- 1Department of Gastroenterology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China
- 2Department of Gastroenterology, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People’s Hospital of Shunde), Foshan, Guangdong, China
- 3Department of Surgical Oncology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China
Fibrosis is a pathological condition characterized by excessive deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) components, leading to tissue scarring and progressive organ dysfunction. The effective treatment of fibrotic diseases remains a pressing challenge in medical research. Dihydromyricetin (DHM), a principal bioactive flavonoid derived from Ampelopsis grossedentata, exhibits diverse pharmacological activities, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and autophagy-modulating effects. This comprehensive review systematically analyzes current research to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying DHM’s anti-fibrotic effects across various organ systems. Additionally, we assessed the compound’s chemical properties and toxicological profile. This review aims to advance the understanding of DHM’s therapeutic potential for fibrotic diseases, clarify associated molecular mechanisms, and highlight persistent challenges. We also propose new research directions to further decipher the mechanisms of action of this flavonoid, which may facilitate the development of novel therapeutic strategies for fibrotic diseases.
1 Introduction
Fibrosis is a pathological repair process that arises from physiological responses to chronic diseases and injuries, characterized by excessive accumulation of ECM components like collagen, fibronectin, and proteoglycans (Goetsch and Niesler, 2016). Normally, tissue repair involves coordination among inflammatory mediators, growth factors, and matrix remodeling enzymes to restore structural integrity (Winkler and Fowlkes, 2002; Jiang et al., 2007; Clarke et al., 2013). However, persistent harmful stimuli often lead to aberrant ECM deposition and fibrosis development. Fibrosis can affect multiple organs, including the heart, liver, kidneys, lungs, intestines, skin, and connective tissues, potentially compromising organ anatomy and function. According to the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GDaI, 2020), fibrotic diseases accounted for 16.5% of global mortality in 1990, a figure that increased to 17.8% by 2019. When cancer was included within the category of fibrotic diseases, their overall contribution to global deaths rose from 28.7% in 1990 to 35.4% in 2019. These findings underscore the necessity of continued research into fibrotic diseases to develop effective anti-fibrotic therapies-a critical need that remains largely unmet.
Dihydromyricetin (DHM; chemically defined as 3,5,7,3′,4′,5′-hexahydroxy-2,3-dihydroflavonol), also known as ampelopsin, is the primary active compound found in Ampelopsis grossedentata (Hand.-Mazz.) W.T.Wang (family Vitaceae). Its content in the dried leaves of A. grossedentata (commonly known as Tengcha) can account for up to 30% of the dry weight (Guo et al., 2019) (Figure 1). Recent studies have highlighted its diverse biological activities, such as anti-diabetes (Xiang et al., 2019), anti-hypertensive (Li Q. et al., 2017), anti-microbial (Shevelev et al., 2020), anti-atherosclerosis (Williams et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2020), anti-oxidative (Guo et al., 2019), anti-inflammatory (Zhou et al., 2017), and anti-carcinogenic (Tan et al., 2019) effects; Moreover, emerging evidence indicates that DHM exerts anti-fibrotic effects based on empirical evidence from preclinical studies, including in vivo animal models (e.g., rodent models of liver or lung fibrosis) and in vitro cell cultures (e.g., hepatic stellate cells or cardiac fibroblasts) (Table 1).
This review summarizes current knowledge on the pharmacology of DHM, with a focus on the pathological processes of fibrotic diseases and relevant experimental models. We suggest some research areas where this compound may exhibit beneficial effects on fibrotic diseases.
2 Pharmacokinetics of DHM in vivo
DHM contains multiple functional groups, including hydroxyl and carbonyl moieties, which contribute to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties (Ondrejicková et al., 2006; Li et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2018). However, the phenol hydroxyl groups also confer chemical instability, leading to transformations including oxidation, hydrolysis, ring fission and reduction, all contributing to metabolite formation (Xiang et al., 2017). DHM demonstrates stability in weak acidic solutions (pH1.2-4.6) but undergoes degradation under basic conditions with partial degradation observed at pH 6.0 (Ruan et al., 2005). The poor solubility of DHM represents another critical factor limiting its bioavailability. Specifically, DHM exhibits solubilities of 0.2–0.32 mg/mL in cold water (25 °C), 20 mg/mL in hot water (80 °C), and 170 mg/mL in ethanol (25 °C) (Ruan et al., 2005). Following oral administration, DHM rapidly distributes to the gastrointestinal tract but demonstrates poor systemic absorption, with an oral bioavailability of approximately 4.02% (Liu and Wang, 2017). This indicates that only a small fraction of the administered dose reaches systemic circulation compared to intravenous delivery.
In mice orally administered DHM at 100 mg/kg, peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) reached 81.3 ng/mL and 107 ng/mL, with corresponding peak times of 36.7 min and 160 min, and elimination half-lives of approximately 288 min and 367 min, respectively (Tong et al., 2015). The elimination of DHM occurs relatively rapidly, with complete clearance within approximately 12 h, suggesting minimal potential for long-term accumulation (Fan et al., 2017). DHM uptake and transport are optimized under conditions of decreasing pH (from 8.0 to 6.0), exhibiting both time- and concentration-dependent characteristics. Metabolic profiling identified eight metabolites in urine and feces, but not in plasma, generated through various pathways including glucuronidation, reduction, dihydroxylation, sulfation, and methylation (Fan et al., 2017). Another study (Zhang et al., 2007) detected seven metabolites in urine and feces (four in rat urine and three in rat fecal specimens), representing five distinct metabolic pathways: glucuronidation, reduction, dihydroxylation, isomerization, and methylation. Gut microbiota significantly influences DHM pharmacokinetics. Fecal microflora metabolizes DHM into three primary metabolites via dihydroxylation and reduction pathways, with dihydroxylation representing the dominant metabolic route (Fan et al., 2018). Fan et al. (2018) demonstrated that pseudo-germ-free rats exhibited significantly higher Cmax values compared to control animals, indicating substantial involvement of intestinal flora in DHM metabolism.
Although comprehensive toxicity studies of DHM remain limited, existing evidence suggests low acute toxicity. Zhou et al. (2001) evaluated the safety profile of A. grossedentata extract (Teng tea), which contains high DHM levels, through acute toxicity, genetic toxicity tests and 90-day feeding tests. These investigations demonstrated toxicological safety and enhanced immunological function in mice. Zhang et al. (2014) reported no significant adverse effects in mice at doses ranging from 150 mg/kg to 1.5 g/kg, while Su et al. (2009) conducted acute toxicity tests showing minimal DHM toxicity, with a maximum tolerated oral dose of 5.0 g/kg body weight in rats. These pharmacokinetic characteristics highlight the necessity for developing advanced formulation strategies to improve DHM delivery efficiency. Furthermore, additional in vivo and in vitro studies are essential to establish comprehensive safety profiles and optimize therapeutic applications.
