ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychiatry
Sec. Public Mental Health
This article is part of the Research TopicPsychological Health in the Digital Age across Global CommunitiesView all 5 articles
Longitudinal Comparison of Psychological Outcomes of Professional Content Moderators Engaged in Resilience Training Program
Provisionally accepted
- TaskUs, New Braunfels, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Introduction: Content moderators safeguard the ever-growing online realm by reviewing and filtering out harms, yet are themselves subject to the risk of psychological concerns. Method: This study explored the psychological outcomes of content moderators (N=311) who were offered a resilience training program called The TaskUs Method 2.0 from baseline to 18 months. Participants completed psychometric screeners for resilience, burnout, secondary traumatic stress, compassion satisfaction, and perceived stress. For the analyses, three timepoints were identified to follow participants across the study period based on their tenure–T0 (0–3 months tenure), T1 (5–10 months), and T2 (11–16 months tenure). Results: Findings from the entire sample (regardless of whether participants had data for all three timepoints) revealed that secondary traumatic stress and perceived stress did not differ significantly between timepoints. However, burnout, compassion satisfaction and resilience showed small yet significant decline between T0 and T2. With a reduced sample of only those having data for all three timepoints, similar trends remained although the rate of change from T0 to T1 did not differ significantly from that of T1 to T2 for any of the variables. Discussion: Results indicated that participants in the program showed no significant increases in secondary traumatic stress, the main target of the program. Across the different psychometrics, effect sizes were small suggesting that content moderators using the program were not at significant risk for increased psychological distress from content moderation during the study duration. These findings provide a valuable foundation for further refining interventions aimed at content moderators. Future studies may consider experimental and multifactorial designs to delve into therapeutic mechanisms and different types of psychological outcomes.
Keywords: Content moderation1, psychological safety2, resilience3, Secondary trauma4, Wellness intervention5
Received: 15 Jul 2025; Accepted: 20 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Savio, Balammal, De Villa, Perez, Huang and Guevara. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Aruna Balammal, aruna100.100@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.