SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Digital Mental Health
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1519670
Digital Resilience Interventions for Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review
Provisionally accepted
- 1University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
- 2Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
- 3Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève (HUG), Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Burnout among healthcare professionals is rising, exacerbated by increased workloads and the Covid-19 pandemic. Affected individuals face stress, depression, and anxiety, adversely impacting both personal well-being and patient care. Resilience has emerged as a key focus for targeted interventions, with online delivery gaining relevance due to the digital transformation and the need for flexibility in busy healthcare schedules.Methods: A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for eligible studies from April 2014 to April 2024, using search terms related to resilience, online/blended interventions, and healthcare professionals. A total of 7,619 records were identified and screened by two independent reviewers (ML, AM). Final inclusion was based on predefined criteria for online or blended interventions aimed at enhancing resilience in healthcare professionals. The Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) assessed risk of bias. PRISMA guidelines were followed.Results: Fifty-five studies were selected, employing various interventions such as psychoeducation, meditation, mindfulness, and elements of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). Interventions were delivered online through websites, apps, audio files, etc. or in blended formats complementing in-person sessions. Most studies reported significant improvements in resilience, alongside reductions in stress, burnout, depression, and anxiety. However, only three studies in the online group involving mindfulness or CBT interventions received a strong global rating in the risk of bias assessment by fulfilling the methodological quality criteria. Among these, mindfulness, compared to a waitlist control or a psychoeducational brochure, significantly improved resilience and reduced burnout, while the CBT intervention, compared to bibliotherapy, led to a significant reduction in stress. Compared to the other studies, these three stood out due to minimal selection bias, low attrition rates, a robust study design, and at least partial blinding. Discussion: This review indicates that digital interventions may enhance resilience and associated factors in healthcare personnel. However, caution is advised due to the heterogeneity of interventions and varied measurement methods. Only three studies met methodological quality criteria, limiting the reliability of other findings. Future research should standardize resilience concepts and adhere to methodological criteria to ensure valid conclusions.
Keywords: resilience, Mental Health, Digital intervention, Healthcare workers, healthcare students Boston, Massachusetts Pre-posttest, pragmatic, non-randomized No Brief Online Focused Attention Meditation Training: Immediate Impact. 2017 Significant between resilience and empathy
Received: 30 Oct 2024; Accepted: 21 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Larsson, Ho, Kirschner, Seifritz and Manoliu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Malin Larsson, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.