Gita Ramamurthy
Robert Gregory- Department of Psychiatry, Norton School of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, United States
Seriousness of suicide crisis
Suicide has become an urgent public health crisis in the United States. The age-adjusted suicide rate increased by 36% between 2000 and 2022 (1). In 2023, suicide was among the top eight leading causes of death for people ages 10–64 and the second leading cause of death for people ages 10-34 (1).
Broadening treatment focus from the chronic illness model: restoring life meaning
The dominant treatment model in the U.S. for suicidality involves somatic treatments (primarily medication) and psychotherapy to manage psychiatric conditions and suicidality (2, 3). An underlying assumption of this model is that suicidality is generally chronic, reflecting long-standing psychiatric disorders with periodic life-threatening exacerbations. Indeed, suicidality is commonly associated with chronic mental disorders, particularly treatment-resistant depression (2, 4). Acute exacerbations of symptoms and suicidal risk are common, often requiring recurrent emergency services and/or hospitalization (5). Even after hospitalization, suicide risk remains elevated for at least 10 years (6). Since the common trajectory for suicidality involves chronicity, we call the dominant approach the “chronic illness” model.
Systematic reviews (7, 8) addressing psychotherapy for suicidality support the efficacy of psychotherapy, involving multiple approaches including cognitive-behavioral (CBT), dialectical behavioral (DBT) and psychodynamic therapies. In authoritative texts and systematic reviews, typical targets of psychotherapy involve suicidality and chronic psychiatric conditions, especially treatment-resistant depression, but do not necessarily include socio-occupational recovery (2, 3, 7–9).
Suicidality and socio-occupational dysfunction, manifested by social isolation (10) and unemployment/precarious employment (11, 12), are commonly linked, partly because both are associated with mental illness (13–18). Additionally, socio-occupational dysfunction is associated with demoralization (10, 11), a robust risk factor of suicidality (12), reflecting helplessness, hopelessness and meaninglessness (13).
Meaning, purpose and belonging are considered fundamental human needs (19, 20), integral to mental health and life satisfaction (21–24). The interpersonal theory of suicide posits that two factors underlie suicidal ideation, an intractable belief of being burdensome and thwarted belonging (16). Empirical evidence for this theory (16, 25) is reinforced by studies linking a sense of meaning/purpose and social connectedness with lower suicide risk (26–28). The US “National Strategy for Suicide Prevention” emphasizes the protective importance of socio-occupational function, given its association with a sense of meaning/purpose and belonging (29–31).
A recovery-based model: psychotherapy targeting transdiagnostic suicide risk factors, including emotion processing deficits, to promote socio-occupational recovery
We believe resolution of chronic suicidality is possible by adding a focus on socio-occupational recovery to promote life satisfaction and social connectedness, which predict remission from suicidal ideation more robustly than psychiatric symptoms (32). Having socio-occupational recovery as the goal influences the necessary duration of psychotherapy. The recommended duration and intensity of psychotherapy for suicidality is not consensually defined. Systematic reviews reference a wide range of durations, from days to years (7–9). One systematic review reported a median duration of 12 weeks (9). However, when targeting recovery of interpersonal function, evidence suggests that a year or more is necessary (33).
Recovery of well-being and life satisfaction is facilitated by several conditions, including meeting basic needs (food, shelter and safety), developing a sense of autonomy, personal responsibility, self-acceptance and wellness skills and experiencing meaningful roles and relationships (34). The U.S. federal agency, SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration), emphasizes several key principles for recovery, such as hope, relationships, and person-driven holistic care, addressing biological and psychosocial vulnerabilities (35). We recommend a recovery framework to instill hope and re-engagement in life by targeting factors promoting vulnerability to socio-occupational dysfunction, treatment resistance and suicidality across diagnoses (“transdiagnostic”). These include emotion processing deficits, such as alexithymia, avoidance coping and impaired mentalization, and harsh self-criticism/lack of self- compassion (36–51).
Many of these transdiagnostic vulnerabilities can also be conceptualized as neurobiological deficits in emotion processing, the affective, cognitive and behavioral dimensions of emotion perception, interpretation and responses (52–54). Emotion processing networks include the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, limbic cortex (medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, insula), striatum and amygdala (55). For example, alexithymia has been linked to limbic cortex dysfunction (56). Mentalization is associated medial prefrontal cortex activity (57). Notably, neurobiological changes associated with suicide appear to be independent of diagnosis, i.e., transdiagnostic (58).
