ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Digital Mental Health
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1617650
Graph Learning Based Suicidal Ideation Detection via Tree-Drawing Test
Provisionally accepted- 1School of Future Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
- 2Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Adolescent suicide is a critical public health concern worldwide, necessitating effective methods for early detection of high suicidal ideation. Traditional detection methods, such as self-report scales, suffer from limited accuracy and are susceptible to personal concealment. Automatic methods based on artificial intelligence techniques are more accurate, while they often lack scalability due to strict data requirements. In order to achieve a balance between accuracy and scalability, this paper introduces the Tree-Drawing Test (TDT) as an effective tool for suicidal ideation detection, and proposes a novel graph learning approach to enable its automatic application. Specifically, we first construct a semantic graph based on psychological features annotated automatically from tree drawing images, and then a Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) model is trained to realize individual suicidal ideation detection. The proposed method is evaluated on a collected real dataset of 806 students from primary and secondary school in Shaanxi Province, China. Our results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms traditional machine learning and convolution neural network approaches, highlighting its effectiveness in large-scale suicidal ideation screening.
Keywords: Suicidal Ideation Detection, Tree-drawing test, Projective test, Graph learning, Graph convolutional network
Received: 24 Apr 2025; Accepted: 20 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Liu, Zheng, Zeng, Luo and Tian. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Xuetao Tian, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.