Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol., 30 October 2025

Sec. Ethnopharmacology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1662980

This article is part of the Research TopicNutraceuticals and Medicinal Plants for Preventive Health Care: Integrative Approaches from Ethnopharmacology to Regulatory Science and Applications in Human Health and DiseaseView all 11 articles

The herbal pharmacopoeia of Ecuador: a national model for integrating traditional knowledge and biodiscovery

  • 1 Centro de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas del Ecuador, CIBE, Faculty of Life Sciences, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL, Campus Gustavo Galindo, Guayaquil, Ecuador
  • 2 Finca Botánica Aromática, Guayaquil, Ecuador
  • 3 Grupo de Investigación en Aplicaciones Biotecnológicas, GIAB, Carrera de Biotecnología, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana, UPS, Guayaquil, Ecuador
  • 4 Universidad Tecnológica ECOTEC, Guayaquil, Ecuador
  • 5 Fundación Kichwa Institute of Science Technology, KISTH, Language Department, Otavalo, Ecuador
  • 6 D. Gary Young Research Institute, Lehi, UT, United States
  • 7 Department of Biosciences, Group of Medicinal Plants and Natural Products, Faculty of Chemistry, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador
  • 8 Laboratorio de Farmacología Molecular Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL, Guayaquil, Ecuador

Introduction: The Herbal Pharmacopoeia of Ecuador is a proposal aimed at systematizing and organizing information on the use of medicinal plants and natural products through the scientific evaluation of existing knowledge (ancestral or otherwise) in Ecuador, a country with high biodiversity and a rich ethnobotanical heritage, contributing to the safe use of medicinal plants and their potential phytopharmaceutical derivatives, offering safe alternatives for the treatment or relief of various health conditions.

Objectives: To build a foundation that organizes and structures validated information on medicinal plants and natural products, serving in the future as a reference resource for the development of phytotherapeutic products, knowledge transfer, protection of ancestral knowledge, supported by regulatory bodies, and as a source of consultation for health professionals in Ecuador.

Methodology: An interdisciplinary approach was used to develop monographs on medicinal plants used in various regions of Ecuador, integrating an extensive literature review that highlights ethnobotanical, pharmacological, and phytochemical analysis. In a collaborative effort by academic institutions integrated into the VLIR-Ecuador Network, a digital platform was developed using the Angular software framework to organize these monographs.

Results: The creation of a digital platform enabled the systematization of scientific knowledge on 14 selected medicinal plants through the generation of monographs, organized within the Ecuadorian Herbal Pharmacopoeia. This has facilitated access for the medical and scientific community to relevant data on the common use of plants and traditional Ecuadorian medicine.

Conclusion: The official adoption of an Herbal Pharmacopoeia in Ecuador will strengthen scientific production, support the regulation of natural products, protect ancestral knowledge, and promote research on bioactive compounds. Its success will depend on collaboration between the government, academia, industry, and ancestral communities, ensuring its development and positioning Ecuador as a leading reference in ethnobotany and biosustainability.

1 Introduction

Ecuador is considered one of the most biodiverse countries in the world, thanks to its diverse climate, geographical contrasts, and extensive biodiversity. The presence of the Andes Mountain range divides the country into three regions (Amazon, Highlands, and Coast), each with distinct cultural characteristics. Additionally, there is a fourth region: the Galápagos Islands. This extraordinary diversity is not only a source of national pride but also a reservoir of medicinal plant species, many of which have been used for centuries in traditional medicine (Malagón et al., 2016; Torre et al., 2006).

The use of plants for healing purposes is as old as civilization itself. In Ecuador, ancestral knowledge has been passed down from generation to generation, forming the foundation of the healthcare system for many Indigenous and rural communities (Moraes et al., 2007). However, despite this valuable ethnobotanical heritage, challenges remain in modern healthcare (Reinoso, 2008). Socioeconomic inequalities, limited access to medicines, and deficiencies in the public healthcare system have led many Ecuadorians to seek alternative treatments (SIT, 2020). As a result, medicinal plants remain an essential component of primary healthcare, especially in marginalized and rural populations (Moraes et al., 2007). Today, Ecuador risks losing its ancestral medicinal knowledge due to acculturation and the lack of an official record (Galindo Lozano, 2020; Malagón et al., 2016). This natural and cultural wealth not only offers the opportunity to develop effective therapeutic alternatives but can also strengthen the country’s healthcare system, in line with the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations to promote practices based on traditional medicine (Burton et al., 2014).

Health problems around the world are diverse and complex, ranging from the growing issue of bacterial resistance and the emergence of variants of chronic diseases such as cancer, to the vulnerability of healthcare systems in the face of pandemics like COVID-19. Although antibiotics have been one of the most successful forms of chemotherapy, saving countless lives (Banin et al., 2017), the decline in the development of new drugs and the emergence of “superbugs” resistant to multiple medications (Alanis, 2005) have become major global health concerns (Mancuso et al., 2021). In Ecuador, hospital collapses and medicine shortages during the pandemic exposed the vulnerability of the healthcare system, highlighting the importance of exploring innovative alternatives such as the use of medicinal plants and ancestral knowledge, to strengthen the health response and address future crises sustainably (Llivisaca-Contreras et al., 2021).

In this context, the importance of a national pharmacopoeia becomes evident. The absence of an official herbal pharmacopoeia in Ecuador represents a significant gap in the regulating and validating medicinal plants and natural products (Mosquera, 2022). Many herbal remedies are marketed without scientific validation, and their therapeutic effects, active compounds, and potential toxicities remain largely undocumented. This not only poses a risk to consumers but also limits scientific and economic development in the field of phytotherapy (Dehesa, 2009). A well-structured compilation can close this gap by collecting validated information on medicinal plants, establishing quality standards, and promoting research. Creating an Herbal Pharmacopoeia of Ecuador would align the country with global efforts to integrate traditional medicine into modern healthcare systems. As is the case today, countries including China, India, or Germany have recognized the value of herbal medicine, incorporating it into their official health policies and developing comprehensive pharmacopoeias to standardize its use (Sharma, 2025). With its unmatched biodiversity, Ecuador has the opportunity to become a leader in this field. By systematically documenting medicinal plants, identifying bioactive compounds, and ensuring compliance with Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), the country can establish a solid framework that benefits both health and the economy. Additionally, these efforts would help preserve ancestral knowledge, preventing its loss due to modernization and cultural changes (Durán et al., 2017; Mosquera, 2022; Ortega, 2025).

This paper outlines the initial efforts made through collaboration between various academic institutions and social organizations to lay the foundations for an Herbal Pharmacopoeia for Ecuador, compiling and organizing scientific information on various medicinal plants used in our country.

2 Methodology

2.1 Establishment of the FAPRONAT consortium for the herbal pharmacopoeia of Ecuador

To create and formalize the Ecuadorian Herbal Pharmacopoeia, it was necessary to establish the Consortium for the Pharmacopoeia of Plants and Natural Products of Ecuador (FAPRONAT), an initiative of the VLIR Network in Ecuador. The acronym VLIR (Vlaamse Interuniversitaire Raad) stands for the Flemish Interuniversity Council (VLIR-UOS) of Belgium (www.vliruos.be). Four Universities participated on the Ecuadorian site, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL), Universidad de Cuenca (UCuenca), Escuela Politécnica Nacional (EPN), and Universidad Técnica del Norte (UTN). This network was active until 2024 (http://www.vlirnetworkecuador.com/) (https://webhistorico.epn.edu.ec/vlir-network-ecuador/).

FAPRONAT comprises scientists specializing in medicinal plants and natural products and is dedicated to pharmacological characterization and bioprospecting of secondary metabolites. It manages the Herbal Pharmacopoeia of Ecuador and is responsible for developing and validating monographs of the most in-demand native medicinal plants. Its goal is to disseminate the properties of the plants and promote their application in academia and industry, thereby contributing to the country’s scientific development.