Remediating emotion processing, self-compassion, and social connectedness through psychotherapy may not only reduce psychiatric symptoms, but also promote a meaningful, connected life, from functional socio-occupational recovery, to prevent suicide. Psychotherapy may reverse inflammation and many neurobiological deficits in the emotion processing system (59, 60). Additionally, psychotherapy can improve hopelessness, self-compassion, resilience, well-being and engagement in life in suicidal individuals (61–65). Preliminary evidence indicates that psychological interventions targeting alexithymia, experiential avoidance, and low self-compassion improve psychopathology, interpersonal functioning and suicide risk (66–70). Recovery of life satisfaction and sense of belonging increases well- being and predicts remission of suicidality (71).
This paper reviews evidence, including research from our institutional center, the Psychiatry High Risk Program (PHRP), supporting this treatment approach targeting transdiagnostic suicide risk factors, particularly dysfunctional emotion processing to promote recovery. Psychotherapy and adjunctive medication is given for a year, while monitoring improvement in suicidality, psychiatric symptoms and emotion processing with standardized scales (e.g., Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) (72). This approach can lead to the resolution of suicidality, substantial recovery from psychiatric conditions and renewal of life satisfaction. The PHRP treatment model was recently designated by SAMHSA’s Suicide Prevention Resource Center as “a best practice” in suicide prevention, and received the 2023 Psychiatric Services Silver Award by the American Psychiatric Association for innovative and effective care.
Front-loading investment in recovery to prevent suicide
We believe that the assumption of the intractability of chronic suicidality reflects insufficient outpatient treatment, particularly involving psychotherapy targeting functional recovery for at least a year.
Treatment duration and intensity can be limited by financial constraints. However, costly excessive emergency care and hospitalizations may result from inadequate outpatient treatment (73). Evidence indicates that individual psychotherapy and medication effectively reduce suicide risk and support functioning (8, 74). In adolescents, adjunctive family therapy for suicide prevention is recommended (75). This approach requires front-loading investment in recovery-focused psychiatric treatment, which we call a “recovery-based model.”
Few outpatient clinics specialize in individuals with high suicide risk. Parallels can be made with the clinical specialty clinics (CSCs) for early psychosis, promoted by NIMH and the federal government, to implement best practices (76). CSCs provide intensive, evidence-based treatment, including case management, low-dose antipsychotics, psychotherapy and occupational support. Unlike crisis-focused care, CSCs offer a long-term return in recovery/prevention of psychosis. Similarly, the approach from our institutional center, the PHRP, demonstrate effectiveness in resolving suicidality among adults and adolescents after a one-year program of psychotherapy and medication management (69, 77).
Social determinants of suicide & deaths of despair: supporting resilience
Although psychiatric work focuses on addressing individuals, addressing a national suicide crisis requires a multi-level analysis, that includes social “determinants” (risk factors) for mental illness. Increased suicide risk from social determinants appears mediated by overwhelming stress and feelings of meaningless and disconnection.
The influential “Deaths of Despair” theory attributes the crisis of increased suicide among Americans without college degrees to financial stress and community breakdown from off-shoring/automation of manufacturing (78), leading to loss of meaning and connectedness, shame and demoralization (79). The Cultural Theory and Model of Suicide emphasizes minority stress as an important suicide risk factor (80). Minority stress is understood at two levels: The “distal” level involves experiencing chronic discrimination. Psychological consequences at the “proximal” level, such as shame from internalizing prejudicial stereotypes, or concealment, mediate negative impacts, such as suicidality and loneliness (72, 81, 82). Lower socioeconomic standing from poverty/unemployment, or ethnic/sexual minority status, are associated with shame, a lower sense of belonging and chronic, overwhelming stress (15, 83–88).
Possibly excepting ethnic minority groups, these socioeconomic characteristics are associated with increased suicide risk (87, 89).
The psychiatric consequences of marginalization and disempowerment are likely mediated by the neurotoxic and psychological effects of chronic stress (88), which can lead to demoralization (18, 90). Emotion processing deficits, exemplified by transdiagnostic suicide risk factors such as alexithymia (91), experiential avoidance (92, 93) or shame/self-blame (94, 95) can mediate and/or exacerbate the consequences of unemployment/minority stress. Psychiatrists individually cannot change social determinants, but can counteract their impact by remediating emotion processing.
