ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Psychopathology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1608601

Diabetes-related distress and psychological burden in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes -the role of child maltreatment, personality functioning, and epistemic trust: findings from a German clinical inpatient sample

Provisionally accepted
Sandra  ZaraSandra Zara1*Imogen  Carla UllrichImogen Carla Ullrich1Anna  Maria LevelingAnna Maria Leveling1Friederike  Gisela Genoveva SaretzkiFriederike Gisela Genoveva Saretzki1Jana  SchmitzJana Schmitz1Michael  EckhardMichael Eckhard2Johannes  KruseJohannes Kruse1,3,4Hanna  KamplingHanna Kampling1,4
  • 1Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
  • 2GZW Diabetes-Klinik Bad Nauheim, Bad Nauheim, Germany
  • 3Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Marburg, Marburg, Hesse, Germany
  • 4German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), München Neuherberg, München, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: Patients with diabetes exhibit high frequencies of psychological burden and diabetes-related distress. Child maltreatment has been independently linked to both diabetes and psychological burden. We aimed 1) to explore the association between child maltreatment and diabetes-related distress, and between child maltreatment and psychological burden, and 2) to investigate the mediating role of personality functioning (psychological abilities with regard to the self and others) in this association. We included epistemic trust (openness for social learning) and its impairments mistrust (the tendency to consider information sources as unreliable or ill-intended) and credulity (lack of vigilance and discrimination between trustworthy and untrustworthy information) as covariates.Methods: In a sample of n=119 patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes aged 18-69, self-report questionnaires assessed diabetes-related distress (PAID-5), psychological burden (PHQ-D, PHQ-9, PHQ-15), child maltreatment (CTQ), personality functioning (OPD-SQS), and epistemic trust, mistrust, and credulity (ETMCQ). Mediation analyses assessed the role of personality functioning in the association between child maltreatment, diabetes-related distress, and psychological burden, including epistemic trust, mistrust, and credulity as covariates.Results: Patients with child maltreatment compared to those without showed higher diabetes-related distress (t(112)=4.033, p<.001, d=.756) and higher frequencies of major depressive syndrome (χ2(1)=10.968, p<.001, φ=.310) with medium effect sizes. They showed higher frequencies of somatoform syndrome (χ2(1)=8.130, p=.004, φ=.267), panic syndrome (χ2(1)=6.281, p=.012, φ=.235), and other anxiety syndromes (χ2(1)=8.828, p=.003, φ=.278), with small effect sizes. Impairments in personality functioning were more severe (t(100,857)=5.136, p<.001, d=.967), with a large effect size. Epistemic mistrust and credulity were significantly higher (mistrust: t(111)=3.677, p<.001, d=.692; credulity: t(111)=5.000, p<.001, d=.941), with medium and large effect sizes. No differences regarding epistemic trust were found (t(111)=.409, p=.683, d=.077), with the effect size below the threshold for small effects. Personality functioning mediated the association between child maltreatment and diabetes-related distress (b=.03, 95%-CI [.005, .053]), depressive symptoms (b=.08, 95%-CI [.030, .129]), and somatic symptoms (b=.06, 95%-CI [.020, .122]).Conclusions: In a clinical diabetes sample, diabetes-related distress and psychological burden are frequently reported, and personality functioning is impaired, particularly after child maltreatment. Addressing these impairments and initiating psychosomatic treatment including psychodynamic or mentalization-based interventions might offer new clinical treatment avenues.

Keywords: child maltreatment, Clinical sample, Diabetes-related distress, Epistemic trust, Personality functioning, Psychological burden

Received: 09 Apr 2025; Accepted: 24 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zara, Ullrich, Leveling, Saretzki, Schmitz, Eckhard, Kruse and Kampling. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Sandra Zara, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.