Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Anxiety and Stress Disorders

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1624276

Comparative Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life in Patients with Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Network

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Institute of Physical Education, Sports and Tourism, St. Petersburg Great Technical University, Russia, St.Petersburg, Russia
  • 2College of Sports Science, Jishou University, China, Jishou, China
  • 3School of Competitive Sports, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China
  • 4Department of Immunochemistry, Institution of Chemical Engineering, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia, Yekaterinburg, Russia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Important Epilepsy is a persistent neurological condition featuring abnormal electrical activity in the brain. Beyond its neurological symptoms, it is frequently associated with comorbid anxiety and depression, which significantly impair patients' quality of life (QoL). Cognitive therapy (CBT), psychotherapy, and self-management (SM) have been substantiated through research to be significantly effective in alleviating psychological distress and enhancing quality of life. However, comprehensive comparisons of these diverse interventions remain scarce, highlighting a critical gap in the literature. OBJECTIVE This study aims to compare, through randomized controlled trials, the effects of different non-pharmacological interventions versus controls on anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with epilepsy. DATA SOURCES A systematic search was conducted in five electronic databases: Cochrane Library, PsycInfo, PubMed, Web of Science and the Embase, covering studies published up to March 19, 2025. The search strategy included terms such as "exercise," "mind-body exercise," "cognitive-behavioral therapy," "psychotherapy," "epilepsy," "anxiety," "depression," and "quality of life."  STUDY SELECTION Only English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Eligible studies examined the effects of non-pharmacological interventions on anxiety, depression, and QoL in patients clinically diagnosed with epilepsy. There were no restrictions on participants’ age or gender. Control conditions included standard care, placebo, wait-list, or alternative non-pharmacological interventions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes included changes in anxiety, depression, and QoL. Outcomes were assessed using validated psychological scales across studies. RESULTS Fifty-eight RCTs encompassing 6,541 participants across 20 countries or regions were included. Compared to control groups(CON), enhanced education therapy (EET) and psychotherapy (PT) were significantly more effective in reducing anxiety symptoms. Psychotherapy also demonstrated notable efficacy in alleviating depressive symptoms. For QoL improvement, Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), mind-body therapies (MBT), Psychotherapy (PT), and enhanced care (EC) all showed significant advantages over controls. SUCRA rankings suggested that Enhanced education therapy (EET), Psychotherapy (PT), and Enhanced care (EC) were the most effective interventions for improving anxiety, depression, and Quality of Life (QoL), respectively. Subgroup analyses further suggest that EET and CBT may be more beneficial for minors in reducing anxiety and improving QoL, respectively, while psychotherapy shows consistent superiority in adults for both anxiety and depression.

Keywords: non-pharmacological intervention, Epilepsy, Anxiety, Depression, Quality of Life, Systematic review, Network meta-analysis

Received: 09 May 2025; Accepted: 11 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Luo, Ding, Zhang and Xiao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ningkun Xiao, Department of Immunochemistry, Institution of Chemical Engineering, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia, Yekaterinburg, Russia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.