Abstract
Background:
The management of off-label use (OLU) is an important aspect of standardizing and promoting the rational use of antitumor drugs. Tumor anti-angiogenic therapy (AAT) is essential in cancer treatment. However, OLU of anti-angiogenic drugs is common in clinical practice. Recognizing and standardizing the OLU of AAT is a significant challenge that needs to be addressed in the clinic.
Aim:
We aim to collect and categorize the OLU of AAT in oncology based on clinical guidelines, providing practical guidance for drug management.
Methods:
We established a multidisciplinary expert team to screen and include evidence-based OLU information.
Results:
By organizing the OLU information, it is evident that these 14 drugs of AAT have indications for 33 cancer types (36 items). Among them, 12 (85.7%) have OLU recommendations, totaling 215 items. These OLU recommendations were classified into four major categories. Cancer type is the most common OLU category, with 12 drugs covering 64 cancer types and 155 items. In addition, OLU in therapy lines, regimens, and dosage was identified in 3–4 drugs each. Bevacizumab, the drug most frequently involved in OLU, is associated with 12 cancer types, 3 therapy lines, 6 regimens, and 2 dosage-related OLU items. In addition, lenvatinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, apatinib, and sunitinib also have OLU recommendations for more than five cancer types.
Conclusion:
Our work offers an updated reference for the OLU of tumor AAT and highlights the need for further exploration into specific management measures for OLU in clinical practice.
Introduction
Off-label use (OLU) of medications, also known as the unregistered use of a drug, occurs when a drug is prescribed for indications, dosages, treatment courses, routes of administration, or patient populations that fall outside the scope of its approved label as authorized by drug regulatory authorities (Maschke, 2018). In recent years, China has implemented a series of policies to regulate the OLU of anti-tumor drugs. The Law for Licensing Medical Practitioners of the People’s Republic of China (P.R.C.), originally enacted in 1999, was amended in 2021. This amendment marked the first legal protection for evidence-based off-label drug use in China. From 2018 to 2024, the National Health Commission (NHC) of the P.R.C. has issued annual guidelines for the clinical application of novel anti-tumor drugs, incorporating indications approved in other countries or regions. In 2021, the NHC released the Administrative Measures for the Clinical Application of Anti-Tumor Drugs (Trial) and the Guiding Principles for the Clinical Application of New Anti-Tumor Drugs to further standardize the management of off-label drug use. Scholars have also issued guidelines for off-label drug use recommendations, which primarily encompass general guidelines and those specifically tailored for pediatric or ophthalmic medications (Meng et al., 2022a; Li et al., 2022; Zuo et al., 2022; Singh et al., 2024; Meng et al., 2022b). Additionally, professional societies in China, such as the Guangdong Pharmaceutical Association, Zhejiang Pharmaceutical Association, Shandong Pharmaceutical Association, Sichuan Pharmaceutical Association, and Medical Association, have published several directories and expert consensuses on off-label drug use (Shi et al., 2024; International Medical Society and Breast Cancer Group Branch of Oncologist Chinese Medical Doctor Association, 2022), providing valuable references for the OLU of drugs. However, among these catalogs, one catalog with the most comprehensive inclusion of tumor anti-angiogenic therapy (AAT) lists a total of 19 off-label items for 7 drugs. Another catalog includes nine items for five drugs of tumor AAT. The remaining catalog does not include any drug for tumor AAT.
AAT represents a critical class of anticancer agents, which is widely used in clinical practice (Liu et al., 2023). Due to its unique mechanism of action, AAT can be effectively combined with cytotoxic drugs and tumor immunotherapy agents, offering broad application potential (Li and Fang, 2024). By October 2024, 14 drugs of AAT had been approved for use in China. However, the approved indications for drugs of AAT in China are fewer than those recommended by international guidelines, leading to the frequent OLU in real-world settings (Fontanals et al., 2023; Levêque, 2016). In clinical practice, identifying and managing the OLU of AAT remains challenging. One of the primary reasons is the slow progress in establishing hospital-level systems for documenting and approving OLU. Additionally, the lack of up-to-date reviews and summaries of OLU evidence further complicates this issue (Shi et al., 2024).
The Oncology Pharmacy Group of the Hospital Pharmacy Committee of the Zhejiang Pharmaceutical Society has issued a series of consensus statements on the off-label use of specific drugs of AAT, such as recombinant human endostatin, anlotinib, pazopanib, and regorafenib in China. However, with the rapid accumulation of new clinical evidence and the increasing number of AAT drugs entering the market, the existing off-label consensus requires updating. To address this need, we established a multidisciplinary expert writing group to systematically classify and summarize the evidence for 14 drugs of tumor AAT. This initiative aims to provide an updated and comprehensive reference for the clinical OLU of AAT in oncology.
Aim
In this narrative review, we screened and collected the most recent drug label information and guideline recommendations for the use of 14 drugs of AAT in oncology. These findings were systematically organized and summarized by drug, with a particular focus on OLU details, recommended sources, and the corresponding levels of evidence.
Methods
Data sources
Two investigators independently collected drug names, drug labels, and guideline documents according to the following data collection steps. After completion, a third investigator compared and verified the completeness of the collected data.
We identified 14 AAT drugs approved and marketed in China before October 2024 through the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) database (https://english.nmpa.gov.cn/database.html). For each drug, we obtained the latest prescribing information (current as of October 2024) from China (https://db.yaozh.com/instruct), the United States (https://www.fda.gov/drugs), and the European Union (https://www.ema.europa.eu). Details of drug label versions/dates are provided in Supplementary Table S1.
We collected the latest tumor treatment guidelines (current as of October 2024). The primary guidelines included the following: Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) guidelines (https://www.csco.org.cn), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines (https://www.nccn.org), and oncology diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines issued by the China National Health Commission (China, 2023).
Guideline and drug label inclusion/exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria were as follows: NMPA labels for the 14 drugs of AAT available at that time; FDA and EMA labels in cases where discrepancies existed in indications, treatment lines, regimens, or dosage, compared with the NMPA labels; and guidelines that formally recommended any of the 14 AAT drugs as oncology treatment regimens. Exclusion criteria were as follows: drug labels from non-originator manufacturers; historical versions of labels; FDA and EMA product information consistent with the NMPA labeling; and guidelines with recommendations not involving OLU of the 14 AAT drugs. The full process of the guideline and label search is shown in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1
Off-label use categorization framework
Two independent investigators evaluated all collected data using an abstraction form (Supplementary Table S2). OLU was defined as meeting any of the following criteria compared with NMPA-approved indications: cancer type(s) not included in the approved indications; treatment lines differing from the approved sequence; combination therapy regimens not specified in the label; dosage regimens deviating from the approved prescribing information.
As shown in Figure 2, identified OLU cases were hierarchically categorized based on the scope of divergence (broad to narrow): cancer type (unapproved indication), therapy line (unapproved treatment sequence), regimen (unapproved combination therapy), and dosage (unapproved dosing). Each case was assigned exclusively to the most comprehensive applicable category. Dosage OLU implied on-label cancer type, therapy line, and regimen. Regimen OLU implied on-label cancer type and therapy line. Therapy line OLU implied on-label cancer type. This hierarchical classification ensured mutually exclusive categorization across all OLU types. Python 3.12 software was used to perform a kappa agreement test on the OLU classifications of the two investigators. For OLU classification items with disputes, the final category was determined through joint discussion by the article writing team in accordance with the initial workflow criteria.
FIGURE 2
Evidence classification and recommendation grading adhered to the original guideline standards. When an OLU entry has recommendations from different guidelines, we list all the recommendations. Where recommendations lacked explicit evidence levels, we applied the CSCO evidence classification system. For a quick understanding of the classification of recommendations and evidence, we compiled a table (Supplementary Table S3) that outlines the corresponding recommendation categories and evidence levels. For detailed information, please check the official websites.