3 DHM's pan-assay interference substances (PAINS) properties
We explicitly acknowledge that DHM contains structural features (catechol group, polyphenolic structure) that classify it as a potential PAINS compound. These properties may contribute to false-positive results through various mechanisms including redox cycling, metal chelation, non-specific protein binding, and membrane disruption (Baell et al., 2010; Bolz et al., 2021). Therefore, we have implemented the following strategy in our review:
Evidence Hierarchy System: We categorized studies based on their experimental evidence level (Table 2):
Level 1: In vitro only studies (interpreted with caution)
Level 2: In vitro with comprehensive counter-screening assays
Level 3: In vivo validation with mechanistic studies
Level 4: Multiple animal models and clinical evidence
4 Antioxidant effects of DHM
Free radicals, characterized as highly reactive molecules, initiate oxidative stress that subsequently induces cellular damage and contributes to the pathogenesis of various diseases, including cancer and neurodegenerative disorders (Sander et al., 2004; Khan et al., 2016; Houldsworth, 2024). Accumulating evidence indicates that elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) promote systemic oxidative stress, resulting in molecular and cellular alterations that drive the development of tissue fibrosis (Murrell, 1993). Experimental investigations have demonstrated that DHM effectively reduces intracellular ROS levels in cellular models, thereby conferring protection against oxidative damage. For instance, in HTR-8/SVneo trophoblast cells subjected to hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress, DHM treatment significantly attenuated oxidative injury, as evidenced by reduced levels of lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation biomarkers (Bruić et al., 2024).
The antioxidant properties of DHM are mediated through dual mechanisms: direct scavenging of oxygen free radicals and activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway, which enhances the expression of cytoprotective enzymes including glutathione peroxidase (GPx), catalase, and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1). In a nutritional intervention study utilizing growing-finishing pigs, dietary supplementation with DHM substantially improved systemic antioxidant capacity, demonstrated by enhanced total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC), elevated catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activities, and reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations. Complementary molecular analyses revealed DHM-mediated upregulation of HO-1 and NQO1 protein expression, accompanied by promoted nuclear translocation of Nrf2 and phosphorylation of ERK (Wei et al., 2022). Beyond these fundamental antioxidant mechanisms, DHM modulates multiple signaling pathways implicated in oxidative stress responses, including the MAPK (Jiang et al., 2014) and PI3K/Akt pathway (Yang et al., 2024), which collectively participate in the transcriptional regulation of detoxifying and antioxidant enzymes. Substantial experimental evidence confirms that DHM activates the ERK/Nrf2/HO-1 signaling axis, thereby amplifying cellular antioxidant responses while concurrently suppressing inflammatory processes (Wei et al., 2022; Hu et al., 2018; Luo et al., 2017). Additionally, DHM influences the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) pathway, potentially reducing the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and further reinforcing its cytoprotective function against oxidative damage (Sukhovskaya et al., 2023). Through coordinated regulation of these interconnected signaling networks, DHM not only safeguards cellular integrity against oxidative stress but also promotes the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. These comprehensive mechanisms underscore the significant potential of DHM in mitigating oxidative stress and its implications for the prevention and treatment of fibrotic diseases.
5 Anti-inflammatory effects of DHM
Research has demonstrated that DHM exerts anti-inflammatory effects through multiple molecular mechanisms. In lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated macrophages, DHM potently inhibits the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway, thereby reducing the secretion of key pro-inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) (Sukhovskaya et al., 2023). Furthermore, DHM exhibits bidirectional regulatory capacity over macrophage polarization attenuating the pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype while concurrently promoting the polarization of anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages (Zhou et al., 2022). Furthermore, DHM demonstrates significant modulatory activity in mast cell, effectively suppressing degranulation and regulating the release of inflammatory mediator (Xiao et al., 2021). This multimodal immunomodulatory mechanism highlights DHM’s therapeutic potential in resolving inflammation and promoting tissue repair. Further investigations have revealed that DHM’s anti-inflammatory activities involve orchestrated regulation of complex signaling networks. In viral infection models, DHM interacts specifically with Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) to suppress activation of inflammatory transcription factors, thereby reducing cytokine release during herpes simplex virus infection (Takeda et al., 2011; Sauter et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2020). Additionally, DHM attenuates influenza virus-induced immunopathology by inhibiting the TLR3 signaling pathway (Zhou et al., 2020). In metabolic contexts, DHM activates the Ca2+-CaMKK-AMPK pathway, improving insulin sensitivity and ameliorating inflammation-driven insulin resistance (Hou et al., 2021). The compound also manifests significant anti-inflammatory effects through modulation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway in multiple disease models (Song et al., 2024). The significance of these broad anti-inflammatory mechanisms is particularly evident in the context of fibrosis pathogenesis, wherein chronic inflammation acts as a primary instigator and sustained driver. The persistent inflammatory milieu, characterized by the infiltration of innate and adaptive immune cells and their release of pro-fibrotic mediators, orchestrates the activation of resident fibroblasts and their differentiation into collagen-producing myofibroblasts, ultimately leading to excessive ECM deposition and organ dysfunction. Thus, the ability of DHM to target these key upstream inflammatory pathways presents a crucial therapeutic strategy for mitigating fibrosis progression. Collectively, these findings underscore the considerable therapeutic potential of DHM as a multi-targeted agent against various inflammatory diseases, highlighting its promise for the development of novel therapeutic strategies.
6 Anti-fibrosis effect of DHM
6.1 Effects of DHM in animal models of liver fibrosis
Liver fibrosis results from chronic injury caused by various stimuli including viral infections, alcohol consumption, cholestasis, autoimmune responses, and drug toxicity, leading to excessive deposition of fibrous connective tissue, architectural distortion, and ultimately functional impairment. The activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) represents a central event in the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis (Zhang et al., 2016). Upon liver injury, quiescent HSCs transdifferentiate into proliferative, contractile, and fibrogenic myofibroblasts that secrete large amounts of ECM components and collagen, ultimately leading to fibrous scar formation and disruption of normal liver architecture (Tsuchida and Friedman, 2017). Alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) serves as a well-established marker of HSC activation, while transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) functions as the primary profibrogenic cytokine, with its signaling pathway being critically implicated in numerous liver diseases (Wynn and Ramalingam, 2012).
Oxidative stress not only causes persistent hepatic damage but also activates key signaling pathways such as TGF-β1/Smad and NF-κB, collectively promoting the development and progression of liver fibrosis (Gao et al., 2021). Zhao et al. (2021) demonstrated that in a thioacetamide (TAA)-induced liver fibrosis model in ICR mice, daily administration of DHM (20–40 mg/kg) via oral gavage reduced inflammatory cell infiltration in liver lobules, attenuated collagen deposition, and diminished the liver weight increase associated with fibrosis. Furthermore, DHM treatment enhanced the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), decreased serum levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in hepatic malondialdehyde (MDA) content. These findings indicate that DHM alleviates TAA-induced oxidative stress and liver injury, exhibiting hepatoprotective effects. Further investigations revealed that DHM effectively suppresses TGF-β1 secretion and α-SMA expression, inhibiting HSC activation and thereby attenuating liver fibrosis progression. Additionally, DHM ameliorates liver fibrosis by inhibiting NF-κB signaling activation, reducing the release of inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α and interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and increasing the expression of anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL.
