ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Mood Disorders
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1657696
Psychometric Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in Chinese Adolescent and Adult Psychiatric Inpatient Populations
Provisionally accepted- 1Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan, China
- 2Peking University, Beijing, China
- 3Tongji University Tongji University Press, Shanghai, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Depressive disorder represents a major public health burden globally, yet the validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)—a widely used depression screening tool—remains underexplored in Chinese psychiatric inpatient populations. This study aimed to (1) validate the Chinese version of the PHQ-9 in Chinese psychiatric inpatients (contrasting with community-based findings) and (2) compare its psychometric properties between adolescent and adult inpatients. This cross-sectional study enrolled 485 psychiatric inpatients (including 105 adolescents) from Shanxi Bethune Hospital. Participants completed the Chinese version of the PHQ-9. Analyses encompassed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Gaussian Graphical Model-based network analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine optimal diagnostic cutoff scores. Results showed the PHQ-9 had good internal consistency: Cronbach’s α = 0.876 (adolescents) and 0.883 (adults). CFA revealed no significant difference in fit between the unidimensional and two-factor (cognitive-affective vs. somatic) models in adolescents (Δχ²=0.79, p=0.374), with both models showing marginal fit (likely affected by small sample size). In adults, the two-factor model was preferred (Δχ²=6.49, p=0.011). The Network Comparison Test found no significant differences in network structure (M=0.211, p=0.598) or global strength (S=0.262, p=0.186) between age groups, but the adolescent network had poor stability (correlation stability coefficient = 0), limiting interpretation. ROC analysis identified age-specific optimal cutoffs exceeding the conventional threshold of 10: 15.5 for adolescents (sensitivity=0.84, specificity=0.47) and 14.5 for adults (sensitivity=0.79, specificity=0.66). Notably, 64.7% of the total sample scored ≥15 on the PHQ-9, while only 43.7% had a primary diagnosis of depressive disorder (ICD-11 6A7), indicating comorbid depressive symptoms contributed to higher cutoffs. The findings of this study validate the structural and diagnostic validity of the PHQ-9 among Chinese adult psychiatric inpatients, while emphasizing that the interpretation of its factor structure in the adolescent population requires caution. The age-related symptom topological patterns indicated by network analyses are highly likely to be influenced by the insufficient size of the adolescent sample and need to be confirmed by subsequent studies. The results of the ROC curve highlight the clinical significance of formulating population-specific diagnostic cutoffs; however, the impact of comorbidity on the findings of this study must be taken into consideration.
Keywords: Patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Depressive Disorder, Chinese psychiatric inpatients, Adolescent, validity
Received: 01 Jul 2025; Accepted: 13 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li, Yin, Wang and Zhong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Qian Wang, qian_wang@tongji.edu.cn
Jie Zhong, jzhong@pku.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.