ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Drug Metabolism and Transport
Development of an In Vitro Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis Model to Investigate Altered Drug Metabolizing Enzymes, Transport Proteins, and Hepatobiliary Disposition
Provisionally accepted- 1Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
 - 2Biopharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
 - 3Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States
 - 4Division of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, and Center for Nanotechnology in Drug Delivery, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
 - 5Pharmaron Germantown, Germantown, United States
 
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is estimated to affect ~30% of adults globally. The progressive form of MASLD, metabolic-dysfunction steatohepatitis (MASH), is a leading cause of chronic liver disease. MASH is marked by hepatocellular fat accumulation (steatosis), ballooning, and inflammation. Although many in vitro and in vivo models replicate MASH pathophysiology, no in vitro hepatocyte MASH model has been evaluated for its ability to reflect clinically observed changes in drug metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) and transporters. This study addressed this gap by developing a model using sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes (SCHH) that mimics both MASH pathophysiology and alterations in DME and transporter concentrations and function. Methods: Lipid–cytokine treatments were first optimized using differentiated HuH-7 cells based on cellular toxicity and their ability to induce a MASH-like phenotype. Three final treatments—all including TNF-α (1 ng/mL) and IL-6 (1.2 ng/mL)—were selected for SCHH evaluation: (1) oleic acid (OA):palmitic acid (PA) (1:2, 0.5 mM), (2) a lipid mix (lysophospholipids mixture + OA:PA), and (3) lipid mix+0.01 mM cholesterol. Treatments were incubated for 72 hours with SCHH from three donors. Quantitative targeted absolute proteomics (QTAP) assessed transporter and DME concentrations, while B-CLEAR® technology evaluated transporter function using [3H]-taurocholate (TCA) and [3H]-estradiol-17β-glucuronide (E217G). Results: All three treatments significantly increased lipid droplet formation and peroxidation in SCHH with minimal toxicity. These treatments also altered DME and transporter concentrations in a similar manner to changes observed in liver tissue from patients with MASH. Across treatments, concentrations of bile salt export pump (BSEP), sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP), organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1, OATP1B3, and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) 2 were reduced by 0.66–0.57-fold, 0.71–0.52-fold, 0.74–0.63-fold, 0.82–0.80-fold, and 0.71–0.48-fold, respectively. Correspondingly, TCA apparent uptake clearance and biliary clearance were reduced by 0.70–0.26-fold and 0.61–0.27-fold, respectively. E217G apparent uptake clearance was reduced by 0.67–0.35-fold while biliary excretion index values were reduced to negligible levels. Discussion: These findings demonstrate that lipid–cytokine treatments induce MASH-like changes in SCHH, including clinically relevant reductions in DME and transporter concentrations and function. This model may serve as a valuable tool for predicting altered hepatobiliary drug disposition in MASH.
Keywords: MASH, Lysophospholipids, Fatty Liver Disease Model, Lipid-CytokineTreatments, Intracellular Lipid Droplet Formation, Hepatobiliary transport, QuantitativeTargeted Absolute Proteomics (QTAP), Sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes
Received: 12 Jul 2025; Accepted: 03 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Murphy, Kyburz, Ho, Loop, Fallon, Tiley, Kralj and Brouwer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Kim  L.R. Brouwer, kbrouwer@unc.edu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
