Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1658616

Persistent benefit of pharmacogenomic testing on initial remission and response rates in patients with major depressive disorder

Provisionally accepted
Daniel  HainDaniel Hain1Andria  L Del TrediciAndria L Del Tredici1*Ryan  B GriggsRyan B Griggs1Rebecca  LawRebecca Law1Brent  MabeyBrent Mabey1Holly  L JohnsonHolly L Johnson1Katie  Johansen TaberKatie Johansen Taber1Kevin  G LynchKevin G Lynch2,3Alexander  GutinAlexander Gutin1David  W OslinDavid W Oslin2,3
  • 1Myriad (United States), Salt Lake City, United States
  • 2Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, United States
  • 3Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: In patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), achieving remission and/or response may take many months because of the lengthy trial-and-error process often needed to identify effective medication. Pharmacogenomic testing is a prescribing tool that has been shown to improve remission and response rates for MDD patients, but data describing its impact over time is limited. The objective of this study was to determine whether pharmacogenomic-guided treatment increases the rate of remission and response over time in patients with MDD, and if so, to assess the persistence of that effect. Methods: This study was a prespecified post hoc analysis of the PRIME Care (Precision Medicine in Mental Health Care) randomized clinical trial, a pragmatic trial that compared pharmacogenomic-guided treatment with usual care among veterans with depression. Participants were recruited at 22 Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers by 676 clinicians and were randomized to the pharmacogenomic-guided arm or the usual care arm. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between study arm (pharmacogenomic-guided treatment or usual care) and the first instance of response or remission as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale. Results: 1,764 (90.7%) of the 1,944 veterans who participated in the PRIME Care trial had sufficient visit data to be included in this analysis. Patients who received pharmacogenomic-guided treatment had higher rates of remission (HR [95% CI] = 1.27 [1.05, 1.53]; p = 0.015) and response (HR [95% CI] = 1.21 [1.05, 1.40]; p = 0.010) at any time relative to patients receiving usual care. Schoenfeld residuals tests were not statistically significant for remission (p = 0.931) or response (p = 0.112), providing no evidence that the benefit due to pharmacogenomic-guided treatment changed over the 24-week period. Conclusion: Pharmacogenomic-guided treatment led to faster initial remission and response in patients with MDD, and this benefit persisted over six months with no evidence of changing over time.

Keywords: Pharmacogenetics, drug response, Antidepressive Agents, precision medicine, Depression, pharmacogenomics

Received: 02 Jul 2025; Accepted: 29 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Hain, Del Tredici, Griggs, Law, Mabey, Johnson, Johansen Taber, Lynch, Gutin and Oslin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Andria L Del Tredici, andria.deltredici@myriad.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.