Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Perinatal Psychiatry

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1606957

This article is part of the Research TopicPerinatal Mental Health in the Post-COVID Era: Impacts and Future StrategiesView all 5 articles

Building toward a standard model for perinatal mental healthcare

Provisionally accepted
  • 1UMass Chan Medical School, Shrewsbury, MA, United States
  • 2Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States
  • 3Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States
  • 4University of North Carolina System, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
  • 5Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States
  • 6University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • 7University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Healthcare decision-making relies on models that synthesize complex components such as disease epidemiology, diagnostic accuracy, and treatment efficacy. A healthcare model serves as a framework to integrate health systems research, biological understanding, and diverse perspectives on health, enabling decision-makers to optimize access, quality, cost, and equity. The National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine underscored the need for a shared conceptualization in behavioral sciences to unify definitions and facilitate data synthesis. To achieve this, a standard model of perinatal mental healthcare is imperative. Objective: We propose the development of a standard model of perinatal mental healthcare, analogous to the Standard Model of Particle Physics, which has guided scientific discovery by defining building blocks, highlighting knowledge gaps, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration. A standard model for perinatal mental healthcare should function similarly—identifying key components, delineating evidence gaps, and inspiring critical inquiry. Methods: Our work is informed by our role as an advisory council supporting Perinatal Psychiatry Access Programs, which enhance healthcare systems by providing frontline clinicians with psychiatric consultation, training, and resources. These programs are designed to support evidence-based interventions across screening, therapy, and pharmacotherapy, and have been successfully implemented in multiple states and internationally. Conclusion: Establishing a robust standard model of perinatal mental healthcare is essential for addressing population-level mental health challenges. Furthermore, collaboration and governance structures for shared resources—akin to Elinor Ostrom's principles of common-pool resource management—are essential for sustainability. Scientific advances in systems modeling, teamwork, and knowledge-sharing frameworks will be critical to developing an effective, widely accepted model.

Keywords: perinatal, Mental healthcare, Perinatal mental health care model, Psychiatry, Access programs

Received: 06 Apr 2025; Accepted: 15 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Sheldrick, Deichen Hansen, Cirino, Kimmel, King, Logan, Menke and Tabb. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Karen Tabb, ktabb@illinois.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.