SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Mood Disorders
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1627507
Depression and Depressive Symptoms in Physicians Prior to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Provisionally accepted- 1Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), Ottawa, Canada
- 2School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- 3ICES, Ottawa, Canada
- 4Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- 5Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- 6Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China
- 7Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Mental health disorders, such as depression, can significantly impact a physician's well-being and the quality of care they provide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify risk factors and to estimate the prevalence of depression and depressive symptoms in physicians prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review and meta-analyses, searching EMBASE, APA PsycINFO and Medline databases from January 2002-March 2020 (pre-COVID-19). Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort and cross-sectional studies. We included studies of physicians where depression/depressive symptoms were measured by either a validated questionnaire or clinical diagnosis. The primary and secondary outcomes measures included assessing the prevalence of depression/depressive symptoms, and whether depression differed by pertinent risk factors (study design, sex, specialty, training stage) in the literature prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Forty-two studies from 14 countries involving 27,284 physicians (7,293 with depression or depressive symptoms) were included. The pooled prevalence estimate was 34.2% (95% CI: 26.4-43.0%), with substantial heterogeneity identified across studies (I2 = 98%). Most studies were cross-sectional surveys (n=28) and cohort studies (n=14). A total of 13 different assessment methods were used. We found no statistically significant difference in depression between male and female physicians (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.46, 131), and a slightly increased rates in residents compared to staff physicians [pooled estimates of 36% (95% CI: 26-47%) and 29% (95% CI: 13-53%)]. Finally, 25 studies were deemed "High" risk of bias, while the remaining 17 were "Low" risk. Conclusions: In this review examining depression and depressive symptoms among physicians, we report a pooled estimate of 34% prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the high degree of heterogeneity in study design and limited examination of key risk factors, limited conclusions can be made regarding the true prevalence across the physicians, and how best to target interventions. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO ID CRD42021232814
Keywords: Depression, Physicians, depressive symptoms, Prevalence, Systematic review & meta-analysis
Received: 12 May 2025; Accepted: 29 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Dhaliwal, Fremont, Li, Myran, Solmi, Tanuseputro, Wilson and Sood. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Manish M Sood, msood@toh.ca
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.