The psychiatry high risk program as an example of a recovery-based suicide prevention model
The Psychiatry High Risk Program (PHRP) offers one example of a specialized long-term outpatient recovery-based suicide prevention model. The PHRP addresses transdiagnostic vulnerabilities, such as emotion processing deficits, low self-compassion, and social alienation to promote transformational healing and resilience in suicidal youth and young adults, aged 14–40 years. The few exclusion criteria, i.e., severe intellectual impairment, severe autism, severe psychosis, and severe malnourishment, relate to suitability for full engagement in psychotherapy.
In a published study, the PHRP treatment approach led to large and significant reductions in rehospitalizations as compared to usual care, and large reductions in depression and suicide ideation, sustained for over 6 months after discharge (69). Another study demonstrated broad based improvements in highly suicidal adolescents (median 7 lifetime suicide attempts), including improvements in suicidality, depression, anxiety, self-harm, functioning, utilization, and self-compassion (77).
Initial PHRP sessions aim to inject hope by laying out a path for recovery and inviting patients to join the clinician on that path. Pros and cons of a recovery pathway versus a chronic illness pathway of care are discussed with patients, emphasizing personal choice and responsibility for health and recovery.
A core required component of the PHRP is weekly individual psychotherapy with Dynamic Deconstructive Psychotherapy (96) for up to 12 months, followed by optional monthly “maintenance” treatment. DDP has shown efficacy across a wide range of outcomes in patients with borderline personality disorder, with improvement continuing even after treatment completion (96–98). Furthermore, evidence supports that DDP promotes recovery of socio-occupational function (96, 97, 99, 100). All PHRP clinicians, including prescribers, are fully trained in DDP, enabling a common theoretical framework and minimizing potential for splitting between team members.
Individual therapy may be supplemented with medications, case management, family therapy, or group therapy within the PHRP. A team approach emphasizes a caring atmosphere and good communication among team members through weekly peer supervision of challenging cases and team meetings. Tight quality control is maintained through video recordings and quarterly outcome measures.
Transdiagnostic vulnerabilities linked to suicidality and treatment-resistance
Although the PHRP specifically employs DDP, we believe other psychotherapies would be effective. DBT, ACT, Good Psychiatric Management and Mentalization-Based Therapy also address transdiagnostic vulnerabilities, including emotion processing deficits, linked to socio-occupational dysfunction, suicidality and treatment-resistance. For example, ACT targets avoidance coping and harsh self-criticism (101). DBT promotes emotion regulation and mindful self-compassion (102–106).
Limitations to the recovery model
The primary difficulty in applying this model relates to front-loading costs, given insurance constraints on long-term psychotherapy. The limited supply of psychotherapists is another difficulty. Research into may clarify whether, as we believe, front-loading care over a year offers cost-effectiveness over less intensive treatment spread out over a longer term.
Furthermore, public health experts critique the neglect of population-level governmental policies, termed “universal” interventions, relative to individual-level interventions by providers (107). For example, the disproportionate increase in United States suicide rates during the 2010s, over comparable high-income countries, has been attributed to weaker social safety nets that buffer against the loss of manufacturing jobs (108). However effective a recovery approach may be, the society-wide suicide crisis is best addressed when such individual-level interventions are integrated with macroeconomic/social policies that reduce the prevalence and impact of socioeconomic risk factors for suicide (107).
Summary
There is a need to move beyond managing chronic suicidality. We propose a Recovery-Based Model that adds functional recovery as a treatment goal. Suicidality, treatment-resistance and functional impairment commonly stem from underlying transdiagnostic biological, psychological, and socioeconomic vulnerabilities. The PHRP uses DDP for effective recovery-based suicide prevention. Other psychotherapy approaches directly targeting these vulnerabilities are likely effective also. Front-loading investment in more intensive, focused treatment may break the cycle of chronicity, reduce inpatient expenditures, resolve suicidality and improve functioning, restoring purpose and belonging.
Author contributions
GR: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. RG: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. Upstate Foundation, Inc. fund# 44565 paid for publication fees.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. National Vital Statistics System. Mortality 2018–2022. Program VSC, editor. Atlanta, GA: CDC WONDER Online Database (2024).
2. Gold LH, Frierson RL, and American Psychiatric Association Publishing. The American Psychiatric Association Publishing textbook of suicide risk assessment and management. 3rd ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association Publishing (2020). p. 453. xxiii.
