Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Psychological Therapy and Psychosomatics

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1530932

From Numerical to Empathy: The dual impact of psychological contracts in Doctor-Patient communication

Provisionally accepted
Xinru  WangXinru Wang1Yating  ChenYating Chen1Yi  YuYi Yu2Huan  JiangHuan Jiang1Jinyan  SongJinyan Song1Weixian  LiangWeixian Liang1Qiang  ZhouQiang Zhou1*Liang  YingLiang Ying1*
  • 1Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
  • 2Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To investigate how the presence or absence of psychological contracts and different formats of probabilistic da ta representation influence healthcare professionals' pain empathy and probability estimation bias in simulated doctor–pati ent communication contexts. Methods: We included 60 healthcare professionals with the same mathematical ability and divided them into two groups to complete the probability estimation bias task of decision events and the classification task of pain non-pain pictures with and without psychological contracts. The data are analyzed by generalized estimation equation (Gee). Results: The fulfillment of psychological contracts significantly affects the level of empathy for pain[0.3(95% CI 0.1, 0.4), p < 0.001], and the probability bias of decision events with an impact of [19.2 (95% CI 8.5, 29.8), p < 0.001] in small probability events and [−21.2 (95% CI −41.7, −0.5 ), p < 0.05] in large probability events. Conclusions: The establishment of psychological contract reduced the difference between the different data representation forms, significantly improved the pain empathy of the healthcare professionals, and reduced the probability estimation bias of risk decision events.

Keywords: Pain, Empathy, Psychological Contracts, Doctor-patient relationship, Probability estimation bias

Received: 06 Jan 2025; Accepted: 30 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Chen, Yu, Jiang, Song, Liang, Zhou and Ying. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Qiang Zhou, zq@wmu.edu.cn
Liang Ying, rjyingl@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.