Ketamine in treating opioid use disorder and opioid withdrawal: a scoping review

Introduction: Opioid use disorder (OUD) continues to be a public health crisis in the United States, with mortality having doubled over the last twenty years, leading to significant economic cost, morbidity, and mortality. This has caused significant demand for novel therapeutics. Preliminary evidence demonstrates that ketamine may be helpful in treating OUD as well as serve as an adjunct during treatment of opioid withdrawal (OW).

Methods: We conducted a scoping review of two databases (PubMed and PsycINFO) for English language, peer-reviewed manuscripts reporting on use of ketamine in treatment of OUD or OW in humans, excluding protocols and reviews. The study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.

Results: The search yielded 998 studies. After duplicates were removed, 715 studies underwent title and abstract screening for inclusion in the review. Of those, 21 were further considered under full text review. Three studies were excluded due to wrong study design and ten were excluded due to the wrong indication, specifically the use of ketamine for treatment of pain rather than substance use disorder or withdrawal. Eight studies were included in the review, regarding treatment for OUD (n=2) and OW (n=6). In OUD, ketamine administration was helpful in reducing opioid cravings and opioid use. In OW, ketamine attenuated precipitated withdrawal symptoms and was used in several case series/studies as an adjunct to buprenorphine treatment.

Conclusion: In summary, this review presents a baseline of literature supporting the use of ketamine in OUD and OW. However, more research is needed before widespread use.

Introduction

Despite significant attention and ongoing efforts, opioid use disorder (OUD) continues to be a public health crisis in the United States. The economic burden of OUD is estimated to be over $1 trillion annually, driven by reduced quality of life from OUD and the value of life lost from fatal opioid overdose (1). While prevalence of OUD has remained stable since the 1990s, rates of death have increased 10-fold in the last twenty years, due to higher potency formulations of opioids, specifically in illicitly-sourced fentanyl (2, 3). Given the morbidity and mortality associated with OUD, there continues to be significant demand for novel therapeutics.

Ketamine has been approved for medical treatment since the 1960s, but its use has been limited to short-term sedation and anesthesia (4). In recent years, there has been increased interest in expanding the use of ketamine and its various forms, with FDA approval garnered for the enantiomer, esketamine, in treatment-resistant depression in 2019 (5). Since then, there have been continued efforts to expand the use of ketamine in other disorders, ranging from bipolar depression, PTSD, obsessive compulsive disorder, epilepsy, and fibromyalgia, as well as substance use disorders (6). Specifically, there is interest in exploring the use of ketamine not only in treating opioid use disorder (OUD) but also as an adjunct in the treatment of opioid withdrawal (OW) (7).

Ketamine is primarily classified as a N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, affecting the glutaminergic pathways in the brain. However, it also has pleiotropic effects on a multitude of receptors and channels. Ketamine blocks nicotinic acetylcholine ion channels and affects monoamine transporters by inhibiting serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine reuptake (8). Furthermore, it is possible that there are interactions of ketamine with the opioid system, though it is not well understood (9). Specifically, in OUD, chronic opioid use leads to NMDA receptor upregulation in the mesolimbic pathway “reward” center. It is thought that NMDA antagonism decreases the activity of these pathways, increasing neuroplasticity and recircuiting the cue-response pathways in OUD (8). Moreover, it is possible that opioid withdrawal is mediated in part by the NMDA receptor. Additionally, it possible that ketamine’s mechanistic activity may involve the opioid receptor, facilitating its role in opioid withdrawal pathology. However, the opioid receptor effects of ketamine remain incompletely characterized. Preliminary animal studies have demonstrated that ketamine administration can also alleviate the symptoms of opioid withdrawal (9, 10).

This review aims to discuss the use and efficacy of ketamine in the treatment of OUD and OW in order to establish a baseline of literature in this sphere, as well as identify gaps in the literature to target future research.

Methods

Search strategy

We developed a search algorithm that included the terms ‘ketamine,’ as well as terms indicating OUD and OW, (i.e., ‘X’ use disorder, ‘X’ withdrawal, ‘X’ abuse, ‘X’ addiction, ‘X’ dependence), where ‘X’ represented opioid, fentanyl, and heroin). PubMed and APA PsychINFO were searched from database inception to 09/05/2024. Identification of studies for inclusion followed the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (10). Articles identified were extracted and imported into Covidence, a systematic review platform. Additional articles were found through manual review of reference lists in identified articles that met the inclusion criteria.