3. Sudak HS. Suicide treatment 2017. In: Kaplan and sadocks comprehensive textbook of psychiatry, 10th ed. Wolters Kluwer Health, Philadelphia, PA. p. 8841–55. Kindle Edition. (2017)
4. Kautzky A, Dold M, Bartova L, Spies M, Kranz GS, Souery D, et al. Clinical factors predicting treatment resistant depression: affirmative results from the European multicenter study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. (2019) 139:78–88. doi: 10.1111/acps.12959
5. Fonseca Barbosa J and Gama Marques J. The revolving door phenomenon in severe psychiatric disorders: A systematic review. Int J Soc Psychiatry. (2023) 69:1075–89. doi: 10.1177/00207640221143282
6. Chung DT, Ryan CJ, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Singh SP, Stanton C, and Large MM. Suicide rates after discharge from psychiatric facilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. (2017) 74:694–702. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.1044
7. Mendez-Bustos P, Calati R, Rubio-Ramirez F, Olie E, Courtet P, and Lopez-Castroman J. Effectiveness of psychotherapy on suicidal risk: A systematic review of observational studies. Front Psychol. (2019) 10:277. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00277
8. Sobanski T, Josfeld S, Peikert G, and Wagner G. Psychotherapeutic interventions for the prevention of suicide re-attempts: a systematic review. Psychol Med. (2021) 51:2525–40. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721003081
9. Fox KR, Huang X, Guzman EM, Funsch KM, Cha CB, Ribeiro JD, et al. Interventions for suicide and self-injury: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials across nearly 50 years of research. Psychol Bull. (2020) 146:1117–45. doi: 10.1037/bul0000305
10. Calati R, Ferrari C, Brittner M, Oasi O, Olie E, Carvalho AF, et al. Suicidal thoughts and behaviors and social isolation: A narrative review of the literature. J Affect Disord. (2019) 245:653–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.022
11. Skinner A, Osgood ND, Occhipinti JA, Song YJC, and Hickie IB. Unemployment and underemployment are causes of suicide. Sci Adv. (2023) 9:eadg3758. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg3758
12. Favril L, Yu R, Geddes JR, and Fazel S. Individual-level risk factors for suicide mortality in the general population: an umbrella review. Lancet Public Health. (2023) 8:e868–e77. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00207-4
13. Virgolino A, Costa J, Santos O, Pereira ME, Antunes R, Ambrosio S, et al. Lost in transition: a systematic review of the association between unemployment and mental health. J Ment Health. (2022) 31:432–44. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2021.2022615
14. Motillon-Toudic C, Walter M, Seguin M, Carrier JD, Berrouiguet S, and Lemey C. Social isolation and suicide risk: Literature review and perspectives. Eur Psychiatry. (2022) 65:e65. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2320
15. Rosso BD, Dekas KH, and Wrzesniewski A. On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Res Organizational Behav. (2010) 30:91–127. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001
16. Chu C, Buchman-Schmitt JM, Stanley IH, Hom MA, Tucker RP, Hagan CR, et al. The interpersonal theory of suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a decade of cross-national research. Psychol Bull. (2017) 143:1313–45. doi: 10.1037/bul0000123
17. Costanza A, Vasileios C, Ambrosetti J, Shah S, Amerio A, Aguglia A, et al. Demoralization in suicide: A systematic review. J Psychosom Res. (2022) 157:110788. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.110788
18. Wozniewicz A and Cosci F. Clinical utility of demoralization: A systematic review of the literature. Clin Psychol Rev. (2023) 99:102227. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102227
20. Allen KA, Gray DL, Baumeister RF, and Leary MR. The need to belong: a deep dive into the origins, implications, and future of a foundational construct. Educ Psychol Rev. (2022) 34:1133–56. doi: 10.1007/s10648-021-09633-6
21. Glaw X, Kable A, Hazelton M, and Inder K. Meaning in life and meaning of life in mental health care: an integrative literature review. Issues Ment Health Nurs. (2017) 38:243–52. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2016.1253804
22. Helliwell JF and Putnam RD. The social context of well-being. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. (2004) 359:1435–46. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1522
23. Harlow LL and Newcomb MD. Towards a general hierarchical model of meaning and satisfaction in life. Multivariate Behav Res. (1990) 25:387–405. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2503_9
24. Sanchez J, Wadsworth JS, Frain MP, Umucu E, and Chan F. Psychiatric symptoms, psychosocial factors, and life satisfaction among persons with serious mental illness: A path analysis. J Nerv Ment Dis. (2020) 208:600–7. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000001166
25. Silva C, Smith PN, Rogers M, Joiner TE, Foote B, and Van Orden KA. Clinically significant scores for thwarted belonging and perceived burden from the interpersonal needs questionnaire (INQ-15). Crisis. (2023) 44:406–14. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000898
26. Fischer IC, Nichter B, Feldman DB, Na PJ, Tsai J, Harpaz-Rotem I, et al. Purpose in life protects against the development of suicidal thoughts and behaviors in U.S. veterans without a history of suicidality: A 10-year, nationally representative, longitudinal study. J Affect Disord. (2023) 340:551–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.08.040
27. Lew B, Chistopolskaya K, Osman A, Huen JMY, Abu Talib M, and Leung ANM. Meaning in life as a protective factor against suicidal tendencies in Chinese University students. BMC Psychiatry. (2020) 20:73. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02485-4
28. Fassberg MM, van Orden KA, Duberstein P, Erlangsen A, Lapierre S, Bodner E, et al. A systematic review of social factors and suicidal behavior in older adulthood. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2012) 9:722–45. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9030722
29. Zechmann A and Paul KI. Why do individuals suffer during unemployment? Analyzing the role of deprived psychological needs in a six-wave longitudinal study. J Occup Health Psychol. (2019) 24:641–61. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000154
30. Morrish N and Medina-Lara A. Does unemployment lead to greater levels of loneliness? A systematic review. Soc Sci Med. (2021) 287:114339. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114339
31. (OSG) OotSG. The surgeon general’s call to action to implement the national strategy for suicide prevention. Washington (DC): US Department of Health and Human Services. (2021). Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK592704/.