2.2 Influence of pharmacopoeias on scientific output in health

A bibliometric analysis was conducted to understand the influence of pharmacopoeia on scientific output in the health field. Bibliometrics is a quantitative analysis method that uses mathematical and statistical tools to examine scientific production. It allows for predicting future research trends and summarizing large volumes of data and information (Regus et al., 2022). A comprehensive search of scientific publications was conducted in the Scopus database from 2000 to 2024. The year 2000 was chosen as the starting point, as it was when the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana, the first model plant whose genome (115.4 Mb) was sequenced (Kaul et al., 2000). Arabidopsis thaliana sequencing revealed essential genes for producing medicinal compounds, accelerating drug development. It was also a key genetic model for studying plant metabolic pathways, driving plant biotechnology and marking a turning point in botany and pharmacology (Tariq Yahya, 2022). The keywords for the bibliometric analysis were the following: scientific name, pharmacopoeia, herbal medicine, plant extract, toxicity, traditional use, and treatment. In this way, it is possible to demonstrate the scientific impact in a given country when an Herbal Pharmacopoeia is available and utilized to manage scientific and ancestral knowledge efficiently, influencing the health sector, phytotherapeutic production, and even the environmental sphere of a nation. The search equation is based on the methodology proposed by Manzano and Miranda (2015), who established three phases for the selection of journals: first, the identification of journals according to their topics; second, the analysis of titles, abstracts, and keywords based on relevance; and third, the selection of journals according to research quality criteria (Paoloni et al., 2023). This methodology allows for understanding the current state of pharmacopoeias research and identifying areas with the most significant potential for Ecuador and other Andean regions.

2.3 Design and construction of the monographs

A standard format was designed to develop the monographs of the Herbal Pharmacopoeia. Initially, these were developed based on the experience and scientific knowledge of the research groups regarding medicinal species, as previously mentioned. Likewise, internationally recognized monograph formats were analyzed, such as those of ESCOP (European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy) based in the United Kingdom (Exeter), FEUM (Farmacopea de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos), the Brazilian Pharmacopoeia, the French Pharmacopoeia, and that of the WHO, etc. (CenadIM, 2025). We adapted specific ideas to our pharmacopoeia to align with the country’s interests. We established keywords and search criteria based on the proposed structure to gather information and draft the monographs. We consulted various digital databases, including ISI Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, BioMed Central, Google Scholar, Tropicos.org, and The Plant List. To ensure that the Monograph is structured to organize existing scientific and traditional information effectively, it has been divided into three distinct Sections: 1) The first section provides information on identification and classification, focusing on its “safe use.” This includes scientific names, photographs, common names, botanical descriptions, micrographs, and genetic data. 2) The second section is dedicated to phytochemical composition and “pharmacological action.” It encompasses traditional uses, phytochemical profiles, pharmacological activities, toxicity or contraindications, extract preparation, and dosage guidelines. 3) The final section addresses “quality control,” compiling information on phytochemical and genetic markers, and rapid identification tests (Alamgir, 2017; WHO, 2019).

2.4 Monographs validation

To validate a complete monograph of a species, the double-blind method was used (Shmidt and Jacobson, 2022), establishing the following process: first, the editors send it to the consortium administrator; second, the administrator manages the peer review using the double-blind method; third, the reviewers evaluate the content and send their comments to the administrator, who in turn forwards them to the editors for the necessary corrections. This cycle is repeated until the monograph meets the scientific standards required for publication on the digital platform of the Herbal Pharmacopoeia of Ecuador.

2.5 Development of the digital platform for the herbal pharmacopoeia of Ecuador

The digital platform was initially built using the content management system “WordPress,” where different sections were created to structure the website. These included details such as the members of the FAPRONAT Consortium and their academic and scientific credentials, the services offered by the member universities, and scientific articles, among other options. Among these, the Monographs section was a key feature, designed as a repository for studies and research on various plants native to Ecuador. It covers topics ranging from their botanical descriptions and pharmacological activities to their toxicity-related contraindications, essential preparations, phytotherapeutic uses, and more.

This content management system, which remained in place until early 2024. From that year onwards, it was decided to enhance the platform’s technology to facilitate updates, improve cybersecurity, and adapt to the demands of a modern and globalized world. The redesign resulted in a new visual identity for the Pharmacopoeia on its website. The “Frontend” (the part the user interacts with) was developed using the “Angular” framework (Sahani, 2020), whose Single Page Application (SPA) functionality and use of components enable efficient design of the necessary sections. For the “Backend” (the functions that facilitate buttons, forms, and data submission), it is planned to be developed using the.NET Core framework, which will provide robust tools for managing data reception and database insertions, ensuring high levels of security against threats, scalability, and ease of maintenance (https://farmacopea.ec/). Social media accounts were also created for the Herbal Pharmacopoeia of Ecuador, where monographs and events such as courses, workshops, seminars, webinars, and conferences will be shared.

The structure of the official Pharmacopoeia was developed in several stages, as shown in Figure 1. To date, we have completed Stage 5 and are currently in Stage 6, corresponding to “promotion and dissemination.” It is worth emphasizing that the duration of each stage depends on the funding obtained and the current government’s priorities for supporting the project. We will continue to seek resources, with the expectation that, in the future, the Herbal Pharmacopoeia of Ecuador may be incorporated into the annual state budget.

Figure 1
Flowchart titled

Figure 1. Structuring of the official Pharmacopoeia of Ecuador, coordinated by the VLIR Network Ecuador in the year 2020.

2.6 Engagement with regulatory entities and official instruments

A participatory and regulatory engagement framework was implemented in the research design to ensure institutional alignment, legal compliance, and cultural inclusivity for the development of the Herbal Pharmacopoeia and the FAPRONAT initiative. The methodology involved formal consultations, collaborative agreements, and multi-sectoral dialogues with key national agencies responsible for intellectual property, environmental protection, and health regulation. Initially, coordinated meetings were held with the Servicio Nacional de Derechos Intelectuales (SENADI) to address the protection of Indigenous intellectual property rights. As a result of these discussions, a cooperative agreement was established with the Kichwa Institute of Science, Technology and Humanities (KISTH). This agreement enabled a systematic review and bilingual translation of selected monographs into the Kichwa language, ensuring linguistic accessibility and cultural validation of traditional knowledge. Next, the project team collaborated with the Ministry of the Environment, Water, and Ecological Transition (MAATE, acronym in Spanish) to assess the pharmacopoeia’s contributions to biodiversity conservation and sustainable resource use. MAATE provided institutional support, affirming that the initiative aligns with national conservation goals, particularly concerning endemic medicinal species. Finally, the Agencia Nacional de Regulación, Control y Vigilancia Sanitaria (ARCSA) proposed technical collaboration to integrate the Herbal Pharmacopoeia into national pharmacovigilance and natural product monitoring frameworks. These collaborative efforts were structured through inter-institutional working sessions, during which the Pharmacopoeia’s scientific and regulatory utility was assessed. All institutional interactions followed a structured protocol that involved preparing briefing documents, presenting scientific justifications, and integrating feedback into the project design. Emphasis was placed on aligning the Pharmacopoeia with Article 385 of the Ecuadorian Constitution, which mandates support for scientific innovation, protection of traditional knowledge, and sustainable development. Efforts are ongoing to secure official recognition of the Herbal Pharmacopoeia and FAPRONAT through formal endorsement processes. This step is crucial for establishing regulatory legitimacy, fostering scientific collaboration, and ensuring equitable access to and responsible use of ancestral medicinal knowledge.

3 Results

3.1 Influence of pharmacopoeias on scientific production worldwide

The search results for “Pharmacopoeia” and “natural products” yielded a total of 576 scientific documents published between 2000 and 2024 on the Scopus platform. As depicted in Figures 2, 3, a noticeable upward trend is evident in scientific publications, indicating that ongoing research is progressively bridging existing gaps in the field. It is anticipated that the number of publications will continue to grow within the international scientific community in the years ahead.

Figure 2
Line graph showing scientific production from 1995 to 2030, with a sharp increase after 2020. The trend line has an R-squared value of 0.7814, indicating a strong correlation.

Figure 2. Positive trend in scientific production from 1995 to 2024, based on data obtained in March from the Scopus repository.