Natural killer (NK) cells play a crucial role in liver fibrosis regression by producing interferon-γ (IFN-γ), which acts through the JAK/STAT signaling pathway to block TGF-β signaling and exert antifibrotic effects (Jeong et al., 2006). NK cells can also directly kill activated HSCs and promote their apoptosis (Fasbender et al., 2016). Studies have shown that DHM (100 mg/kg/d) reduces serum ALT and AST levels in mice, ameliorating liver inflammation and fibrosis. In vitro experiments using the human hepatic stellate cell line LX-2 demonstrated that pre-incubation with DHM (at concentrations >30 μmol/L) significantly suppressed collagen type I (Col-I) and α-SMA protein expression. Mechanistic studies confirmed that DHM activates both NF-κB and JAK/STAT3 signaling pathways to stimulate IFN-γ production, induce autophagy, and enhance NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity, thereby inhibiting HSC activation and attenuating liver fibrosis progression (Zhou et al., 2021). Ma’s team (Ma et al., 2019)further demonstrated that DHM inhibits HSC activation by modulating the SIRT1/TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling and autophagy pathways, effectively attenuating CCL4-induced hepatic fibrosis.
6.2 Effects of DHM in animal models of pulmonary fibrosis
Multiple etiological factors contribute to pulmonary fibrosis pathogenesis, including pharmaceutical agents, particulate matter exposure, viral infections, and chronic inflammatory stimuli. Pulmonary fibrosis is characterized by irreversible alveolar epithelial cell injury, aberrant fibroblast proliferation, and excessive ECM deposition, leading to compromised pulmonary function, elevated airway resistance, and respiratory insufficiency. These pathological changes severely compromise quality of life and may ultimately prove fatal (Thannickal et al., 2004).
Persistent inflammatory stimuli promote excessive division and proliferation of pulmonary fibroblasts, accelerating their differentiation into myofibroblasts and resulting in pathological ECM accumulation, thereby driving pulmonary fibrosis progression (Tao et al., 2021). Experimental studies have demonstrated the therapeutic potential of DHM in pulmonary fibrosis management. In a bleomycin (BLM)-induced lung injury murine model, DHM administration significantly attenuated pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. Specifically, DHM effectively inhibited fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition, consequently reducing pulmonary collagen deposition and fibrotic lesion formation. Furthermore, studies indicate that DHM exerts its anti-fibrotic effects through modulation of the STAT3 signaling pathway, which plays an indispensable role in fibroblast activation and ECM production (Li et al., 2022). Notably, studies revealed that DHM significantly suppresses inflammatory cell infiltration in pulmonary tissues and improves respiratory function, representing a crucial mechanism for alleviating pulmonary fibrosis (Xiao et al., 2021). Mechanistic investigations established that DHM mediates its protective effects primarily through reduction of pro-fibrotic markers and inflammatory cytokines, which effectively suppresses fibrotic responses and creates a favorable microenvironment for lung tissue repair (Matouk et al., 2023).
TGF-β1 induces pulmonary fibroblast activation and regulates the TGF-β1/Smad signaling axis, thereby promoting pulmonary fibrosis development (Chaikuad and Bullock, 2016). Pharmacological modulation of the TGF-β1/Smad pathway represents a promising therapeutic target for pulmonary fibrosis intervention. Xiao et al. (2021) established a BLM-induced pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis model in C57/BL6 mice, with experimental groups receiving DHM at doses of 50–200 mg/kg/day. DHM treatment significantly ameliorated pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis compared to control animals. Additional investigations demonstrated that DHM reduces early inflammatory factor secretion and inhibits inflammatory cell infiltration, thereby substantially alleviating pulmonary inflammation and improving lung function, demonstrating its potential as a therapeutic agent. In vitro studies further confirmed that DHM significantly inhibits fibroblast migration and ECM production through regulation of the TGF-β1/Smad signaling pathway, suggesting that DHM may effectively ameliorate pulmonary inflammatory and fibrotic pathologies.
6.3 Effects of DHM in animal and cell models of cardiac fibrosis
Multiple cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension, cardiomyopathy, and myocardial infarction, contribute to myocardial fibrosis pathogenesis. This condition is characterized by aberrant cardiac fibroblast proliferation and excessive ECM deposition, ultimately compromising normal cardiac architecture and precipitating functional impairments, including heart failure, arrhythmias, and even sudden cardiac death (González et al., 2018).
Research has confirmed that oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in the initiation and progression of myocardial fibrosis (Guillory et al., 2018). NADPH oxidase (NOX),a key enzymatic source of reactive oxygen species in the cardiovascular system (Holterman et al., 2015), exhibits upregulated expression and dysregulated activity under pathological conditions. Such alterations exacerbate oxidative damage to cardiac fibroblasts and promote ECM accumulation, thereby driving myocardial fibrosis progression (Wang et al., 2021). Therefore, targeting oxidative stress and its associated molecular components-including proteins, cytokines, and signaling pathways-represents a crucial therapeutic strategy for myocardial fibrosis intervention. Song et al. (2017) established a cardiac fibroblast proliferation model in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats using angiotensin II (Ang II), with subsequent DHM intervention. The results demonstrated that DHM inhibited cardiac fibroblast proliferation in both concentration-dependent (20, 40, 80 μmol/L) and time-dependent (4, 12, 24 h) manners. Specifically, DHM suppressed the expression of Col-I, Col-III, and α-SMA.
Furthermore, administration of a high concentration (320 μmol/L) of DHM demonstrated no significant cytotoxicity, thereby eliminating potential confounding effects on fibroblast proliferation. Additionally, DHM significantly reduced myocardial MDA levels and nitric oxide (NO) concentrations, while enhancing superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and T-AOC. These findings also indicated that DHM not only suppressed p22phox expression but also increased the levels of antioxidant proteins, including SOD and thioredoxin (Trx) in Ang II-stimulated myocardial fibroblasts (Suresh et al., 2015).
AMPK regulates SIRT3 expression, thereby attenuating myocardial fibrosis progression by reducing oxidative stress levels (Chen et al., 2017). Wu et al. (2017) established a streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) model in C57BL/6 mice and administered DHM (100 mg/kg/day) via oral gavage. The results demonstrated that myocardial fibrosis was significantly attenuated and cardiac function was improved in DHM-treated mice compared to controls, concomitant with reduced myocardial MDA content and enhanced T-AOC. Further mechanistic investigations revealed that DHM upregulated SIRT3 expression while downregulating receptor-interacting protein kinase 3 (RIPK3) in myocardial tissues. Additionally, DHM enhanced the expression of antioxidant proteins and regulated the AMPK/SIRT3 signaling pathway, thereby mitigating oxidative stress-mediated myocardial damage and alleviating fibrotic remodeling through coordinated modulation of the AMPK/SIRT3 signaling axis.
6.4 Effects of DHM in animal models of renal fibrosis
Renal fibrosis represents a common pathological endpoint in numerous chronic kidney diseases, including primary glomerulonephritis, diabetic nephropathy, and obstructive nephropathy, ultimately progressing to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The primary pathological features encompass epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of renal tubular epithelial cells, excessive deposition of ECM in glomerular and interstitial compartments, and persistent fibroblast activation, culminating in tubular injury, reduced glomerular filtration rate, and architectural and functional impairment of renal tissue (Nogueira et al., 2017).
