EDITORIAL article
Front. Pharmacol.
Sec. Drugs Outcomes Research and Policies
This article is part of the Research TopicMathematical Modeling of Medication NonadherenceView all 6 articles
Editorial: Mathematical Modeling of Medication Nonadherence
Provisionally accepted- 1The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
- 2Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, United States
- 3Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Medication adherence is the process by which patients take their medications as prescribed [1]. Medication nonadherence is an age-old problem, as even Hippocrates warned physicians to "keep a watch also on the faults of the patients, which often make them lie about the taking of things prescribed" [2]. Today, medication nonadherence results in over 100,000 preventable deaths and more than $100 billion in healthcare costs each year in the United States alone [3,4].In fact, the World Health Organization has claimed: [5] "increasing the effectiveness of adherence interventions may have a far greater impact on the health of the population than any improvement in specific medical treatments."A former United States surgeon general famously observed, "drugs don't work in patients who don't take them." [6].Medication nonadherence is challenging to understand and mitigate for many reasons. For one, nonadherence can be erratic, as patients do not miss doses on neat, predictable schedules. Indeed, adherence data for an individual patient over time shows doses taken on-time, doses taken late, doses skipped, double doses, etc. [7]. Furthermore, these seemingly stochastic, temporal fluctuations in adherence vary considerably between patients [8], with perhaps at least six qualitatively distinct patterns seen in different patients [9]. In addition to temporal and patient heterogeneity, the physiological consequences of nonadherence can vary considerably between drugs. For example, missing a morning dose of one medication may go largely undetected by the patient or might entail a lethargic afternoon, but a missing a dose of an antiepileptic drug might cause a seizure [10]. Moreover, even within a specific drug class, some drugs maintain efficacy despite lapses in adherence (so-called "forgiving" drugs), whereas other drugs require nearly perfect adherence to be effective [11].Due to this complexity, mathematical and computational approaches are emerging as powerful tools to combat medication nonadherence. For instance, stochastic analysis can leverage the science of pharmacometrics to investigate remedial dosing protocols and design regimens to mitigate nonadherence [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Furthermore, "drug forgiveness" has been quantified with a number of approaches [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], which enables the identification and design of drugs which are robust to nonadherence. In effect, the mathematical equations are a laboratory to conduct experiments which would not be feasible in human trials, such as quantifying how therapeutic efficacy depends on adherence rates and patterns. In addition, methods employing artificial intelligence (AI) and sophisticated statistical approaches are being applied to swaths of adherence data to predict, detect, and ameliorate nonadherence [36][37][38][39][40].This Research Topic presents five articles in this burgeoning field. Three
Keywords: adherence, Nonadherence, mathematical modeling, Stochastic Modeling, statistical analysis, artificial intelligence
Received: 06 Nov 2025; Accepted: 07 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Lawley, Gibson and Zheng. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Sean D Lawley, lawley@math.utah.edu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.