Figure 3
Network visualization showing international collaboration. Larger nodes like

Figure 3. VOSviewer overlay visualization shows the scientific production of different countries related to pharmacopoeias and natural products from 2000 to 2024. The network map shows the interconnection of the main pharmacopoeias, with the size of the nodes representing the relevance and normative production of each country. China, India, the United States, Germany, and Brazil are highlighted as central players. The connections reflect collaboration and alignment between national, regional, and international pharmacopoeias, as described in the WHO Index of Pharmacopoeias (WHO, Working document QAS/11.453/ Rev.17). This network illustrates the importance of global harmonization of standards for medicine quality, safety, and efficacy, within the framework of initiatives like the European Pharmacopoeia and the WHO’s coordinated work.

By utilizing the VOSviewer tool, we assessed countries with official pharmacopoeias based on their bibliometric output and arranged them in descending order. The seven leading countries are China, India, the United States, Morocco, Brazil, Germany, and Italy, with publication totals of 231, 63, 43, 25, 21, 19, and 19, respectively. In the Americas, the United States and Brazil emerge as the most significant contributors (see Figure 3).

The United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) holds significant global influence and adheres to rigorous quality standards, making it a prevalent choice within the pharmaceutical industry. In contrast, the Brazilian Pharmacopoeia is primarily focused on traditional medicine and specifically caters to the needs of its local population. Other major pharmacopoeias, such as the Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP) and the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.), are in the process of harmonizing their General Chapters to promote consistency. Additionally, the World Health Organization (WHO) has published a series of monographs on selected medicinal plants, which includes five volumes—four initial volumes plus an additional one dedicated to newly independent states. While these monographs are not legally binding, they provide a valuable global reference, offering comprehensive and scientifically rigorous information on medicinal plants.

Pharmacopoeias showcase cultural diversity and various medical traditions; however, they all share a common focus on ensuring the quality and safety of medicines. In our increasingly interconnected world, harmonizing these standards is essential for facilitating international trade and enhancing access to safe and effective treatments. According to the Ministry of Public Health of Ecuador (Art. 26), the following pharmacopoeias are recognized as normative codes: the United States Pharmacopoeia, the National Formulary of the United States, the British Pharmacopoeia, the International Pharmacopoeia, the European Pharmacopoeia, the French Codex, and the Chinese Pharmacopoeia. These serve as references for processed natural products intended for medicinal use (Reglamento de Registro Sanitario Para Medicamentos En General, 2021). This selection, along with other globally significant codes, supports the analysis presented in Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Comparison of selected international reference pharmacopoeias (https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/QAS-11.453-Rev.12).

Through this bibliometric analysis, several significant thematic areas were identified. The most notable among these include pharmacology, toxicology, and pharmacy, which together accounted for 367 documents; medicine, with 194 papers; and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, which comprised 136 relevant scientific works compiled over the past 24 years. The six most prevalent keywords identified in the scientific articles were “phytochemistry,” “therapeutics,” “chemistry,” “articles,” “herbal medicine,” and “medicinal plants,” as depicted in Figure 4. Utilizing these keywords for information searches and text drafting revealed “herbal medicine” as a central theme that both connects and flourishes in areas where research gaps exist. This also highlights opportunities for development and innovation in the fields of medicines and medicinal plants (refer to Figure 4).

Figure 4
Network visualization map created with VOSviewer showing clusters of related terms in herbal medicine research. Terms like

Figure 4. Network visualization of terms related to herbal medicine and its biological activities. In the network visualization generated by VOSviewer, the size of each node (dot) reflects the frequency of occurrence of the corresponding term in the analyzed literature; larger nodes indicate greater frequency and relevance within the dataset. The colors represent groupings of frequently co-occurring terms, according to the software’s clustering algorithm. Each color corresponds to a distinct thematic cluster, allowing the reader to visually identify conceptual relationships and research trends in the field of medicinal plants and their pharmacological activities.

Brazil is at the forefront of scientific production in this field, with Argentina and Peru closely behind. Argentina is especially recognized for its research in traditional medicine and phytotherapy. Other countries demonstrating notable scientific contributions include Bolivia, Colombia, Chile, and Uruguay, while Ecuador ranks the lowest in scientific output (Table 2).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Scientific production of the leading South American countries on pharmacopoeia and natural products between 2000 and 2024.

3.2 Herbal pharmacopoeia of Ecuador

The Herbal Pharmacopoeia of Ecuador was established in response to the health crisis triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. During this period, shortages of pharmaceutical products led to a heightened reliance on medicinal plants, often which, due to lack of guidance, posed significant health risks. In light of this situation, the need to create a reliable digital platform about the use of medicinal plant and natural products (https://farmacopea.ec) was recognized.

This platform currently features 14 monographs on selected different plant species, selected for their widespread traditional use and relevance to Ecuadorian traditional medicine. They represent a diverse range of botanical families and life forms, from trees such as Theobroma cacao to herbs such as Artemisia annua. The selection encompasses species native to the Andean and Amazonian regions, such as Ilex guayusa, along with introduced and cultivated plants such as Azadirachta indica, reflecting a mix of local and global flora. Considering, furthermore, the limited organization of research on these organisms in our country, the species were selected based on the knowledge generated about them by the different research groups at the FAPRONAT membersAs described, 14 medicinal plants were selected for the development of the monographs, namely: Azadiractha indica A. Juss., Conyza bonariensis (L.) Cronquist, Ilex Guayusa Loes., Vernonanthura patens (Kunth) H. Rob., Mansoa alliacea (Lam.arck) A.H.Gentry, Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa O. Deg., Theobroma cacao L., Vallesia glabra var. glabra (Cav.) Link, Artemisia annua L., Clinopodium nubigenum (Kunth) Kuntze, Jungia rugosa Less., Minthostachys mollis (Kunth) Griseb., Peperomia galioides Kunth in H. B. K., and Carica pentagona Heilborn. Their main reported activity is presented in Table 3. Verification of taxonomy, scientific names, and/or synonyms was carried out using the botanical databases of the Field Museum (plantidtools.fieldmuseum.org), the Missouri Botanical Garden (mobot.org), and Tropicos (https://www.tropicos.org), which are reliable sources for the taxonomy of plants in the Neotropical region and Ecuador.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Selected medicinal plants for the development of monographs, including their main pharmacological activities, traditional uses, key bioactive compounds, and the validation methods reported in the scientific literature.

3.3 Approach to the population and respective validation of the platform

As mentioned in the methodology section, each monograph developed was validated using a double-blind methodology, with an initial review by the editor, subsequent assignment to the administrator, and distribution to academic peers who evaluated the information compiled for each species. As a next step, the aim was to make organized knowledge accessible to the population, following criteria for the development of knowledge transfer programs related to production, research trials, and therapeutic treatments (Caminero et al., 2021).

The first point of contact between the Herbal Pharmacopoeia of Ecuador and Ecuadorian citizens is its digital platform, which is publicly accessible at www.farmacopea.ec. The site features two main links: “Farmacopeadia,” which contains various cultivation guides, plant preparation methods, etc., and the “Farmacopea,” where all the monographs are available in Spanish, Kichwa, and soon in English. The inclusion of Kichwa is one of the strategies to strengthen this connection, offering summaries that can be downloaded for free from the digital platform, promoting the dissemination of knowledge in an accessible and culturally relevant format.

3.4 Integrate the outcomes from the development and implementation of the website

The development and launch of the digital platform for the Herbal Pharmacopoeia of Ecuador enabled the establishment of a modern, secure, and accessible virtual space for disseminating national herbal knowledge. The platform provides access to monographs, scientific articles, and academic services, promoting integration among member institutions of the FAPRONAT Consortium and the broader academic community. Additionally, it has expanded its reach through active social media, thereby strengthening the project’s visibility and impact at both national and international levels. This technological tool not only enhances the accessibility of specialized information but also fosters the appreciation of ancestral knowledge and promotes research in Ecuadorian phytotherapy.

