ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Public Mental Health
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1658354
Analysis of Characteristics among Unemployed Callers to the Psychological Support Hotline in Beijing
Provisionally accepted
- 1Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
- 2Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China
- 3Baoding Institute of Technology, Baoding, China
- 4University College London, London, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Unemployment constitutes a significant social stressor that systematically impairs individuals' psychological adaptive capacity. It serves as an independent risk factor for mental health deterioration, significantly elevating the risks of depressive disorders, suicidal ideation, and related conditions.This study analyzes characteristics and mental health status of unemployed callers through psychological support hotline data, aiming to identify underlying psychological risk factors.A retrospective analysis was conducted on the general demographic data, primary concerns, and mental health status of unemployed callers to the Beijing Psychological Support Hotline from 2020 to 2023. Group comparisons were stratified by age and gender. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with mental health outcomes.The study included 9,002 call records from unemployed individuals, with 60.3% being female, 70.1% aged between 19 and 29, 73.2% unmarried, and 64.8% having no more than 15 years of education. Callers aged 19-29 years reported significantly higher proportions of non-familial interpersonal issues (χ² =8.03, P<0.01), depressive symptoms (χ² =7.48, P<0.01), and psychiatric symptoms (χ² =7.04, P<0.01) compared to those aged 30-59 years. Female callers (OR=1.50) exhibited higher susceptibility to suicidal ideation, hopelessness, and depression; individuals aged 30-59 years (OR=0.34-0.80, P<0.05) and those with prior psychiatric diagnoses (OR=0.66) demonstrated lower suicidal ideation risk; unmarried/divorced callers showed elevated hopelessness (OR=1.30-1.63), psychological distress (OR=1.39) and depression (OR=1.57); callers with ≥16 years of education had lower levels of hopelessness, distress, and depression (OR=0.68-0.89, P<0.05); and daytime callers (8:00-23:00) exhibited lower hopelessness levels (OR=0.68-0.80, P<0.05).Conclusions: Unemployed callers who are female, aged 19-29 or unmarried/divorced exhibited higher levels of psychological distress and suicide risk. Notably, while callers with a history of psychiatric diagnoses reported lower levels of suicidal ideation, they demonstrated higher levels of hopelessness and depressive symptoms. These findings warrant attention, and hotline services should implement timely identification, psychological support, and targeted interventions to effectively alleviate psychological distress and reduce potential suicide risk in these high-risk groups.
Keywords: psychological support hotline, Unemployment, Mental Health, Characteristics, Risk factors
Received: 02 Jul 2025; Accepted: 30 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Xingxue, Liu, Wu, Yuan, Wang, Zhao, Yang and Liang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Hong Liang, Beijing Huilongguan Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.