ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Digital Mental Health
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1571647
Measurement of schizophrenia symptoms through speech analysis from PANSS interview recordings
Provisionally accepted- 1Brooklyn Health, Brooklyn, United States
- 2School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
- 3University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
- 4Google (United States), Mountain View, California, United States
- 5Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, New York, United States
- 6Signant Health, Prague, Czechia
- 7Bristol Myers Squibb (United States), New York, New York, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Speech is considered a clinically meaningful indicator of schizophrenia symptom severity and the quantification of speech measures has the potential to improve the measurement of symptoms. Speech collection for digital phenotyping is often dependent on platforms built using closed-source code and associated with patient and clinician burden. Here, we evaluate recordings of clinical interviews conducted as part of standard clinical trial procedures as reliable sources of patient speech for symptom assessment using digital phenotyping. We hypothesize that speech will be associated with schizophrenia symptom severity as measured by PANSS scores using PANSS interview recordings as a data source, in line with existing research showing these associations using dedicated speech collection platforms and proprietary processing pipelines. Methods: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) interview recordings, collected during a Phase 2 schizophrenia clinical trial, are used to calculate speech characteristics using open source code. A total of 825 PANSS recordings from 212 participants were used in this study. Mixed effects models accounting for demographic variables and time were conducted to assess the relationship between speech characteristics and PANSS scores. Results: Our findings show strong relationships between the calculated speech characteristics and schizophrenia symptom severity. Positive symptoms were associated with greater amount of speech, faster speech, and shorter, less varied pauses. By contrast, negative symptoms were associated with decreased amount of speech, slower speech, and longer, more varied pauses. Discussion: A large sample of PANSS recordings was successfully processed using open source methods for phenotyping and strong relationships between speech characteristics and symptoms from these recordings were observed. These observations, consistent with existing understandings of speech-based manifestations of schizophrenia, highlight the potential use of patient speech collected passively during clinical interactions for digital phenotyping and symptom assessment. Implications for clinical practice, drug development, and progress towards precision psychiatry are discussed.
Keywords: Digital phenotyping, digital health measures, Natural Language Processing, Schizophrenia spectrum disorders, Speech characteristics, psychosis
Received: 05 Feb 2025; Accepted: 15 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Abbas, Efstathiadis, Worthington, Yadav, Galatzer-Levy, Kott, Pintilii, Patel, Sauder, Kaul and Brannan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Anzar Abbas, Brooklyn Health, Brooklyn, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.