apicultural Association conference and 10. BEENET symposium and technofora (Philippines: Laguna College), 321–329.
73
MenkveldR. (2010). Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the fifth edition of the WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Asian J. Androl.12, 47–58. 10.1038/aja.2009.14
74
MiddendorffR.MullerD.WichersS.HolsteinA. F.DavidoffM. S. (1997). Evidence for production and functional activity of nitric oxide in seminiferous tubules and blood vessels of the human testis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.82, 4154–4161. 10.1210/jc.82.12.4154
75
MillerK. D.NogueiraL.DevasiaT.MariottoA. B.YabroffK. R.JemalA.et al (2022). Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022. Cancer. J. Clin.72, 409–436. 10.3322/caac.21731
76
MitchellR. N. (2015). “The cell as a unit of health and disease,” in Robbins and cotran pathologic basis of disease. Editors Kumar. V.AsterJ. C. (New York: Elsevier Health Sciences), 1–30.
77
MohamedH. K.MobasherM. A.EbiyaR. A.HassenM. T.HagagH. M.El-SayedR.et al (2022). Anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and antioxidant roles of honey, royal jelly, and propolis in suppressing nephrotoxicity induced by doxorubicin in male albino rats. Antioxidants11, 1029. 10.3390/antiox11051029
78
MohlalaK.OfforU.MonagengE.TakalaniN. B.OpuwariC. S. (2023). Overview of the effects of moringa oleifera leaf extract on oxidative stress and male infertility: a review. Appl. Sci.13, 4387. 10.3390/app13074387
79
MoskwaJ.NaliwajkoS. K.Markiewicz-ŻukowskaR.Gromkowska-KępkaK. J.NowakowskiP.StrawaJ. W.et al (2020). Chemical composition of Polish propolis and its antiproliferative effect in combination with Bacopa monnieri on glioblastoma cell lines. Sci. Rep.10, 21127. 10.1038/s41598-020-78014-w
80
NarayanaK.SouzaU. J.RaoK. P. (2002). Effect of ribavirin on epididymal sperm count in rat. Indian J. Physiol. Pharmacol.46, 97–101.
81
NasimiP.VahdatiA.TabandehM. R.KhatamsazS. (2016). Study of side effects of busulfan on testis tissue and epididymal sperm of adult mice following treatment with clinical dose. Cell Tissue J.6, 533–542. 10.29252/JCT.6.4.533
82
NnaV. U.BakarA. B. A.AhmadA.UmarU. Z.SuleimanJ. B.ZakariaZ.et al (2020). Malaysian propolis and metformin mitigate subfertility in streptozotocin‐induced diabetic male rats by targeting steroidogenesis, testicular lactate transport, spermatogenesis and mating behaviour. Andrology8, 731–746. 10.1111/andr.12739
83
OmmatiM. M.AhmadiH. N.SabouriS.Retana‐MarquezS.AbdoliN.RashnoS.et al (2022). Glycine protects the male reproductive system against lead toxicity via alleviating oxidative stress, preventing sperm mitochondrial impairment, improving kinematics of sperm, and blunting the downregulation of enzymes involved in the steroidogenesis. Environ. Toxicol.37, 2990–3006. 10.1002/tox.23654
84
OzkanM.AliyaziciogluR.DemirS.MisirS.TuranI.YildirmisS.et al (2017). Phenolic characterisation and antioxidant activity of Primula vulgaris and its antigenotoxic effect on fibroblast cells. Jundishapur J. Nat. Pharm. Prod.12, e40073. 10.5812/jjnpp.40073
85
PanossianA.WikmanG. (2010). Effects of adaptogens on the central nervous system and the molecular mechanisms associated with their stress—protective activity. Pharmaceuticals3, 188–224. 10.3390/ph3010188
86
PanossianA. G.EfferthT.ShikovA. N.PozharitskayaO. N.KuchtaK.MukherjeeP. K.et al (2021). Evolution of the adaptogenic concept from traditional use to medical systems: pharmacology of stress‐and aging‐related diseases. Med. Res. Rev.41, 630–703. 10.1002/med.21743