4 Discussion

Our research shows that over 576 scientific documents were published in SCOPUS between 2000 and 2024, focusing on the keywords “Pharmacopoeia” and “Natural Products,” revealing a positive trend in scientific publications. This upward trajectory indicates that ongoing research effectively addresses existing gaps in scientific knowledge, with expectations for sustained growth in international journals. The United States and Brazil have emerged as key contributors to scientific output in the Americas, with their Pharmacopoeias playing a crucial role in ensuring the quality of medicinal products (Haiyan and Chuncai, 2022; Wang et al., 2022). The United States Pharmacopoeia has established vital global quality standards and is a reference for the pharmaceutical industry. In the Brazilian Pharmacopoeia, traditional medicine is strongly emphasized, tailoring its focus to meet the specific needs of the population. This pattern can also be observed in other internationally recognized Pharmacopoeias, such as Egypt, Europe, India, Japan, Korea, and China (Haiyan and Chuncai, 2022; Wang et al., 2022).

This global context highlights the need for the harmonization of pharmacopoeias to enhance international pharmaceutical trade and improve patient access to safe and effective treatments (Qu et al., 2018; 2022). Exploring key terms such as phytochemistry, therapeutics, chemistry, herbal medicine, and medicinal plants has underscored its significance. This central theme connects diverse research fields and paves the way for development and innovation in plant-derived pharmaceuticals, as shown in the results section (Figure 4). The Herbal Pharmacopoeia seeks to resolve issues stemming from insufficient coordination and collaboration among academic stakeholders, thereby minimizing the duplication of efforts associated with revisiting previously studied topics. Securing funding for research projects can often prove challenging, and this initiative will contribute to more efficient investments in scientific research (Gasmi et al., 2024).

In Ecuador, the sustainability of the Herbal Pharmacopoeia relies heavily on securing funding, a critical element for any organization’s growth and international relevance. In contrast, pharmacopoeias in Asia often receive substantial financial support from governments, international organizations, and the pharmaceutical industry. This backing allows them to establish high-quality standards and scientifically validate traditional medicine. Such support is vital for global recognition; without a robust Pharmacopoeia, scientific collaboration suffers, access to funding diminishes, and the ability to publish in high-impact journals is hindered. Consequently, local innovation is restricted, resulting in a greater dependence on external research (Shen et al., 2021; Gasmi et al., 2024). An official Herbal Pharmacopoeia will help regulate and certify natural medicinal products, and establish a solid foundation for local scientific research, particularly in traditional medicine and phytotherapy. It will document the usage of medicinal plants, their efficacy, and safe dosages, paving the way for the development of therapeutics that address public health needs while stimulating the economy. The absence of this official compilation limits countries’ healthcare safety and their capability to engage in the global scientific and economic spheres (Gasmi et al., 2024; Shen et al., 2021). Much like many other nations, Ecuador must invest in scientific research, the development of Pharmacopoeias, and the production of natural products. Attention should be directed toward training scientists in this field and fostering international collaboration, as exemplified by Brazil, a leader in scientific output in this arena (Table 2). Although Ecuador has made strides in natural product research, it lags behind its regional counterparts. A significant limitation is the lack of an organization that can compile and systematize scientific and traditional knowledge within the country, as well as the capacity to identify research trends genuinely relevant to Ecuador clearly (Leong et al., 2020).

The advancement of scientific production is strongly linked to investments in research. Countries investing more in this area typically benefit from superior infrastructure, equipment, and reagents, which enhance scientific output. Additionally, the presence of qualified personnel and the fostering of international collaboration among researchers are vital factors that contribute to this growth, as supported by various studies (Cuéllar Rodríguez, 2023; Guzmán-Cervantes et al., 2024). The future perspectives of the Herbal Pharmacopoeia in Ecuador are promising, especially considering its rich biodiversity and ancestral knowledge about health, which strengthen complementary medicine and the country’s economy. Studies indicate that systematizing herbal knowledge in an official pharmacopoeia promotes research development to ensure the quality and efficacy of phytotherapeutic resources (Rastogi et al., 2022a). This effort contributes to integrating traditional medicine into the public health system and helps regulate its safe use, in line with WHO recommendations (Burton et al., 2014; WHO, 2024b). Additionally, the WHO emphasizes the importance of these practices in countries with high biological diversity, as a national pharmacopoeia supports scientific research on bioactive compounds that can offer low-cost, highly effective therapeutic solutions for local and emerging diseases (Mosquera, 2022).

The Herbal Pharmacopoeia and its promotion of research on medicinal plants will stimulate studies on phytochemicals in Ecuador, thereby expanding pharmacognosy and validating traditional knowledge (Gonzalez et al., 2022). This aspect is particularly relevant in the context of antimicrobial resistance, as the herbal pharmacopoeia will support the exploration of natural sources of antimicrobials, which are crucial in addressing current challenges, such as multidrug-resistant “superbugs” (Gharebaghi et al., 2020). Additionally, research indicates that compounds derived from Ecuadorian plants have potential for treating chronic diseases, highlighting the relevance of a digital research platform that documents and validates their therapeutic effects (Valencia, 2020).

The existence of an official pharmacopoeia impacts the regulation of medicines and health products, fostering solid and continuous scientific production. In countries such as China, the United States, Germany, and Japan, these pharmacopoeias set standards for research, development, and drug evaluation, ensuring data are replicable and comparable internationally, encouraging innovation, and improving medical treatments. They also foster collaboration among universities, research centers, and the pharmaceutical industry, resulting in high-impact publications and the development of new therapies (Rastogi et al., 2022b; The International Pharmacopoeia, 2013). In contrast, in much of Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia, the absence of a uniform regulatory framework limits research, the validation of plant-based products, and the utilization of traditional knowledge, thereby hindering development and export potential (Yapar and Mehmet, 2020).

The network representation demonstrates how national, regional, and international pharmacopoeias are interconnected, forming a framework for collaboration and regulatory harmonization. As shown in the WHO Index of Pharmacopoeias, the existence of multiple pharmacopoeial authorities reflects the diversity of regulatory approaches, while also highlighting the need to establish links that enable the convergence of standards for the quality, safety, and efficacy of medicines. In Figure 3, the centrality of pharmacopoeias, such as those of the United States, China, India, and the European Pharmacopoeia, highlights their role as global regulatory references. Meanwhile, regional connections, including the Eurasian Economic Union and the African initiative, demonstrate collective efforts to strengthen technical cooperation. This interrelationship suggests that progress toward international harmonization depends not only on the production of regulatory texts but also on the construction of strong networks of communication and scientific consensus (WHO, 2023). The Herbal Pharmacopoeia of Ecuador is expected to have a positive impact on the rural economy and environmental conservation. Studies indicate that the sustainable management of medicinal plants in Ecuador offers economic alternatives for indigenous and rural communities, while also promoting ecosystem preservation (Robles Arias et al., 2020; Tinitana et al., 2016). These efforts demonstrate a commitment to sustainable development, promoting the safe and regulated use of natural resources while strengthening the health and socioeconomic sectors through policies that support the use and conservation of biodiversity (Burton et al., 2014; Mosquera, 2022). Ecuador faces the challenge of preserving and scientifically validating the use of medicinal plants. Although numerous articles highlight their medicinal importance, most lack support from phytochemical, pharmacological, or toxicological evaluations, which hinders their integration into formal health systems. In response to this situation, the WHO, in its Draft Global Traditional Medicine Strategy (2025–2034), emphasizes the need to incorporate herbal medicine into alternative therapies based on scientific criteria, ensuring their quality and reducing the risk of toxicity for the population (WHO, 2024a; World Health Organization, 2024). Ensuring the effectiveness of the herbal pharmacopoeia in Ecuador requires documenting, standardizing, and protecting both scientific and ancestral knowledge, as well as establishing parameters that certify the quality and safety of phytomedicines. Pharmacopoeias play a key role in regulating herbal medicine, enabling its integration into the formal healthcare system. However, their consolidation depends on the generation of reliable evidence and production standards that guarantee the uniformity and safety of the products (Rastogi et al., 2022a).

