Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Psychopathology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1597879

This article is part of the Research TopicThe Heterogeneity of Psychiatric Symptoms and DisordersView all 20 articles

Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology and Personalized Mental Health Treatment Selection

Provisionally accepted
Evangelia  ArgyriouEvangelia Argyriou1*Christiana  PrestigiacomoChristiana Prestigiacomo2Douglas  B SamuelDouglas B Samuel3Jesse  C StewartJesse C Stewart2Wei  WuWei Wu2Melissa  CydersMelissa Cyders2
  • 1Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, United States
  • 2Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, United States
  • 3Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Accumulated research has shown considerable heterogeneity in mental health treatment response. Precision mental health approaches aim to leverage this heterogeneity to tailor treatment selection to individual needs. The goals of this manuscript are to 1) present theoretical rationale for the potential usefulness of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) to optimize treatment selection and 2) conduct a scoping review of the role of individual psychopathology components that map onto HiTOP on differential psychotherapy response, both as a proof-of-concept analysis, as well as to identify gaps and concrete recommendations for future application. We focus our review on treatment for internalizing disorders as a candidate class of disorders, and on Cognitive-Behavioral Therapiesy given its their empirical support for this disorder class. Overall, the reviewed literature provides preliminary evidence about the potential usefulness of HiTOP dimensions of differing levels of specificity for personalized treatment selection that can guide future research. Gaps and limitations were identified, including limited research in several HiTOP domains, strict inclusion/exclusion criteria shrinking individual heterogeneity, large variability in HiTOP dimension measurement, risk of Type I and Type II error, and other methodological limitations for assessing personalized treatment response. The translation of this research to clinical decision making has a long way to go. Nonetheless, we view the application of HiTOP-relevant dimensions to personalized mental health approaches as a viable and exciting direction that offers many avenues for research for the improvement of patient outcomes.

Keywords: HITOP, Precision mental health, treatment response, cbt, Internalizing

Received: 21 Mar 2025; Accepted: 19 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Argyriou, Prestigiacomo, Samuel, Stewart, Wu and Cyders. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Evangelia Argyriou, eargy9@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.