Abstract
Background:
Chronic Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is associated with both gastrointestinal symptoms and systemic inflammation, which may contribute to the development of psychiatric disorders, particularly anxiety. Appropriate psychiatric interventions have been shown to significantly enhance treatment outcomes in patients undergoing clinical management for H. pylori infection. Early screening for anxiety in this population is therefore of critical clinical importance. This study aimed to identify potential biomarkers for anxiety detection and evaluate the relationship between these biomarkers and anxiety symptoms in H. pylori-positive individuals.
Method:
A total of 160 participants (81 H. pylori-positive and 79 H. pylori-negative patients) were enrolled in this study. All participants underwent standardized neuropsychological assessments and venous blood collection. Systemic inflammation indices were derived from routine hematological parameters.
Results:
(1) H. pylori-positive patients showed significantly higher anxiety scores [Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS)] and elevated inflammatory markers [systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI)] as compared to H. pylori-negative ones. (2) AISI showed optimal diagnostic accuracy for infection status [area under the curve (AUC) =0.746)], followed by SIRI and SII (both AUC > 0.7). (3) In H. pylori-positive patients, inflammatory markers correlated with both anxiety scores and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels. (4) Interactions between serum GFAP and blood SII and AISI were significantly associated with HAMA and SAS scores in H. pylori-positive patients. (5) The GFAP as the mediator, affected the relationship between the blood levels of systemic inflammatory markers and HAMA and SAS scores in H. pylori-positive patients.
Conclusion:
Our findings suggest systemic inflammation indices contribute to anxiety development in H. pylori infection and may serve as practical biomarkers for anxiety screening.
Introduction
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), a Gram-negative, microaerobic bacterium of the Proteobacteria phylum, colonizes the stomach and duodenum, contributing to gastrointestinal disorders, including gastritis, peptic ulcers, and gastric cancer (, ). Chronic H. pylori infection can exert systemic effects via gut-brain axis modulation and induce neuroinflammation, potentially reaching the central nervous system (CNS) through hematogenous spread, olfactory pathways, or retrograde axonal transport from the gut (, ). Growing evidence suggests that H. pylori infection may contribute to neurological disorders, including Alzheimer’s disease, stroke, multiple sclerosis (). Furthermore, H. pylori infection has been strongly associated with psychiatric conditions, particularly anxiety (–). Notably, even after successful eradication therapy, some individuals may develop anxiety disorders due to persistent concerns about infection recurrence or fear of severe illness, despite testing negative for H. pylori antigens. A previous clinical study indicates that approximately 30% of H. pylori-positive individuals developed anxiety-related complications and psychiatric intervention can obviously enhance treatment outcomes for H. pylori infection (). Therefore, early detection of anxiety in H. pylori-infected patients is clinically important, and the identification of reliable biomarkers for anxiety could significantly improve therapeutic management of H. pylori infection.
Due to the systemic inflammatory response serves as the key link between H. pylori infection and anxiety, inflammatory-related markers show more potential. Recent advances in inflammatory assessment have utilized leukocyte subtype ratios from complete blood counts to quantify systemic inflammation (). Three novel indices have emerged as particularly valuable: the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI), and Aggregate Index of Systemic Inflammation (AISI), which have demonstrated significant diagnostic and prognostic utility across various clinical conditions (, ). Previous study has demonstrated that elevated SIRI levels are significantly associated with higher all-cause mortality in H. pylori-infected individuals (). Meanwhile, these hematological inflammatory markers show potential as screening biomarkers for early-stage gastric cancer detection (, ). Furthermore, increased levels of these systemic inflammatory markers have also been observed in patients with anxiety disorders, with blood concentrations positively correlating with anxiety severity (, ). The clinical applicability of these systemic inflammatory markers for H. pylori-positive individuals with comorbid anxiety has not yet been established, warranting investigation into their potential effects on central nervous system neuroinflammation.
Astrocyte activation can induce neuroinflammation, subsequently affecting brain regions implicated in mood regulation, including anxiety-related circuits (). Serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a peripheral biomarker of astrocyte activation, has been shown to both reflect the degree of astrocyte-mediated neuroinflammation and correlate with the pathogenesis of anxiety disorders (–). In our previous study, serum GFAP levels were found to differ significantly between H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative patients (). Furthermore, among H. pylori-positive individuals, GFAP levels showed a significant correlation with scores on depressive psychological assessments ().
