Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Pharmacoepidemiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1690600

This article is part of the Research TopicEmerging Trends in Real-World Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety: 2025View all 6 articles

Implementation of Pharmacist Recommendations following Medication Reviews in Aged Care

Provisionally accepted
  • University of Tasmania School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Hobart, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Residential medication management reviews (RMMRs) are a government-funded program in Australia, designed to optimise medication use and enhance safety in aged care residents through reviews conducted by credentialed pharmacists. However, variability in general practitioners' (GPs) implementation of pharmacists' recommendations may limit their effectiveness. This study investigated the recommendations made by pharmacists during RMMRs, and the aspects of the recommendations that were associated with their subsequent implementation by GPs. Methods: This retrospective study analysed RMMRs from 54 aged care facilities across Tasmania, Australia between January 2020 and December 2023. Residents with at least two RMMRs spaced approximately 12 months apart were included, with data extracted from the earliest eligible RMMR as the index. Data sources included medication profiles, residents' clinical histories, RMMR reports, GP feedback forms, and follow-up RMMRs. Results: Of the 1646 index RMMRs analysed, 3774 recommendations were made (median: 2 per RMMR), with 50% (n = 1872) fully implemented by the next RMMR 12 months later. Most recommendations (91%, n = 3380) involved a change in therapy, primarily medicine cessation (49%, n = 1810) or dose reduction (21%, n = 799), with implementation rates of 51% and 49%, respectively. Common deprescribing targets included colecalciferol (n = 318, 37% implemented), proton pump inhibitors (n = 123, 43% implemented), statins (n = 145, 48% implemented), and low-dose aspirin (n = 107, 63% implemented). One in six recommendations involved a potentially inappropriate medicine (PIM) according to an Australian resource, such as antipsychotics, benzodiazepines, and opioids. Implementation rates were comparable between deprescribing of PIMs and non-PIMs (51% vs. 50%, p >0.9). Monitoring-related recommendations were significantly more likely to be implemented than those involving a change in therapy (73% vs. 48%, p <0.001). Conclusion: Half of all recommendations were implemented by GPs within 12 months, with most targeting the deprescribing of preventive or high-risk medicines. Future research should identify which recommendations GPs prioritise and the factors influencing their implementation of pharmacists' medication review recommendations, in order to enhance the effectiveness of RMMRs in aged care.

Keywords: aged care, medication review, Deprescribing, implementation, medication safety

Received: 22 Aug 2025; Accepted: 20 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ramsey, Peterson, Mirkazemi and Salahudeen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mohammed S. Salahudeen, mohammed.salahudeen@utas.edu.au

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.