Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Pharmacol.

Sec. Drug Metabolism and Transport

Bioequivalence of a Single Dose of Two Palbociclib Formulations in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting Conditions: A Two-Period Crossover Study with Rabeprazole Pre-treatment

Provisionally accepted
Wanjun  BaiWanjun Bai1Shuo  ShiShuo Shi1,2Deliang  YinDeliang Yin3Caihui  GuoCaihui Guo1Haojing  SongHaojing Song1Yiting  HuYiting Hu1Jin  GaoJin Gao1Bo  QiuBo Qiu1Xueyuan  ZhangXueyuan Zhang4Lusha  BiLusha Bi5Huizhen  WuHuizhen Wu1*Zhanjun  DongZhanjun Dong1*
  • 1Hebei General Hospital Affiliated to Hebei Medicine University, Shijiazhuang, China
  • 2Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
  • 3Beijing Kangchuanglian Biopharmaceutical Technology Research Co Ltd, Beijing, China
  • 4Shanghai Innovstone Therapeutics Limited, Shanghai, China
  • 5CSPC Ouyi Pharmaceutical Co., Shijiazhuang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objectives: This study assessed the pharmacokinetics, safety, and bioequivalence of generic and original palbociclib tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions with rabeprazole pretreatment. Methods: This was a single-dose, randomized, open-label, two-period crossover bioequivalence study conducted under fasting conditions with rabeprazole pre-treatment. In each trial, healthy Chinese subjects received 40 mg oral rabeprazole enteric-coated tablets once daily before breakfast for six days. Following an overnight fast of at least 10 hours, they took the seventh dose of rabeprazole and maintained fasting. They then received a single 125 mg oral dose of either the test or reference palbociclib tablet, followed by a 14-day washout interval between periods. Blood samples were collected from 0 to 96 hours post-dose in each period, and palbociclib plasma concentrations were determined using a validated method. The primary pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using the non-compartmental method. The geometric mean ratios of the two formulations and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals were acquired for bioequivalence analysis. The safety of both formulations was also evaluated. Results: The 90% confidence intervals for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters of Cmax (84.53-91.72%), AUC0-t (87.81-92.49%), and AUC0-∞(87.59-92.03%) all fell within the 80.00-125.00% bioequivalence range. No serious adverse events occurred during the study. This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article Conclusion: The trial confirmed that the pharmacokinetic parameters of the generic and original palbociclib tablets were bioequivalent in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions with rabeprazole pre-treatment. Both formulations were safe and well tolerated. Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered on the Drug Clinical Trial Registration and Information Disclosure Platform [http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn] (number: CTR20232617, date: August 23, 2023) and retrospectively registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry [https://www.chictr.org.cn] (number: ChiCTR2400084355, date: May 15, 2024).

Keywords: Palbociclib, acid-reducing agent, pharmacokinetics, Bioequivalence, Safety

Received: 10 Oct 2025; Accepted: 31 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Bai, Shi, Yin, Guo, Song, Hu, Gao, Qiu, Zhang, Bi, Wu and Dong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Huizhen Wu, 13582005982@163.com
Zhanjun Dong, dzjhbgh@126.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.