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

Our inclusion criteria comprised of English language, peer-reviewed manuscripts regarding use of ketamine in the treatment of OUD or OW in humans. Studies were excluded if they did not include humans, studied the illicit use of ketamine, or if the study did not discuss the use of ketamine in the treatment primarily of OUD or OW (e.g., including the use of ketamine in the treatment of pain in opioid-tolerant patients). Given the limited number of papers in this study, group consensus among researchers was to include case reports and case series. Study protocols and reviews were excluded.

Study selection

Two authors (DC, SM) independently screened titles and abstracts. Two additional authors independently screened full texts (AK, NR). Senior authors (MS, JS) resolved conflicts independently after title and abstract screening, as well as after full text review. The study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.

Data extraction/analysis

Three authors (AK, SM, DC) extracted data from identified articles into an electronic database. Data extracted included population demographics, study design, interventions utilized (dosing, route, adjuncts), primary and secondary outcomes, and relevant results. A meta-analysis was not possible given the heterogeneity in design and intervention of identified studies.

Results

The search yielded 998 studies. After duplicates were removed, 715 studies underwent title and abstract screening for inclusion in the review. Of those, 21 were further considered under full text review. Three studies were excluded due to wrong study design and ten were excluded due to the wrong indication, specifically the use of ketamine for treatment of pain rather than substance use disorder or withdrawal. Eight studies were included in the review (Figure 1), regarding treatment for OUD (n=2) and OW (n=6).

Figure 1

Figure 1. The PRISMA flow diagram for the scoping review detailing the database searches, the number of abstracts screened, the full texts retrieved, and the studies included.

Ketamine in the treatment of OUD

In examining the efficacy of ketamine in treating OUD, there were two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified (Table 1).

Table 1

Table 1. Summary of studies on ketamine and opioid use disorder.

Both RCTs, conducted by Krupitsky et al. in Russia, examined the use of ketamine in the setting of ketamine-assisted psychotherapy (11, 12). The first study, conducted in 2002, recruited 70 young adults with a history of opioid dependence as defined by the DSM-IV, who had been sober for at least two weeks (11). The researchers conducted a parallel group, double-blinded, placebo-controlled RCT examining abstinence rates, as well as symptoms of craving, depression, and anxiety. The intervention group received a “high-dose” or psychedelic dose of 2.0 mg/kg ketamine intramuscularly, while the “low-dose” or active placebo group received 0.2 mg/kg ketamine intramuscularly. According to the authors, a psychedelic dose was defined as a hallucinogenic dose, quantitatively assessed using the Hallucinogen Rating Scale. Patient scores at this level were consistent with those known to produce a comparable psychedelic experience to N, N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) in this validated scale. In contrast, a low dose “elicit[ed] sub-psychedelic experiences and functions[ed] as ketamine-facilitated guided imagery.” (11) As this was ketamine-assisted psychotherapy, participants underwent ten hours of preparatory psychotherapy before the ketamine session and the ketamine session itself lasted between 1.5 to 2 hours. A five-hour integration therapy was offered thereafter to help participants process their experience. During the ketamine session, participants were made comfortable, offered eyeshades and music. The psychotherapist remained present throughout, offering support during the session. A single psychiatrist conducted all psychotherapy sessions. Participants were followed for 12 months with assessments that included urine toxicology. Results demonstrated that members of the “high-dose” group were significantly more likely to be abstinent at 1 and 2 months (p<0.01) and at all other months except 7 and 8 (p<0.05). Both groups showed reduced cravings, with the high-dose group experiencing greater reductions than controls immediately post-therapy (4.0 vs. 15.1, p<0.01), at 1 month (7.7 vs. 20.2, p<0.05), 3 months (5.4 vs. 28.3, p<0.01), and 1 year (1.7 vs. 29.2, p<0.01). While both groups experienced reduced anhedonia, anxiety, and depression, they were not significantly different between groups. These results demonstrate that a “high-dose,” psychedelic dose of ketamine was more effective at prolonging abstinence compared to “low-dose” or non-psychedelic dose of ketamine.

