Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Psychopharmacology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1606497

This article is part of the Research TopicWomen in Psychiatry 2025: PsychopharmacologyView all articles

Pharmacist-assisted implementation of guideline recommendations for QTc monitoring during psychopharmacotherapy -a prospective, randomized feasibility study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • 2Hospital Pharmacy, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
  • 3Center of Brain, Behavior and Metabolism, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
  • 4Department of Rhythmology, University Heart Center Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Many psychotropic drugs potentially prolong the QTc interval. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of the pharmacist-supported implementation of a new local guideline for QTc monitoring at a psychiatric department and to gather preliminary data on the effectiveness of this intervention. Methods: The study was conducted as a prospective, randomized-controlled feasibility study at the inpatient service of a department of psychiatry. In the intervention group (IG), guideline-based monitoring of QTc intervals was supported by a clinical pharmacist. The control group (CG) was solely monitored by the treating physicians. The primary effectiveness outcome was the mean change in the QTc interval between admission (T0) and 30 days after admission (T1). The implementation ratio of guideline recommendations and the acceptability of the pharmacist support based on an online employee satisfaction survey were assessed as secondary outcomes. Results: 160 patients were recruited and randomly allocated to the IG (n = 75) or CG (n = 85). A total of 102 patients completed the trial (IG: n = 42, CG: n = 60). There was no significant difference in the mean change of the QTc interval from T0 to T1 between the two groups (p = 0.582). Guideline recommendations were significantly more often implemented in the IG than in the CG (78% vs. 37%, p = 0.004). 4 out of 15 (26.7%) physicians and 9 out of 45 (20%) nurses working on the wards responded to the online survey. Physicians and nurses were very satisfied with the pharmaceutical support. Discussion: Pharmacist support of the implementation of a new guideline for QTc monitoring led to a higher rate of uptake of guideline recommendations but did not have a significant effect on the QTc interval. The responding physicians and nurses were very satisfied with this intervention. Future research using an adapted study design would be required to assess guideline adherence as the primary outcome and, secondarily, determine the effect of pharmacist support on cardiac outcomes. Funding: No funding was received for the conduction of this study. Clinical Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00033127, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00033127.

Keywords: Psychopharmacotherapy, QTc-prolongation, Monitoring, Guideline implementation, Clinical pharmacists, Interdisciplinary Collaboration

Received: 05 Apr 2025; Accepted: 30 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wien, Klein, Rodenstein, Vogler, Tilz, Thern and Borgwardt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Katharina Wien, Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, 23562, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.