Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Ethnopharmacology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1676393

Perceptions and Attitudes toward Clinical Trial Participation: A Study on Moringa oleifera Lam. Supplementation in Adult HIV Patients in Kano State, Nigeria

Provisionally accepted
Aisha  GamboAisha Gambo1*Musa  BabashaniMusa Babashani2,3Nceba  GqaleniNceba Gqaleni1,4Limakatso  LebinaLimakatso Lebina4
  • 1University of KwaZulu-Natal College of Health Sciences, Durban, South Africa
  • 2Bayero University Department of Medicine, Kano, Nigeria
  • 3Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria
  • 4Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Participation of patients in well-designed clinical trials forms the essence of all clinical research. PLHIV and receiving ART at AKTH, Kano State, Nigeria, were invited to participate in a six-month Moringa oleifera Lam. supplementation study. One hundred and seventy-seven (177) patients participated, while 27 declined. This study assesses the perception and attitude to clinical trial participation as well as the refusal of the study participants. A questionnaire interview was conducted on those who participated and those who declined. Data was analysed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. All the reasons for participation in clinical trials were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Reasons such as "To help myself" and "To improve my health" both have a perfect mean score of 1.0000 and a standard deviation of .0000, indicating reasons as the most important for participation. "To help others" (mean = 1.9379) and "Asked by the doctor" (mean = 2.4237) were moderately endorsed. "For the money" (mean = 3.0000) was the least supported among tangible reasons. Most participants understood the consent form, agreed they gained something from participating, felt respected and treated with dignity, trusted that their information would remain private, and believed the research would benefit others. Participation was largely seen as a free and meaningful choice. The most significant reasons cited for the lack of participation were time constraints (p = 0.029) and lack of money to come to the hospital for the study (p = 0.049). Clinical trials can be conducted more quickly and effectively with greater patient participation. Improving awareness will improve patient participation and retention in clinical trials, which will invariably increase access to the newest available treatments.

Keywords: clinical trials, perceptions, Participation, PLHIV, Nigeria

Received: 30 Jul 2025; Accepted: 13 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Gambo, Babashani, Gqaleni and Lebina. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Aisha Gambo, gamboaishatu@yahoo.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.