In 2007, Krupitsky et al. conducted a similar trial determining whether number of ketamine-assisted psychotherapy sessions impacted 1-year abstinence rates (12). They recruited 59 young adults and randomized patients into receiving either one or three ketamine sessions, with all participants receiving 2.0 mg/kg intramuscularly per session. After detoxification, participants received five hours of psychotherapy followed by the first ketamine session prior to discharge. After discharge, participants received five more hours of psychotherapy. Those randomized to receive a single session received two monthly addiction counseling, while those randomized to the three-session group received two more ketamine sessions each preceded by addiction counseling. At 12-months, rate of abstinence in the three-session group was greater compared to the single-session group (50% vs 22.2%, p<0.05), with no differences between depression, anxiety, and craving scores between groups. Of note, all symptom measures significantly decreased after the first session and continued to decline for both groups for those who remained abstinent and continued adherence to the protocol.

Ketamine in the treatment of OW

There were six studies identified that examined the efficacy of ketamine in the treatment of OW (Table 2). Of these six studies, there was one prospective cohort study and one RCT. The remaining four studies identified were case series or single case studies. Two of the studies examined the effect of ketamine on withdrawal symptoms after receiving an opioid receptor antagonist (13, 14). Two case reports included patients receiving ketamine for treating buprenorphine precipitated opioid withdrawal (BPOW), and one case series reporting results using ketamine as a preventative measure while initiating patients on buprenorphine (15–17).

Table 2

Table 2. Summary of studies on ketamine and opioid withdrawal.

In the only RCT, Jovaisa et al. examined 58 patients with opioid dependence as defined as the DSM-IV undergoing rapid opioid antagonist induction under anesthesia with tracheal intubation (14). Patients in the intervention group received a subanesthetic infusion of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg), finding that ketamine infusion significantly suppressed symptoms of precipitated opiate withdrawal especially in the first two hours after induction. This was true specifically in terms of peak mean arterial pressure (96.6 ± 13.8 in the placebo group vs. 79.4 ± 10.8 in the ketamine group, p<0.001) and peak heart rate (95.5 ± 12.8 in the placebo group vs. 75.6 ± 13.0 in the ketamine group, p<0.001). Furthermore, patients in the ketamine group required significantly less supportive medications (i.e., carbamazepine, clonazepam) to maintain the same level of opiate withdrawal symptoms during the first 48 hours (p<0.001).

Freye et al. conducted a prospective cohort study examining changes in electroencephalogram excitatory activity in acute withdrawal (13). The authors recruited adults actively using heroin or enrolled in methadone maintenance programs who had several unsuccessful inpatient detoxifications in the past to examine electroencephalogram excitatory activity. The authors found that S-ketamine infusion attenuated the increase in EEG activity and amplitude height of sensory-evoked potentials (p<0.01) during rapid opioid detoxification.

Grande et al. conducted a pilot case series in Washington State over 14 months detailing an iterative process of using ketamine to successfully transition adult patients with OUD from fentanyl or methadone to buprenorphine using either low- or macro-dose inductions (17). Patients self-administered 4-8 doses of sublingual ketamine 16 mg (3-6% of an anesthetic dose) with daily monitoring of symptoms. Of the included 37 patients, 16 patients (43%) successfully completed buprenorphine initiation. However, of the last 12 patients who completed buprenorphine initiation, 11 (92%) achieved 30-day retention in treatment. Patients who used ketamine reported reduction of elimination of spontaneous opioid withdrawal symptoms. The authors report that the novel strategy here is recommending patients to proactively use ketamine before emergence of withdrawal to facilitate buprenorphine induction.

The remaining three studies were single case reports. The first was a case report of a 36-year-old woman in France with severe OUD in the context of chronic back pain who was treated with ketamine in an attempt to reduce her daily opioid consumption (18). Prior to ketamine treatment, she was on a regimen of oxycontin extended-release 120 mg daily, oxycodone 60 mg daily, and acetaminophen/codeine 300 mg/25 mg 6 times per day). She received one oral dose of ketamine solution (1 mg/kg), then her opioid regimen was down-titrated by 10% every 48 hours to a goal of 50 mg codeine three times daily over two weeks. Patient experienced no withdrawal symptoms as her regimen was down-titrated with minimal side effects.

