ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Digital Mental Health

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1470554

This article is part of the Research TopicDigital Medicine in Psychiatry and Neurology - Chances and Challenges for Mobile Scalable Monitoring and InterventionView all 5 articles

Reasons for non-participation and dropout in a longitudinal study of an app-based support service among adult patients in a psychiatric outpatient setting during the COVID-19 pandemic

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
  • 2Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background:Increasing non-participation in research studies and high dropout rates in research on mental health apps compromise interpretability and generalizability of results. Analyzing underlying reasons holds promise for improving future recruitment methods, study design, and app features.Objective:This study investigated reasons for non-participation and dropout among adult psychiatric outpatients in a study examining an app for self-reflection, daily structuring, relaxation, mindfulness, and psychoeducation in Germany during COVID-19 pandemic, as well as potential differences between dropouts and completers.Methods:Descriptive statistics on reasons for non-participation using an anonymous questionnaire and for dropout based on semi-structured telephone interviews were performed. Differences between dropouts and completers in sociodemographic, clinical, app-related, and daily mood data were analyzed.Results:Of N=88 persons approached for potential study participation, n=57 (64.8%) participated in the app study, while n=31 (35.2%) declined. Of n=31 non-participants, n=29 (93.5%) indicated specific reasons. On average, M=1.72 (SD=1.03) reasons were provided per non-participant, with no motivation for regular app use (n=7, 24.1%), no interest in using an app for the presented content (n=6, 20.7%), and no time for app use (n=6, 20.7%) being the most common. Of n=57 study participants, n=40 (70.2%) were completers and n=17 (29.8%) were dropouts. On average, M=2.82 (SD=1.29) dropout reasons were provided per dropout, with too severe health complaints (n=6, 35.3%), not individually suitable contents (n=5, 29.4%), and lack of incentives to use the app (n=5, 29.4%) being the most frequent. Dropouts and completers did not differ significantly in sociodemographic, clinical, and app-related variables (all p>.05). Dropouts reported their mood significantly less often than completers during the first five and seven days of the intervention period (all p<.001).Conclusions:This study provides exclusive insights into non-participation and dropout in an app study among adults with mental disorders. It identified personal motivation, app-related aspects, no interest in app-based offers, and personal health complaints as common reasons. Suggestions for improving future studies include focusing on incentives, app questionnaires, app installation, user needs analysis, and symptom severity. Early app engagement and adherence measurements (for example number of daily mood reports) may help identify potential dropouts earlier in future studies.Trial registration:German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00027536;https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00027536

Keywords: Non-participation, dropout, eHealth, APP, Mental Health, mental disorder

Received: 25 Jul 2024; Accepted: 10 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Kaufmann, Baldofski, Golsong, Kohls and Rummel-Kluge. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Christine Rummel-Kluge, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.