Results
Initially, we identified 192 oncology clinical guidelines and 322 drug product information documents. After multi-round screening (Figure 1), we finally included 19 AAT drug labels [14 NMPA labels (ROCHE, 2024; ChiaTaiTianqing, 2024; JiangsuHengrui, 2023; Pfizer, 2024; Hutchison, 2023; Eisai, 2022; EliLilly, 2022; Hutchison, 2024; SuzhouZelgen, 2022; Novartis, 2021; Bayer, 2021; Bayer, 2018; PFIZER, 2022; Simcere, 2020) and 5 AAT labels from other regions (Roche, 2022; GENENTECH, 2022; PF, 2024; EISAI, 2024; ELILILLY, 2024; NOVARTIS, 2024; CPPI, 2024)], 3 non-AAT labels (MERCK, 2024; Innovent, 2023; ASTRAZENECA, 2023), and 43 guidelines (NCCN, 2024b; NCCN, 2024d, NCCN, 2024p, NCCN, 2024v; CSCO, 2023c, NCCN, 2024o; CSCO, 2023h; CSCO, 2023f, NCCN, 2024l, NCCN, 2024k; NCCN, 2025b; CSCO, 2023e, NCCN, 2024r, NCCN, 2024s; CSCO, 2023b; NCCN, 2025c, NCCN, 2024w, NCCN, 2024n; CSCO, 2024e; CSCO, 2024a; NCCN, 2024e, NCCN, 2024q; CSCO, 2023a; CSCO, 2024b; CSCO, 2024c; CSCO, 2023g; CSCO, 2021; CSCO, 2022a; NCCN, 2024h; NCCN, 2024i, NCCN, 2024t, NCCN, 2024u; CSCO, 2022b; NCCN, 2024f; NCCN, 2025a; NCCN, 2024g; CSCO, 2023d, NCCN, 2024j; NCCN, 2024c; CSCO, 2024d; NCCN, 2024a, NCCN, 2024m) for OLU evaluation. After aggregation, the tumor types across the indications of the 14 drugs of tumor AAT were summed, resulting in a total of 33 tumor types involving 36 entries. Among the 14 drugs, 12 had OLU recommendations, with a total of 215 OLU entries determined (Cohen’s kappa = 0.917) (Supplementary Table S4, where each row, except NMPA labels in the table, is considered one entry or item).
Off-label use of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors
Currently, there are two anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody drugs available: bevacizumab, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2004, and aflibercept, approved in 2011 (Hida et al., 2024). Bevacizumab and aflibercept were approved for marketing in China in 2010 and 2013, respectively. Bevacizumab is widely used in oncological treatments, while aflibercept is primarily indicated for ophthalmological conditions in China (Hang et al., 2023).
In the field of antitumor therapy, the main OLU of bevacizumab involves indications (Table 1). There are 12 cancer types and 57 items involving bevacizumab recommended by guidelines that are not included in the NMPA-approved indications. Additionally, OLU related to treatment regimens includes 22 entries across 6 therapy lines in 4 cancer types. Exceeding the recommended therapy lines was observed in the palliative treatment of three cancer types. Furthermore, differences in dosing practices for specific indications across geographical regions have resulted in variations in the recommended dosages specified in product inserts.
TABLE 1
| Drug name Dosage form Strength | Off-label type | Cancer type Subtype (molecular subtyping) [NMPA label content] | Therapy line(s)1 | Regimen | Limiting condition | Evidence and recommendation category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor | ||||||
| Bevacizumab solution for infusion 100 mg; 400 mg | NMPA indications | Colorectal cancer | + Fluorouracil-based chemo | NMPA label (ROCHE, 2024) | ||
| Cervical cancer | + Paclitaxel/cisplatin + Paclitaxel/topotecan | |||||
| Epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer | First | + Carboplatin/paclitaxel and maintenance bevacizumab | ||||
| Glioblastoma | Recurrent | Adult | ||||
| Hepatocellular carcinoma | First | + Atezolizumab | ||||
| Non-small-cell lung cancer | First | + Platinum-based chemo | Non-squamous | |||
| Cancer type | Ampullary adenocarcinoma | First | + Capecitabine/oxaliplatin + Fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan + Fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin | Intestinal type | 2A, NM (NCCN, 2024b) | |
| + Fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan/oxaliplatin | ECOG 0–1 | |||||
| + Capecitabine + Fluorouracil/leucovorin | ECOG 2 | |||||
| ≥Second | + Fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan | Prior oxaliplatin-based therapy | ||||
| + Capecitabine ± oxaliplatin + Fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin + Fluorouracil/leucovorin ± irinotecan | ECOG 2 | |||||
| Breast Cancer | First | + Paclitaxel | EMA label (Roche, 2022) | |||
| First | + Capecitabine | Other chemo unsuited; taxanes and anthracyclines not used in 12 months | ||||
| Central nervous system cancer | Single | Pediatric | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2024p) | |||
| Intracranial and spinal ependymoma | Single | Adult, not subependymoma | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024d) | |||
| Medulloblastoma | Recurrent | + Temozolomide/irinotecan | Adult | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024d) | ||
| Meningiomas | Single + everolimus | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024d) | ||||
| Miscellaneous | Single | Neurofibromatosis type 2 vestibular schwannomas with hearing loss | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024d) | |||
| Astrocytoma (IDH-mutant) Oligodendroglioma (IDH-mutant, 1p19q codeleted) | Single | WHO grade 3, KPS ≥60 | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024d) | |||
| + Carmustine + Lomustine + Temozolomide | WHO grade 3, KPS ≥60 | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024d) | ||||
| Endometrial carcinoma | First | + Carboplatin/paclitaxel | 2A,OR (NCCN, 2024v); NM, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023c) | |||
| ≥Second | Single | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024v); NM, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023c) | ||||
| Malignant sex cord-stromal tumors | Single | Recurrent | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024o); 3, Ⅲ(CSCO, 2023h) | |||
| Melanoma | ||||||
| Cutaneous, acral | First | + (Paclitaxel or albumin-bound paclitaxel) ± platinum | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023f) | |||
| Second | + (Paclitaxel or albumin-bound paclitaxel) ± platinum | 2A, I (CSCO, 2023f) | ||||
| Uveal | + (Paclitaxel or albumin-bound paclitaxel) ± platinum | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023f) | ||||
| Mucosal | + (Paclitaxel or albumin-bound paclitaxel) ± platinum | 2A, I (CSCO, 2023f) | ||||
| + Atezolizumab | 2A, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023f) | |||||
| Mesothelioma | ||||||
| Pleural | First | + (Cisplatin or carboplatin)/pemetrexed | Epithelioid | 1, preferred (NCCN, 2024L) | ||
| + (Cisplatin or carboplatin)/pemetrexed | Biphasic or sarcomatoid | 1, OR (NCCN, 2024L) | ||||
| ≥Second | + (Cisplatin or carboplatin)/pemetrexed | Nivolumab/ipilimumab first-line | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024L) | |||
| Peritoneal | First | + Cisplatin/pemetrexed | Epithelioid | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024k) | ||
| + Cisplatin/pemetrexed | Biphasic or sarcomatoid | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024k) | ||||
| ≥Second | + Cisplatin/pemetrexed | Nivolumab/ipilimumab first line | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024k) | |||
| + Atezolizumab | Immune checkpoint inhibitor-naïve | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024k) | ||||
| Renal cell carcinoma | + Interferon alfa | FDA label (GENENTECH, 2022) | ||||
| Clear cell | ≥Second | Single | 2B, UCC (NCCN, 2025b) | |||
| Non-clear cell | + Everolimus + Erlotinib | Not collecting duct and medullary regions | NM, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023e) | |||
| + Erlotinib | Papillary subtype | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2025b) | ||||
| + Everolimus | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2025b) | |||||
| Small-bowel adenocarcinoma | + Fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin + Capecitabine/oxaliplatin + Fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan | Intensive therapy suitable | 2A, NM (NCCN, 2024r) | |||
| First | + Fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan/oxaliplatin | Intensive therapy suitable | 2A, NM (NCCN, 2024r) | |||
| First | + Fluorouracil/leucovorin + Capecitabine | Intensive therapy unsuitable | 2A, NM (NCCN, 2024r) | |||
| Soft tissue sarcoma | ||||||