The single case reports by Hailozian et al. and Christian et al. both examined the effect of ketamine in the treatment of BPOW (15, 16). Given this is the terminology used by authors, we have elected to remain consistent while acknowledging that the precipitation is due to unregulated fentanyl use in the setting of using buprenorphine as evidence-based treatment. In the first case, a 32-year-old male patient with OUD, who initially presented to the emergency department with suicidal ideation, developed severe BPOW after lack of response to outpatient low dose induction, with COWS score reaching 18. Of note, he had several attempts to transition to buprenorphine in the outpatient setting, with the goal of abstinence, prior to presenting to the emergency department. He was treated with one infusion of IV ketamine (0.6 mg/kg over 60 minutes) along with high-dose buprenorphine (16 mg) administered sublingually, after which, patient’s COWS score decreased to 2. The patient was given month-long dose of extended-release buprenorphine delivered subcutaneously prior to discharge. The extended-release buprenorphine was repeated monthly for 3 months. At 120 days, the patient was able to remain in treatment and remained abstinent from opioid use (15). In the second case, a 32-year-old male patient with history of severe OUD undergoing withdrawal (24 hours since last fentanyl use) and concomitant suicidal ideation was initially given buprenorphine-naloxone (BNX) 16-4 mg over two doses sublingually in the emergency department, which raised his COWS score to 36+ (15). He first received one ketamine infusions (first 0.3 mg/kg over 15 minutes, immediately followed by 0.3 mg/kg over 60 minutes) along with additional BNX. After the first ketamine infusion, the patient’s COWS score was sustained at 18, then after the second ketamine infusion, the patient’s COWS score decreased to 0 within 8 hours (16). Of note, all studies examining use of ketamine for OW used standard adjunctive treatments, including anti-anxiolytics, analgesics, anti-emetics, among other medications.

Discussion

In the last decade, several reviews have been published exploring the therapeutic use of ketamine in substance use disorders, eating disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, bipolar disorder, suicidal ideation, social anxiety and generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and ketamine’s interactions with electroconvulsive therapy (20–22). Ketamine has also shown preliminary efficacy in other substance use disorders, including alcohol use disorder and stimulant use disorder (19, 20). The findings from these studies are especially promising for stimulant use disorder, as there is a modicum of pharmacological treatments. In fact, a systematic review of ketamine treatment for stimulant use disorders found that ketamine improved cravings, motivation, and decreased cocaine use rates (19).

This is the first review, to our knowledge, that specifically examines the efficacy of ketamine in treating OUD and OW. While the amount of research in this space is clearly limited, one strength of this review is the inclusion of two RCTs in examining the use of ketamine in treatment of opioid use disorder. Furthermore, for treatment of OW, this review adds several successful recent case reports of using ketamine as an adjunct to buprenorphine to prevent withdrawal symptoms and precipitated withdrawal (16–18).

In the use of ketamine to treat OUD, we identified two RCTs, with both studies conducted by Krupitsky et al. The author found that increasing dose and number of ketamine treatments administered improved outcomes (i.e., rates of abstinence in patients receiving three ketamine-assisted psychotherapy sessions were almost twice as high as patients receiving one ketamine-assisted psychotherapy session) (12). This finding is consistent with the literature in using ketamine for other alcohol use disorder. In 2009, Kolp et al. conducted a retrospective cohort study finding that patients who received two ketamine infusions had higher alcohol abstinence rates compared to patients who received just one infusion (21).

In these RCTs examining ketamine for OUD, it is difficult to disentangle the effects of psychotherapy from the effects of ketamine in these RCTs, as all patients received some amount of ketamine, whether it was a “psychedelic” dose or a “non-psychedelic” dose. There are no RCTs with ketamine and opioid use disorder that have compared ketamine-assisted psychotherapy to only ketamine, which is a conspicuous gap in the literature. However, in looking to the literature in using ketamine in alcohol use disorder, Grabski et al. found patients receiving concomitant therapy had more days abstinent and lower odds of relapse, but the confidence interval included the null (22). Furthermore, as above, the retrospective cohort study by Kolp et al. found that patients undergoing more intensive group psychotherapy sessions had higher abstinence rates (21). As it stands, the evidence is limited - the role of psychotherapy in ketamine administration for opioid use disorder is currently unclear and requires further exploration.

In the studies examining the role of ketamine in OW, the findings suggest benefit in its effect on diminishing withdrawal symptoms and CNS sensory activation. As such, it is important to discuss two studies that discuss the proactive use of ketamine in opioid withdrawal, but did not meet inclusion criteria, as neither are peer-reviewed manuscripts. Casey et al. reported in a letter to the editor the use oral ketamine (20 mg dosed every 6 hours) to treat concurrent pain and opioid withdrawal (23). In 113 patients, they found the reduction of total oral morphine equivalents by 35% throughout the course of the hospitalization. Heeney et al. conducted a retrospective case series of 10 patients examining the use of ketamine for buprenorphine-precipitated opioid withdrawal. Patients generally received ketamine 0.3 mg/kg IV infusion over 15 minutes, followed by 0.3-1 mg/kg infusion over 1 hour. All patients were able to discharge safely from the hospital and the majority (8/10) remained engaged in treatment through California Bridge services (24).