Accumulating evidence has established TGF-β1 as a pivotal cytokine driving renal fibrogenesis. TGF-β1 activates the TGF-β1/Smads signaling pathway, promoting EMT-mediated transformation of renal tubular cells into myofibroblasts, thereby exacerbating fibrotic processes (Ma and Meng, 2019). Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) represents a major etiology of renal fibrosis, wherein hyperglycemic conditions enhance TGF-β1 activity and upregulate TGF-β1 mRNA expression, stimulating fibroblast proliferation and ECM deposition that accelerate renal interstitial fibrosis (RIF) progression (Zhao et al., 2020). Liu ZL. et al. (2019) established a DKD model in SD rats using STZ and administered DHM at doses of 125, 250, and 500 mg/kg/day via oral gavage for 12 weeks. Post-treatment assessment revealed significant reductions in 24-h urinary protein excretion, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and serum creatinine (Scr) levels compared to control animals. Histopathological analysis revealed that DHM treatment ameliorated glomerular basement membrane thickening and collagen fiber proliferation. These findings indicate DHM’s nephroprotective effects against DKD-induced renal damage and fibrosis. Further mechanistic studies demonstrated that DHM downregulated TGF-β1 and Smad2 protein expression while upregulating Smad7, suggesting inhibition of TGF-β1/Smads pathway activation. Li JL. et al. (2017) investigated DHM in high glucose-stimulated mesangial cells (MCs), revealing that DHM binds directly to Smad2, inhibits its phosphorylation, and suppresses TGF-β/Smads signaling activation, thereby improving DKD-associated glomerulosclerosis.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) regulates phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), consequently negatively modulating the PI3K/AKT pathway and attenuating renal fibrosis (Cong et al., 2020). The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway represents a key signaling cascade mediating fibrotic processes in various renal pathologies, including diabetic nephropathy and acute kidney injury. This pathway critically controls renal fibrogenesis through PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling regulation (Dou et al., 2019).
MiR-155-5p is predominantly expressed in mesangial cells, glomerular endothelial cells and renal tubules, highlighting its pathological relevance in diabetic nephropathy (DN). Elevated miR-155-5p levels in renal tissues of DN patients promote RIF progression and inhibit autophagy in renal interstitial fibroblasts, with expression levels correlating with DKD severity (Klimczak et al., 2017). Guo et al. (2020) established a DN model in 6-week-old SD rats, treating them with 100 mg/kg/day DHM for 10 weeks. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated elevated expression of Col-IV and α-SMA in the DN group compared to normal controls, while DHM treatment attenuated these increases. Notably, DHM not only reduced miR-155-5p expression but also enhanced PTEN expression.
Mechanistic investigations revealed that DHM primarily inhibits RIF progression and promotes renal interstitial cell autophagy by suppressing miR-155-5p expression and modulating both PI3K/AKT/mTOR and miR-155-5p/PTEN signaling pathways. Autophagy induction constitutes a crucial protective mechanism against cellular damage, potentially ameliorating renal impairment in human kidney diseases (Hartleben et al., 2010). The PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway represents a classical regulatory mechanism associated with autophagy (Sun et al., 2013). In this study, DHM promoted high glucose (HG)-induced autophagy in NRK-52E cells and reduced renal fibrosis (Guo et al., 2020). Additionally, studies indicate that DHM alleviates oxidative stress by enhancing expression of antioxidant proteins, particularly nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), which is crucial for cellular protection (Wang et al., 2020). DHM inhibits Smad3 activation, an essential component of TGF-β signaling, thereby preventing fibroblast activation and collagen production (Wang et al., 2020).
MiR-34a serves as a transcriptional target of p53, regulating cell cycle progression and apoptosis (Slabáková et al., 2017). Klotho, primarily expressed in renal tubular epithelial cells, functions as an important endogenous inhibitor of renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Initially identified as an anti-aging gene, Klotho plays significant roles in protecting against acute and chronic kidney injury (Satoh et al., 2012). Liu Y. et al. (2019) demonstrated increased miR-34a expression in renal tubular epithelial cells of patients with renal fibrosis and unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) mice (Liu et al., 2018). Using miR-34a knockout mice, they confirmed that miR-34a promotes renal fibrosis by downregulating Klotho. In vitro experiments showed that TGF-β1-stimulated human renal tubular epithelial cells (HK-2) exhibited increased miR-34a and α-SMA expression along with enhanced collagen deposition. DHM treatment inhibited both p53/miR-34a/sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) and TGF-β1/Smads signaling pathways, upregulating Klotho expression and consequently attenuating renal fibrosis (Wang et al., 2020). Collectively, these findings suggest that DHM represents a promising therapeutic candidate for patients with chronic kidney disease and renal fibrosis.
6.5 Effects of DHM in animal models of intestinal fibrosis
Intestinal fibrosis represents a serious complication associated with Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). In this pathology, excessive accumulation of ECM leads to a progressive loss of intestinal tissue elasticity, resulting in luminal narrowing and a substantial decline in the patient’s quality of life. The pathophysiology of intestinal fibrosis is complex, involving EMT, activation of intestinal fibroblasts, and chronic inflammation. Inflammation is often seen as a precursor to fibrosis; however, evidence indicates that fibrotic progression can persist independently of active inflammation. TGF-β is a key driver of fibroblast activation and ECM production in this process. Additionally, the intestinal microbiota is implicated in the pathogenesis of intestinal fibrosis, whereby microbial dysbiosis can promote fibroblast activation and fibrotic reactions (Chen et al., 2021; Watanabe and Kamada, 2022).
Emerging research suggests that DHM alleviates intestinal fibrosis by inducing autophagy in colonic fibroblasts, thereby inhibiting their activation and proliferation (Wang et al., 2024). This effect is potentially mediated through the regulation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, a pivotal pathway regulating autophagy and cell survival. By promoting autophagic flux, DHM inhibits fibroblast activation, thereby attenuating the progression of intestinal fibrosis (Wang et al., 2024). This protective property positions DHM as a potential therapeutic agent for conditions characterized by intestinal fibrosis.
6.6 Effects of DHM in animal models of other fibrotic diseases
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disorder that primarily affects multiple joints. Joint impairment facilitates the infiltration of numerous immune cells into the synovial tissue, leading to synovial swelling, joint deformity, and progressive functional impairment (McInnes and Schett, 2011). Under physiological conditions, synovial fibroblasts maintain joint homeostasis by providing nutritional support and lubrication. However, upon immune cell infiltration, synovial fibroblasts undergo pathological proliferation and migration, contributing to progressive destruction of bone and articular cartilage. Consequently, targeting synovial fibroblasts and modulating joint inflammation represent promising strategies for RA therapy. Wu et al. (2019) established a collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) rat model to investigate RA pathogenesis. DHM was administered intraperitoneally at doses of 5, 25, and 50 mg/kg every other day for 5 weeks. DHM treatment significantly ameliorated clinical signs, including paw erythema and edema, in RA-induced rats. Histopathological examination of knee joints and analysis of peripheral blood cytokine levels further confirmed the potent anti-arthritic effects of DHM, demonstrating its ability to mitigate synovitis and systemic inflammatory responses. Mechanistically, DHM suppressed the phosphorylation of IκB kinase (IKK) and IκBα, significantly reducing IL-1β-induced nuclear translocation of NF-κB in fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs).
