Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychiatry

Sec. ADHD

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1655548

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Clinical Neuropsychology and Interplay with Mental Health in Several Health ConditionsView all 5 articles

Psychometric Validation of the SNAP-IV Rating Scale in Amblyopic Children at High AD/HD Risk: Structural Validity and Measurement Invariance

Provisionally accepted
Lu  PanLu Pan1Meng  RuMeng Ru2Yuxing  HuangYuxing Huang3Wuqiang  LUOWuqiang LUO3Lili  LiLili Li3Yan  LuoYan Luo3Enwei  LinEnwei Lin3Min  KongMin Kong3Qi  ChenQi Chen3Yali  LuoYali Luo4Hairun  LiuHairun Liu3Siyan  HuangSiyan Huang3Jin  ZengJin Zeng5Fei  HanFei Han2Xin  XiaoXin Xiao3*
  • 1Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China
  • 2Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
  • 3People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China
  • 4GuangXi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China
  • 5Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To validate the psychometric properties of the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Rating Scale (SNAP-IV) in amblyopic children at high AD/HD risk and establish its clinical utility for comorbid AD/HD screening. Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized baseline data from the China Amblyopia Behavioral Cohort (CABC), which comprises 465 amblyopic children (aged 4–17 years). The reliability of the SNAP-IV was comprehensively assessed using Cronbach's alpha and the split-half coefficient. The validity of the SNAP-IV was evaluated using criterion validity with the Conners' parent rating scale (CPRS) and construct validity via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The measurement invariance of the SNAP-IV across gender and age groups was also investigated. Results: The SNAP-IV demonstrated exceptional internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.965 [95% CI: 0.958–0.972], split-half coefficient = 0.891) and strong criterion validity with the CPRS domains, particularly with respect to the oppositional factor of the SNAP-IV scale, which showed the highest correlation with the conduct problem factor of the Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) (rₛ = 0.837, 95% CI: 0.807–0.863, p < 0.001, large effect). The findings indicated a substantial correlation between inattention and learning problems (rₛ = 0.808, 95% CI: 0.767–0.834, p < 0.001, large effect) and conduct problems (rₛ = 0.719, 95% CI: 0.675–0.765, p < 0.001, large effect). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a three-factor structure (inattention, hyperactivity-impulsivity, oppositional) with robust fit indices (χ²/(291) = 1033.4, χ²/df = 3.551, RMSEA = 0.074, CFI = 0.92, IFI = 0.92), with full measurement invariance confirmed across gender and age groups. Conclusions: This study constitutes the first systematic validation of the SNAP-IV in amblyopic children, thereby establishing its robustness for AD/HD screening in visually impaired populations. The scale's standardized application has the potential to enhance the screening of early AD/HD-amblyopia comorbidity and the development of multidisciplinary intervention strategies for integrating visual and behavioral rehabilitation.

Keywords: SNAP-IV, Validation, Reliability, Amblyopia, AD/HD, Children

Received: 28 Jun 2025; Accepted: 09 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Pan, Ru, Huang, LUO, Li, Luo, Lin, Kong, Chen, Luo, Liu, Huang, Zeng, Han and Xiao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Xin Xiao, xiaoxi3891@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.