It must be noted that a substantial barrier to research with psychoactive compounds is identifying an appropriate placebo for ketamine (25). In examining the role of ketamine in OW, two of the studies administered ketamine under anesthesia, patients were effectively blinded, which strengthens the interpretation of the results of those studies (13, 14). The potential utility of ketamine as an adjunct to treating OW, especially during buprenorphine induction, is of particular importance given the challenges patients now face in safely initiating treatment. More research is urgently needed to better understand how ketamine can mitigate the risk of OW during buprenorphine inductions.

Limitations of this review include heterogeneous studies with small sample sizes, restricting the ability to conduct a meta-analysis. This was especially true for examining the use of ketamine in OW, as the majority of the studies cited were case series/reports. Furthermore, there was heterogeneity in ketamine dosing, routes of administration, and adjunctive psychotherapeutic treatments, which may have greatly affected the outcomes. Furthermore, the dosing varied by study, an important consideration given difference in ketamine bioavailability based on route of administration (i.e., IV, IM, sublingually, or orally). For the RCTs exploring OUD, ketamine was administered intramuscularly (IM) at either a high (e.g., 2.0 mg/kg) or low dose (e.g., 0.20 mg/kg), or as the same dose (2.0 mg/kg) across single versus multiple sessions. Observational studies utilized intravenous (IV) ketamine (n = 4), sublingual ketamine (n = 1), or oral ketamine (n = 1). The differences in bioavailability and metabolism across these routes are important to discuss. IV administration results in 100% bioavailability and rapid onset, IM has approximately 93% bioavailability with slightly slower absorption, sublingual administration bypasses first-pass metabolism but has variable bioavailability (~32%), and oral administration has the lowest bioavailability (~17%) due to extensive first-pass metabolism (26, 27). As such, creating a standardized protocol in the future may be challenging without increasing homogeneity in dosing and route of administration in future studies. It is also important to acknowledge that 694 studies were excluded out of 712 non-redundant results. Given the dearth of research in this area, we opted for a more inclusive search to ensure no relevant studies were missed. Finally, in terms of the demographics of patients recruited, none of the studies reported race. In four of the five larger studies, the majority of the sample were aged 22-31, with male patients comprising 74-83% of the studied population, limiting generalizability of results. This point is especially true for the RCTs for OUD, where both studies were conducted in Russia, in a predominantly young, male population. Further research is needed to evaluate ketamine treatment across a more representative range of backgrounds and sexes.

As with the trials of ketamine for alcohol use disorder, it is unknown if combining ketamine treatment with mindfulness-based relapse prevention would lead to different outcomes. Another limitation is the challenge of isolating the effects of ketamine, particularly given its nature as a network therapeutic. For instance, it is known that patients with depression are more likely to use opioids long-term and that comorbid depression may drive substance use (28, 29). In fact, it is possible that there is endogenous opioid system dysregulation in depression (30). Thus, in examining OUD, it is difficult to extricate the effects of depression and/or other comorbid mental health disorders as a mediator for post-treatment abstinence. Furthermore, it is unclear how long the effects of the treatment is sustained, as the longest follow-up period was only 24 months (11). Interestingly, in the Jovaisa et al. study, there was no significant difference in length of abstinence from opioids at 4 months (14), which differed from the results demonstrated by Krupitsky et al. (11, 12). More research would be needed to see if abstinence is sustained, and if so, how long the effects last.

Additionally, the cost-effectiveness of ketamine treatment for OUD/OW has not been explored, thus more work needs to be done to clarify the financial feasibility. This point would be especially true if used as an adjunct to intensive psychotherapy, similar to the two RCTs examining ketamine for treating OUD.