32. Teismann T, Forkmann T, Glaesmer H, Egeri L, and Margraf J. Remission of suicidal thoughts: Findings from a longitudinal epidemiological study. J Affect Disord. (2016) 190:723–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.066
33. Nordmo M, Sonderland NM, Havik OE, Eilertsen DE, Monsen JT, and Solbakken OA. Effectiveness of open-ended psychotherapy under clinically representative conditions. Front Psychiatry. (2020) 11:384. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00384
34. Dell NA, Long C, and Mancini MA. Models of mental health recovery: An overview of systematic reviews and qualitative meta-syntheses. Psychiatr Rehabil J. (2021) 44:238–53. doi: 10.1037/prj0000444
36. Hemming L, Taylor P, Haddock G, Shaw J, and Pratt D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between alexithymia and suicide ideation and behaviour. J Affect Disord. (2019) 254:34–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.013
37. Taylor GJ and Bagby RM. New trends in alexithymia research. Psychother Psychosom. (2004) 73:68–77. doi: 10.1159/000075537
38. Vanheule S, Desmet M, Meganck R, and Bogaerts S. Alexithymia and interpersonal problems. J Clin Psychol. (2007) 63:109–17. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20324
39. Angelakis I and Gooding P. Experiential avoidance in non-suicidal self-injury and suicide experiences: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Suicide Life Threat Behav. (2021) 51:978–92. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12784
40. Herpers PCM, Neumann JEC, and Staal WG. Treatment refractory internalizing behaviour across disorders: an aetiological model for severe emotion dysregulation in adolescence. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. (2021) 52:515–32. doi: 10.1007/s10578-020-01036-y
41. Srivastava S, Tamir M, McGonigal KM, John OP, and Gross JJ. The social costs of emotional suppression: a prospective study of the transition to college. J Pers Soc Psychol. (2009) 96:883–97. doi: 10.1037/a0014755
42. Ypsilanti A. Lonely but avoidant—the unfortunate juxtaposition of loneliness and self-disgust. Palgrave Commun. (2018) 4:144. doi: 10.1057/s41599-018-0198-1
43. Luyten P, Campbell C, Allison E, and Fonagy P. The mentalizing approach to psychopathology: state of the art and future directions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. (2020) 16:297–325. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-071919-015355
44. Hatkevich C, Venta A, and Sharp C. Theory of mind and suicide ideation and attempt in adolescent inpatients. J Affect Disord. (2019) 256:17–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.051
45. Hayden MC, Mullauer PK, Gaugeler R, Senft B, and Andreas S. Improvements in mentalization predict improvements in interpersonal distress in patients with mental disorders. J Clin Psychol. (2018) 74:2276–86. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22673
46. Suh H and Jeong J. Association of self-compassion with suicidal thoughts and behaviors and non-suicidal self injury: A meta-analysis. Front Psychol. (2021) 12:633482. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633482
47. Werner AM, Tibubos AN, Rohrmann S, and Reiss N. The clinical trait self-criticism and its relation to psychopathology: A systematic review - Update. J Affect Disord. (2019) 246:530–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.069
48. Low CA, Schauenburg H, and Dinger U. Self-criticism and psychotherapy outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. (2020) 75:101808. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101808
49. Zuroff DC, Koestner R, and Powers TA. Self-criticism at age 12: A longitudinal study of adjustment. Cogn Ther Res. (1994) 10:367–85. doi: 10.1007/BF02357511
50. Michaeli Y, Kalfon Hakhmigari M, Dickson DJ, Scharf M, and Shulman S. The role of change in self-criticism across young adulthood in explaining developmental outcomes and psychological wellbeing. J Pers. (2019) 87:785–98. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12433
51. Ypsilanti A, Lazuras L, Powell P, and Overton P. Self-disgust as a potential mechanism explaining the association between loneliness and depression. J Affect Disord. (2019) 243:108–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.056
52. Kret ME and Ploeger A. Emotion processing deficits: a liability spectrum providing insight into comorbidity of mental disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2015) 52:153–71. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.02.011
53. Angus LE and Paivio SC. Narrative processes in emotion-focused therapy for trauma. Washington DC: American Psychological Association (2017) p. 3–7.
