REVIEW article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Perinatal Psychiatry
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1544485
This article is part of the Research TopicPerinatal Bereavement, Trauma, & LossView all articles
Women's psychological experiences of preterm labour and birth which results in an intrapartum stillbirth or a neonatal death: An empty systematic review
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Liverpool, Liverpool, North West England, United Kingdom
- 2King's College London, London, England, United Kingdom
- 3Bangor University, Bangor, Wales, United Kingdom
- 4The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, United Kingdom
- 5PETALS: The Baby Loss Counselling Charity, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- 6Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- 7St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, England, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Nearly three quarters of stillbirths and neonatal deaths occur in infants born prematurely. The mothers of these children may be at increased risk of developing mental health difficulties as a result of their premature labour and/or subsequent loss.Methods: This systematic review was conducted to understand the psychological experiences of mothers who gave birth prematurely to a baby who subsequently dies as a result of an intrapartum stillbirth or a neonatal death. Ten databases were searched. Any studies which included women who had suffered a perinatal bereavement as a result of preterm labour and birth, in any country, and in any language were eligible to be included. Studies focusing on antepartum stillbirth or in utero death were excluded due to not having the element of preterm labour and/or birth within the studies. Risk of bias was to be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme.Results: Following the screening of citations, no studies were eligible for inclusion in the review. The majority of studies were excluded due to a lack of distinction in terms of intrapartum or antepartum stillbirth, or grouping of types of perinatal loss. Had the studies which were excluded three most common reasons for exclusion been included, 19 studies would have been eligible for inclusion in the review, and we present a brief summary of these findings.Discussion: These review findings highlight the need for more research into the psychological experiences of mothers of preterm infants whose baby subsequently dies, whereby future studies should consider routine reporting of gestational age. To address the identified gaps, future research should consider alternative methods or broader inclusion criteria to capture relevant data. Emphasising the importance of reporting gestational age and distinguishing between types of perinatal loss will enhance the specificity of research findings.
Keywords: Preterm Birth, Neonatal death, Intrapartum stillbirth, Gestational Age, Perinatal mental health, Empty systematic review
Received: 12 Dec 2024; Accepted: 19 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Worrall, Payne, Fellows, Pike, Carlisle, Carter, Wittkowski, Burgess, Storey, Magee, von Dadelszen, Christisnsen, Fallon, Khalil and Silverio. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Sergio A. Silverio, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZX, North West England, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.