Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Ethnopharmacology

Integrated Effects of Kampo Treatment on Gastrointestinal Symptoms and Stress in Patients with Functional Dyspepsia: A Preliminary Prospective Observational Study

Provisionally accepted
Lian  LiangLian Liang1Hongyang  LiHongyang Li1Hirokazu  DoiHirokazu Doi2Yaxuan  JiangYaxuan Jiang1Satoshi  TashiroSatoshi Tashiro3Jiying  SunJiying Sun3Akihiro  KawaharaAkihiro Kawahara1Shiro  OkaShiro Oka4Masanori  ItoMasanori Ito5Keiko  Ogawa-OchiaiKeiko Ogawa-Ochiai1*
  • 1Department of Kampo Clinical Center, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan, Hiroshima, Japan
  • 2Department of Information and Management Systems, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka City, Niigata, Japan., Nagaoka, Japan
  • 3Department of Cellular Biology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Hiroshima, Japan
  • 4Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan, Hiroshima, Japan
  • 5Department of General Internal Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan., Hiroshima, Japan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Aim: This preliminary, single-center prospective observational study aimed to investigate the effects of Kampo treatment on improving gastrointestinal symptoms and reducing stress levels in patients with Functional Dyspepsia (FD). Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with FD were included and their background characteristics were collected using a Fundamental State Questionnaire. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) was used to assess gastrointestinal symptom improvement, and the Profile of Mood States Second Edition-Adult Short Form (POMS-2A) was used to evaluate stress relief both before and after treatment. Paired t-tests were used to compare the GSRS and POMS-2A scores before and after treatment. One-way ANOVA was applied to explore whether there were differences in efficacy among the three Kampo formulas, while Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the associations between patient characteristics and treatment outcomes. Results: Forty-one patients with FD were included, and thirty-three were included in the final analysis (N=41, n=33 analyzed). Following an average of 52 days of Kampo treatment (bukuryoin, heiisan, rikkunshito), there was a significant improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms, such as hunger, pain, constipation, and gastrectasia, as well as overall symptoms. Additionally, there was a significant decrease in negative mood components (anger and depression) and total mood disturbance. Marital status, smoking habits and sleep quality may serve as significant factors influencing the outcomes of Kampo treatment. Conclusion: In this exploratory and preliminary study, following Kampo treatment (bukuryoin, heiisan, rikkunshito), the trend of improvements in gastrointestinal symptoms and stress levels were observed in patients with FD. Additionally, marital status, smoking habits and sleep quality may serve as significant factors influencing treatment outcomes.

Keywords: Traditional Japanese medicine, Kampo formulas, Kampo, FunctionalDyspepsia, Dyspepsia, stress

Received: 14 Aug 2025; Accepted: 07 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Liang, Li, Doi, Jiang, Tashiro, Sun, Kawahara, Oka, Ito and Ogawa-Ochiai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Keiko Ogawa-Ochiai, ikkandoo@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.