54. Milan S, Carlone C, Printz D, and Perez SD. Understanding children’s emotions: differences in mothers with a history of childhood maltreatment. Child Maltreat. (2022) 27:33–42. doi: 10.1177/1077559520972188
55. Mann JJ and Rizk MM. A brain-centric model of suicidal behavior. Am J Psychiatry. (2020) 177:902–16. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20081224
56. van der Velde J, Servaas MN, Goerlich KS, Bruggeman R, Horton P, Costafreda SG, et al. Neural correlates of alexithymia: a meta-analysis of emotion processing studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2013) 37:1774–85. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.008
57. Arioli M, Cattaneo Z, Ricciardi E, and Canessa N. Overlapping and specific neural correlates for empathizing, affective mentalizing, and cognitive mentalizing: A coordinate-based meta-analytic study. Hum Brain Mapp. (2021) 42:4777–804. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25570
58. Fan S, Lippard ETC, Sankar A, Wallace A, Johnston JAY, Wang F, et al. Gray and white matter differences in adolescents and young adults with prior suicide attempts across bipolar and major depressive disorders. J Affect Disord. (2019) 245:1089–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.11.095
59. Shields GS, Spahr CM, and Slavich GM. Psychosocial interventions and immune system function: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Psychiatry. (2020) 77:1031–43. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0431
60. Marwood L, Wise T, Perkins AM, and Cleare AJ. Meta-analyses of the neural mechanisms and predictors of response to psychotherapy in depression and anxiety. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. (2018) 95:61–72. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.09.022
61. Hawton K, Witt KG, Salisbury TLT, Arensman E, Gunnell D, Hazell P, et al. Psychosocial interventions following self-harm in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. (2016) 3:740–50. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30070-0
62. Ferrari M, Hunt C, Harrysunker A, Abbott MJ, Beath AP, and Einstein DA. Self-compassion interventions and psychosocial outcomes: a meta-analysis of RCTs. Mindfulness Mindfulness. (2019) 10:1455–73. doi: 10.1007/s12671-019-01134-6
63. Ferrari M, Hunt C, Harrysunker A, Abbott MJ, Beath AP, Einstein DA, et al. Road to resilience: a systematic review and meta-analysis of resilience training programmes and interventions. BMJ Open. (2018) 8:e017858. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017858
64. Briggs S, Netuveli G, Gould N, Gkaravella A, Gluckman NS, Kangogyere P, et al. The effectiveness of psychoanalytic/psychodynamic psychotherapy for reducing suicide attempts and self-harm: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. (2019) 214:320–8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.33
65. Ducasse D, Jaussent I, Arpon-Brand V, Vienot M, Laglaoui C, Beziat S, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy for the management of suicidal patients: A randomized controlled trial. Psychother Psychosom. (2018) 87:211–22. doi: 10.1159/000488715
66. Johnson SB, Goodnight BL, Zhang H, Daboin I, Patterson B, and Kaslow NJ. Compassion-based meditation in african americans: self-criticism mediates changes in depression. Suicide Life Threat Behav. (2018) 48:160–8. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12347
67. Ogrodniczuk JS, Sochting I, Piper WE, and Joyce AS. A naturalistic study of alexithymia among psychiatric outpatients treated in an integrated group therapy program. Psychol Psychother. (2012) 85:278–91. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.2011.02032.x
68. Shorey RC, Gawrysiak MJ, Elmquist J, Brem M, Anderson S, and Stuart GL. Experiential avoidance, distress tolerance, and substance use cravings among adults in residential treatment for substance use disorders. J Addict Dis. (2017) 36:151–7. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2017.1302661
69. Thomas JG, Sperry SD, Shields RJ, and Gregory RJ. A novel recovery-based suicide prevention program in upstate new york. J Addict Dis. (2022) 73:701–4. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100162. pidpmid.
