ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Sleep Disorders

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1533652

This article is part of the Research TopicChronic insomnia: Treatment and managementView all 19 articles

Clinical efficacy of modified suanzaoren decoction compared to esazolam tablets in the treatment of chronic insomnia disorder

Provisionally accepted
Ping  YaoPing Yao1Xingyan  GuoXingyan Guo1Zhiguo  GuoZhiguo Guo1Wuhong  LinWuhong Lin1Min  LiuMin Liu1Min  ChenMin Chen1Jie  LiJie Li1Long-Biao  CuiLong-Biao Cui2*Dongsheng  LvDongsheng Lv1*
  • 1Mental Health Center of Inner Mongolia, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China
  • 2Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Traditional Chinese medicine is one of the important methods for treating chronic insomnia disorder (CID).Aims: We aimed to observe the multi-dimensional clinical outcomes of modified suanzaoren decoction (SZRD) compared to esazolam tablets in the treatment of CID patients. Methods: A total of 80 patients with CID were divided into two treatment groups, and were given modified SZRD and esazolam tablets treatment respectively for 6 weeks. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Insomnia Severity Index, Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Hamilton Depression Scale, polysomnography (PSG), repeated battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status were performed to assess the changes of subjective and objective sleep, mood, and cognitive function. Results: Intra-group improvement: Compared to before treatment, both the modified SZRD and estazolam groups showed improvements in subjective sleep, depression, anxiety, immediate memory, and delayed memory scores (P<0.05). Inter-group comparison: There was a significant difference between the modified SZRD and estazolam groups in subjective PSQI scores (P=0.033). Based on PSG objective assessment results, both the estazolam and modified SZRD groups demonstrated a significant increase in N3 stage sleep (slow-wave sleep) duration compared to before treatment (P=0.037). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the effect size between the two groups (P>0.05), indicating that both interventions were equivalent in improving deep sleep. Nevertheless, residual variance analysis indicates that estazolam showed enhanced predictive stability in subjective sleep quality assessed by ISI (SSR=11.73 vs. 31.19; F=13.39, P<0.001), while modified SZRD exhibited enhanced predictive stability in objective slow-wave sleep maintenance, specifically in N3 stage duration (SSR=703.11 vs. 1761.08; F=4.98, P=0.029). Conclusion: After the treatment of CID with the modified suanzaoren decoction and esazolam, they have the comparable clinical efficacy. However, estazolam showed a more consistent treatment effect in subjective sleep quality assessment among the study population, whereas modified SZRD showed a more consistent treatment effect in objective slow-wave sleep maintenance, specifically in N3 stage duration. The registration number was NCT06452953.

Keywords: SZRD, Suanzaoren Decoction treatment, TCM, traditional Chinese medicine, Esazolam Tablets, Clinical Efficacy Analysis, Cognitive Function

Received: 24 Nov 2024; Accepted: 01 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yao, Guo, Guo, Lin, Liu, Chen, Li, Cui and Lv. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Long-Biao Cui, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China
Dongsheng Lv, Mental Health Center of Inner Mongolia, Hohhot, 010010, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.