HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Addictive Disorders
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1562619
Give me five! A Modern Perspective on Addiction from the up-dated Freudian Drive Theory
Provisionally accepted- Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Sigmund Freud´s drive theory, often (and erroneously) referred to as his theory of the instincts, was an early attempt to describe the motivations behind both healthy and mentally ill individuals. In his final formulation, Freud identified two main categories of drives: life drives (which he termed Eros), encompassing physiological drives, and a set of inherent impulses, including self-destructive tendencies (which he called "death drives"), with masochism -a form of auto-addictive disorder -as a prime example.Freud´s drive theory was developed with the framework of a 19 th -century medical mind-set, but this model has since been up-dated in various publications using advanced data from neuroanatomy, (neuro)endocrinology and biochemistry. Modern research has shown that all physiological drives (i.e., hunger, thirst, sleep, sexual drive and attachment) are regulated in key brain regions, including the nucleus accumbens and lateral hypothalamus, by neurotransmitters like dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine. These, in turn, stimulate the release of b-endorphin, maintaining its levels within physiological norms.Importantly, nearly all forms of addiction are associated with altered b-endorphin levels, and one or more essential drives are disrupted. Since addictive behaviors often aim to restore bendorphin levels to normal, addiction -whether behavioral or substance-related -acts, from the perspective of an up-dated Freudian drive theory, as a surrogate for malfunctioning drives. To restore all five healthy drives, particularly attachment, it is crucial to recognize and address the underlying causative factors, such as trauma, epigenetic changes, genetic predisposition, environmental stress, or co-occurring chronic illnesses.
Keywords: beta-Endorphin, Freudian Drive disruption, surrogates mechanisms, Insecure attachment, Fluoxetine
Received: 17 Jan 2025; Accepted: 04 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kirsch. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Michael Kirsch, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.