Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1696229

This article is part of the Research TopicNovel Targets and Therapeutic Strategies for Overcoming Drug Resistance in Hematologic MalignanciesView all 6 articles

Acute myeloid leukemia drug resistance: targetable nodes and the clinical trajectory of small-molecule inhibitors

Provisionally accepted
Xixi  ZhangXixi Zhang1Yao  PengYao Peng2Yina  TianYina Tian1Shichao  ChenShichao Chen1Yijiu  JiaYijiu Jia1Mengtong  LiuMengtong Liu1Li  ZhangLi Zhang1*
  • 1Henan University, Kaifeng, China
  • 2Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is paradigmatic for therapeutic resistance driven by genetic heterogeneity, epigenetic plasticity and microenvironmental protection. Over the past decade, six targeted or pathway-directed small molecules—midostaurin, gilteritinib, quizartinib, ivosidenib, enasidenib, venetoclax and glasdegib—have changed frontline and relapsed/refractory (R/R) practice in genomically defined subgroups or in patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Yet primary refractoriness and early relapse remain common, frequently via adaptive rewiring of apoptotic dependencies, clonal evolution and differentiation resistance. Here we integrate mechanistic insights with clinical evidence to: (i) map resistance biology onto targetable nodes (apoptosis control; signalling kinases; chromatin/lineage programmes; RNA splicing; DNA-damage response; nuclear export; niche adhesion and innate immune evasion); (ii) summarise the clinical trajectory and current limits of approved and emerging small molecules (including menin and LSD1 inhibitors); (iii) propose rules for rational doublets and triplets that are biologically orthogonal yet clinically tolerable; (iv) outline a regulatory timeline for key AML small molecules; and (v) prioritise where drug development should go next, including next-generation BH3 toolkits, clonal-pressure-aware designs, minimal residual disease (MRD)–adapted trials and therapy guided by dynamic functional profiling. The review closes with cross-platform challenges—myelosuppression, infectious risk, resistance monitoring and trial design—and a pragmatic framework for moving beyond incrementalism toward durable control and cure.

Keywords: Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Drug Resistance, Small-molecule inhibitors, BH3 mimetics, FLT3, IDH1/2, menin, LSD1

Received: 31 Aug 2025; Accepted: 08 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Peng, Tian, Chen, Jia, Liu and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Li Zhang, zl02@henu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.