The FAPRONAT Consortium has emerged to gather scientifically validated information and preserve valuable ancestral knowledge by safeguarding it in an Herbal Pharmacopoeia. One of the collateral outcomes of this work is the development of knowledge transfer programs related to production, the development of trials, and therapeutic treatments (Caminero et al., 2021).

The first interaction between the Herbal Pharmacopoeia of Ecuador and the public is through its digital platform, which is freely accessible. It contains two main sections: “Farmacopeadia,” which includes various guides on cultivation, methods of plant preparation, and more; and the “Pharmacopoeia” section, where all the monographs are available. Including Kichwa is one strategy that strengthens this connection with the Ecuadorian population. Summaries can be downloaded from the digital platform free of charge.

5 Conclusion

The analysis conducted with VOSviewer reveals that herbal pharmacopoeia significantly contributes to a country’s scientific output by collecting, organizing, and documenting knowledge about medicinal plants. It serves as a key reference for regulation and quality in the manufacturing of natural products in Ecuador, as is the case in countries such as China, India, the USA, and Brazil. In the case of Ecuador, the official establishment of an Herbal Pharmacopoeia will allow for the systematization and validation of its vast wealth of traditional and ancestral medicine, thereby strengthening scientific development and phytosanitary regulation. This progress will facilitate the analysis of bioactive compounds from native plants with therapeutic potential for chronic and infectious diseases. It will promote an evidence-based approach to medical care that enhances the safety and efficacy of natural products.

In addition, this initiative could address global challenges, such as antimicrobial resistance, by exploring plant-derived compounds for new antimicrobials while also preserving cultural and biological heritage. The inclusion of Indigenous communities in this process will ensure knowledge transfer, support the protection of ancestral wisdom, promote sustainable practices, and position Ecuador as a leader in ethnobotanical research and the responsible use of its megadiversity. Consolidating the herbal pharmacopoeia in Ecuador requires joint work among the State, academia, industry, and non-governmental organizations. Cooperation among these sectors is key to scientifically validating medicinal plants and ensuring their quality. Harmonizing criteria and maintaining production standards will be difficult without sustained support and clear regulations. Only through an inter-institutional collaboration model will it be possible to strengthen its development and ensure tangible benefits for the population.

In summary, the Ecuadorian Herbal Pharmacopoeia is a dynamic and evolving project that aims to consolidate scientific, traditional, and ancestral knowledge of medicinal plants through the use of digital technologies. The annual and continuous incorporation of new monographs is planned, together with the periodic review and updating of existing ones, to ensure their validity and scientific rigor. Additionally, the publication of an English version of the monographs is being considered, which would significantly enhance their international dissemination. The FAPRONAT consortium also remains open to establishing further collaborations and is evaluating the implementation of clinical studies to validate the efficacy and safety of Ecuador’s herbal resources.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

SL-C: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Investigation, Software, Data curation. JN-M: Validation, Writing – original draft, Conceptualization, Investigation. MB-G: Investigation, Software, Writing – original draft, Methodology. JJ-C: Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft. MM-T: Validation, Writing – original draft. PM-S: Validation, Writing – review and editing, Supervision. AA-M: Visualization, Writing – review and editing. AA-N: Investigation, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Formal Analysis. JC-C: Writing – review and editing, Supervision, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition. AO-M: Writing – review and editing, Investigation, Resources, Supervision. FL-T: Writing – review and editing, Validation, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Formal Analysis.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was also partially developed within the university cooperation program VLIR NETWORK Ecuador between Ecuadorian and Flemish Interuniversity Council (VLIR).

Acknowledgments

The authors of this work express their sincere gratitude to Consejo de Universidades Flamencas and VLIR-Network Ecuador for the financial support and motivation they have provided to this platform project. Their support has been essential for the development of this initiative and for promoting academic and scientific collaboration in Ecuador. Special thanks also go to the FAPRONAT consortium for its contribution to preparing this scientific article and disseminating knowledge on pharmacopoeias and natural products.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Agrawal, S., Bablani Popli, D., Sircar, K., and Chowdhry, A. (2020). A review of the anticancer activity of Azadirachta indica (neem) in oral cancer. J. Oral Biol. Craniofacial Res., 10(2), 206–209. doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.04.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aguirre-Rodríguez, A., Duarte-Casar, R., Rojas-Le-Fort, M., and Romero-Benavides, J. (2024). Food uses, functional activities, and bioactive compounds of three Ecuadorian vasconcellea fruits: bibliometric analysis and review. J. Agric. Food Res. 17, 101244. doi:10.1016/J.JAFR.2024.101244

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alamgir, A. N. M. (2017). Therapeutic use of medicinal plants and their extracts, 1, 73. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63862-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alanis, A. J. (2005). Resistance to antibiotics: are we in the post-antibiotic era? Archives Med. Res. 36 (6), 697–705. doi:10.1016/J.ARCMED.2005.06.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Banin, E., Hughes, D., and Kuipers, O. P. (2017). Editorial: bacterial pathogens, antibiotics and antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 41 (3), 450–452. doi:10.1093/FEMSRE/FUX016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bedini, S., Flamini, G., Cosci, F., Ascrizzi, R., Echeverria, M. C., Gomez, E. V., et al. (2019). Toxicity and oviposition deterrence of essential oils of Clinopodium nubigenum and Lavandula angustifolia against the myiasis-inducing blowfly Lucilia sericata. PLOS ONE 14 (2), e0212576. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0212576

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Burton, A., Falkenberg, T., Smith, M., Zhang, Q., Zhang, X., Boerma, T., et al. (2014). “Estrategia de la OMS sobre medicina tradicional,” in Organización Mundial de la Salud, 1–72.

Google Scholar

Calvopiña, K., Malagón, O., Capetti, F., Sgorbini, B., Verdugo, V., and Gilardoni, G. (2021). A new sesquiterpene essential oil from the native andean species Jungia rugosa less (asteraceae): Chemical analysis, enantiomeric evaluation, and cholinergic activity. Plants 10 (10), 2102. doi:10.3390/PLANTS10102102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caminero, J., Pérez, G., and Rodríguez, F. (2021). Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis, ten years later. Med. Clínica 156 (8), 393–401. doi:10.1016/J.MEDCLI.2020.08.018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

CenadIM (2025). Farmacopeas. CenadIM. Available online at: https://bvcenadim.digemid.minsa.gob.pe/index.php/enlaces/farmacopeas.

Google Scholar

Chebbac, K., Benziane, Z., El Moussaoui, A., Chalkha, M., Lafraxo, S., Bin Jardan, Y., et al. (2023). Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of chemically analyzed essential oil of Artemisia annua L. (asteraceae) native to mediterranean area. Life 13 (3), 807. doi:10.3390/LIFE13030807

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Condori, M. O., Arizaca, J. F., Zavaleta, T. V., and Borda, E. O. (2013). Propiedades Fisicoquímicas y Bioactivas in vitro del Aceite Esencial de Mansoa alliacea (LAM.) A. GENTRY. Ceprosimad 2 (1), 96–102.

Google Scholar

Cuéllar Rodríguez, S. (2023). Medicamentos: Breve Historia y su Evolución el Mercado Global. An. R. Acad. Nac. Farm. (Internet) 89 (89(01), 127–134. doi:10.53519/ANALESRANF.2023.89.01.07

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Czechowski, T., Rinaldi, M., Famodimu, M., Van Veelen, M., Larson, T., Winzer, T., et al. (2019). Flavonoid versus artemisinin anti-malarial activity in Artemisia annua whole-leaf extracts. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 984. doi:10.3389/FPLS.2019.00984

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Paula, C. C., Martins, D. T. D. O., Arunachalam, K., Balogun, S. O., Borges, Q. I., Picone, M. G., et al. (2018). Antimicrobial screening of medicinal plants popularly used in Mato Grosso for treating infections: advances on the evaluation of Conyza bonariensis (L.) cronquist in vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities. Pharmacogn. J. 10 (6s), s152–s166. doi:10.5530/pj.2018.6s.28

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dehesa, M. (2009). La Legislación Vigente en Ecuador para la Fabricación, Uso y Comercialización de Plantas Medicinales y Fitomedicamentos. Bol. Latinoam. Del Caribe Med. Aromáticas 8, 52–57.