This study aims to: (1) compare the expression levels of systemic inflammatory markers between H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative patients; (2) assess the association between these markers and anxiety symptoms in H. pylori-positive individuals; and (3) investigate the potential mechanisms through which these inflammatory markers may influence anxiety pathology in H. pylori-infected patients. The hypothesis of this study was that systemic inflammatory marker levels differed significantly between the two groups and were correlated with the severity of anxiety in H. pylori-positive individuals.
Method and materials
Participants
A total of 160 adult Chinese Han participants were recruited from Wuxi Xishan People’s Hospital, comprising 79 H. pylori-positive patients and 81 H. pylori-negative patients. In the present study, H. pylori infection status was assessed using the14C-urea breath test, rapid urease test, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with histopathological examination of biopsy samples (Supplementary Figure 1). Each participant underwent all three tests. H. pylori infection was defined as a positive result in ≥ 1 test, while H. pylori-negative status required no positive findings in any of the tests. A qualified gastroenterologist conducted standardized clinical interviews and evaluated the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) for all participants.
Eligible participants were required to meet the following criteria: (1) age between 20 and 85 years; (2) self-reported gastrointestinal discomfort; and (3) willingness to undergo upper endoscopy and biopsy for diagnostic evaluation. Meanwhile, participants were excluded if they met any of the following conditions: (1) recent use (within one month prior to enrollment) of medications that could influence gastrointestinal function, including histamine-2 receptor antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or probiotics; (2) a history of severe systemic diseases, such as hepatic, cardiovascular, renal, or thyroid dysfunction, as well as malignancy, active infections, stroke, or autoimmune disorders; (3) diagnosed psychiatric conditions (e.g., bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, dementia) or a family history of psychotic disorders; (4) prior surgery involving the digestive tract; (5) current alcohol or substance abuse or dependence; (6) pregnancy or lactation at the time of screening; or (7) taking psychotropic medications, including anti-anxiety or antidepressant drugs.
The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Wuxi Xishan People’s Hospital (approval number: xs2021ky025). All participants or their legal guardians provided written informed consent.
Neuropsychological assessments
Trained researchers conducted standardized neuropsychological assessments for all participants. Anxiety symptoms were evaluated using two validated scales: the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) (), administered by the assessors, and the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) (), a self-reported measure.
Measurement of blood indices
Fasting peripheral venous blood samples were collected from each participant between 8:00 am and 9:00 am using two types of vacutainer tubes: a plain tube (without anticoagulant) and an EDTA-coated tube.
For serum preparation, blood samples in plain tubes were centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 minutes at 4 °C within 30 minutes of collection. The obtained serum was aliquoted and stored at -80 °C until analysis. Serum concentrations of GFAP were quantified using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays kits (FineTest, Wuhan, China; Catalog Numbers: EH0410). All measurements were performed in triplicate, with both inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation < 5%.
Blood samples collected in EDTA-coated tubes were immediately transported to the clinical laboratory of Wuxi Xishan People’s Hospital for complete blood count analysis. Based on these results, we calculated three systemic inflammation indices: (1) SII = (neutrophil count × platelet count)/lymphocyte count; (2) SIRI = (neutrophil count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count; and (3) AISI = (neutrophil count × monocyte count × platelet count)/lymphocyte count, which is also referred to as systemic immune-inflammation response index.
Statistical analyses
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 20.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data normality was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Continuous variables with normal distribution were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and compared using independent samples t-tests, while non-normally distributed variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square tests. The diagnostic performance of biomarkers was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, with the area under the curve (AUC) serving as the primary accuracy measure. Optimal cutoff values were determined by maximizing the Youden index (, ).
Bivariate correlations were examined to assess relationships between continuous variables. Linear regression analysis was employed to evaluate multivariate associations with anxiety symptoms (). Additionally, we conducted mediation analyses to investigate whether serum markers mediated the relationship between systemic inflammation indices and anxiety symptom severity, following established three-variable mediation models (–). A two-tailed p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analyses.
Results
Comparative analysis of clinical characteristics between H. pylori-positive and negative groups
As shown in Table 1, the two groups demonstrated comparable baseline characteristics including age, sex, endoscopic findings, and GSRS scores (all p > 0.05). However, H. pylori-positive patients exhibited significantly higher anxiety scores on both the HAMA and SAS compared to the H. pylori-negative ones (p < 0.05). Meanwhile, serum analysis demonstrated significant between-group differences in GFAP levels (p < 0.05).