70. Yela JR, Crego A, Buz J, Sanchez-Zaballos E, and Gomez-Martinez MA. Reductions in experiential avoidance explain changes in anxiety, depression and well-being after a mindfulness and self-compassion (MSC) training. Psychol Psychother. (2022) 95:402–22. doi: 10.1111/papt.12375
71. Koivumaa-Honkanen H, Honkanen R, Viinamaki H, Heikkila K, Kaprio J, and Koskenvuo M. Life satisfaction and suicide: a 20-year follow-up study. Am J Psychiatry. (2001) 158:433–9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.433
72. Meyer IH. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychol Bull. (2003) 129:674–97. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
73. Casey M, Perera D, Enticott J, Vo H, Cubra S, Gravell A, et al. High utilisers of emergency departments: the profile and journey of patients with mental health issues. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. (2021) 25:316–24. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2021.1904998
74. Mann JJ, Michel CA, and Auerbach RP. Improving suicide prevention through evidence-based strategies: A systematic review. Am J Psychiatry. (2021) 178:611–24. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20060864
75. Frey LM, Hunt QA, Russon JM, and Diamond G. Review of family-based treatments from 2010 to 2019 for suicidal ideation and behavior. J Marital Fam Ther. (2022) 48:154–77. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12568
76. George P, Ghose SS, Goldman HH, O’Brien J, Daley TC, Dixon LB, et al. Growth of coordinated specialty care in the United States with changes in federal funding policies: 2014-2018. Psychiatr Serv. (2022) 73(12):1346–51. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100600. Epub 2022 Jun 16. Erratum in: Psychiatr Serv. (2022) 73(12):1189. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100600correction
77. Shields RJ, Helfrich JP, and Gregory RJ. Dynamic deconstructive psychotherapy for suicidal adolescents: effectiveness of routine care in an outpatient clinic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2024) 21. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21070929
78. Case A and Deaton A. The great divide: education, despair, and death. Annu Rev Econom. (2022) 14:1–21. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-051520-015607
79. Friedman SR, Krawczyk N, Perlman DC, Mateu-Gelabert P, Ompad DC, Hamilton L, et al. The opioid/overdose crisis as a dialectics of pain, despair, and one-sided struggle. Front Public Health. (2020) 8:540423. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.540423
80. Chu JP, Goldblum P, Floyd R, and Bongar B. The cultural theory and model of suicide. Appl Prev Psychol. (2010) 14:25–40. doi: 10.1016/j.appsy.2011.11.001
81. Frost DM and Meyer IH. Minority stress theory: Application, critique, and continued relevance. Curr Opin Psychol. (2023) 51:101579. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101579
82. Huang YT and Chan RCH. Effects of sexual orientation concealment on well-being among sexual minorities: How and when does concealment hurt? J Couns Psychol. (2022) 69:630–41. doi: 10.1037/cou0000623
83. Cenat JM. Complex racial trauma: evidence, theory, assessment, and treatment. Perspect Psychol Sci. (2023) 18:675–87. doi: 10.1177/17456916221120428
84. Eales MJ. Shame among unemployed men. Soc Sci Med. (1989) 28:783–9. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90107-x
85. Stewart MJ, Makwarimba E, Reutter LI, Veenstra G, Raphae D, and Love R. Poverty, sense of belonging and experiences of social isolation. J Poverty. (2009) 13:173–95. doi: 10.1080/10875540902841762
86. Wu Z and Finnsdottir M. Perceived racial and cultural discrimination and sense of belonging in Canadian society. Can Rev Sociol. (2021) 58:229–49. doi: 10.1111/cars.12339
87. Garcia J, Vargas N, Clark JL, Magana Alvarez M, Nelons DA, and Parker RG. Social isolation and connectedness as determinants of well-being: Global evidence mapping focused on LGBTQ youth. Glob Public Health. (2020) 15:497–519. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2019.1682028
88. Sederer LI. The social determinants of mental health. Glob Public Health (2016) 67:234–5. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500232
89. Liu S, Morin SB, Bourand NM, DeClue IL, Delgado GE, Fan J, et al. Social vulnerability and risk of suicide in US adults, 2016-2020. JAMA Netw Open. (2023) 6:e239995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.9995
90. Briggs L. Is the degree of demoralization found among refugee and migrant populations a social-political problem or a psychological one? Eur J Psychiatry. (2013) 27:27–35. doi: 10.4321/S0213-61632013000100004
