Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Ethnopharmacology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1666698

This article is part of the Research Topic4Rs in Ethnopharmacology - Reduce, Refine, Replace and Responsibility using Animal ModelsView all 4 articles

Protective effects and mechanism of Resveratrol in animal models of pulmonary fibrosis: a preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
Yajie  YinYajie Yin1,2Nan  JiaNan Jia1,2Hui  LuoHui Luo3Xinglin  FengXinglin Feng1,2Fei  WangFei Wang4*Xin  HeXin He5*
  • 1Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
  • 2Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
  • 3Chengdu Shuangliu area Gongxing Community Health Service Centres, Chengdu, China
  • 4Department of Geriatrics, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
  • 5Chengdu Integrated TCM&Western Medicine Hospital, Chengdu, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a chronic lung disease characterized by ongoing interstitial scarring. Current treatments can only slow the progression of the disease. Resveratrol (RES), a natural polyphenolic compound, has become a potential therapy for PF because of its multiple biological effects, including anti-fibrotic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties. Objective: To clarify RES's efficacy, safety, and mechanism of action in treating PF through a preclinical systematic review. Methods: A computerized search of eight databases (up to March 6, 2025) was conducted to identify in vivo animal experiments on RES treatment for PF. The SYRCLE tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 and Stata 17.0. The outcome measures included two main aspects: core pathological processes and molecular mechanisms. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I² test, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots and Egger’s test. Results: A total of 25 studies were included, involving 628 animals in the experimental groups and 357 animals in the control groups. Meta-analysis of selected outcome measures showed: 1. Improved fibrosis: significant reduction in pulmonary fibrosis score (SMD = -2.30, 95% CI [-2.80, -1.79], p < 0.00001, I2 = 76%) and decreased Hyp content (SMD = -2.16, 95% CI [-2.69, -1.63], p < 0.00001, I2 = 85%); 2. Inhibited inflammation: reduced TNF-α content (SMD = -1.58, 95% CI [-2.18, -0.99], p < 0.00001, I2 = 70%) and decreased IL-6 content (SMD = -2.16, 95% CI [-2.74, -1.59], p = 0.007, I2 = 57%); 3. Restored oxidative balance: decreased MDA content (SMD = -2.22, 95% CI [-3.09, -1.35], p = 0.06, I2 = 55%) and increased SOD content (SMD = 1.67, 95% CI [1.05, 2.30], p < 0.0001, I2 = 76%). Conclusion: RES significantly enhances the pathological process in PF animal models by regulating the TGF-β/Smad and NF-κB pathways. Future efforts should focus on optimizing preclinical study designs to decrease heterogeneity and improve clinical translation.

Keywords: Pulmonary Fibrosis, resveratrol, Animal Models, Mechanism, Meta-analysis

Received: 15 Jul 2025; Accepted: 05 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yin, Jia, Luo, Feng, Wang and He. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Fei Wang, Department of Geriatrics, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
Xin He, Chengdu Integrated TCM&Western Medicine Hospital, Chengdu, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.