| Angiosarcoma | Single | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2024s) | ||||
| Solitary fibrous tumor | + Temozolomide | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024s); 3, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023b) | ||||
| Vaginal cancer: squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma | First | + (Cisplatin or Carboplatin)/paclitaxel/pembrolizumab | PD-L1-positive | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2025c) | ||
| + (Cisplatin or carboplatin)/paclitaxel | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2025c) | |||||
| + Topotecan/paclitaxel | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2025c) | |||||
| ≥Second | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2025c) | |||||
| Vulvar cancer | + Cisplatin/paclitaxel | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024w) | ||||
| + Carboplatin/paclitaxel | 2B, preferred (NCCN, 2024w) | |||||
| Therapy line | Colorectal cancer [NMPA label: 1st] | First to second | + Fluoropyrimidine–irinotecan-based chemo + Fluoropyrimidine–oxaliplatin-based chemo | First-line bevacizumab-containing regimen | FDA label (GENENTECH, 2022) | |
| Epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer [NMPA label: 1st] | ≤Third | + Paclitaxel + PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin + Topotecan | Platinum-resistant recurrence | FDA label (GENENTECH, 2022) EMA label (Roche, 2022) | ||
| Recurrence maintenance | Single | No BRCA1/2 mutation, bevacizumab in platinum-sensitive recurrence therapy, complete or partial response achieved | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023h) | |||
| Platinum-resistant recurrence | + Gemcitabine | 2A, Ⅰ (CSCO, 2023h); 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024o) | ||||
| Single or + cyclophosphamide (oral) | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024o); 2B, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023h) | |||||
| + Carboplatin/gemcitabine or + carboplatin/liposomal doxorubicin | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024o); 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023h) | |||||
| + Cyclophosphamide (oral)/pembrolizumab | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024o) | |||||
| + Ixabepilone | 2B, OR (NCCN, 2024o) | |||||
| + Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx | FRα-expressing | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2024o); 2A, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023h) | ||||
| Non-small-cell lung cancer | ||||||
| Non-squamous [NMPA label: 1st] | Maintenance | Single | PS 0–2 | 1, NM (NCCN, 2024n) | ||
| + Atezolizumab | PS 0–2, PD-L1 ≥1%, prior atezolizumab/carboplatin/paclitaxel/bevacizumab | |||||
| + Pemetrexed | PS 0–2, prior bevacizumab/pemetrexed/platinum | 2A, NM (NCCN, 2024n) | ||||
| Non-squamous (EGFR ex19del or L858Rm) [NMPA label: 1st] | ≥Second | + Erlotinib | T790M-, prior erlotinib/bevacizumab | 2A, NM (NCCN, 2024n) | ||
| + Platinum-based dual-drug chemo | Multiple lesion progression on EGFR-TKI | 2A, Ⅰ (T790M- or prior third-generation TKI) or Ⅱ (T790M+) (CSCO, 2024e) | ||||
| + Single-drug chemo | PS 0–2, prior EGFR-TKI and dual-drug chemo | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2024e) | ||||
| Non-squamous (ALK rearrangement) [NMPA label: 1st] | ≥Second | + Platinum-based dual-drug chemo | Multiple lesion progression | 2A, Ⅰ (prior ALK-TKI) or Ⅱ (CSCO, 2024e) | ||
| + Single-drug chemo | PS 0–2, prior ALK-TKI and dual-drug chemo | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2024e) | ||||
| Non-squamous (ROS1 rearrangement) [NMPA label: 1st] | Second | + Platinum-based dual-drug chemo | Multiple lesion progression | 2A, Ⅰ (CSCO, 2024e) | ||
| Third | + Single-drug chemo | PS 0–2 | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2024e) | |||
| Regimen | Cervical cancer [NMPA label: + paclitaxel/cisplatin or + paclitaxel/topotecan] | First | + Pembrolizumab/chemo | PD-L1-positive (CPS ≥1) | FDA label (MERCK, 2024) | |
| + Carboplatin/paclitaxel | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024o) 2A, Ⅰ (CSCO, 2023h) | |||||
| Colorectal cancer (microsatellite stability or microsatellite instability-low/mismatch repair proficient) [NMPA label: + 5-FU-based chemo] | First | + Trifluridine pyrimidine | Intensive therapy unsuitable | 2B, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2024a) | ||
| ≥Third | + Trifluridine pyrimidine | Prior oxaliplatin and irinotecan | 1A, I (CSCO, 2024a); 2A, NM (NCCN, 2024e; NCCN, 2024q) | |||
| Epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer | ||||||
| [NMPA label + carboplatin/paclitaxel] | Primary | + Docetaxel/carboplatin and maintenance bevacizumab | Stage II–IV | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024o) | ||
| + Docetaxel/oxaliplatin and maintenance bevacizumab | Stage II–IV | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2024o) | ||||
| + Fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin + Capecitabine/oxaliplatin | Mucinous carcinoma, stage II–IV | 2B, preferred (NCCN, 2024o) 2B, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023h) | ||||
| + Chemo, maintenance bevacizumab | Clear-cell carcinoma, stage Ⅲ–IV | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023h) | ||||
| Homologous recombination deficiency positive [NMPA label: single] | First-line maintenance | + Olaparib | Bevacizumab in primary therapy, complete or partial response achieved | FDA label (ASTRAZENECA, 2023) | ||
| + Niraparib (olaparib-intolerant) | 2A, NM (NCCN, 2024o) | |||||
| [NMPA label: + carboplatin/paclitaxel] | Platinum-sensitive recurrence | Single | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024o) | |||
| + Carboplatin/gemcitabine + Carboplatin/liposomal doxorubicin | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024o); 1A, NM (CSCO, 2023h) | |||||
| + Niraparib | 2B, OR (NCCN, 2024o); 2A, Ⅲ (No BRCA1/2 mutation) (CSCO, 2023h) | |||||
| +5-FU/LV/oxaliplatin or + capecitabine/oxaliplatin | 2B, UCC (NCCN, 2024o) | |||||
| + Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx | FRα-expressing | 2B, UCC (NCCN, 2024o) | ||||
| Non-small-cell lung cancer: non-squamous [NMPA label: + platinum-based chemo] | First | + Erlotinib | EGFR-activating mutation | EMA label (Roche, 2022) 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2024n) | ||
| + Carboplatin/paclitaxel/atezolizumab | PD-L1 ≥ 1%, PS 0–2 | 1, OR (NCCN, 2024n) | ||||
| ≥Second | + Pemetrexed/cisplatin/sintilimab | First- or second-generation EGFR-TKI resistance with T790M- or third-generation EGFR-TKI resistance | NMPA label (Innovent, 2023) 1A, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2024e) | |||
| Dosage | Colorectal cancer [NMPA label: 5 mg/kg q2w or 7.5 mg/kg q3w] | 10 mg/kg q2w | FDA label (GENENTECH, 2022); EMA label (Roche, 2022) | |||
| 15 mg/kg q3w | EMA label (Roche, 2022) | |||||
| Non-small-cell lung cancer [NMPA label: 15 mg/kg q3w] | 7.5 mg/kg q3w | Non-squamous | EMA label (Roche, 2022) | |||
| Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors | ||||||
| Anlotinib capsules 8 mg 10 mg 12 mg | NMPA indications | Non-small-cell lung cancer | ≥Third | EGFR mutations or ALK-positive | NMPA label (ChiaTaiTianqing, 2024) | |
| Soft tissue sarcoma | ≥Second | Prior to anthracycline-based chemo | ||||
| Small-cell lung cancer | ≥Third | |||||
| Thyroid carcinoma: medullary | Symptomatic or progression | |||||
| Thyroid carcinoma: differentiated | Refractory radioactive iodine | |||||
| Cancer type | Biliary tract cancers | Second | + anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy | PS ≤ 1 | 2B, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023a) | |
| Esophageal and esophagogastric junction: squamous cell carcinoma | ≥Second | PS 0–2 | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2024b) | |||
| Renal cell carcinoma: clear cell | First | Single | Poor or intermediate risk | NM, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023e) | ||
| Apatinib tablet 250 mg 375 mg 425 mg | NMPA indication | Gastric or gastroesophageal: junction adenocarcinoma | ≥Third | 850 mg qd, Single | Prior ≥2 systemic chemo | NMPA label (JiangsuHengrui, 2023) |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma | First | 250 mg qd, + camrelizumab | ||||