Google Scholar

Durán, C. E., Lucio, R., and Rovira, J. (2017). “Pharmaceutical policy in Ecuador,” in Pharmaceutical policy in countries with developing healthcare systems, 221–236. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-51673-8_11/COVER

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fournet, A., Ferreira, M. E., Rojas De Arias, A., Fuentes, S., Torres, S., Inchausti, A., et al. (1996). In vitro and in vivo leishmanicidal studies of Peperomia galioides (piperaceae). Phytomedicine 3 (3), 271–275. doi:10.1016/S0944-7113(96)80065-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Galindo Lozano, A. S. (2020). Limitaciones al reconocimiento del territorio ancestral en Ecuador. Foro Rev. Derecho 2020 (34), 25–44. doi:10.32719/26312484.2020.34.2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gasmi, A., Noor, S., Dadar, M., Semenova, Y., Menzel, A., Benahmed, A. G., et al. (2024). The role of traditional Chinese medicine and Chinese pharmacopoeia in the evaluation and treatment of COVID-19. Curr. Pharm. Des. 30 (14), 1060–1074. doi:10.2174/0113816128217263240220060252

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gavidia-Valencia, J., Llaure-Mora, A., Venegas-Casanova, E., Suárez-Rebaza, L., Rubio-López, F., Rodrigo-Villanueva, M., et al. (2022). A review of the traditional uses, phytochemical compounds, and pharmacological activities of Vallesia glabra (cav.) link (apocynaceae). Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 24, 1–15. doi:10.32859/era.24.27.1-15

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gharebaghi, R., Heidary, F., Moradi, M., and Parvizi, M. (2020). Metronidazole; a potential novel addition to the COVID-19 treatment regimen. Archives Acad. Emerg. Med. 8 (1), e40.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Giacometti, J., Muhvić, D., Pavletić, A., and Dudarić, L. (2016). Cocoa polyphenols exhibit antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancerogenic, and anti-necrotic activity in carbon tetrachloride-intoxicated mice. J. Funct. Foods 23, 177–187. doi:10.1016/J.JFF.2016.02.036

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gonzalez, L., Cárdenas, L., and Mosquera-Tayupanta, T. (2022). Natural products in Ecuador phytochemical review and analysis. Abiayala. doi:10.7476/9789978108260.0010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

González-Velázquez, D., Mazorra-Manzano, M., Martínez-Porchas, M., Huerta-Ocampo, J., Mora-Cortes, W. G., Moreno-Hernández, J., et al. (2021). Exploring the milk-clotting and proteolytic activities in different tissues of vallesia glabra: a new source of plant proteolytic enzymes. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 193 (2), 389–404. doi:10.1007/S12010-020-03432-5/FIGURES/7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gupta, P., Dutta, B., Pant, D., Joshi, P., and Lohar, D. (2009). In vitro antibacterial activity of Artemisia annua linn. Growing in India. Int. J. Green Pharm. (IJGP) 3 (3). doi:10.22377/IJGP.V3I3.96

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guzmán-Cervantes, I. R., Parra-Hernández, E., Svarch-Pérez, A. E., Zúñiga-Estrada, A., and Alcocer-Varela, J. C. (2024). Importancia de las Agencias Reguladoras Nacionales y los Laboratorios Nacionales de Control ante la Pandemia de COVID-19: Experiencia de la Comisión Federal para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios (COFEPRIS). Vacunas 25 (3), 424–427. doi:10.1016/J.VACUN.2024.06.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haiyan, Y., and Chuncai, Z. (2022). Progress and prospect of application of traditional Chinese medicine fingerprint (specific chromatogram) in Chinese pharmacopoeia (2010-2020). J. South Med. Univ. 42 (1), 150. doi:10.12122/J.ISSN.1673-4254.2022.01.19

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hamann, F. R., Brusco, I., de Campos Severo, G., de Carvalho, L. M., Faccin, H., Gobo, L., et al. (2019). Mansoa alliacea extract presents antinociceptive effect in a chronic inflammatory pain model in mice through opioid mechanisms. Neurochem. Int., 122, 157–169. doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2018.11.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, X., Luan, F., Yang, Y., Wang, Z., Zhao, Z., Fang, J., et al. (2020). Passiflora Edulis: an insight into current researches on phytochemistry and pharmacology. Front. Pharmacol. 11, 617. doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.00617

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huamaní, K., Vilchez, L., Mauricio, F., Jáuregui, H., Munive-Degregori, A., and Mayta-Tovalino, F. (2021). Comparison of the antifungal efficacy of four concentrations of Minthostachys mollis (muña) essential oil against candida Albicans: an in vitro study. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 22 (11), 1227–1231. doi:10.5005/JP-JOURNALS-10024-3225

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Isabel, P., Santana, M., Osorio, M. S., Sterner, O., Lilia, E., Garcìa, P., et al. (2012). Phytochemical studies of fractions and compounds present in Vernonanthura patens with antifungal bioactivity and potential as antineoplastic.

Google Scholar

Jean-Marie, E., Jiang, W., Bereau, D., and Robinson, J. C. (2022). Theobroma cacao and theobroma Grandiflorum: Botany, composition and pharmacological activities of pods and seeds. Foods 11 (24), 3966. doi:10.3390/FOODS11243966

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Juncos, N., Ponso, C., Grosso, N., and Olmedo, R. (2024). Oxidation protection efficiency of the combination of Minthostachys mollis K. And Origanum vulgare L. essential oils with “Chain-Breaking” and “Termination-Enhancing” antioxidant mechanisms. J. Food Sci. 89 (12), 9166–9178. doi:10.1111/1750-3841.17546

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kale, M., Aher, A., and Dhanokar, S. (2020). Authentication of Azadirachta indica (neem) plant by pharmacognostic, physicochemical and phytochemical evaluation. Curr. Trends Pharm. Pharm. Chem. 2 (3), 109–115.

Google Scholar

Kaul, S., Koo, H. L., Jenkins, J., Rizzo, M., Rooney, T., Tallon, L. J., et al. (2000). Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. 2000 408 (6814), 796–815. doi:10.1038/35048692

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Langfield, R., Scarano, F., Heitzman, M., Kondo, M., Hammond, G., and Neto, C. (2004). Use of a modified microplate bioassay method to investigate antibacterial activity in the Peruvian medicinal plant Peperomia galioides. J. Ethnopharmacol. 94 (2–3), 279–281. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2004.06.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Leong, F., Hua, X., Wang, M., Chen, T., Song, Y., Tu, P., et al. (2020). Quality standard of traditional Chinese medicines: Comparison between European pharmacopoeia and Chinese pharmacopoeia and recent advances. Chin. Med. 15, 76, 1. doi:10.1186/s13020-020-00357-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liao, B., Hu, H., Xiao, S., Zhou, G., Sun, W., Chu, Y., et al. (2022). Global pharmacopoeia genome database is an integrated and mineable genomic database for traditional medicines derived from eight international pharmacopoeias. Sci. China. Life Sci. 65 (4), 809–817. doi:10.1007/s11427-021-1968-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Llivisaca-Contreras, S. A., Naranjo-Morán, J., Pino-Acosta, A., Pieters, L., Vanden Berghe, W., Manzano, P., et al. (2021). Plants and natural products with activity against various types of coronaviruses: a review with focus on SARS-CoV-2. Mol. 2021 26 (13), 4099. doi:10.3390/MOLECULES26134099

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mahiou, V., Roblot, F., Hocquemiller, R., LastName, A., A Roja De Arias, A., Inchausti, A., et al. (1996). New prenylated quinones from Peperomia galioides. J. Nat. Prod. 59 (7), 694–697. doi:10.1021/NP960148P

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malagón, O., Ramírez, J., Andrade, J. M., Morocho, V., Armijos, C., and Gilardoni, G. (2016). Phytochemistry and ethnopharmacology of the Ecuadorian flora. A review. Nat. Product. Commun. 11 (3), 1934578X1601100. doi:10.1177/1934578X1601100307

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mancuso, G., Midiri, A., Gerace, E., and Biondo, C. (2021). Bacterial antibiotic resistance: the Most critical pathogens. Pathogens 10 (10), 1310. doi:10.3390/pathogens10101310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Manzano, P. I., Miranda, M., Quijano, M. F., and Monzote, L. (2015). Advances in studies of Vernonanthura patens (kunth) H. Rob. Growing in Ecuador. In Characterisation and role in human health.