It is important to consider how ketamine compares to standard care for OUD. Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), like methadone and buprenorphine, have well-established efficacy, with studies showing a 20-60% abstinence from opioids, according to a review examining randomized controlled trials of opioid-abstinence rates when using MOUD (31). Psychosocial interventions, including cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and contingency management, have demonstrated success rates of approximately 30-50% when used alone but are more effective when combined with MOUD with studies demonstrating abstinence rates as high as 85% in randomized trials (32, 33). In the present review, for the treatment of OUD, the two studies included used ketamine as a replacement for MOUD. As such, there is a clear gap in the literature in examining the utility of ketamine as an adjunctive treatment to MOUD. Furthermore, it is known that utilization of MOUD in eligible populations is as low as 17% (34). It is not currently known if patients who are unwilling or unable to accept MOUD would be more willing to engage in ketamine-assisted psychotherapy. In clinical scenarios with limited opportunities to interface for treatment due to setting (i.e., a temporary setting like residential rehabilitation programs) or patient population (i.e., clients who are undomiciled or migrant workers), it would be helpful to further explore ketamine as a potential solution. Long-term comparative efficacy of these different treatments remains unclear. While psychotherapy remains a mainstay of addiction treatment, ketamine’s rapid-acting effects may provide a window of increased neuroplasticity that could enhance psychotherapeutic outcomes. Further research is needed to determine optimal integration strategies and long-term efficacy relative to standard care.

Though ketamine may demonstrate several benefits, there are also risks. When taken in high doses, it can have an anesthetic effect that impairs respiration and cardiovascular function, potentially leading to fatal consequences if misused, especially in unmonitored settings or when combined with CNS depressants or opioids (35). Hallucinogen use disorder can develop from ketamine use and long-term use has been associated with cognitive decline, including impairment of memory, as well as persistent dissociative or delusional thinking (36). Furthermore, there may be increased risk in ketamine-induced cystitis, leading to bladder scarring. This process is thought to be secondary to inflammatory signaling pathways causing damage to the bladder epithelium due to ketamine metabolites (37). While ketamine-induced cystitis (KIC) is most prevalent in illicit ketamine use, there have been case studies involving cystitis as a side effect of ketamine use for anesthetic and depression-treatment purposes (38, 39). Hemodynamic instability must also be monitored closely with higher risks for those with pre-existing cardiovascular conditions (40), though as seen in the studies listed above, ketamine may attenuate hemodynamic variability in patients undergoing precipitated opioid withdrawal (14). It is also unclear whether mode of administration can affect opioid use or withdrawal, as oral, intranasal, intravenous, and intramuscular forms exist. While none of the participants in these studies developed a hallucinogen use disorder, more research is needed to evaluate the safety of this treatment, as well as target populations that may derive the most benefit from this medication. Furthermore, there may be gaps in access to ketamine, such that those who may benefit the most would face significant financial barriers to treatment with ketamine (41).

These studies demonstrate promising evidence for the use of ketamine in treatment of OUD and OW. However, more research is needed. While there are currently five clinical trials in this space with unpublished results according to ClinicalTrials.gov, more research is needed to determine the optimal dose, frequency, and adjuncts of treatment (i.e., psychotherapy or other substance use treatment programs), as well as the safety and tolerability of this medication. Furthermore, given the recent approval for esketamine as monotherapy for treatment-resistant depression (42), the role of ketamine as a singular treatment versus as an adjunct for psychotherapy or medications for OUD requires further exploration.

Conclusions

In summary, this review presents a baseline of literature supporting the use of ketamine in OUD and OW. In OUD, ketamine was shown to be effective as an adjunct to psychotherapy, with increasing efficacy for patients receiving higher doses and greater number of sessions. In OW, ketamine appears to be a helpful treatment, along with other supportive medications, in treating withdrawal symptoms and facilitating buprenorphine initiation. However, we strongly urge that more rigorous research is needed before ketamine is recommended for widespread use as a therapeutic for OUD and OW.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Author contributions

MS: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. DC: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. AK: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. SM: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. NR: Visualization, Writing – review & editing. KN: Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JS: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Florence C, Luo F, Rice K. The economic burden of opioid use disorder and fatal opioid overdose in the United States, 2017. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2021) 218:108350. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108350

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Rudd RA, Aleshire N, Zibbell JE, Matthew Gladden R. Increases in drug and opioid overdose deaths—United states, 2000–2014. Am J Transplant. (2016) 16:1323–7. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13776

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Kuczyńska K, Grzonkowski P, Kacprzak Ł, Zawilska JB. Abuse of fentanyl: An emerging problem to face. Forensic Sci Int. (2018) 289:207–14. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.05.042

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Chang. The history of ketamine use and its clinical indications . SpringerLink. Available online at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-42925-0_1 (Accessed November 21, 2024).

