Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1690480

This article is part of the Research TopicPharmacist and patient safety: Focus on drug safetyView all 4 articles

Clinical Pharmacist Prescriber in Primary Care in Slovenia: Prospective Non-Randomised Interventional Study Focused on Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life

Provisionally accepted
Matej  StuhecMatej Stuhec1*Alenka  KovacicAlenka Kovacic1,2Marjetka  KorparMarjetka Korpar1,3Ana  Banovic KoscakAna Banovic Koscak4Barbara  KoderBarbara Koder5Dunja  MahoricDunja Mahoric6Spela  BernikSpela Bernik7Eva  Gorup CedilnikEva Gorup Cedilnik8Vesna  HomarVesna Homar8Aleksander  StepanovićAleksander Stepanović8Danica  Rotar PavlicDanica Rotar Pavlic8
  • 1Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
  • 2Splosna bolnisnica Murska Sobota, Murska Sobota, Slovenia
  • 3Lekarna Ptuj, Ptuj, Slovenia
  • 4Goriška lekarna Nova Gorica, Rejčeva ulica 2, 5000 Nova Gorica, Slovenia, Nova Gorica, Slovenia
  • 5Gorenjske Lekarne, Kranj, Slovenia
  • 6Lekarna Toplek, Ptuj, Slovenia
  • 7Lekarniska zbornica slovenije, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • 8Univerza v Ljubljani Medicinska fakulteta, Ljubljana, Slovenia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Clinical pharmacist prescribers in primary care settings and their impact on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and clinical outcomes have not been described outside English-speaking countries. Aim: The aim of this prospective interventional pilot study was to assess the impact of pharmacist prescribers on clinical results and PROMs, while describing their development, evaluation, and implementation in Slovenia. Methods: This prospective, six-month, interventional, non-randomised study started in November 2024 and concluded in June 2025 in four primary care settings in Slovenia. Clinical pharmacists reviewed medications of patients and additionally prescribed medications based on the Collaborative Practice Agreement (CPA). In this process, they cooperated with patients and general practitioners (GPs). Only patients with an established diagnosis for selected noncommunicable chronic conditions were included. The primary outcomes were changes in PROMs, including quality of life (assessed via EQ-5D-VAS), and the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI). Secondary outcomes included the prescription acceptance rate by GPs (percentage) and adherence to treatment guidelines. Tertiary outcomes involved the number of prescriptions that met the predefined clinical outcomes. Results: The study included 119 patients, with a mean age of 72.3 years (SD = 10.0). Quality of life improved from 63.6/100 (SD = 18.7) at baseline to 71.4/100 (SD = 15.9) at the end of the study (p = 0.000), with a corresponding QALY difference of 0.0252. The effect size (Cohen's d) was 0.448 (95% CI: 0.084 to 0.812. The number needed to treat (NNT) was 4.0. During the study, clinical pharmacists prescribed 264 prescriptions to 119 patients, resulting in an acceptance rate of 91.3%. Adherence to treatment guidelines improved significantly (29.8% vs. 90.9%; p = 0.000). The effect size, expressed as an odds ratio (OR), was 25.7 (95% CI: 15.6 to 42.4). The number of prescriptions achieving the predefined clinical outcomes was significantly higher at the end of the study (70.8% vs. 6.4%; p = 0.000), with an OR of 33.9 (95% CI: 19.1 to 60.4). Deprescribing accounted for 25.3% of all protocols.Conclusions: This study demonstrates that prescriptions made by clinical pharmacists in collaboration with GPs, as specified in the CPA, improved PROMs and clinical outcomes for predefined conditions.

Keywords: Pharmacist prescriber, Clinical Pharmacy, family medicine, medicationreview, Primary Care

Received: 21 Aug 2025; Accepted: 01 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Stuhec, Kovacic, Korpar, Banovic Koscak, Koder, Mahoric, Bernik, Gorup Cedilnik, Homar, Stepanović and Rotar Pavlic. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Matej Stuhec, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.