| ≥Second | 750 mg qd, single | Prior ≥1 systemic therapy | ||||
| Cancer type | Esophageal and esophagogastric junction squamous cell carcinoma | ≥Second | 250–500 mg, qd | PS 0–2 | 3, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2024b) | |
| 250 mg qd, + camrelizumab | PS 0–2 | 3, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2024b) | ||||
| Head and neck cancer: adenoid cystic carcinoma | Symptomatic, rapidly progressing | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2024c) | ||||
| Melanoma: acral | First | + Camrelizumab/temozolomide | No brain metastases | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023f) | ||
| + Camrelizumab/temozolomide | Unresectable brain metastases, PS 0–2 | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023f) | ||||
| Nasopharyngeal carcinoma | ≥Second | 250 mg qd + camrelizumab | Anti-PD-1-/PD-L1-based therapy naïve | 2B, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023g) | ||
| Ovarian epithelial carcinoma | Recurrence | 250 mg qd + doxorubicin liposomes | Platinum-resistant | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023h) | ||
| Thyroid cancer: differentiated | 500 mg qd, single | RET-based or unknown, iodine refractory, symptomatic, rapidly progressing | 1A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2021) | |||
| Regimen | Hepatocellular carcinoma [NMPA label: 750 mg qd, single] | Second | 250 mg qd + camrelizumab | Prior oxaliplatin-based therapy, Child–Pugh A or B (score ≤7) | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2022a) | |
| Axitinib tablet 1 mg 5 mg | NMPA indication | Renal cell carcinoma | ≥Second | Single | NMPA label (Pfizer, 2024) | |
| Cancer type | Head and neck cancer | |||||
| Adenoid cystic carcinoma | Single | No surgery or radiotherapy option | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2024c) | |||
| First | + Avelumab | No surgery or radiotherapy option | 2B, UCC (NCCN, 2024h) | |||
| Salivary gland tumor | Single | No surgery or radiotherapy option | 2B, UCC (NCCN, 2024h) | |||
| Melanoma: mucosal | First | + Toripalimab | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023f) | |||
| Soft tissue sarcoma: alveolar soft part sarcoma | + Pembrolizumab | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024s); 3, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023b) | ||||
| Therapy line | Renal cell carcinoma | |||||
| Clear cell [NMPA label: subsequent]> | First | + Avelumab or + pembrolizumab | FDA label (PF, 2024) | |||
| + Toripalimab | Poor or intermediate risk | 1A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023e) | ||||
| Single | 2B, UCC (NCCN, 2025b) | |||||
| Single | Favorable or intermediate risk | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023e) | ||||
| Non-clear cell [NMPA label: subsequent] | First | Single | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2025b) NM, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023e) | |||
| + Pembrolizumab | NM, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023e) | |||||
| Regimen | Renal cell carcinoma: clear cell [NMPA label: single] | Second or Third | + Pembrolizumab | Prior TKI therapy | 2B, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023e) | |
| Fruquintinib capsule 1 mg 5 mg | NMPA indication | Colorectal cancer | ≥Third | 5 mg qd D1-21 q4w | Prior 5-FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan-based chemo and prior or not suitable for anti-VEGF therapy and anti-EGFR therapy (RAS wild type) | NMPA label (Hutchison, 2023) |
| Lenvatinib capsule 4 mg 10 mg | NMPA indication | Hepatocellular carcinoma | 8–12 mg qd, single | NMPA label (Eisai, 2022) | ||
| Thyroid cancer: differentiated | 24 mg qd, single | Radioactive iodine-refractory | ||||
| Cancer type | Endometrial carcinoma | Recurrent | 20 mg qd, + pembrolizumab | MMR-proficient or not MSI-H | FDA label (EISAI, 2024) | |
| Melanoma | ||||||
| Cutaneous | ≥Second | + Pembrolizumab | Prior anti-PD-1-/PD-L1-based therapy | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2024i) | ||
| Cutaneous, acral | Second | 20 mg qd + pembrolizumab | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023f) | |||
| Osteosarcoma | ≥Second | + Etoposide/ifosfamide | 3, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023b) | |||
| Renal cell carcinoma | First | 20 mg qd + pembrolizumab | FDA label (EISAI, 2024) | |||
| ≥Second | 18 mg qd + everolimus | Prior 1 anti-angiogenic therapy | ||||
| Clear cell | ≥Second | + Pembrolizumab | Immuno-oncology therapy naïve | 2A, ORR (NCCN, 2025b) | ||
| Prior immuno-oncology therapy | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2025b) | |||||
| Non-clear cell | First | + Everolimus | 2A, ORR (NCCN, 2025b) | |||
| ≥Second | + Pembrolizumab | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2025b) | ||||
| Salivary gland tumor: adenoid cystic carcinoma | 2B, UCC (NCCN, 2024h) | |||||
| Symptomatic, rapidly progressing | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2024c) | |||||
| Thymic carcinomas | Second | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024t) | ||||
| Thyroid carcinoma: medullary | 24 mg qd | Symptomatic or progression | 2A, ORR (NCCN, 2024u); 2A, Ⅱ (RET- or unknown) (CSCO, 2022b) | |||
| Ramucirumab injection 100 mg; 500 mg | NMPA indication | Gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma | ≥Second | 8 mg/kg q2w, single or + paclitaxel | Prior fluoropyrimidine- or platinum-containing chemo | NMPA label |
| Hepatocellular carcinoma | ≥Second | 8 mg/kg q2w, single | Alpha fetoprotein ≥400 ng/mL and prior sorafenib | |||
| Cancer type | Colorectal cancer | ≥Second | 8 mg/kg q2w, + FOLFIRI | Prior bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidine | FDA label (ELILILLY, 2024) | |
| + Irinotecan | Previous therapy without irinotecan | 2A, NM (NCCN, 2024e; NCCN, 2024q) | ||||
| Mesothelioma: pleural | ≥Second | + Gemcitabine | 2A, ORR (NCCN, 2024L) | |||
| Non-small-cell lung cancer | First | 10 mg/kg q2w + erlotinib | EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (L858R) mutations | FDA label (ELILILLY, 2024) | ||
| ≥Second | 10 mg/kg q3w + docetaxel | Prior platinum-based chemo or FDA-approved therapy for EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations | ||||
| Regimen | Gastric cancer [NMPA label: single or + Paclitaxel] | ≥Second | + Fluorouracil/irinotecan + Irinotecan | 2A, ORR (NCCN, 2024f) | ||
| Surufatinib capsule 50 mg; 100 mg | NMPA indication | Neuroendocrine tumor | Single | Non-functional, well-differentiated (G1, G2) | NMPA label (Hutchison, 2024) | |
| Cancer type | Biliary tract cancer | Second | PS ≤ 1 | 2B, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023a) | ||
| Thyroid carcinoma: medullary | Symptomatic or progression, RET- or unknown | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2022b) | ||||
Off-label use of vascular endothelial growth factor and receptor inhibitors.
Therapy line(s)1: Unless otherwise mentioned, the therapy lines in this table are for palliation. NMPA, P.R.C National Medical Products Administration; FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration; OR, other recommended intervention; UCC, useful in certain circumstances; NM, not mentioned; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status Scale; APL, acute promyelocytic leukemia; SDH, succinate dehydrogenase; ECOG, Eastern cooperative oncology group; PS, performance status; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; HRD, homologous recombination deficiency; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. As of October 2024, drugs with underlined generic names were only approved for marketing in China.
Off-label use of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors
The scope of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors in China includes a total of seven drugs: anlotinib, apatinib, axitinib, fruquintinib, lenvatinib, ramucirumab, and surufatinib. The predominant form of OLU among these drugs was related to indications (Table 1). OLU involving exceeding standard treatment regimens or therapy lines was relatively infrequent. Notably, there were no OLU recommendations for fruquintinib.
