ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies
This article is part of the Research TopicFrom Bedside to Outcome: Integrating Clinical Trials and Real-World Data (RWD) to Optimize Drug Development and Patient CareView all articles
Association between vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring and improved clinical outcomes in critically ill patients receiving renal replacement therapy: A retrospective cohort study
Provisionally accepted- 1Guangzhou Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou, China
- 2Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, China
- 3Gaoming District People's Hospital of Foshan City, Foshan, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Vancomycin is commonly prescribed for serious infections in critically ill patients. A substantial proportion of these individuals present with renal impairment or develop acute kidney injury (AKI), and some may require renal replacement therapy (RRT). Different RRT modalities can substantially affect vancomycin pharmacokinetics, thereby posing challenges for individualized dosing. Although therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended by clinical guidelines to optimize drug exposure, its association with mortality among critically ill patients undergoing RRT has not been well characterized. Methods: This retrospective study used the MIMIC-IV database to identify adults with an initial ICU admission who received RRT within the first week and intravenous vancomycin. Patients were classified into TDM and non-TDM groups according to whether TDM was performed. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. To control for confounding, baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity scores. Associations between TDM and mortality were assessed using IPTW-weighted Cox regression, with results compared to unweighted Cox models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results. Results: A total of 2,085 patients were included, with 1,556 in the TDM group and 529 in the non-TDM group. 30-day all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the TDM group (38.9% vs. 48.8%, P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analyses, both before and after IPTW adjustment, demonstrated a consistent association between TDM and reduced mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR] 0.457–0.478, all P < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis further confirmed higher survival in the TDM group (log-rank P < 0.001). In the continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) subgroup, all models yielded consistent results, with TDM associated with significantly lower mortality (HR 0.427–0.431, all P < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of these findings, as the inverse association between TDM and mortality persisted across all approaches to handling missing vancomycin dose data (HR 0.474–0.610, all P < 0.001). Conclusion: Vancomycin TDM was significantly associated with reduced 30-day mortality in critically ill patients receiving RRT, with an even stronger effect observed in those undergoing CRRT.
Keywords: Vancomycin, Therapeutic drug monitoring, critically ill patients, Renal Replacement Therapy, Mortality
Received: 28 Sep 2025; Accepted: 25 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Peng, Tang, Chen, Yang, Cai, Xie and Xu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Tingting Xie
Dan Xu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