Google Scholar

5. Yavi M, Lee H, Henter ID, Park LT, Zarate CA. Ketamine treatment for depression: a review. Discovery Ment Health. (2022) 2:9. doi: 10.1007/s44192-022-00012-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Morgan CJA, Curran HV. Drugs (ISCD) the ISC on. Ketamine use: review Addict. (2012) 107:27–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03576.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Nowacka A, Borczyk M. Ketamine applications beyond anesthesia – A literature review. Eur J Pharmacol. (2019) 860:172547–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172547

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Ivan Ezquerra-Romano I, Lawn W, Krupitsky E, Morgan CJA. Ketamine for the treatment of addiction: Evidence and potential mechanisms. Neuropharmacology. (2018) 142:72–82. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.01.017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Gomes I, Gupta A, Margolis EB, Fricker LD, Devi LA. Ketamine and major ketamine metabolites function as allosteric modulators of opioid receptors. Mol Pharmacol. (2024) 106:240–52. doi: 10.1124/molpharm.124.000947

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg. (2021) 88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Krupitsky E, Burakov A, Romanova T, Dunaevsky I, Strassman R, Grinenko A. Ketamine psychotherapy for heroin addiction: Immediate effects and two-year follow-up. J Subst Abuse Treat. (2002) 23:273–83. doi: 10.1016/S0740-5472(02)00275-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Krupitsky EM, Burakov AM, Dunaevsky IV, Romanova TN, Slavina TY, Grinenko AY. Single versus repeated sessions of ketamine-assisted psychotherapy for people with heroin dependence. J Psychoactive Drugs. (2007) 39:13–9. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2007.10399860

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Freye E, Latasch L, Levy JV. S(+)-ketamine attenuates increase in electroencephalograph activity and amplitude height of sensory-evoked potentials during rapid opioid detoxification. Anesth Analgesia. (2006) 102:1439. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000202382.82847.64

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Jovaisa T, Laurinėnas G, Vosylius S, Šipylaitė J, Badaras R, Ivaškevičius J. Effects of ketamine on precipitated opiate withdrawal. Medicina (Kaunas). (2006) 42:625–34.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

15. Hailozian C, Luftig J, Liang A, Outhay M, Ullal M, Anderson ES, et al. Synergistic effect of ketamine and buprenorphine observed in the treatment of buprenorphine precipitated opioid withdrawal in a patient with fentanyl use. J Addict Med. (2022) 16(4):483–7. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000929

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Christian NJ, Butner JL, Evarts MS, Weimer MB. Precipitated opioid withdrawal treated with ketamine in a hospitalized patient: A case report. J Addict Med. (2023) 17:488. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000001151

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Grande LA, Hutch T, Jack K, Mironov W, Iwuoha J, Muy-Rivera M, et al. Ketamine-assisted buprenorphine initiation: a pilot case series. Addict Sci Clin Pract. (2024) 19:60. doi: 10.1186/s13722-024-00494-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Lalanne L, Nicot C, Lang J-P, Bertschy G, Salvat E. Experience of the use of Ketamine to manage opioid withdrawal in an addicted woman: a case report. BMC Psychiatry. (2016) 16:395. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1112-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Jones JL, Mateus CF, Malcolm RJ, Brady KT, Back SE. Efficacy of ketamine in the treatment of substance use disorders: A systematic review. Front Psychiatry. (2018) 9:277. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00277

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Martinotti G, Chiappini S, Pettorruso M, Mosca A, Miuli A, Di Carlo F, et al. Therapeutic potentials of ketamine and esketamine in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), substance use disorders (SUD) and eating disorders (ED): A review of the current literature. Brain Sci. (2021) 11:856. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11070856

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Kolp E, Friedman HL, Young MS, Krupitsky E. Ketamine enhanced psychotherapy: preliminary clinical observations on its effectiveness in treating alcoholism. Humanistic Psychol. (2006) 34:399–422. doi: 10.1207/s15473333thp3404_7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Grabski M, McAndrew A, Lawn W, Marsh B, Raymen L, Stevens T, et al. Adjunctive ketamine with relapse prevention–based psychological therapy in the treatment of alcohol use disorder. AJP. (2022) 179:152–62. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.21030277