91. Denning DM and Brown TA. Examining the prospective effects of alexithymia and minority stress on emotion regulation in sexual minority adults. Affect Sci. (2025). doi: 10.1007/s42761-024-00290-w
92. Mann AM, Naugle AE, and Lieberman E. Experiential avoidance and emotion dysregulation as mediators in the LGBTQ minority stress model. Arch Sex Behav. (2022) 51:3443–56. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02376-7
93. Mantler J, Matejicek A, Matheson K, and Anisman H. Coping with employment uncertainty: a comparison of employed and unemployed workers. J Occup Health Psychol. (2005) 10:200–9. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.10.3.200
94. Barrita AM and Wong-Padoongpatt G. Ethnic identity and resilience: a moderated mediation analysis of protective factors for self-blame and racial microaggressions. Front Psychol. (2023) 14:1198375. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1198375
95. Extremera N and Rey L. Health-related quality of life and cognitive emotion regulation strategies in the unemployed: a cross-sectional survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes. (2014) 12:172. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0172-6
96. Gregory RJ, Chlebowski S, Kang D, Remen AL, Soderberg MG, Stepkovitch J, et al. A controlled trial of psychodynamic psychotherapy for co-occurring borderline personality disorder and alcohol use disorder. Psychother (Chic). (2008) 45:28–41. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.45.1.28
97. Gregory RJ and Sachdeva S. Naturalistic outcomes of evidence-based therapies for borderline personality disorder at a medical university clinic. Am J Psychother. (2016) 70:167–84. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2016.70.2.167
98. Majdara E, Rahimmian I, Talepassand S, and Gregory RJ. A randomized trial of dynamic deconstructive psychotherapy in Iran for borderline personality disorder. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. (2019) 67:NP1–7. doi: 10.1177/0003065119891390
99. Gregory RJ. Borderline attributions. Am J Psychother. (2007) 61:131–47. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2007.61.2.131
100. Storebo OJ, Stoffers-Winterling JM, Vollm BA, Kongerslev MT, Mattivi JT, Jorgensen MS, et al. Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2020) 5:CD012955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012955.pub2
101. Fawson S, Moon Z, Novogrudsky K, Moxham F, Forster K, Tribe I, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy processes and their association with distress in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. (2024) 18:456–77. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2023.2261518
102. McMain S, Korman LM, and Dimeff L. Dialectical behavior therapy and the treatment of emotion dysregulation. J Clin Psychol. (2001) 57:183–96. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(200102)57:2<183::aid-jclp5>3.0.co;2-y
103. Linehan M. DBT skills training handouts and worksheets. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press (2015). p. 422.
104. Patrichi A, Rimbu R, Miu AC, and Szentagotai-Tatar A. Loneliness and emotion regulation: A meta-analytic review. Emotion. (2025) 25:755–74. doi: 10.1037/emo0001438
105. Fornaro M, Caiazza C, Pistone L, Crincoli W, Pezone R, De Prisco M, et al. Atypical depression and emotion dysregulation: Clinical and psychopathological features. J Affect Disord. (2025) 376:410–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.02.034
106. Colmenero-Navarrete L, Garcia-Sancho E, and Salguero JM. Relationship between emotion regulation and suicide ideation and attempt in adults and adolescents: A systematic review. Arch Suicide Res. (2022) 26:1702–35. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2021.1999872
107. Pirkis J, Dandona R, Silverman M, Khan M, and Hawton K. Preventing suicide: a public health approach to a global problem. Lancet Public Health. (2024) 9:e787–e95. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00149-X
Keywords: suicide, recovery, treatment resistance, emotion processing, psychotherapy, function, utilization, resilience
Citation: Ramamurthy G and Gregory R (2025) Recovery-based suicide prevention. Front. Psychiatry 16:1556927. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1556927
Received: 07 January 2025; Accepted: 30 June 2025;
Published: 23 July 2025.
Reviewed by:
Tadashi Takeshima, Kawasaki City Inclusive Rehabilitation Center, JapanTatiana Villarreal-Otalora, Kennesaw State University, United States
Maria Paz Garcia-Caro, University of Granada, Spain
Copyright © 2025 Ramamurthy and Gregory. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Gita Ramamurthy, cmFtYW11cmdAdXBzdGF0ZS5lZHU=