Among the VEGFR inhibitors, lenvatinib had the highest number of OLU recommendations for cancer types, with a total of seven uses beyond its labeled indications. This was followed by apatinib, which had six off-label recommendations for cancer types. Anlotinib, axitinib, and ramucirumab each had three off-label recommended cancer types, while surufatinib had two.
In terms of treatment regimens, anlotinib, axitinib, and ramucirumab each had one recommended regimen item that constituted OLU. Recommendations for OLU related to therapy lines were rare among VEGFR inhibitors, with axitinib being the only drug for which a recommendation transitioned subsequent lines of therapy to first-line use.
Off-label use of multi-kinase targeted tumor anti-angiogenic drugs
The multi-kinase targeted included a total of five drugs: donafenib, pazopanib, regorafenib, sorafenib, and sunitinib.
Except for donafenib, which had no OLU recommendations, the remaining four drugs had recommendations for use beyond their approved tumor types (Table 2). Notably, pazopanib and sorafenib had off-label recommendations for seven distinct cancer types. Sunitinib followed closely, with OLU recommendations for six cancer types and nine items. Regorafenib was recommended for OLU in four cancer types, comprising eight items, and also had one OLU recommendation related to dosage.
TABLE 2
| Drug name Dosage form Strength | Off-label type | Cancer type Subtype (molecular subtyping) [NMPA label content] | Therapy line(s)1 | Dosage, combined agent(s) | Limiting condition | Evidence and recommendation category (reference) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-kinase-targeted tumor anti-angiogenic inhibitors | ||||||
| Donafenib tablet: 0.1 g | NMPA indications | Hepatocellular carcinoma | First | 0.2 g bid | NMPA label (SuzhouZelgen, 2022) | |
| Thyroid cancer: differentiated | 0.3 g bid | Iodine refractory | ||||
| Pazopanib tablet 200 mg; 400 mg | NMPA indications | Renal cell carcinoma | First | NMPA label (Novartis, 2021) | ||
| ≥Second | Prior cytokine therapy | |||||
| Cancer type | Chondrosarcoma | Metastatic and widespread disease | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2025a) | |||
| Epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer | Recurrence | 2B, OR (NCCN, 2024o) | ||||
| Gastrointestinal stromal tumor | First | SDH-deficient | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2024g) | |||
| Third | Prior imatinib and sunitinib | 2A, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023d) | ||||
| ≥Fifth | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024g) | |||||
| Merkel cell carcinoma | Anti-PD-(L)1-contraindicated or prior anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy | 2B, UCC (NCCN, 2024j) | ||||
| Soft tissue sarcoma | First | Ineligible for IV systemic therapy or anthracycline-based regimens | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2024s) | |||
| ≥Second | Not liposarcoma, prior chemo | FDA label (NOVARTIS, 2024) | ||||
| + Gemcitabine | 2B, UCC (NCCN, 2024s) | |||||
| Alveolar soft part sarcoma Solitary fibrous tumor | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024s); 3, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023b) | |||||
| Angiosarcoma | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024s) | |||||
| Chondrosarcoma | Extraskeletal myxoid | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024s) | ||||
| Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans | With fibrosarcomatous transformation, ineligible for IV systemic therapy or anthracycline-based regimens | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024s) | ||||
| Desmoid tumors | Aggressive fibromatosis | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024s); 2B, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023b) | ||||
| Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024s) | |||||
| Thyroid carcinoma | Radioactive iodine unsuitable | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2024u) | ||||
| Uterine sarcoma | ≥Second | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024v) | ||||
| Regorafenib tablet 40 mg | NMPA indications | Colorectal cancer | Third | Prior fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy, an anti-VEGF therapy, and, if RAS wild-type, an anti-EGFR therapy | NMPA label (Bayer, 2021) | |
| Gastrointestinal stromal tumors | Third | Prior imatinib and sunitinib | ||||
| Hepatocellular carcinoma | Second | Prior sorafenib | ||||
| Cancer type | Biliary tract cancers | Second | 2B, OR (NCCN, 2024c); 2B, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023a) | |||
| Bone cancer | ||||||
| Ewing sarcoma | Second | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2025a) | ||||
| Pleomorphic sarcoma | Second | High-grade undifferentiated | 2B, OR (NCCN, 2025a) | |||
| Osteosarcoma | Second | 1, preferred (NCCN, 2025a); 2B, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2023b) | ||||
| Glioblastoma | Adult | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024d) | ||||
| Soft tissue sarcoma | ≥Second | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024s) | ||||
| Second | Not liposarcoma | 2B, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023b) | ||||
| Angiosarcoma | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2024s) | |||||
| Dosage | Colorectal cancer [NMPA label: 160 mg PO daily on days 1–21] | Third | First cycle: 80 mg PO daily on days 1–7, followed by 120 mg PO daily on days 8–14 and 160 mg PO daily on days 15–21 Subsequent cycles: regorafenib 160 mg PO daily on days 1–21 Repeat every 28 days | 2A (NCCN, 2024e; NCCN, 2024q; CSCO, 2024a) | ||
| Sorafenib tablet 200 mg | NMPA indications | Renal cell carcinoma | 0.4 g bid | NMPA label (Bayer, 2018) | ||
| Hepatocellular carcinoma | ||||||
| Thyroid cancer: differentiated | ||||||
| Cancer type | Acute myeloid leukemia (FLT3-ITD) | Induction | + Azacitidine + Decitabine | Not APL, age ≥60 years, PS < 3, no major concomitant diseases, mini-mental state examination <28, short physical performance battery <9 | 2A, Ⅰ (CSCO, 2024d) | |
| Age ≥18 years; intensive induction therapy unsuitable or declines; no IDH1 mutation | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2024a) | |||||
| Maintenance | 200 mg bid d1–28 for 3 cycles, then 400 mg bid d1-28 (24 months max) | Post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant, in remission, history of FLT3 mutation | 2A, NM (NCCN, 2024a) | |||
| Relapsed | + Azacitidine + Decitabine | Not APL | 2A, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2024d) | |||
| Age ≥18 years | 2A, NM (NCCN, 2024a) | |||||
| Bone cancer | ||||||
| Chordoma | Single | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2025a) | ||||
| Osteosarcoma | Second | Single | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2025a); 3, II (CSCO, 2023b) | |||
| 500 mg/d + everolimus | 2B, OR (NCCN, 2025a); 3, II (CSCO, 2023b) | |||||
| High-grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma | Second | Single | 2B, preferred (NCCN, 2025a) | |||
| + Everolimus | 2B, OR (NCCN, 2025a) | |||||
| Epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer | Recurrence | + Topotecan | Platinum-resistant | 2B, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023h) | ||
| Gastrointestinal stromal tumors | ≥Fifth | Single | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2024g) NM, NM (CSCO, 2023d) | |||
| Head and neck cancer | ||||||
| Adenoid cystic carcinoma | Symptomatic or rapidly progressing | 2A, II (CSCO, 2024c) | ||||
| Salivary gland tumors | 2B, UCC (NCCN, 2024h) | |||||
| Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia | Chronic phase | FLT3 rearrangement | 2A, ORR (NCCN, 2024m) | |||
| Soft tissue sarcoma | ||||||
| Angiosarcoma | Single | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2024s) | ||||
| Desmoid tumors | Single | 1, preferred (NCCN, 2024s); 2A, Ⅰ (CSCO, 2023b) | ||||
| Solitary fibrous tumor | Single | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024s); 3, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023b) | ||||
| Sunitinib capsule 12.5 mg; 25 mg; 37.5 mg; 50 mg | NMPA indications | Gastrointestinal stromal tumor | Second | 50 mg qd q1–28 q6w | Prior or intolerance to imatinib | NMPA label (PFIZER, 2022) |
| Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors | First | 37.5 mg qd | Well-differentiated, adult | |||
| Renal cell carcinoma | First | 50 mg qd q1–28 q6w | ||||
| Cancer type | Chordoma | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2025a) | ||||
| Thymic carcinomas | Second | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024t) | ||||
| Thyroid carcinoma | Radioactive iodine, clinical trials, or other systemic therapies unsuitable | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2024u) | ||||
| Medullary | With ectopic Cushing syndrome | 2B, Ⅱ (CSCO, 2022b) | ||||
| Meningiomas | 2B, OR (NCCN, 2024d) | |||||
| Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms | Chronic phase | With eosinophilia, FLT3 rearrangement | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024m) | |||
| Soft tissue sarcoma | ||||||
| Alveolar soft part sarcoma Solitary fibrous tumor | 2A, preferred (NCCN, 2024s); 3, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023b) | |||||
| Angiosarcoma | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2024s) | |||||
| Chondrosarcoma | Extraskeletal myxoid | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024s) | ||||
| Therapy line | Renal cell carcinoma [NMPA label: First] | Adjuvant | 50 mg qd q1–28 q6w, ≤9 cycles | High recurrent risk after nephrectomy | FDA label (CPPI, 2024) | |
| Gastrointestinal stromal tumor [NMPA label: Second] | Neoadjuvant or first | SDH-deficient | 2A, UCC (NCCN, 2024g) | |||
| Other tumor anti-angiogenic inhibitors | ||||||
| Recombinant human endostatin injection 15 mg | NMPA indications | Non-small-cell lung cancer | + Vinorelbine/cisplatin | NMPA label (Simcere, 2020) | ||
| Cancer type | Melanoma | |||||
| Cutaneous or acral | 1st | + Dacarbazine ± platinum + Temozolomide ± platinum | No brain metastases | 2A, Ⅰ (CSCO, 2023f) | ||
| + Dacarbazine ± cisplatin | Unresectable brain metastases, PS 0–2 | 2A, II (CSCO, 2023f) | ||||
| Mucosal | + Dacarbazine ± platinum + Temozolomide ± platinum | 2A, Ⅰ (CSCO, 2023f) | ||||
| Uveal | + Dacarbazine ± platinum + Temozolomide ± platinum | Stage Ⅳ | 2A, II (CSCO, 2023f) | |||
| Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia | Chronic phase | FLT3 rearrangement | 2A, OR (NCCN, 2024m) | |||
| Nasopharyngeal carcinoma | First | + Cisplatin/gemcitabine | 2B, Ⅲ (CSCO, 2023g) | |||
| Osteosarcoma | Neoadjuvant | + Chemo | Stage Ⅱb, limb-sparing resection unsuitable | 2A, II (CSCO, 2023b) | ||
| Stage Ⅲ | Clinician experience, II (CSCO, 2023b) | |||||
| Dosage | Melanoma [NMPA label: 7.5 mg/m2 d1–14 q3w] | 7.5 mg/m2 d1–14 q4w | 2A, Ⅰ (CSCO, 2023f) | |||
| Non-small-cell lung cancer [NMPA label: 7.5 mg/m2 d1–14 q3w] | 210 mg civ (72 h or 120 h) | NM, NM (China, 2023) | ||||
Off-label use of multi-kinase-targeted and other tumor anti-angiogenic inhibitors.
Therapy line(s)1: Unless otherwise mentioned, the therapy lines in this table are for palliation. NMPA, P.R.C National Medical Products Administration; FDA, U.S. Food and Drug Administration; OR, other recommended intervention; UCC, useful in certain circumstances; NM, not mentioned; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status Scale; APL, acute promyelocytic leukemia; SDH, succinate dehydrogenase; ECOG, Eastern cooperative oncology group; PS, performance status; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. As of October 2024, drug with underlined generic name was only approved for marketing in China.
Among these five drugs, sunitinib was the only one with OLU recommendations for therapy lines, specifically for adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapies in two cancer types.
Off-label use of other tumor anti-angiogenic inhibitors
Endostatin is a potent endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis. It is a 20 kDa C-terminal fragment of collagen XVIII, a component of the basement membrane. Endostar, a recombinant human endostatin, was launched in China on 23 July 2006 (Han et al., 2011).
The OLU recommendations for recombinant human endostatin primarily involved indications beyond the approved cancer types and dosages. There were 4 cancer types and 11 items recommended for OLU. Additionally, there were two tumor types with OLU recommendations related to dosage.
Discussion
AAT is an essential component of malignant tumor treatment (Liu et al., 2023). However, some AAT drugs, particularly those with limited market availability, insufficient evidence, or limited clinical experience, are frequently used off-label (Fontanals et al., 2023; Van Norman, 2023; Zarkavelis et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2024). This comprehensive narrative review shows that OLU is highly prevalent across a diverse range of tumor AAT, primarily manifesting through four distinct aspects. The use of AAT drugs beyond approved labels reflects the rapid evolution of clinical evidence and the necessity of addressing complex and diverse patient needs in oncology (Gray et al., 2009).
Based on the OLU table, the most common type of OLU is cancer types. This is also the type of OLU that clinical practice pays the most attention to. There are a total of 64 recommendations for the OLU of cancer type for 14 drugs. Although we had only included recommendations for OLU of AAT in oncology, bevacizumab has emerged as the drug most frequently recommended for OLU, with 12 cancer types and 57 documented items. Lenvatinib, pazopanib, and sorafenib also show significant OLU, mainly within expanded indications. This trend highlights the clinicians’ efforts to explore new therapeutic applications for these agents beyond their currently approved cancer types, potentially offering new hope to patients with challenging diseases (Fontanals et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2025).
In contrast, the OLUs for therapy line, regimen, and dosage were relatively sparse, with each OLU category typically involving 3–4 drugs. Furthermore, in most instances, the number of associated items was also limited. This may be attributed to our setting, wherein each OLU situation could only be assigned to one type of OLU, following a classification method that prioritizes cancer type first, then therapy line, followed by regimen, and ultimately dosage. Although the span of OLU of the therapy line is considered smaller than the cancer type, it is still important to clarify whether the earlier use of later-line treatment drugs can bring clinical benefits. In addition, there should be sufficient evidence to determine whether AAT should be continued in the subsequent line of treatment following the failure of the previous drug regimen. Modification of combination therapies involves the strategic use of AAT in conjunction with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or other agents in treatment regimens not explicitly specified in the prescribing information. Such modifications reflect the attempts to optimize treatment efficacy by leveraging the synergistic effects of different therapeutic modalities. These combinations may provide enhanced anti-tumor activity and potentially improve patient outcomes in complex clinical scenarios. Adjustments in dosage and administration are commonly implemented based on careful assessments of treatment efficacy and patient tolerance, particularly when the drugs are used in combination with other therapies (Overbeek et al., 2023). Scholars have previously proposed a nine-category OLU classification method, which more comprehensively encompasses the content of statutory product information (Chen et al., 2024). However, since some categories have minimal relevance to OLU recommendations for AAT, we adopted a more concise four-category method in this study. Future investigations may warrant consideration of a more comprehensive OLU evaluation framework.
The lack of high-quality evidence is a significant concern (Liang and Cai, 2025) as many off-label uses are based on small studies or case reports, lacking the support of large-scale randomized controlled trials. Safety concerns arise as off-label uses may increase the risk of adverse reactions, such as hypertension, proteinuria, and bleeding. Ethical and legal issues also loom large as off-label uses can lead to medical disputes, particularly in the absence of clear informed consent (Liang and Cai, 2025). Additionally, economic burdens can be substantial as anti-angiogenic drugs are expensive, potentially increasing the financial burden on patients (Shi et al., 2024; Gordon et al., 2021). Thus, OLU should adhere to the following principles: in the absence of other effective treatment options, OLU should be applied for therapeutic purposes, prioritizing the patient’s best interests; physicians must inform patients of the specific drug, reasons, and risks associated with OLU and obtain explicit informed consent; off-label practices must be supported by safety and efficacy evidence from evidence-based medicine; medical institutions should establish management mechanisms and strictly follow off-label drug use procedures; and OLU should not be conducted for the purpose of clinical trials, scientific research, or the personal interests of medical staff (Liang and Cai, 2025).
Limitations
Although we attempted to include the most current and up-to-date recommended evidence, readers are reminded that this is not a systematic review. The perspective on off-label recommendations presented in our review is based on authoritative guidelines and, as such, may lack the most cutting-edge research evidence. Furthermore, the tumor anti-angiogenic drugs included in this review were all products marketed in China, which may differ from those in other regions.