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Casey ER, Hetrick ML, Zwiebel SJ. Potential application of ketamine in pain and withdrawal in patients with opioid use disorder. J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry. (2024) 65:409–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaclp.2024.04.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Heeney M, Herring A, Anderson E. 159 ketamine use for buprenorphine-precipitated opioid withdrawal: A case series of 10 patients. Ann Emergency Med. (2022) 80:S72. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.08.183

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Hendy K. Placebo problems: boundary work in the psychedelic science renaissance. In: Labate BC, Cavnar C, editors. Plant medicines, healing and psychedelic science: cultural perspectives. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018). p. 151–66. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-76720-8_9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Clements JA, Nimmo WS, Grant IS. Bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and analgesic activity of ketamine in humans. J Pharm Sci. (1982) 71:539–42. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600710516

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Chong C, Schug S, Page-Sharp M, Ilett K. Bioavailability of ketamine after oral or sublingual administration. Pain Med. (2006) 7:469–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00208_8.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Rogers AH, Zvolensky MJ, Ditre JW, Buckner JD, Asmundson GJG. Association of opioid misuse with anxiety and depression: A systematic review of the literature. Clin Psychol Rev. (2021) 84:101978. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101978

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Tormohlen KN, Mojtabai R, Seiwell A, McGinty EE, Stuart EA, Tobin KE, et al. Co-occurring opioid use and depressive disorders: patient characteristics and co-occurring health conditions. J Dual Diagnosis. (2021) 17(4):296–303. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2021.1979349

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Peciña M, Karp JF, Mathew S, Todtenkopf MS, Ehrich EW, Zubieta J-K. Endogenous opioid system dysregulation in depression: implications for new therapeutic approaches. Mol Psychiatry. (2019) 24:576–87. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0117-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Connery HS. Medication-assisted treatment of opioid use disorder: review of the evidence and future directions. Harvard Rev Psychiatry. (2015) 23:63. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000075

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. McHugh RK, Fitzmaurice GM, Votaw VR, Geyer RB, Ragnini K, Greenfield SF, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and opioid use disorder: Development and pilot testing. J Subst Use Addict Treat. (2024) 160:209296. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209296

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Moore BA, Fiellin DA, Cutter CJ, Buono FD, Barry DT, Fiellin LE, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy improves treatment outcomes for prescription opioid users in primary-care based buprenorphine treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. (2016) 71:54–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.08.016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Mauro PM, Gutkind S, Annunziato EM, Samples H. Use of medication for opioid use disorder among US adolescents and adults with need for opioid treatment, 2019. JAMA Network Open. (2022) 5:e223821. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3821

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Sassano-Higgins S, Baron D, Juarez G, Esmaili N, Gold M. A review of ketamine abuse and diversion. Depress Anxiety. (2016) 33(8):718–27. doi: 10.1002/da.22536

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Ke X, Ding Y, Xu K, He H, Wang D, Deng X, et al. The profile of cognitive impairments in chronic ketamine users. Psychiatry Res. (2018) 266:124–31. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.05.050

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Pal R, Balt S, Erowid E, Erowid F, Baggott MJ, Mendelson J, et al. Ketamine is associated with lower urinary tract signs and symptoms. Drug Alcohol Depend. (2013) 132:189–94. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.02.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Chang M, Juruena MF, Young AH. Ketamine cystitis following ketamine therapy for treatment-resistant depression – case report. BMC Psychiatry. (2024) 24:9. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05468-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Shahzad K, Svec A, Al-Koussayer O, Harris M, Fulford S. Analgesic ketamine use leading to cystectomy: A case report. Br J Med Surg Urol. (2012) 5:188–91. doi: 10.1016/j.bjmsu.2011.06.005

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Waxman K, Shoemaker WC, Lippmann M. Cardiovascular effects of anesthetic induction with ketamine. Anesth Analgesia. (1980) 59:355. doi: 10.1213/00000539-198005000-00007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Andrade C. Ketamine for depression—Knowns, unknowns, possibilities, barriers, and opportunities. JAMA Psychiatry. (2023) 80:1189–90. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.3982

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. SPRAVATO. (esketamine) approved in the U.S. as the first and only monotherapy for adults with treatment-resistant depression (2025). JNJ.com. Available online at: https://www.jnj.com/media-center/press-releases/spravato-esketamine-approved-in-the-u-s-as-the-first-and-only-monotherapy-for-adults-with-treatment-resistant-depression (Accessed March 3, 2025).

Google Scholar