ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Autism
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1588429
This article is part of the Research TopicEnhancing the Social Skills and Social Competence for Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum DisorderView all 8 articles
Context effects: Discourse structure influences narrative ability in autism and first-degree relatives
Provisionally accepted- 1Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, United States
- 2Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York City, New York, United States
- 3Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, St. Johns University, Queens, United States
- 4Schiefelbusch Institute for Life Span Studies and Kansas Center for Autism Research and Training, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Narrative, or storytelling, ability is a well-documented area of difficulty in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and is an important skill that is related to social-communicative success. Evidence also demonstrates subtle narrative differences among first-degree relatives of autistic individuals, including parents (ASD parents) and siblings (ASD siblings), suggesting narrative ability may reflect genetic influences related to ASD. Less structured contexts, such as free form narrative retellings (i.e., without scaffolding via visual aids), require individuals to reconstruct a previously told narrative from memory and reflect differences in underlying attention, language, and executive functioning. Narrative retellings are impacted in ASD, though work has yet to examine this ability in first-degree relatives. A prior study employed a first telling narrative task (First Telling) involving simultaneous viewing of a picture book among autistic individuals, their parents, siblings, and respective control groups while collecting eye tracking data to extrapolate attentional mechanisms. The present study aimed to extend this work by adding an additional less structured narrative retelling (Retell task) to characterize the breakdown in narrative quality between different contexts and assess how narration and visual attention during the First Telling narrative may relate to narrative quality in the Retell task. As predicted, narrative retellings were less sophisticated than first-telling narratives, and the quality of the First Telling was related to the quality of the Retell narrative for all groups. Some overlapping patterns of narrative quality emerged between individuals with ASD, their parents, and siblings. No associations emerged between visual attention in the First Telling and narrative quality in the Retell task. Results support previous findings of narrative challenges in ASD and provide evidence that narrative skills may be subtly impacted in first degree relatives, suggesting ASD-related genetic influence on elements of narrative ability. Findings may inform intervention efforts, as the lack of visual supports in the retell task impacted narrative quality in ways that parallel the challenges individuals may face in everyday storytelling and naturalistic conversational interactions.
Keywords: autism, Siblings, broad autism phenotype, Narrative, eye tracking, Storytelling
Received: 05 Mar 2025; Accepted: 08 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Landau, Nayar, Martin, Stevens, Xing, Guilfoyle, Lau and Losh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Molly Losh, Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, 60208, Illinois, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.