Google Scholar

Manzano, P., Miranda, M., Gutiérrez, Y., García, G., Orellana, T., and Orellana-Manzano, A. (2011). Efecto antiinflamatorio y antimicótico del extracto alcohólico y composición química del aceite de hojas de Conyza bonariensis (L.) Cronquist (canilla de venado). Rev. Cubana Plantas Med. 16 (1), 13–23. doi:10.5772/59866

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Manzano Santana, P. I., Silva, M., Sterner, O., and Peralta Garc, E. L. (2012). Phytochemical studies of fractions and compounds present in Vernonanthura patens with antifungal bioactivity and potential as antineoplastic. Phytochemicals - A Glob. Perspective Their Role Nutr. Health. doi:10.5772/28961

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mohammadi, S., Jafari, B., Asgharian, P., Martorell, M., and Sharifi-Rad, J. (2020). Medicinal plants used in the treatment of malaria: a key emphasis to artemisia, Cinchona, cryptolepis, and tabebuia genera. Phytotherapy Res. PTR 34, 1556–1569. doi:10.1002/PTR.6628

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moraes, R., Olgaard, L., and Balslev, H. (2007). Botánica Económica de los Andes Centrales. Ecol. En. Boliv. Available online at: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1605-25282007000400007.

Google Scholar

Mosquera, T. (2022). “Productos naturales: Investigación y perspectivas en Ecuador,” in In Productos naturales: investigación y perspectivas en Ecuador (Quito-Ecuador: Editorial Abya-Yala). doi:10.7476/9789978108260

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Noriega, P., Mosquera, Á., Osorio, E., Guerra, P., and Fonseca, A. (2018). Clinopodium nubigenum (kunth) kuntze essential oil: Chemical composition, antioxidant activity, and antimicrobial test against respiratory pathogens. J. Pharmacogn. Phytotherapy 10 (9), 149–157. doi:10.5897/JPP2017.0467

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ochoa-Ocampo, M. A., Niño-Ruiz, Z., Torres-Gutiérrez, R., Mogollón, N. G. S., and Diéguez-Santana, K. (2025). Characterization, biological activity and application trends of ilex guayusa loes: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Food Chem. Adv. 7, 100958. doi:10.1016/J.FOCHA.2025.100958

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ortega, F. (2025). Health systems and traditional medicine in Ecuador. Available online at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12342248/.

Google Scholar

Paoloni, P., Modaffari, G., Ricci, F., and Della Corte, G. (2023). Intellectual capital between measurement and reporting: a structured literature review. J. Intellect. Cap. 24 (1), 115–176. doi:10.1108/JIC-07-2021-0195/FULL/XML

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pereira, Z., Cruz, J., Corrêa, R., Sanches, E., Campelo, P., and Bezerra, J. (2023). Passion fruit (passiflora spp.) pulp: a review on bioactive properties, health benefits and technological potential. Food Res. Int. 166, 112626. doi:10.1016/J.FOODRES.2023.112626

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Puga, F. (1905). Farmacopea chilena. Santiago-Chile: Biblioteca Digital de La Universidad de Chile. Available online at: https://bibliotecadigital.uchile.cl/discovery/fulldisplay?vid=56UDC_INST:56UDC_INST&tab=Everything&docid=alma991002701479703936&lang=es&context=L.

Google Scholar

Qu, L., Zou, W., Wang, Y. T., and Wang, M. (2018). European regulation model for herbal medicine: the assessment of the EU monograph and the safety and efficacy evaluation in marketing authorization or registration in member states. Phytomedicine 42, 219–225. doi:10.1016/J.PHYMED.2018.03.048

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qu, L., Li, X., Xiong, Y., Wang, Z., Zhou, Y., Zou, W., et al. (2022). Opportunities and hurdles to European market access for multi-herbal traditional Chinese medicine products: an analysis of EU regulations for combination herbal medicinal products. Pharmacol. Res. 186, 106528. doi:10.1016/J.PHRS.2022.106528

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Radice, M., Scalvenzi, L., and Sablón Cossio, N. (2017). Ilex Guayusa: a systematic review of its traditional uses. Chem. Const. Biol. Activities Biotrade Oppor. Sciforum. 3868. doi:10.3390/mol2net-02-03868

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rai, S., Nagar, J. C., and Mukim, M. (2022). Pharmacological and medicinal importance of passiflora edulis: a review. Int. J. Res. Rev. 9 (4), 341–349. doi:10.52403/IJRR.20220442

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ran, F. (2023). The history and evolution of pharmacopoeias. Pharmacoeconomics Open Access 8 (2), 1–2. doi:10.37421/2472-1042.2023.8.167

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rao, A. L., Prasanth, D., Sowmya, J. S., Teja, N., Pujitha, B., Manikumar, A. S., et al. (2019). Pharmacognostic study of Mansoa alliacea leaf. Int. J. Res. AYUSH Pharm. Sci., 369–372.

Google Scholar

Rastogi, S., Sharma, S., Chauhan, J., Saini, P., Kumar, R., Raghuvanshi, R., et al. (2022a). Pharmacopoeia roles and responses: a systemic resilience approach to COVID-19 pandemic. Saudi Pharm. J. SPJ Official Publ. Saudi Pharm. Soc. 30 (5), 613–618. doi:10.1016/J.JSPS.2022.02.09

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rastogi, S., Sharma, S., Chauhan, J., Saini, P., Kumar, R., Raghuvanshi, R., et al. (2022b). Pharmacopoeia roles and responses: a systemic resilience approach to COVID-19 pandemic. Saudi Pharm. J. SPJ 30 (5), 613–618. doi:10.1016/J.JSPS.2022.02.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reglamento de Registro Sanitario Para Medicamentos En General (2021). Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. Available online at: www.lexis.com.ec.

Google Scholar

Regus, F., Laffont-Schwob, I., Hamrouni, R., Dupuy, N., and Farnet Da Silva, A. M. (2022). Using bibliometrics to analyze the state of art of pesticide use in vineyard agrosystems: a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 29 (53), 80123–80136. doi:10.1007/S11356-022-23285-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reinoso, A. (2008). La Pachamama: remedios y Hierberas - Diálogos. Rev. Electrónica Hist. doi:10.15517/dre.v9i0.31156

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Robles Arias, D., Cevallos, D., Gaoue, O., Fadiman, M., and Hindle, T. (2020). Non-random medicinal plants selection in the kichwa community of the Ecuadorian amazon. J. Ethnopharmacol. 246, 112220. doi:10.1016/J.JEP.2019.112220

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rojas-Armas, J., Arroyo-Acevedo, J., Ortiz-Sánchez, J., Palomino-Pacheco, M., Hilario-Vargas, H., Herrera-Calderón, O., et al. (2019). Potential toxicity of the essential oil from minthostachys mollis: a medicinal plant commonly used in the traditional Andean medicine in Peru. J. Toxicol. 2019, 1987935. doi:10.1155/2019/1987935

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sahani, A. K. (2020). Web development using angular: a case study. J. Inf. Electr. Electron. Eng. (JIEEE) 1 (2), 1–7. doi:10.54060/JIEEE/001.02.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salazar, A., Scalvenzi, L., Lescano, A., and Radice, M. (2017). Biological activity and chemical characterization of mansoa alliacea. A review about a promising plant from Amazonian region. Ethnopharmacology. doi:10.3390/mol2net-03-04617

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saleem, M., Naseer, F., Ahmad, S., Nazish, A., Bukhari, F. R., Rehman, A., et al. (2014). Hepatoprotective activity of ethanol extract of Conyza bonariensis against paracetamol induced hepatotoxicity in Swiss albino mice. Am. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2 (6), 124–127. doi:10.12691/ajmbr-2-6-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saleem, M., Naseer, F., Hussain, K., and Alamgeer, (2015). Cytotoxic effect of methanol extract of Conyza bonariensis on DMBA-induced skin carcinogenesis: an in vivo study. Bangladesh J. Pharmacology 10 (2), 467–474. doi:10.3329/bjp.v10i2.23063

