ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Rehabilitation
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1519527
Mental illness-related stigma and its associated factors among primary health care professionals in rural China
Provisionally accepted- 1Mental Health Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- 2Hong Kong Shue Yan University, North Point, Hong Kong, SAR China
- 3Shanghai University, Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
- 4Peking University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
- 5Xinjin Second People’s Hospital, chengdu, China
- 6Chongqing Mental Health Center, chongqing, China
- 7University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- 8New York University, New York City, New York, United States
- 9The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, SAR China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Primary health care professionals (PHCPs) play a key role in the workforce of community mental health services in rural China. This study aimed to explore the mental illness-related stigma and its associated factors among PHCPs in rural communities.Methods: This study collected the data from 247 PHCPs in 10 township health service centers in Xinjin District, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China from November to December 2023. The Mental Illness: Clinicians' Attitudes (MICA) was used to assess the mental illness-related stigma. Demographic and stigma-related psychological scales were compared between PHCPs with and without mental illness-related stigma. Correlation and binary logistic regression analyses were performed.Results: There were 155 PHCPs (62.8%) with mental illness-related stigma, and the mean score of MICA was 50.68±8.08. PHCPs with mental illness-related stigma had significantly lower mean scores of the Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MAKS), the Reported and Intended Behavior Scale (RIBS), the 5-item Contact Scale (CQTS), and the 5-item Contact Quality Scale (CQLS) (p=0.001, p<0.001, P=0.041, P<0.001), and higher mean scores of the Social Distance Scale (SDS) (p<0.001) than those without mental illness-related stigma. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that PHCPs’ work experience (β=0.080, 95%CI=1.002~1.170, p=0.044) and scores of SDS (β=0.169, 95%CI=1.056~1.328, p=0.004) had significantly positive impact on the mental illness-related stigma, and the scores of MAKS (β=-0.082, 95%CI=0.850~0.998, p=0.045) and RIBS (β=-0.131, 95%CI=0.783~0.983, p=0.024) had significantly negative impact on the mental illness-related stigma.Conclusions: The PHCPs have severe mental illness-related stigma in rural China, and the associated factors include work experience, mental health knowledge, behavioral discrimination, and social distance towards people with mental illness. The results of this study are crucial for development of anti-stigma intervention among PHCPs in rural communities.
Keywords: Primary health care professionals, mental illness, stigma, Influencing factors, Rural China
Received: 04 Nov 2024; Accepted: 13 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yang, Wang, Cai, Mu, Zhou, Wang, Zhang, Zhao, Li, Luo, Luo, Irenewong, Yang, Ng and Ran. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Mao-Sheng Ran, Mental Health Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.