Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. Mood Disorders

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1626653

Preferences of Patients with Depression for Medication Management: A Discrete

Provisionally accepted
Peng  XiePeng Xie1HuiQin  LIHuiQin LI2*Sizhu  GuoSizhu Guo3Hao  YangHao Yang4Yanfen  WangYanfen Wang1Wenwen  MingWenwen Ming1Huangyan  LiHuangyan Li1
  • 1People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, China
  • 2Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
  • 3The Third Peoples Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China
  • 4Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Depression threatens people's health and imposes heavy economic burden on society. Oral antidepressants are the first-line treatment for depression.However, poor adherence in depressed patients contributes to poor clinical outcomes. Effective medication management can improve patient adherence, but the current approaches to medication management in depression have shown limited success. Understanding patients' needs and preferences can help improve their medication adherence. There are no data on the preferences of depressed patients in developing countries. Objective: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to elicit and quantify the preferences of people with depression for medication management, and to provide references for the development of effective medication management strategies to improve the medication adherence of people with depression.The design principles of discrete choice experiments were used to develop the survey instrument. Attributes included adverse reactions, provider, follow-up frequency, cost, follow-up method, and convenience of purchase. A mixed logit model was used to estimate the preferences, willingness to pay (WTP), subgroup analyses based on relapse, and the uptake rates of different medication management programme using the NLCOM command.The preferences of 373 people with depression were analyzed. The six attributes included in this study had a significant impact on preferences of people with depression (P < 0.05). Slight adverse reactions were the most important attribute level (coefficient =0.905), with the highest willingness to pay, and and increased program uptake by 0.362. Patients who did not experience recurrence preferred to go to the pharmacy to purchase antidepressants on site. In terms of follow-up methods, those with recurrence experience preferred remote follow-up. Providing face-to-face and telephone/we-chat follow-up by psychiatrists, and with slight adverse reactions, the probability of receiving medication management programme increased by 0.478, which was close to the optimal medication management programme.The formulation of medication management strategies should be rooted in the preferences of people with depression. The impact of recurrent depression experiences on preferences should be considered when forming collaborative care teams consisting of psychiatrists, psychiatric nurses, and family physicians to address the complex and multifaceted needs of people with depression.

Keywords: Depressive Disorder, Depression, adherence, preference, Discrete choice experiment, medication management, DCE

Received: 11 May 2025; Accepted: 20 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Xie, LI, Guo, Yang, Wang, Ming and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: HuiQin LI, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.