ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Autism
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1636560
This article is part of the Research TopicInnovative and Cutting-edge Approaches to the Identification and Management of Autism Spectrum DisordersView all 12 articles
Development and Evaluation of Robotic Detection Technology for Assessing Autism
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Educational Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, China
- 2NEC Hong Kong Limited, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
An objective and standardized assessment for assessing autism is needed. This study aimed to develop and validate robotic detection technology for assessing autism. The robot HUMANE, installed with computer vision and linked with face and motion recognition technology, autonomously detected atypical eye gaze and repetitive motor movements, two of the features of autism, while narrating stories. It autonomously prompted the child if they did not establish eye gaze with the robot or produced motor movements for five seconds continuously. The study involved 119 children aged between three and six years old (M=4.53, SD=1.89; 38 females) and included children confirmed or not confirmed with autism. They all received the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule—second edition (ADOS‑2), the standard diagnostic tool for autism. HUMANE’s detection performance – the number of robot prompts and the cumulative duration of inattentiveness/improper posture – was then evaluated against the calibrated severity score of ADOS-2. Our results showed that the average sensitivity and specificity of the detection reached 0.80, the Diagnostic Odds Ratio was beyond 30, and the AUC was .85. These results indicate that the robotic detection technology of atypical eye gaze and repetitive motor movements can contribute to the diagnostic process to identify the presence or absence of autism.
Keywords: autism, assessment, autonomous robot, detection, Children
Received: 28 May 2025; Accepted: 04 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 So, Wong, Ng, Lay, Wong, So, Li and Lee. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Wing Chee So, Department of Educational Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.