ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Anxiety and Stress Disorders
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1613322
This article is part of the Research TopicGenetic and Epigenetic Influences on PTSD Susceptibility and ExpressionView all articles
Influence of genetic polymorphism and trauma on cortical structures and PTSD severity: imaging genetics generalized structured component analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1Kongju National University, Gong, South Chungcheong, Republic of Korea
- 2The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
- 3Inje University, Gimhae, South Gyeongsang, Republic of Korea
- 4Ajou University, Suweon, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea
- 5McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- 6Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Objective: The changes in brain structures affected by potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and polymorphisms of various genes are associated with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Our study investigated the pathophysiology of PTSD along with PTEs, genes, and brain regions of interest (ROIs) via imaging genetics generalized structured component analysis (IG-GSCA). Methods: A total of 231 participants (137 healthy volunteers and 94 PTSD patients) were enrolled. We performed T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging, genotyping for nine genes (SLC6A4, FKBP5, ADCYAP1R1, BDNF, COMT, HTR3A, DRD2, NR3C1, and OXTR), and psychological assessments measuring PTEs, PTSD symptoms, and alcohol problems. Genes, PTEs, and their interactions were set as predictors for volumes of 60 brain ROIs, and volumes of the 60 ROIs were set as predictors for the PTSD severity, implying that volumes of brain ROIs were set to mediate the effects of genes and PTEs on the PTSD severity. Results: Our results suggested that HTR3A was related to the volume of the anterior cingulate gyrus and NR3C1 was related to the volume of the central operculum. Also, volumes of the central operculum, occipital fusiform gyrus, and anterior cingulate gyrus were negatively associated with the severity of PTSD, while PTEs were positively associated with PTSD severity. Conclusions: This study is one of the few that examined the relationships between various factors related to PTSD symptom severity, including genetics, environment, gene-environment interactions, and brain regions of interest (ROIs), all within a single model. The findings indicated mediating pathways from the HTR3A gene polymorphism to PTSD symptom severity through the volume of the anterior cingulate gyrus, and from the NR3C1 gene polymorphism to PTSD symptom severity via the volume of the central operculum. However, only the indirect effect involving NR3C1 was statistically significant. Additionally, the study found a significant association between the occipital fusiform gyrus and PTSD symptom severity.
Keywords: PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder), Genetic polymorphisms, brain structures, potentially traumatic events (PTEs), imaging genetics generalized structured component analysis (IG-GSCA), HTR3A, NR3C1
Received: 17 Apr 2025; Accepted: 20 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Jin, Cho, Jeon, Choi, Hwang and Lee. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Seung-Hwan Lee, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.