Conclusion
Our work offers an updated reference for the OLU of tumor AAT and highlights the need for further exploration into specific management measures for OLU in clinical practice.
Statements
Author contributions
DY: Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. YH: Methodology, Data curation, Software, Writing – review and editing. SW: Project administration, Writing – review and editing, Supervision, Validation, Conceptualization, Resources. TW: Validation, Writing – review and editing, Formal analysis, Software, Data curation. TZ: Validation, Writing – review and editing, Investigation, Data curation. LL: Formal analysis, Data curation, Validation, Writing – review and editing. HL: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review and editing, Investigation. WH: Writing – review and editing, Project administration, Conceptualization, Methodology. HD: Conceptualization, Writing – review and editing, Methodology, Supervision.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under the grant no. ZCLQ24H0901 and the Research Project on High-Quality Development of Hospital Pharmacy, National Institute of Hospital Administration, NHC, China (no. NIHAYSZX2533).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2025.1668620/full#supplementary-material
References
1
ASTRAZENECA (2023). Olaparib Tablets package insert. U.S. Food Drug Adm. website. Available online at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2023/208558s028lbl.pdf (Accessed June 30, 2024).
2
BAYER (2018). Sorafenib tosylate tablets [package insert]. P.R.C national medical products administration. Bayer. Ag., 11–16.
3
BAYER (2021). Regorafenib tablets [package insert]. P.R.C national medical products administration: bayer AG, 7–29.
4
ChenX.OuS.LuoJ.HeZ.JiangQ. (2024). Advancing perspectives on the off-label use of anticancer drugs: an updated classification and exploration of categories. Front. Pharmacol., 15–2024. 10.3389/fphar.2024.1374549
5
CHIATAITIANQING (2024). Anlotinib hydrochloride capsules [package insert]. Beijing: P.R.C national medical products administration: chia tai tianqing pharmaceutical group Co. Ltd.
6
ChinaN. H. O. (2023). Guidelines for clinical application of novel antitumor drugs, 2023.
7
CPPI (2024). Sunitinib malate capsules [package insert]. U.S. Food Drug Adm. website. Available online at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/021938s039lbledt.pdf (Accessed June 30, 2024).
8
CSCO (2021). CSCO guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer 2021. Available online at: https://www.csco.org.cn (Accessed October 31, 2024).
9
CSCO (2022a). CSCO guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma 2022. Available online at: https://www.csco.org.cn (Accessed October 31, 2024).
10
CSCO (2022b). CSCO guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of medullary thyroid carcinoma 2022. Available online at: https://www.csco.org.cn (Accessed October 31, 2024).
11
CSCO (2023a). CSCO guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of biliary tract cancer 2023. Available online at: https://www.csco.org.cn (Accessed October 31, 2024).
12
CSCO (2023b). CSCO guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of bone and soft tissue tumors 2023. Available online at: https://www.csco.org.cn (Accessed October 31, 2024).
13
CSCO (2023c). CSCO guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of endometrial carcinoma 2023. Available online at: https://www.csco.org.cn (Accessed October 31, 2024).
14
CSCO (2023d). CSCO guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors 2023. Available online at: https://www.csco.org.cn (Accessed October 31, 2024).
15
CSCO (2023e). CSCO guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of kidney cancer 2023. Available online at: https://www.csco.org.cn (Accessed October 31, 2024).
16
CSCO (2023f). CSCO guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of melanoma 2023. Available online at: https://www.csco.org.cn (Accessed October 31, 2024).
17
CSCO (2023g). CSCO guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma 2023. Available online at: https://www.csco.org.cn (Accessed October 31, 2024).
18
CSCO (2023h). CSCO guidelines for Diagnosis and treatment of Ovarian cancer 2023. Available online at: https://www.csco.org.cn (Accessed October 31, 2024).
19
CSCO (2024a). CSCO guidelines for Diagnosis and treatment of Colorectal cancer 2024. Available online at: https://www.csco.org.cn (Accessed October 31, 2024).
20
CSCO (2024b). CSCO guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer 2024. Available online at: https://www.csco.org.cn (Accessed October 31, 2024).
21
CSCO (2024c). CSCO guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of Head and Neck cancer 2024. Available online at: https://www.csco.org.cn (Accessed October 31, 2024).
22
CSCO (2024d). CSCO guidelines for Diagnosis and treatment of Hematological malignancies 2024. Available online at: https://www.csco.org.cn (Accessed October 31, 2024).
23
CSCO (2024e). CSCO guidelines for Diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer 2024. Available online at: https://www.csco.org.cn (Accessed October 31, 2024).
24
EISAI (2022). Lenvatinib Mesilate Capsules [package insert]. P.R.C National medical products administration: Eisai GmbH, 2022–29.
25
EISAI (2024). “Lenvatinib Capsules [package insert],”. U.S. Food Drug Adm. website. EISAI INC. Available online at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2024/206947s031lbl.pdf (Accessed October 30, 2024).
26
ELILILLY (2022). Ramucirumab Injection [package insert]. Beijing: P.R.C National medical products administration. Eli Lilly and Company, 2022–2030.
27
ELILILLY (2024). “Ramucirumab Injection [package insert],”. U.S. Food Drug Adm. website. ELI LILLY AND CO. Available online at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/125477s042lbl.pdf (Accessed June 30, 2024).
28
FontanalsS.EsteveA.GonzáLEZA.IbáñEZC.MartíNEZJ.MesíAR.et al (2023). Real-world treatment outcomes of medicines used in special situations (off-label and compassionate use) in oncology and hematology: a retrospective study from a comprehensive cancer institution. Cancer Med.12, 17112–17125. 10.1002/cam4.6360
29
GENENTECH (2022). Bevacizumab Injection [package insert]. U.S. Food Drug Adm. website. Available online at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/125085s340lbl.pdf (Accessed June 30, 2024).
30
GordonN.GoldsteinD. A.TadmorB.StemmerS. M.GreenbergD. (2021). Factors associated with off-label oncology prescriptions: the role of cost and financing in a universal healthcare system. Front. Pharmacol., 12–2021. 10.3389/fphar.2021.754390
31
GrayS. W.ArmstrongK.DemicheleA.SchwartzJ. S.HornikR. C. (2009). Colon cancer patient information seeking and the adoption of targeted therapy for on-label and off-label indications. Cancer115, 1424–1434. 10.1002/cncr.24186
32
HanB.XiuQ.WangH.ShenJ.GuA.LuoY.et al (2011). A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of paclitaxel-carboplatin alone or with endostar for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol.6, 1104–1109. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182166b6b
33
HangA.FeldmanS.AminA. P.OchoaJ. A. R.ParkS. S. (2023). Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies for Retinal Disorders. Pharm. (Basel)16, 1140. 10.3390/ph16081140
34
HidaK.MaishiN.MatsudaA.YuL. (2024). Beyond starving cancer: anti-angiogenic therapy. J. Med. Ultrasonics51, 605–610. 10.1007/s10396-023-01310-1
35
HUTCHISON (2023). Fruquintinib Capsules [package insert]. Beijing: P.R.C National medical products administration: Hutchison Medi Pharma(Shanghai) Co. Ltd., 2023–19.
36
HUTCHISON (2024). Surufatinib Capsules [package insert]. Beijing: P.R.C National medical products administration: Hutchison Medi Pharma(Shanghai) Co. Ltd., 2024–15.
37
INNOVENT (2023). Sintilimab Injection [package insert]. Beijing: P.R.C National medical products administration: Innovent Biologics (Suzhou) Co. Ltd., 2023–16.