Hypertrophic scarring (HPS) is characterized by dysregulated wound healing, featuring excessive ECM deposition and aberrant fibroblast activity. HPS tissue is predominantly composed of fibroblasts and collagen types I and III (Col-I, Col-III), commonly resulting from burns, trauma, or surgical interventions. Fibroblasts in HPS exhibit elevated levels of activin receptor-like kinase 5 (ALK5) compared to normal skin tissues (Tsujita-Kyutoku et al., 2005). The TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway is critically involved in the pathogenesis of proliferative scars, wherein Smad2 and Smad3 proteins bind to the TGF-β type I receptor (ALK5) and undergo phosphorylation, thereby activating downstream fibrotic responses. Ye et al. (2019) established a mechanical traction-induced HPS model in mice. Subsequent daily subcutaneous injections of approximately 50 μmol/L DHM for 14 days significantly reduced scar area, cross-sectional dimensions, cellular proliferation index, and collagen density. Further investigations revealed that DHM selectively inhibits ALK5 within the TGF-β/Smad pathway, leading to downregulation of Smad2 and suppression of Smad3 phosphorylation. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of DHM for HPS management.
7 Conclusions and future prospects
This review systematically summarizes the mechanisms of DHM against fibrotic diseases, with particular emphasis on its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and autophagy-modulating properties (Figure 2). Although accumulating evidence suggests the anti-fibrotic potential of DHM, its pan-assay interference (PAINS) behavior urge cautious interpretation of existing data, particularly from studies relying solely on in vitro models, which may overestimate its target-specific efficacy.
Figure 2. The mechanism and signaling pathway of DHM in various fibrotic diseases. Abbreviations: DHM,Dihydromyricetin; IL-1β,Interleukin-1β; AKT, protein kinase B; PI3K,Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; AMPK, Adenosine 5′-monophosphate activated protein; NF-κB, Nuclear factor-κB; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; T-AOC, total antioxidant, capacity; SOD, superoxide dismutase; IFN-γ,interferon-γ.
To better establish the therapeutic relevance of DHM, future studies should focus on the following key directions:
- Employing advanced target engagement assays to confirm mechanistic specificity;
- Incorporating counter-screening strategies to exclude PAINS-related artifacts;
- Prioritizing *in vivo* validation using dosing regimens guided by pharmacokinetic studies;
- Investigating active metabolites of DHM that retain efficacy without PAINS-associated liabilities.
Moreover, although current evidence is largely derived from animal and cellular studies, clinical evidence remains limited. To advance the translational progress of DHM, the following approaches warrant priority:
- Conducting rigorously designed clinical trials to validate preclinical observations;
- Overcoming critical pharmacokinetic challenges, including low oral bioavailability and suboptimal intestinal absorption.
In conclusion, DHM demonstrates promising anti-fibrotic properties supported by consistent in vivo outcomes across multiple organ systems. However, future efforts must rigorously address its PAINS characteristics and accelerate clinical translation to fully realize its therapeutic potential.
Author contributions
X-CW: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review and editing, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft. PM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – original draft. Z-HY: Writing – review and editing, Data curation. Z-SQ: Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The authors declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by Gansu Provincial Hospital’s Science and technology innovation platform fund project (No. 21GSSYB-23), Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (No. 24JRRA585).
Acknowledgements
We appreciate the contributions of all the doctors, coworkers, and friends involved in this study. We also thank the editors and reviewers for their valuable help in refining this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Abbreviations
DHM, Dihydromyricetin; ECM, extracellular matrix; ROS, reactive oxygen species; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; HO-1, heme oxygenase-1; T- AOC, total antioxidant capacity; CAT, catalase; GSHPx, glutathione peroxidase; MDA, malondialdehyde; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; HSCs, hepatic stellate cells; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; MMP1, matrix metalloproteinase 1; α-SMA, alpha-smooth muscle actin; SOD, superoxide dismutase; UUO, ureteral obstruction; CD, Crohn’s disease; UC, ulcerative colitis; EMT, epithelial mesenchymal transition; RA, Rheumatoid arthritis; FLSs, fibroblast-like synoviocytes; HPS, Hypertrophic scarring.
References
Baell, J. B., and Holloway, G. A. (2010). New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays. J. Med. Chem. 53 (7), 2719–2740. doi:10.1021/jm901137j
Bolz, S. N., Adasme, M. F., and Schroeder, M. (2021). Toward an understanding of pan-assay interference compounds and promiscuity: a structural perspective on binding modes. J. Chem. Inf. Model 61 (5), 2248–2262. doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01227
Bruić, M., Pirković, A., Borozan, S., Nacka Aleksić, M., Jovanović Krivokuća, M., and Spremo-Potparević, B. (2024). Antioxidative and anti-inflammatory effects of taxifolin in H(2)O(2)-induced oxidative stress in HTR-8/SVneo trophoblast cell line. Reprod. Toxicol. 126, 108585. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2024.108585
Chaikuad, A., and Bullock, A. N. (2016). Structural basis of intracellular TGF-β signaling: receptors and smads. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8 (11), a022111. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a022111
Chen, Y., Chen, C., Dong, B., Xing, F., Huang, H., Yao, F., et al. (2017). AMPK attenuates ventricular remodeling and dysfunction following aortic banding in mice via the Sirt3/Oxidative stress pathway. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 814, 335–342. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.08.042
Chen, B., Dong, W., Shao, T., Miao, X., Guo, Y., Liu, X., et al. (2021). A KDM4-DBC1-SIRT1 axis contributes to TGF-b induced mesenchymal transition of intestinal epithelial cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 697614. doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.697614
Clarke, D. L., Carruthers, A. M., Mustelin, T., and Murray, L. A. (2013). Matrix regulation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: the role of enzymes. Fibrogenes. Tissue Repair 6 (1), 20. doi:10.1186/1755-1536-6-20
Cong, L. H., Li, T., Wang, H., Wu, Y. N., Wang, S. P., Zhao, Y. Y., et al. (2020). IL-17A-producing T cells exacerbate fine particulate matter-induced lung inflammation and fibrosis by inhibiting PI3K/Akt/mTOR-mediated autophagy. J. Cell Mol. Med. 24 (15), 8532–8544. doi:10.1111/jcmm.15475