87
QianC.MengQ.LuJ.ZhangL.LiH.HuangB. (2020). Human amnion mesenchymal stem cells restore spermatogenesis in mice with busulfan-induced testis toxicity by inhibiting apoptosis and oxidative stress. Stem Cell Res. Ther.11, 290–12. 10.1186/s13287-020-01803-7
88
RigobelloM. P.ScutariG.FrisoA.BarzonE.ArtusiS.BindoliA. (1999). Mitochondrial permeability transition and release of cytochrome c induced by retinoic acids. Biochem. Pharmacol.58, 665–670. 10.1016/s0006-2952(99)00149-5
89
RostamiA.VakiliS.KoohpeymaF.JahromiB. N.AghajariZ. A.MahmoudikohaniF.et al (2022). Ellagic acid effects on testis, sex hormones, oxidative stress, and apoptosis in the relative sterility rat model following busulfan administration. BMC Complement. Med. Ther.22, 170. 10.1186/s12906-022-03650-w
90
SevenI.Tatli SevenP.Gul BaykalirB.Parlak AkT.Ozer KayaS.YamanM. (2020). Bee glue (propolis) improves reproductive organs, sperm quality and histological changes and antioxidant parameters of testis tissues in rats exposed to excess copper. Andrologia52, e13540. 10.1111/and.13540
91
SevenP. T.SevenI.KarakusS.MutluS. I.KayaS. O.ArkaliG.et al (2021). The in-vivo assessment of Turkish propolis and its nano form on testicular damage induced by cisplatin. J. Integr. Med.19, 451–459. 10.1016/j.joim.2021.08.002
92
SforcinJ. M. (2016). Biological properties and therapeutic applications of propolis. Phytother. Res.30, 894–905. 10.1002/ptr.5605
93
SforcinJ. M.BankovaV. (2011). Propolis: is there a potential for the development of new drugs?J. Ethnopharmacol.133, 253–260. 10.1016/j.jep.2010.10.032
94
ShowalterM. R.BergA. L.NagourneyA.HeilH.Carraway IIIK. L.FiehnO. (2020). The emerging and diverse roles of bis (monoacylglycero) phosphate lipids in cellular physiology and disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21, 8067. 10.3390/ijms21218067
95
Sifuentes-FrancoS.Padilla-TejedaD. E.Carrillo-IbarraS.Miranda-DíazA. G. (2018). Oxidative stress, apoptosis, and mitochondrial function in diabetic nephropathy. Int. J. Endocrinol.2018, 1–13. 10.1155/2018/1875870
96
ŞimşekH.AkarasN.GürC.KüçüklerS.KandemirF. M. (2023). Beneficial effects of Chrysin on cadmium‐induced nephrotoxicity in rats: modulating the levels of Nrf2/HO‐1, RAGE/NLRP3, and Caspase-3/Bax/Bcl-2 signaling pathways. Gene875, 147502. 10.1016/j.gene.2023.147502
97
SmithL. B.WalkerW. H. (2014). The regulation of spermatogenesis by androgens. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.30, 2–13. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.02.012
98
SolimanM. M.AldhahraniA.GhamryH. I.AlbogamiS.YoussefG. B.KesbaH.et al (2022). Chrysin abrogates gibberellic acid‐induced testicular oxidative stress and dysfunction via the regulation of antioxidants and steroidogenesis‐and apoptosis‐associated genes. J. Food Biochem.46, e14165. 10.1111/jfbc.14165
99
SönmezM. F.ÇilenkK. T.KarabulutD.ÜnalmışS.DeligönülE.Öztürkİ.et al (2016). Protective effects of propolis on methotrexate-induced testis injury in rat. Biomed. Pharmacother.79, 44–51. 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.02.002
100
SpiersJ. G.ChenH. J. C.SerniaC.LavidisN. A. (2015). Activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress axis induces cellular oxidative stress. Front. Neurosci.8, 456. 10.3389/fnins.2014.00456
101
VargheseA. C.Fischer-HammadehC.HammadehM. E. (2011). “Acridine Orange Test for assessment of human sperm DNA integrity,” in Sperm chromatin: biological and clinical applications in Male infertility and assisted reproduction. Editors ZiniA.AgarwalA. (New York, NY: Springer), 189–199.