38
International Medical SocietyBreast Cancer Group, Branch of Oncologist, Chinese Medical Doctor Association (2022). Expert consensus on off-label use of small molecule anti-angiogenic drugs in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi44, 523–530. 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20220310-00168
39
JIANGSUHENGRUI (2023). “Apatinib Mesylate Tablets [package insert]. Beijing: P.R.C National medical products administration,”, 2023-3-3. Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
40
LevêqueD. (2016). Off-label use of targeted therapies in oncology. World J. Clin. Oncol.7, 253–257. 10.5306/wjco.v7.i2.253
41
LiA.-Q.FangJ.-H. (2024). Anti-angiogenic therapy enhances cancer immunotherapy: mechanism and clinical application. Interdiscip. Med.2, e20230025. 10.1002/inmd.20230025
42
LiG.WangN.ZhangY.WeiW.LuH.ZhaiS.et al (2022). Recommendations for off-label drug Use in Ophthalmology in China: a clinical practice guideline. Front. Pharmacol.13, 919688. 10.3389/fphar.2022.919688
43
LiangS.CaiF. (2025). Off-label drug use in China after the Physician Law (2021): legal challenges and solutions. Front. Pharmacol., 16–2025. 10.3389/fphar.2025.1547418
44
LiuZ.-L.ChenH.-H.ZhengL.-L.SunL.-P.ShiL. (2023). Angiogenic signaling pathways and anti-angiogenic therapy for cancer. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther.8, 198. 10.1038/s41392-023-01460-1
45
LiuR.WangL.RizzoS.GarmhausenM. R.PalN.WalianyS.et al (2024). Systematic analysis of off-label and off-guideline cancer therapy usage in a real-world cohort of 165,912 US patients. Cell Rep. Med.5, 101444. 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101444
46
MaschkeK. (2018). Off-label Use of medications. Jama320, 306–307. 10.1001/jama.2018.6517
47
MengM.LiuE.ZhangB.LuQ.ZhangX.GeB.et al (2022a). Guideline for the management of pediatric off-label use of drugs in China (2021). BMC Pediatr.22, 442. 10.1186/s12887-022-03457-1
48
MengM.ZhouQ.LeiW.TianM.WangP.LiuY.et al (2022b). Recommendations on off-label drug use in pediatric guidelines. Front. Pharmacol., 13–2022. 10.3389/fphar.2022.892574
49
MERCK (2024). “Pembrolizumab Injection package insert,”. U.S. Food Drug Adm. website. MERCK SHARP DOHME. Available online at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2024/125514s155lbl.pdf (Accessed June 30, 2024).
50
NCCN (2024a). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: acute Myeloid leukemia (version 3. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
51
NCCN (2024b). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Ampullary Adenocarcinoma (V.2.2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
52
NCCN (2024c). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Biliary Tract cancers (version 4. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
53
NCCN (2024d). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Central Nervous system cancers (version 3. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
54
NCCN (2024e). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Colon cancer (version 5. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
55
NCCN (2024f). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Gastric cancer (version 4. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
56
NCCN (2024g). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Gastrointestinal Stromal tumors (version 2. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
57
NCCN (2024h). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Head and Neck cancers (version 4. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
58
NCCN (2024i). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Melanoma: Cutaneous (version 3. 2024)Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
59
NCCN (2024j). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Merkel cell Carcinoma (version 1. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
60
NCCN (2024k). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Mesothelioma: Peritoneal (version 1. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
61
NCCN (2024l). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Mesothelioma: Pleural (version 2. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
62
NCCN (2024m). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Myeloid/Lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions (version 2. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
63
NCCN (2024n). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: non-small cell lung cancer (version 11. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
64
NCCN (2024o). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: ovarian cancer/fallopian tube cancer/primary peritoneal cancer (version 3. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
65
NCCN (2024p). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: pediatric central nervous system cancers (version 1. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
66
NCCN (2024q). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: rectal cancer (version 4. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
67
NCCN (2024r). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: small bowel Adenocarcinoma (version 5. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
68
NCCN (2024s). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: soft tissue Sarcoma (version 3. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
69
NCCN (2024t). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Thymomas and Thymic Carcinomas (version 1. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
70
NCCN (2024u). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Thyroid carcinoma (version 4. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
71
NCCN (2024v). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Uterine Neoplasms (version 3. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
72
NCCN (2024w). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: vulvar cancer (version 4. 2024). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
73
NCCN (2025a). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: bone cancer (version 1. 2025). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
74
NCCN (2025b). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: kidney cancer (version 2. 2025). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
75
NCCN (2025c). NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: vaginal cancer (version 2. 2025). Available online at: www.nccn.org (Accessed October 31, 2024).
76
NOVARTIS (2021). Pazopanib Tablets [package insert]. Beijing: P.R.C National medical products administration. Novartis Pharma Schweiz AG, 12–31.
77
NOVARTIS (2024). Pazopanib Tablets [package insert]. U.S. Food Drug Adm. website. Available online at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2024/022465s036lbl.pdf (Accessed October 30, 2024).
78
OverbeekJ. K.Ter HeineR.VerheulH. M. W.ChatelutE.RudekM. A.GurneyH.et al (2023). Off-label, but on target: the evidence needed to implement alternative dosing regimens of anticancer drugs. ESMO Open8, 100749. 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100749
79
PF (2024). Axitinib Tablets package insert. U.S. Food Drug Adm. website. Available online at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2024/202324s016lbl.pdf (Accessed October 30, 2024).
80
PFIZER (2022). “Sunitinib malate Capsules [package insert]. Beijing: P.R.C National medical products administration,”, 2022-7-29. PFIZER EUROPE MA EEIG.
81
PFIZER (2024). Axitinib Tablets [package insert]. P.R.C National medical products administration. Pfizer Eur. MA EEIG.
82
ROCHE (2022). “Bevacizumab 25 mg/ml concentrate for solution for infusion [package insert],”. Amsterdam: European Medicines Agency, 11–29.
83
ROCHE (2024). Bevacizumab Injection [package insert]. P.R.C National medical products administration: roche Pharma(Schweiz)AG; 2024-10-11.
84
ShiC.YangY.WuC.WangL.DongY.QiY.et al (2024). Guidance documents for off-label drug use management for Chinese health care institutions: a scoping review. J. Evid. Based Med.17, 808–821. 10.1111/jebm.12669
85
SIMCERE (2020). Recombinant human endostatin injection [package insert]. Beijing: P.R.C National medical products administration: Shandong Simcere Bio-pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., 12–30.
86
SinghS.SaxenaS.AkdumanL.MeyerC. H. (2024). Off-label use of intravitreal bevacizumab: a global conundrum. Indian J. Ophthalmol.72, 617–619. 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2166_23
87
SUZHOUZELGEN (2022). Donafenib Tosilate Tablets [package insert]. Beijing: P.R.C national medical products administration: suzhou zelgen biopharmaceuticals Co. Ltd., 2022–16.
88
Van NormanG. A. (2023). Off-label use vs off-label marketing of drugs: Part 1: off-label use—patient harms and prescriber Responsibilities. Basic Transl. Sci.8, 224–233. 10.1016/j.jacbts.2022.12.011
89
WangG.WangY.JinC.SunX. (2025). Off-label use of anlotinib in malignancies’ treatment: efficacy and management of adverse reactions. Pharmacol. Rep.77, 392–408. 10.1007/s43440-025-00700-1
90
ZarkavelisG.AmylidiA. L.VerbaanderdC.ChernyN. I.MetaxasY.DE VriesE. G. E.et al (2023). Off-label despite high-level evidence: a clinical practice review of commonly used off-patent cancer medicines. ESMO Open8, 100604. 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100604
91
ZuoW.SunY.LiuR.DUL.YangN.SunW.et al (2022). Management guideline for the off-label use of medicine in China (2021). Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol.15, 1253–1268. 10.1080/17512433.2022.2120468
Summary
Keywords
anti-angiogenic therapy, off-label use, drug label, guidelines, drug management
Citation
Yao D, Hu Y, Weng S, Wang T, Zhu T, Liu L, Luo H, He W and Dai H (2025) Off-label use catalogue of tumor anti-angiogenic drugs in China: a narrative review. Front. Pharmacol. 16:1668620. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1668620
Received
18 July 2025
Accepted
02 September 2025
Published
14 October 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Nor Eddine Sounni, University of Liège, Belgium
Reviewed by
Xiaoqiang Xiang, Fudan University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Yao, Hu, Weng, Wang, Zhu, Liu, Luo, He and Dai.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Haibin Dai, haibindai@zju.edu.cn; Wei He, 2198039@zju.edu.cn; Difei Yao, yaodifei1021@zju.edu.cn
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.