ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Public Mental Health

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1584753

Suicide Risk Remission in Collaborative Care: A Large-Scale Observational Study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1JG Research and Evaluation, Bozeman, United States
  • 2Concert Health, San Diego, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Primary care settings represent a critical opportunity for suicide prevention, as many individuals who die by suicide visit primary care providers in their final month of life. The Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) offers a structured approach to behavioral health treatment in primary care, but research on its effectiveness for suicide risk management is limited. This study examined how clinical variables (days enrolled, clinical touchpoints, psychiatric consultations) relate to suicide risk outcomes in CoCM, and how these relationships are moderated by initial depression severity. Data from 3,599 patients with suicide risk flags who completed CoCM treatment were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression. Changes in suicide risk level from intake to discharge were categorized as improved, unchanged, or regressed. Longer enrollment (OR=1.432, p<.001) and more clinical touchpoints (OR=2.584, p<.001) predicted improved outcomes. Higher baseline depression scores predicted poorer outcomes (OR=0.741, p<.001) but showed significant interaction with days enrolled. More psychiatric consultations (OR=0.813, p<.001) were associated with risk regression, likely reflecting appropriate escalation of complex cases. CoCM shows promise for suicide risk management in primary care, with sustained engagement and frequent clinical contact improving outcomes. Results suggest treatment intensity should be tailored to initial depression severity.

Keywords: suicide prevention, Collaborative care, suicide care pathway, suicide remission, Suicide treatment, Depression, Risk Assessment

Received: 27 Feb 2025; Accepted: 18 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Hardy, Little and Green. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Carol Hardy, JG Research and Evaluation, Bozeman, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.