Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Addictive Disorders

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1531443

This article is part of the Research TopicExecutive Functions, Reward Systems and Addiction in Adolescents and Young AdultsView all 8 articles

Integrative Cognitive Neuropsychological Program Emphasizing Brain Response to Enhance Inhibitory Control Among Substance Abusers at the Alternative Rehabilitation Communities in Eastern Thailand

Provisionally accepted
Juthamas  HAENJOHNJuthamas HAENJOHN*Warakorn  SupwirapakornWarakorn SupwirapakornJatuporn  NamyenJatuporn Namyen
  • Faculty of Education, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Inhibitory control (IC) deficit among substance abusers is a potential consequence of detrimental drug use and can also serve as a risk factor for drug -seeking behaviors, compromising substance abuse treatment and leading to drug relapse. This study examined the efficacy of an integrative cognitive neuropsychological program emphasizing brain response to enhance inhibitory control (ICNIC intervention program) among substance abusers.: A total of 30 substance abusers were recruited and randomly assigned to either an ICNIC training group and a non-training control group. The ICNIC training group participated in a 12-session intervention program and a regular rehabilitative program at alternative treatment centers. The control group did not receive ICNIC training, but participated in only the regular rehabilitative program. IC was assessed using self-report measures and a cognitive performance task. Data were collected at three points: before ICNIC training, after ICNIC training, and at a 3week follow-up ICNIC training. Statistical analyses were implemented. Results: The primary findings showed that substance abusers exhibited greater self-reported selfefficacy of behavioral IC after the ICNIC training, as assessed by the self -report measure, Behavioral Inhibitory Control Inventory -Substance Use BICI-SU. There were no improvements in the 'Go' or 'Stop' trial accuracy (neither within-subject improvement nor between-group difference at the post-training or follow-up periods), and SSRT reaction time (neither pre-to posttraining within-subject improvement nor between-group difference at post-training or follow-up periods), as measured by Stop Signal Substance Task (SSST). Moreover, the lack of improved accuracy coincided with slower responses to 'Go' stimuli in the ICNIC training group as compared to the non-training control group. Thus, the ICNIC training improved self-reportedself-efficacy in IC and, therefore, may be associated with an improved and cautious response strategies for IC paradigms, resulting in slower response times. However, these strategies did not translate to improved response accuracy during the SSRT.The implementation of an ICNIC intervention program as a supplementary cognitive rehabilitation approach could potentially enhance self-efficacy of behavioral IC and improve response strategies among substance abusers. With further investigation, the program may be expected to contribute to an increase in cognitive control and promote behavioral changes that lead to positive therapeutic outcomes.

Keywords: Inhibitory Control, integrative cognitive neuropsychological program, Brain Response, Substance abusers, Cognitive rehabilitation, alternative rehabilitation communities

Received: 20 Nov 2024; Accepted: 25 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 HAENJOHN, Supwirapakorn and Namyen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Juthamas HAENJOHN, Faculty of Education, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.