Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Mood Disorders

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1553930

Collaborative Challenges During Transition of Patients with Severe Depression from Secondary Mental Health Services to Primary Care and Opportunities for Improvement - A Qualitative Study

Provisionally accepted
Anne Sofie  AggestrupAnne Sofie Aggestrup1,2*Marius  Brostrøm KousgaardMarius Brostrøm Kousgaard1Klaus  MartinyKlaus Martiny2Annette  Sofie DavidsenAnnette Sofie Davidsen1
  • 1Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 2Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Region Hovedstad Psychiatry, Copenhagen, Denmark

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Patients with severe depression are treated across primary and secondary healthcare and receive employment support from municipal caseworkers (CWs). However, collaboration during the transition from outpatient secondary mental health services to primary care is often insufficient, increasing the risk of relapse. Limited knowledge exists on how health professionals (general practitioners (GPs), mental health professionals (MHPs) and social medicine physicians), CWs, and patients perceive barriers – and, in particular, how collaboration could be improved and relapse prevented. We aimed to explore barriers to cross-sectoral collaboration during the transition of patients with severe depression from outpatient secondary mental health services to primary care, and to generate ideas from health professionals, CWs, and patients to enhance this collaboration and contribute to preventing relapse. Materials and Methods: This qualitative study included fieldwork observations, interviews, focus groups, and workshops with 25 health professionals, seven CWs, and four recently discharged patients. Data was analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis and descriptive methods. Results: Four themes were found. Collaboration across sectors was impeded by low relational coordination, including divergent goals, unclear roles, mutual mistrust and limited communication. An asymmetry in dependence between sectors was evident: GPs and CWs were dependent on information from MHPs during and after outpatient treatment, whereas MHPs were neither aware of this need nor expected ongoing updates. Patients felt vulnerable post-discharge, with little support, and the burden of navigating a complex healthcare system on their own. To improve collaboration, participants suggested online planning meetings, a coordinating liaison or care manager, and a smartphone application for patients to monitor their mental health and signs of relapse. Flexible return to work solutions were also emphasised. Discussion: Cross-sectoral collaboration in the care of severe depression is challenged by structural and relational barriers, leaving patients vulnerable and at increased risk of relapse during transitions between sectors. Strengthening coordination through shared planning, clearer roles, a coordinating liaison or care manager, digital tools, and flexible return-to-work solutions may ensure continuity and prevent relapse of depression.

Keywords: Depression, Mental health service, General Practice, Municipality, Primary Care, Secondary Care, qualitative methods

Received: 31 Dec 2024; Accepted: 08 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Aggestrup, Kousgaard, Martiny and Davidsen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Anne Sofie Aggestrup, Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 1165, Denmark

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.