Dou, F., Liu, Y., Liu, L., Wang, J., Sun, T., Mu, F., et al. (2019). Aloe-emodin ameliorates renal fibrosis Via inhibiting PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in vivo and in vitro. Rejuvenation Res. 22 (3), 218–229. doi:10.1089/rej.2018.2104
Fan, L., Tong, Q., Dong, W., Yang, G., Hou, X., Xiong, W., et al. (2017). Tissue distribution, excretion, and metabolic profile of dihydromyricetin, a flavonoid from Vine tea (Ampelopsis grossedentata) after oral administration in rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 65 (23), 4597–4604. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01155
Fan, L., Zhao, X., Tong, Q., Zhou, X., Chen, J., Xiong, W., et al. (2018). Interactions of dihydromyricetin, a flavonoid from Vine tea (Ampelopsis grossedentata) with gut microbiota. J. Food Sci. 83 (5), 1444–1453. doi:10.1111/1750-3841.14128
Fasbender, F., Widera, A., Hengstler, J. G., and Watzl, C. (2016). Natural killer cells and liver fibrosis. Front. Immunol. 7, 19. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2016.00019
Gao, Y., Yuan, D., Gai, L., Wu, X., Shi, Y., He, Y., et al. (2021). Saponins from Panax japonicus ameliorate age-related renal fibrosis by inhibition of inflammation mediated by NF-κB and TGF-β1/Smad signaling and suppression of oxidative stress via activation of Nrf2-ARE signaling. J. Ginseng Res. 45 (3), 408–419. doi:10.1016/j.jgr.2020.08.005
GDaI, C. (2020). Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet 396 (10258), 1204–1222. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9
Goetsch, K. P., and Niesler, C. U. (2016). The extracellular matrix regulates the effect of decorin and transforming growth factor beta-2 (TGF-β2) on myoblast migration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 479 (2), 351–357. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.09.079
González, A., Schelbert, E. B., Díez, J., and Butler, J. (2018). Myocardial interstitial fibrosis in heart failure: biological and translational perspectives. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 71 (15), 1696–1706. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.021
Guillory, A. N., Mustafa, R., and Hijjawi, T. (2018). Oxidative stress and cardiac remodeling: an updated edge. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 14 (1), 53–59. doi:10.2174/1573403X14666180111145207
Guo, L., Zhang, H., and Yan, X. (2019). Protective effect of dihydromyricetin revents fatty liver through nuclear factor-κB/p53/B-cell lymphoma 2-associated X protein signaling pathways in a rat model. Mol. Med. Rep. 19 (3), 1638–1644. doi:10.3892/mmr.2018.9783
Guo, L., Tan, K., Luo, Q., and Bai, X. (2020). Dihydromyricetin promotes autophagy and attenuates renal interstitial fibrosis by regulating miR-155-5p/PTEN signaling in diabetic nephropathy. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 20 (3), 372–380. doi:10.17305/bjbms.2019.4410
Hartleben, B., Godel, M., Meyer-Schwesinger, C., Liu, S., Ulrich, T., Köbler, S., et al. (2010). Autophagy influences glomerular disease susceptibility and maintains podocyte homeostasis in aging mice. J. Clin. Invest 120 (4), 1084–1096. doi:10.1172/JCI39492
Holterman, C. E., Read, N. C., and Kennedy, C. R. (2015). Nox and renal disease. Clin. Sci. (Lond). 128 (8), 465–481. doi:10.1042/CS20140361
Hou, L., Jiang, F., Huang, B., Zheng, W., Jiang, Y., Cai, G., et al. (2021). Dihydromyricetin ameliorates inflammation-induced insulin resistance via phospholipase C-CaMKK-AMPK signal pathway. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2021, 8542809. doi:10.1155/2021/8542809
Houldsworth, A. (2024). Role of oxidative stress in neurodegenerative disorders: a review of reactive oxygen species and prevention by antioxidants. Brain Commun. 6 (1), fcad356. doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcad356
Hu, Q., Zhang, T., Yi, L., Zhou, X., and Mi, M. (2018). Dihydromyricetin inhibits NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent pyroptosis by activating the Nrf2 signaling pathway in vascular endothelial cells. Biofactors 44 (2), 123–136. doi:10.1002/biof.1395
Jeong, W. I., Park, O., Radaeva, S., and Gao, B. (2006). STAT1 inhibits liver fibrosis in mice by inhibiting stellate cell proliferation and stimulating NK cell cytotoxicity. Hepatology 44 (6), 1441–1451. doi:10.1002/hep.21419
Jiang, D., Liang, J., and Noble, P. W. (2007). Hyaluronan in tissue injury and repair. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 23, 435–461. doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123337
Jiang, B., Le, L., Pan, H., Hu, K., Xu, L., and Xiao, P. (2014). Dihydromyricetin ameliorates the oxidative stress response induced by methylglyoxal via the AMPK/GLUT4 signaling pathway in PC12 cells. Brain Res. Bull. 109, 117–126. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2014.10.010
Khan, T. A., Hassan, I., Ahmad, A., Perveen, A., Aman, S., Quddusi, S., et al. (2016). Recent updates on the dynamic association between oxidative stress and neurodegenerative disorders. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 15 (3), 310–320. doi:10.2174/1871527315666160202124518
Klimczak, D., Kuch, M., Pilecki, T., Żochowska, D., Wirkowska, A., and Pączek, L. (2017). Plasma microRNA-155-5p is increased among patients with chronic kidney disease and nocturnal hypertension. J. Am. Soc. Hypertens. 11 (12), 831–841.e4. doi:10.1016/j.jash.2017.10.008
Li, X., Liu, J., Lin, J., Wang, T., Huang, J., Lin, Y., et al. (2016). Protective effects of dihydromyricetin against · OH-induced mesenchymal stem cells damage and mechanistic chemistry. Molecules 21 (5), 604. doi:10.3390/molecules21050604
Li, Q., Wang, J., Zhu, X., Zeng, Z., Wu, X., Xu, Y., et al. (2017a). Dihydromyricetin prevents monocrotaline-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension in rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 96, 825–833. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.007
Li, J. L., Guo, X. H., Wu, Y. J., Huang, Z. W., Liu, S. Q., and Wu, S. Z. (2017b). Effect of dihydromyricetin on high glucose-induced glomerular mesangial cell proliferation and fibronectin accumulation. China Pharm. 28 (34), 4784–4787. doi:10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2017.34.08
Li, Z., Geng, J., Xie, B., He, J., Wang, J., Peng, L., et al. (2022). Dihydromyricetin alleviates pulmonary fibrosis by regulating abnormal fibroblasts through the STAT3/p-STAT3/GLUT1 signaling pathway. Front. Pharmacol. 13, 834604. doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.834604
Liu, J., and Wang, F. (2017). Role of neuroinflammation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: cellular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Front. Immunol. 8, 1005. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01005
Liu, C. M., Yang, W., Ma, J. Q., Yang, H. X., Feng, Z. J., Sun, J. M., et al. (2018). Dihydromyricetin inhibits lead-induced cognitive impairments and inflammation by the adenosine 5'-Monophosphate-Activated protein kinase pathway in mice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 66 (30), 7975–7982. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.8b02433
Liu, Z. L., Zhang, J. D., Peng, W., Wu, S. Z., and Xiao, H. (2019a). The effect of dihydromyricetin on renal fibrosis in diabetic nephropathy rats. J. Gannan Med. Univ. 39 (6), 541–545.
