Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CLINICAL TRIAL article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Digital Mental Health

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1546109

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvancing Digital Mental Health for YouthView all 7 articles

Bridging the Gap in Mental Health Literacy: Co-adapting and feasibility testing a digital intervention to improve mental health literacy amongst young people aged 12-14 in the UK

Provisionally accepted
Emily  VicaryEmily Vicary1*Helen  BrierleyHelen Brierley1Jack  WilkinsonJack Wilkinson1Melody  AdesinaMelody Adesina1Penny  BeePenny Bee1Karina  LovellKarina Lovell1Naz  UzunNaz Uzun2Emily  BeeEmily Bee2Helen  BrooksHelen Brooks1
  • 1The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • 2Young person contributor, no current affiliation, Manchester, United Kingdom

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

AbstractBackground: Digital interventions have shown promise in enhancing mental health literacy among young people (YP). Initially developed in Indonesia, the Improving Mental Health Literacy Among Young People in Indonesia (IMPeTUs) intervention is a co-produced digital application designed to improve mental health literacy and self-management of anxiety and depression in YP. This study aimed to co-adapt the IMPeTUs intervention with YP in the UK and evaluate the feasibility of conducting a future definitive trial in education and community settings.Methods: The study consisted of two phases. Phase 1 involved co-adapting the intervention through consultations with 49 stakeholders, including YP, parents, and professionals, using principles of experience-based co-design. ‘Co-adapting’ and ‘co-creating’ refer to collaborative modification and development of intervention content with stakeholders. Then, Phase 2 was a multi-site, cluster-randomized feasibility trial with a nested mixed-methods process evaluation conducted at two community sites (N = 19, 12 completing 4-week post-intervention data and 11 completing 3-month follow-up). The ‘nested process evaluation’ assessed acceptability and engagement alongside the trial.Results: In Phase 1, the digital intervention was co-adapted with stakeholders to include expanded customization options, UK-specific content, and a new chapter on resilience, healthy relationships and self-care to improve engagement and support mental health literacy. Phase 2 showed the application was well-received, with YP appreciating its relatable storylines and problem-solving focus. Recruitment challenges and lengthy questionnaires highlighted the need for improved partnerships with schools and streamlined data collection. Despite these issues, the usability of the core design was validated, and recommendations to enhance engagement, such as reducing text and adding interactive features, were identified. Exploratory analyses suggested potential improvements in mental health literacy and well-being, although these results require confirmation in a well-powered trial. Conclusion: This study highlights the feasibility of co-adapting and implementing digital interventions to improve mental health literacy among YP within community settings. Future work should focus on refining recruitment strategies for school environments, streamlining data collection, and enhancing engagement features to ensure scalability and effectiveness in large-scale evaluations. These findings lay the foundation for further development and rigorous digital mental health literacy intervention assessment.

Keywords: anxiety1, depression2, digital application3, mental health literacy4, self-management5, young people6

Received: 16 Dec 2024; Accepted: 01 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Vicary, Brierley, Wilkinson, Adesina, Bee, Lovell, Uzun, Bee and Brooks. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Emily Vicary, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.