Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Pharmacoepidemiology

The real-world safety profile of ranolazine: Pharmacovigilance analysis of the FAERS database

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Heyuan People's Hospital, Heyuan, China
  • 2First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical and Pharmaceutical College, Chongqing, China
  • 3Dazhou Central Hospital, Dazhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background Ranolazine, a piperazine derivative, is used as a second-line treatment for individuals with stable or poorly managed chronic angina as well as for those whose chronic angina is not improving with other medications. However, there is still a lack of real-world evidence on the long-term safety of its adverse events (AEs), which calls for constant supplementation. Methods This study conducted disproportionality analysis to evaluate the safety of ranolazine in clinical practice by utilizing data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Reporting Odds Ratio, Proportional Reporting Ratio, Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network were used to identify signals of possible adverse events linked to ranolazine. Additionally, the Weibull distribution was implemented to simulate how the frequency of adverse events changed over time. Results Positive signals were found for adverse events listed on the medication label, including dizziness, nausea, asthenia, constipation, headache, palpitations, tinnitus, abdominal pain, dry mouth, vomiting, peripheral edema, dyspnea and hypotension. Additionally, potential side effects not included on the label were also identified, including chest pain, cardiac disorder, electrocardiogram qt prolonged, hypertension, seizure, tremor, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, pulmonary embolism, myoclonus and myocardial infarction. The significance of tracking adverse events was underlined, especially during the first month after the start of treatment. Conclusions Our study has confirmed certain known adverse effects and identified other potential hazards by providing preliminary safety data on the practical use of ranolazine. The results present vital safety information for physicians prescribing ranolazine. Notably, this study only identifies safety signals and does not establish causal relationships between ranolazine and the observed adverse events.

Keywords: adverse events, Ranolazine, FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS), Disproportionality analysis, Real-world data analysis

Received: 11 Sep 2025; Accepted: 30 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wen, Liu, Yi, Lin, Liu and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Peng Liu, liupeng00820@163.com
Tingting Zhang, ztt20160914@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.