Liu, Y., Bi, X., Xiong, J., Han, W., Xiao, T., Xu, X., et al. (2019b). MicroRNA-34a promotes renal fibrosis by downregulation of klotho in tubular epithelial cells. Mol. Ther. 27 (5), 1051–1065. doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.02.009
Luo, Y., Lu, S., Dong, X., Xu, L., Sun, G., and Sun, X. (2017). Dihydromyricetin protects human umbilical vein endothelial cells from injury through ERK and akt mediated Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway. Apoptosis 22 (8), 1013–1024. doi:10.1007/s10495-017-1381-3
Ma, T. T., and Meng, X. M. (2019). TGF-β/Smad and renal fibrosis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1165, 347–364. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8871-2_16
Ma, J. Q., Sun, Y. Z., Ming, Q. L., Tian, Z. K., Yang, H. X., and Liu, C. M. (2019). Ampelopsin attenuates carbon tetrachloride-induced mouse liver fibrosis and hepatic stellate cell activation associated with the SIRT1/TGF-β1/Smad3 and autophagy pathway. Int. Immunopharmacol. 77, 105984. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105984
Matouk, A. I., Awad, E. M., El-Tahawy, N. F. G., El-Sheikh, A. A. K., and Anter, A. (2023). Dihydromyricetin modulates Nrf2 and NF-κB crosstalk to alleviate methotrexate-induced lung toxicity. Pharm. (Basel) 16 (4), 481. doi:10.3390/ph16040481
McInnes, I. B., and Schett, G. (2011). The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 365 (23), 2205–2219. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1004965
Murrell, D. F. (1993). A radical proposal for the pathogenesis of scleroderma. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol 28 (1), 78–85. doi:10.1016/0190-9622(93)70014-k
Nogueira, A., Pires, M. J., and Oliveira, P. A. (2017). Pathophysiological mechanisms of renal fibrosis: a review of animal models and therapeutic strategies. Vivo 31 (1), 1–22. doi:10.21873/invivo.11019
Ondrejicková, O., Rapková, M., Snirc, V., Dubovický, M., Jariabka, P., Zacharová, S., et al. (2006). Content of protein carbonyl groups in gerbil brain after reversible bilateral carotid occlusion: effect of 2,3-dihydromelatonin. Neuro Endocrinol. Lett. 27 (Suppl. 2), 156–159.
Ruan, L. P., Yu, B. Y., Fu, G. M., and Zhu, D. N. (2005). Improving the solubility of ampelopsin by solid dispersions and inclusion complexes. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 38 (3), 457–464. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2005.01.030
Sander, C. S., Chang, H., Hamm, F., Elsner, P., and Thiele, J. J. (2004). Role of oxidative stress and the antioxidant network in cutaneous carcinogenesis. Int. J. Dermatol 43 (5), 326–335. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02222.x
Satoh, M., Nagasu, H., Morita, Y., Yamaguchi, T. P., Kanwar, Y. S., and Kashihara, N. (2012). Klotho protects against mouse renal fibrosis by inhibiting Wnt signaling. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 303 (12), F1641–F1651. doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00460.2012
Sauter, M. M., Gauger, J. J., and Brandt, C. R. (2014). Oligonucleotides designed to inhibit TLR9 block Herpes simplex virus type 1 infection at multiple steps. Antivir. Res. 109, 83–96. doi:10.1016/j.antiviral.2014.06.015
Shevelev, A. B., La Porta, N., Isakova, E. P., Martens, S., Biryukova, Y. K., Belous, A. S., et al. (2020). In vivo antimicrobial and wound-healing activity of resveratrol, dihydroquercetin, and dihydromyricetin against Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans. Pathogens 9 (4), 296. doi:10.3390/pathogens9040296
Slabáková, E., Culig, Z., Remšík, J., and Souček, K. (2017). Alternative mechanisms of miR-34a regulation in cancer. Cell Death Dis. 8 (10), e3100. doi:10.1038/cddis.2017.495
Song, Q., Liu, L., Yu, J., Zhang, J., Xu, M., Sun, L., et al. (2017). Dihydromyricetin attenuated Ang II induced cardiac fibroblasts proliferation related to inhibitory of oxidative stress. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 807, 159–167. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.04.014
Song, D., Yang, Q., Li, X., Chen, K., Tong, J., and Shen, Y. (2024). The role of the JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway in acquired corneal diseases. Exp. Eye Res. 238, 109748. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2023.109748
Su, D., Huang, J., and Yao, M. (2009). The acute toxicological evaluation of dihydromyricetin and its control effect for alcoholic hepatic injury. Hunan Agric. Sci. 11, 90–93. doi:10.16498/j.cnki.hnnykx.2009.11.034
Sukhovskaya, I. V., Lysenko, L. A., Fokina, N. N., Kantserova, N. P., and Borvinskaya, E. V. (2023). Survival, growth performance, and hepatic antioxidant and lipid profiles in infected rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed a diet supplemented with dihydroquercetin and arabinogalactan. Anim. (Basel) 13 (8), 1345. doi:10.3390/ani13081345
Sun, H., Wang, Z., and Yakisich, J. S. (2013). Natural products targeting autophagy via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway as anticancer agents. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 13 (7), 1048–1056. doi:10.2174/18715206113139990130
Suresh, S. C., Selvaraju, V., Thirunavukkarasu, M., Goldman, J. W., Husain, A., Alexander Palesty, J., et al. (2015). Thioredoxin-1 (Trx1) engineered mesenchymal stem cell therapy increased pro-angiogenic factors, reduced fibrosis and improved heart function in the infarcted rat myocardium. Int. J. Cardiol. 201, 517–528. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.08.117
Takeda, S., Miyazaki, D., Sasaki, S., Yamamoto, Y., Terasaka, Y., Yakura, K., et al. (2011). Roles played by toll-like receptor-9 in corneal endothelial cells after herpes simplex virus type 1 infection. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52 (9), 6729–6736. doi:10.1167/iovs.11-7805
Tan, M., Jiang, B., Wang, H., Ouyang, W., Chen, X., Wang, T., et al. (2019). Dihydromyricetin induced lncRNA MALAT1-TFEB-dependent autophagic cell death in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J. Cancer 10 (18), 4245–4255. doi:10.7150/jca.32807
Tao, N., Li, K., Liu, J., Fan, G., and Sun, T. (2021). Liproxstatin-1 alleviates bleomycin-induced alveolar epithelial cells injury and mice pulmonary fibrosis via attenuating inflammation, reshaping redox equilibrium, and suppressing ROS/p53/α-SMA pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 551, 133–139. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.02.127
Thannickal, V. J., Toews, G. B., White, E. S., Lynch, J. P., and Martinez, F. J. (2004). Mechanisms of pulmonary fibrosis. Annu. Rev. Med. 55, 395–417. doi:10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.103810
Tong, Q., Hou, X., Fang, J., Wang, W., Xiong, W., Liu, X., et al. (2015). Determination of dihydromyricetin in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS and its application to a pharmacokinetic study. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 114, 455–461. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2015.06.030
Tsuchida, T., and Friedman, S. L. (2017). Mechanisms of hepatic stellate cell activation. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 14 (7), 397–411. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2017.38
Tsujita-Kyutoku, M., Uehara, N., Matsuoka, Y., Kyutoku, S., Ogawa, Y., and Tsubura, A. (2005). Comparison of transforming growth factor-beta/Smad signaling between normal dermal fibroblasts and fibroblasts derived from central and peripheral areas of keloid lesions. Vivo 19 (6), 959–963.
