ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Autism

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1569435

This article is part of the Research TopicAnxiety in Autistic People: Moving the NeedleView all 4 articles

Facing Your Fears in Schools: Using the ADIS/ASA to characterize anxiety and intervention outcomes in students with autism or suspected autism

Provisionally accepted
Judy  ReavenJudy Reaven1*Kelly  Theresa CosgroveKelly Theresa Cosgrove1,2Ainsley  LoshAinsley Losh1,3Sarah  NicklesSarah Nickles1,2Connor  KernsConnor Kerns4Katherine  PickardKatherine Pickard5Audrey  Blakeley-SmithAudrey Blakeley-Smith1Lisa  HayutinLisa Hayutin1,3Allison  MeyerAllison Meyer1,3Caitlin  MiddletonCaitlin Middleton1,3Nuri  ReyesNuri Reyes1,3Richard  BolesRichard Boles1,3
  • 1JFK Partners, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
  • 2School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, United States
  • 3Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States
  • 4University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • 5School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Autistic youth are at higher risk of developing anxiety compared to their peers, with as many as 40% experiencing clinical anxiety. Emerging research suggests that these rates are an underestimate as distinct presentations of anxiety (e.g., fear of change, idiosyncratic fears) are often not recognized. CBT is a well-established approach for managing anxiety in autistic youth, but many have difficulty accessing these interventions. School-based CBT programs, like Facing Your Fears in Schools (FYF-S), have shown effectiveness in reducing anxiety in autistic students and may increase access to care. The Anxiety Symptom Interview Scale -IV Autism Spectrum Addendum (ADIS/ASA) is a semi-structured interview that captures both DSM-5 and distinct presentations of anxiety. This study aimed to: 1) characterize a subsample of students with autism or suspected autism and anxiety and 2) examine effectiveness of FYF-S using the ADIS/ASA. Methods: This study utilized a subsample of students (N=37; ages 7-14) from a larger Type 1 hybrid-effectiveness trial who had either autism or suspected autism. Students were randomized to either FYF-S or Usual Care (UC). Caregivers completed the ADIS/ASA at baseline and post-intervention. The ADIS/ASA was administered by clinicians rigorously trained to reliability and masked to condition. Results: Students had both DSM-5 and distinct anxiety diagnoses at Time 1. Further, students in FYF-S demonstrated significant reductions in anxiety compared to UC, as evidenced by fewer anxiety diagnoses overall and significant improvement in total anxiety. Conclusion: This is the first schoolbased study using the ADIS/ASA to characterize anxiety and measure outcomes in autistic students. Overall, results indicate that FYF-S may be a promising school-based intervention for autistic youth.

Keywords: autism, Anxiety, School-based intervention, Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), anxiety disorders interview schedule -autism spectrum addendum (ADIS/ASA), implementation

Received: 31 Jan 2025; Accepted: 23 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Reaven, Cosgrove, Losh, Nickles, Kerns, Pickard, Blakeley-Smith, Hayutin, Meyer, Middleton, Reyes and Boles. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Judy Reaven, JFK Partners, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.