102
VasiliaushaS. R.BeltrameF. L.de SantiF.CerriP. S.CaneguimB. H.Sasso‐CerriE. (2016). Seminiferous epithelium damage after short period of busulphan treatment in adult rats and vitamin B12 efficacy in the recovery of spermatogonial germ cells. Int. J. Exp. Pathol.97, 317–328. 10.1111/iep.12195
103
WangC.YeT.BaoJ.DongJ.WangW.LiC.et al (2024). 5-methylcytidine effectively improves spermatogenesis recovery in busulfan-induced oligoasthenospermia mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol.967, 176405. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2024.176405
104
WesternströerB.TerwortN.EhmckeJ.WistubaJ.SchlattS.NeuhausN. (2014). Profiling of Cxcl12 receptors, Cxcr4 and Cxcr7 in murine testis development and a spermatogenic depletion model indicates a role for Cxcr7 in controlling Cxcl12 activity. PLoS One9, e112598. 10.1371/journal.pone.0112598
105
WezgowiecJ.WieczynskaA.WieckiewiczW.KulbackaJ.SaczkoJ.PachuraN.et al (2020). Polish propolis—chemical composition and biological effects in tongue cancer cells and macrophages. Molecules25, 2426. 10.3390/molecules25102426
106
WhirledgeS. D.GarciaJ. M.SmithR. G.LambD. J. (2015). Ghrelin partially protects against cisplatin-induced male murine gonadal toxicity in a GHSR-1a-dependent manner. Biol. Reprod.92, 1–11. 10.1095/biolreprod.114.123570
107
WuL.QuJ.MouL.LiuC. (2024). Apigenin improves testosterone synthesis by regulating endoplasmic reticulum stress. Biomed. Pharmacother.177, 117075. 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117075
108
YeR. J.YangJ. M.HaiD. M.LiuN.MaL.LanX. B.et al (2020). Interplay between male reproductive system dysfunction and the therapeutic effect of flavonoids. Fitoterapia147, 104756. 10.1016/j.fitote.2020.104756
109
YueD.WangF.HanY.XiongC.YangR. (2024). Exosomes derived from umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate male infertility caused by busulfan in vivo and in vitro. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.272, 116063. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116063
110
ZakariahM.MoleleR. A.MahdyM. A.IbrahimM. I.McGawL. J. (2022). Regulation of spermatogenic cell apoptosis by the pro-apoptotic proteins in the testicular tissues of mammalian and avian species. Anim. Reprod. Sci.247, 107158. 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2022.107158
111
ZhangD.LiM.WangJ.ZhaoH.LiH.ZhaoY.et al (2025). Protective effects of flavonoids on fluoride-induced testicular DNA damage in mice. Free Radic. Biol. Med.228, 79–92. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2024.12.047
112
ZhivotovskyB.KroemerG. (2004). Apoptosis and genomic instability. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.5, 752–762. 10.1038/nrm1443
113
ZouX. F.WuS. H.MaJ. G.YinZ. Q.HuZ. D.WangY. W.et al (2024). 3-O-Methyl-D-glucose blunts cold ischemia damage in kidney via inhibiting ferroptosis. Biomed. Pharmacother.173, 116262. 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116262
Summary
Keywords
propolis, busulfan, testis, histopathology, antioxidants, apoptosis
Citation
AbdAllah EA, Eid BA, Hussein HA, Abou khalil NS, Ragab SMM, Wahman AY, Almohaimeed HM, Moneeb RH, Abdel-Tawab HS, Mohammedsaleh ZM, Barnawi J and Waly HSA (2025) Propolis mitigates busulfan-induced testicular dysfunction in rats: insights into redox stabilization, PCNA modulation, and caspase-3 inhibition. Front. Pharmacol. 16:1656541. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1656541
Received
30 June 2025
Accepted
25 July 2025
Published
13 October 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Karim Hosni, Institut National de Recherche et d'Analyse Physico-Chimique (INRAP), Tunisia
Reviewed by
Tansel Sapmaz, University of Health Sciences, Türkiye
Chengniu Wang, Nantong University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 AbdAllah, Eid, Hussein, Abou khalil, Ragab, Wahman, Almohaimeed, Moneeb, Abdel-Tawab, Mohammedsaleh, Barnawi and Waly.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Nasser S. Abou khalil, nasser82@aun.edu.eg
ORCID: Nasser S. Abou Khalil, orcid.org/0000-0003-4960-4377
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.