Wang, W., Ma, B. L., Xu, C. G., and Zhou, X. J. (2020). Dihydroquercetin protects against renal fibrosis by activating the Nrf2 pathway. Phytomedicine 69, 153185. doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2020.153185
Wang, M., Murdoch, C. E., Brewer, A. C., Ivetic, A., Evans, P., Shah, A. M., et al. (2021). Endothelial NADPH oxidase 4 protects against angiotensin II-induced cardiac fibrosis and inflammation. Esc. Heart Fail 8 (2), 1427–1437. doi:10.1002/ehf2.13228
Wang, X., Li, X., Ma, X., Zhang, L., Han, T., and Zhang, D. (2024). Dihydromyricetin alleviates inflammatory bowel disease associated intestinal fibrosis by inducing autophagy through the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Naunyn Schmiedeb. Arch. Pharmacol. 397 (6), 4183–4194. doi:10.1007/s00210-023-02856-0
Watanabe, D., and Kamada, N. (2022). Contribution of the gut microbiota to intestinal fibrosis in crohn's disease. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 9, 826240. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.826240
Wei, C., Chen, X., Chen, D., Yu, B., Zheng, P., He, J., et al. (2022). Dihydromyricetin enhances intestinal antioxidant capacity of growing-finishing pigs by activating ERK/Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway. Antioxidants (Basel) 11 (4), 704. doi:10.3390/antiox11040704
Williams, J., Ensor, C., Gardner, S., Smith, R., and Lodder, R. (2015). BSN723T prevents atherosclerosis and weight gain in ApoE knockout mice fed a Western diet. Webmedcentral 6 (12).
Winkler, M. K., and Fowlkes, J. L. (2002). Metalloproteinase and growth factor interactions: do they play a role in pulmonary fibrosis? Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 283 (1), L1–L11. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00489.2001
Wu, B., Lin, J., Luo, J., Han, D., Fan, M., Guo, T., et al. (2017). Dihydromyricetin protects against diabetic cardiomyopathy in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017, 3764370. doi:10.1155/2017/3764370
Wu, J., Zhao, F. T., Fan, K. J., Zhang, J., Xu, B. X., Wang, Q. S., et al. (2019). Dihydromyricetin inhibits inflammation of fibroblast-like synoviocytes through regulation of nuclear Factor-κB signaling in rats with collagen-induced arthritis. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 368 (2), 218–228. doi:10.1124/jpet.118.253369
Wynn, T. A., and Ramalingam, T. R. (2012). Mechanisms of fibrosis: therapeutic translation for fibrotic disease. Nat. Med. 18 (7), 1028–1040. doi:10.1038/nm.2807
Xiang, D., Wang, C. G., Wang, W. Q., Shi, C. Y., Xiong, W., Wang, M. D., et al. (2017). Gastrointestinal stability of dihydromyricetin, myricetin, and myricitrin: an in vitro investigation. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 68 (6), 704–711. doi:10.1080/09637486.2016.1276518
Xiang, J., Lv, Q., Yi, F., Song, Y., Le, L., Jiang, B., et al. (2019). Dietary supplementation of Vine tea ameliorates glucose and lipid metabolic disorder via Akt signaling pathway in diabetic rats. Molecules 24 (10), 1866. doi:10.3390/molecules24101866
Xiao, T., Wei, Y., Cui, M., Li, X., Ruan, H., Zhang, L., et al. (2021). Effect of dihydromyricetin on SARS-CoV-2 viral replication and pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. Phytomedicine 91, 153704. doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153704
Yang, D., Yang, Z., Chen, L., Kuang, D., Zou, Y., Li, J., et al. (2020). Dihydromyricetin increases endothelial nitric oxide production and inhibits atherosclerosis through microRNA-21 in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. J. Cell Mol. Med. 24 (10), 5911–5925. doi:10.1111/jcmm.15278
Yang, J., Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Wang, N., Wei, H., Zhang, S., et al. (2024). Dihydromyricetin-loaded oxidized polysaccharide/L-arginine chitosan adhesive hydrogel promotes bone regeneration by regulating PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and MAPK signaling pathway. Carbohydr. Polym. 346, 122614. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122614
Ye, X., Pang, Z., and Zhu, N. (2019). Dihydromyricetin attenuates hypertrophic scar formation by targeting activin receptor-like kinase 5. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 852, 58–67. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.02.039
Zhang, D., Liu, Z. X., Choi, C. S., Tian, L., Kibbey, R., Dong, J., et al. (2007). Mitochondrial dysfunction due to long-chain Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency causes hepatic steatosis and hepatic insulin resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104 (43), 17075–17080. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707060104
Zhang, Q., Liu, J., Liu, B., Xia, J., Chen, N., Chen, X., et al. (2014). Dihydromyricetin promotes hepatocellular carcinoma regression via a p53 activation-dependent mechanism. Sci. Rep. 4, 4628. doi:10.1038/srep04628
Zhang, C. Y., Yuan, W. G., He, P., Lei, J. H., and Wang, C. X. (2016). Liver fibrosis and hepatic stellate cells: etiology, pathological hallmarks and therapeutic targets. World J. Gastroenterol. 22 (48), 10512–10522. doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i48.10512
Zhao, L., Zou, Y., and Liu, F. (2020). Transforming growth Factor-Beta1 in diabetic kidney disease. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 187. doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.00187
Zhao, Y., Liu, X., Ding, C., Gu, Y., and Liu, W. (2021). Dihydromyricetin reverses thioacetamide-induced liver fibrosis through inhibiting NF-κB-Mediated inflammation and TGF-β1-Regulated of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Front. Pharmacol. 12, 783886. doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.783886
Zhou, Y., Hu, Y., Zang, X., Hu, Y., Qiu, F., Liu, X., et al. (2001). Toxicological assess ment on Ampelopsis grossedentata and its i mmune regulation study. Pract. Prev. Med. 8 (6), 412–414.
Zhou, D. Z., Sun, H. Y., Yue, J. Q., Peng, Y., Chen, Y. M., and Zhong, Z. J. (2017). Dihydromyricetin induces apoptosis and cytoprotective autophagy through ROS-NF-κB signalling in human melanoma cells. Free Radic. Res. 51 (5), 517–528. doi:10.1080/10715762.2017.1328552
Zhou, H. Y., Gao, S. Q., Gong, Y. S., Lin, T., Tong, S., Xiong, W., et al. (2020). Anti-HSV-1 effect of dihydromyricetin from Ampelopsis grossedentata via the TLR9-dependent anti-inflammatory pathway. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist 23, 370–376. doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2020.10.003
Zhou, X., Yu, L., Zhou, M., Hou, P., and Mi, M. (2021). Dihydromyricetin ameliorates liver fibrosis via inhibition of hepatic stellate cells by inducing autophagy and natural killer cell-mediated killing effect. Nutr. Metab. (Lond) 18 (1), 64. doi:10.1186/s12986-021-00589-6
Keywords: dihydromyricetin, fibrosis, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, autophagy
Citation: Wang X-C, Mai P, Yuan Z-H and Qiu Z-S (2025) Preclinical research of dihydromyricetin for fibrotic diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 16:1691796. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1691796
Received: 26 August 2025; Accepted: 24 November 2025;
Published: 03 December 2025.
Edited by:
Somasundaram Arumugam, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, Kolkata, IndiaReviewed by:
Amira Raudhah Abdullah, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM), MalaysiaPatricia Azeredo, State University of Campinas, Brazil
Copyright © 2025 Wang, Mai, Yuan and Qiu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zhi-Sheng Qiu, cWl1emhzaDIwQGx6dS5lZHUuY24=
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship
Ping Mai2†