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharma, K. (2025). Herbal pharmacopeias: bridging ancient traditions, nanotechnological innovation, and global regulatory cohesion for equitable healthcare. Pharmacol. Res. - Nat. Prod. 8, 100301. doi:10.1016/J.PRENAP.2025.100301

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shen, M. R., He, Y., and Shi, S. M. (2021). Development of chromatographic technologies for the quality control of traditional Chinese medicine in the Chinese pharmacopoeia. J. Pharm. Analysis 11 (2), 155–162. doi:10.1016/J.JPHA.2020.11.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shmidt, E., and Jacobson, B. C. (2022). Double-blind reviews: a step toward eliminating unconscious bias. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterology 13 (1), e00443. doi:10.14309/CTG.0000000000000443

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, B., Pandya, D., and Mankad, A. (2020). A review on different pharmacological and biological activities of Azadirachta indica A. Jusm. And Melia azedarach L. J. Plant Sci. Res. 36(1/2), 57–63. doi:10.32381/JPSR.2020.36.1-2.7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

SIT (2020). Datos Estadísticos del Sistema de Información Territorial. ULEAM. Available online at: https://siot-est.uleam.edu.ec/view-subindicator/22/CausasdeMorbilidadenelEcuador.

Google Scholar

Sitarek, P., Merecz-Sadowska, A., Sikora, J., Osicka, W., Śpiewak, I., Picot, L., et al. (2024). Exploring the therapeutic potential of Theobroma cacao L.: insights from in vitro,, in vivo,, and nanoparticle studies on anti-inflammatory and anticancer effects. Antioxidants 13 (11), 1376. doi:10.3390/ANTIOX13111376

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sudirga, S. K., Ginantra, I. K., and Darmayasa, I. B. G. (2019). Antifungal activity of leaf extract of Mansoa alliacea against Colletotrichum acutatum the cause of anthracnose disease on chili pepper. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 347 (1), 012058. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/347/1/012058

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tariq Yahya, R. (2022). Describe of Arabidopsis thaliana plant as a model plant in biotechnology. Jornal Pure Sci. EISSN 1 (3), 10–17. doi:10.56286/ntujps.v1i3.251

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thabit, S., Abdulmajid, R., Cheng, X.-R., Tang, X., Sun, J., Shi, Y.-H., et al. (2015). Antioxidant and antibacterial activities of extracts from Conyza bonariensis growing in Yemen. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 28 (1), 129–134. doi:10.3109/13880209.2014.982295

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

The International Pharmacopoeia (2013). “International meeting of world pharmacopoeias,” in WHO drug information. Available online at: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/331176/DI272-119-128-eng.pdf.

Google Scholar

Tinitana, F., Rios, M., Romero-Benavides, J., De la Cruz Rot, M., and Pardo-de-Santayana, M. (2016). Medicinal plants sold at traditional markets in southern Ecuador. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomedicine 12 (1), 1–18. doi:10.1186/S13002-016-0100-4/TABLES/5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Torre, L., Muriel, P., and Balslev, H. (2006). “Etnobotánica en los Andes del Ecuador,” in Botánica Económica de Los Andes Centrales, 246–267.

Google Scholar

Valencia, D. (2020). Brief review on COVID-19: the 2020 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2. Cureus 12 (3), e7386. doi:10.7759/cureus.7386

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, M., Yao, P., Sun, P., Liang, W., and Chen, X. (2022). Key quality factors for Chinese herbal medicines entering the EU market. Chin. Med. (United Kingdom) 17 (1), 1–13. doi:10.1186/S13020-022-00583-X/FIGURES/3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

WHO (2019). WHO global report on traditional and complementary medicine 2019. Geneve: World Health Organization, 1–228.

Google Scholar

WHO (2023). Index of world pharmacopoeias and pharmacopoeial authorities. Available online at: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/QAS-11.453-Rev.12.

Google Scholar

WHO (2024a). Draft global traditional medicine strategy (2025-2034).

Google Scholar

WHO (2024b). Traditional medicine has a long history of contributing to conventional medicine and continues to hold promise. WHO. Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/traditional-medicine-has-a-long-history-of-contributing-to-conventional-medicine-and-continues-to-hold-promise.

Google Scholar

Wilches, I., Tobar, V., Peñaherrera, E., Cuzco, N., Jerves, L., Vander, Y., et al. (2015). Evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity of the methanolic extract from Jungia rugosa leaves in rodents. J. Ethnopharmacol. 173, 166–171. doi:10.1016/J.JEP.2015.07.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wilches, I., Jiménez-Castillo, P., Cuzco, N., Clos, M., Jiménez-Altayó, F., Peñaherrera, E., et al. (2021). Anti-inflammatory and sedative activities of peperomia galioides: in vivo studies in mice. Nat. Prod. Res. 35 (10), 1657–1661. doi:10.1080/14786419.2019.1622104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2024). Draft traditional medicine strategy 2025-2034. WHO.

Google Scholar

Yapar, E., and Mehmet, E. (2020). An overview on pharmacopoeias in the world and monograph elaboration techniques. Univers. J. Pharm. Res. doi:10.22270/ujpr.v5i3.418

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yarmohammadi, F., Mehri, S., Najafi, N., Salar Amoli, S., and Hosseinzadeh, H. (2021). The protective effect of Azadirachta indica (neem) against metabolic syndrome: a review. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 24, 280–292. doi:10.22038/ijbms.2021.48965.11218

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Tao, S., Hou, G., Zhao, F., Meng, Q., and Tan, S. (2023). Phytochemistry, nutritional composition, health benefits and future prospects of passiflora: a review. Food Chem. 428, 136825. doi:10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2023.136825

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Żyżelewicz, D., Zakłos, M., Juśkiewicz, J., Bojczuk, M., Oracz, J., Budryn, G., et al. (2016). Cocoa bean (Theobroma cacao L.) phenolic extracts as PTP1B inhibitors, hepatic HepG2 and pancreatic β-TC3 cell cytoprotective agents and their influence on oxidative stress in rats. Food Res. Int. 89, 946–957. doi:10.1016/J.FOODRES.2016.01.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: medicinal plants, digital-ethnopharmacology, biodiversity, phytotherapeutics, scientific development, public health, complementary medicine

Citation: Llivisaca-Contreras S, Naranjo-Morán J, Bastidas-Gálvez M, Jaime-Carvajal J, Muenala-Tituaña M, Manzano-Santana P, Abad-Mihalache A, Abril-Novillo A, Cevallos-Cevallos JM, Orellana-Manzano A and León-Tamariz F (2025) The herbal pharmacopoeia of Ecuador: a national model for integrating traditional knowledge and biodiscovery. Front. Pharmacol. 16:1662980. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1662980

Received: 09 July 2025; Accepted: 09 October 2025;
Published: 30 October 2025.

Edited by:

Naoufal El Hachlafi, Ibn Zohr University, Morocco

Reviewed by:

Klaus Peter Latté, Independent Researcher, Berlin, Germany
Fikri-Benbrahim Kawtar, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco
Mohamed El fadili, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco
Amine Elbouzidi, Mohamed Premier University, Morocco
Aleixandre Brian Duche-Pérez, Catholic University of Santa María, Peru
Amine Batbat, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Morocco

Copyright © 2025 Llivisaca-Contreras, Naranjo-Morán, Bastidas-Gálvez, Jaime-Carvajal, Muenala-Tituaña, Manzano-Santana, Abad-Mihalache, Abril-Novillo, Cevallos-Cevallos, Orellana-Manzano and León-Tamariz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Fabián León-Tamariz, ZmFiaWFuLmxlb250QHVjdWVuY2EuZWR1LmVj; Andrea Orellana-Manzano, YWtvcmVsbGFAZXNwb2wuZWR1LmVj

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.