Table 1
| H. pylori-negative (n = 81) | H. pylori-positive (n = 79) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 56.99 ± 12.80 | 57.71 ± 13.22 | 0.726* |
| Sex (Female, %) | 28 (34.57%) | 30 (37.97%) | 0.201# |
| Endoscopic features | 0.896# | ||
| Superficial gastritis, % | 47 (58.02%) | 48 (60.76%) | |
| Atrophic gastritis, % | 11 (13.58%) | 7 (8.86%) | |
| erosive gastritis, % | 23 (28.40%) | 24 (30.38%) | |
| GSRS scores | 8.94 ± 2.89 | 9.43 ± 3.07 | 0.276† |
| HAMA scores | 4.60 ± 3.19 | 26.41 ± 7.02 | < 0.001† |
| SAS scores | 33.84 ± 5.68 | 63.10 ± 7.04 | < 0.001† |
| Blood indices levels | |||
| Neutrophil count, 109/L | 3.34 ± 1.08 | 4.10 ± 1.21 | 0.001* |
| Lymphocyte count, 109/L | 1.94 ± 0.64 | 1.94 ± 0.81 | 0.493† |
| Monocyte count, 109/L | 0.41 ± 0.13 | 0.49 ± 0.19 | 0.010* |
| Platelet count, 109/L | 200.62 ± 54.10 | 222.32 ± 55.97 | 0.014* |
| Erythrocyte count, 109/L | 4.56 ± 0.63 | 4.49 ± 0.76 | 0.495* |
| Hemoglobin, g/L | 139.77 ± 18.67 | 134.72 ± 20.54 | 0.106* |
| GFAP, ng/ml | 0.30 ± 0.73 | 0.38 ± 0.39 | < 0.001† |
Comparison of clinical features, psychological assessments and blood indices levels between the H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative groups.
Data are presented as means ± standard deviation or number of participants in each group (% of total).
H. pylori, Helicobacter pylori; GSRS, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale; HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Scale; SAS, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein.
*P values were obtained by Independent-Samples T test.
†P values were obtained by Mann-Whitney U test.
#P values were obtained by Chi-square test.
Blood count analysis indicated no significant intergroup differences in lymphocyte counts, erythrocyte counts, or hemoglobin levels (p > 0.05 for all; Table 1). However, H. pylori-positive patients showed distinct alterations in several inflammatory markers, including elevated neutrophil counts, monocyte counts, and platelet counts (p < 0.05; Table 1). Additionally, H. pylori-positive patients demonstrated significantly elevated levels of all three systemic inflammation indices (SII, SIRI, and AISI) compared to H. pylori-negative individuals (Figures 1A–C).
Figure 1
ROC curve analysis
ROC curve analysis was conducted on the six blood count indices that showed significant differences between H. pylori-positive and negative groups (Figure 1D). The results revealed that the AISI demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.746; sensitivity = 60.76%, specificity = 82.72%), followed by the SIRI (AUC = 0.707; sensitivity = 63.29%, specificity = 77.78%) and SII (AUC = 0.706; sensitivity = 67.09%, specificity = 67.90%). The remaining three indices showed limited discriminative ability, with AUC values below 0.7.
Psychological assessments association with systemic inflammation indices and serum indices levels in H. pylori-positive patients
In H. pylori-positive patients, significant positive correlations were observed between three systemic inflammation indices and serum GFAP levels (Table 2). Moreover, HAMA scores showed significant positive correlations with all three systemic inflammation indices in these patients, while SAS scores were only positively associated with SII and AISI levels (Table 2).
Table 2
| SII levels | SIRI levels | AISI levels | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GFAP levels | r = 0.270, p = 0.016 | r = 0.273, p = 0.015 | r = 0.380, p = 0.001 |
| HAMA scores | r = 0.383, p < 0.001 | r = 0.289, p = 0.010 | r = 0.353, p = 0.001 |
| SAS scores | r = 0.370, p = 0.001 | r = 0.181, p = 0.110 | r = 0.263, p = 0.019 |
Correlation analyses between blood systemic inflammatory markers levels and serum GFAP levels and psychological assessments in the H. pylori-positive group.
H. pylori, Helicobacter pylori; SII, systemic immune-inflammation index; SIRI, systemic inflammation response index; AISI, aggregate index of systemic inflammation; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; HAMA, Hamilton Anxiety Scale; SAS, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale.
In addition, linear regression analyses revealed that blood SII, AISI, and serum GFAP levels were significantly associated with anxiety in H. pylori-positive patients (Figure 2). To further characterize these relationships, we stratified H. pylori-positive patients into two subgroups based on their HAMA scores: a “low HAMA” group (n = 39, HAMA score < 27) and a “high HAMA” group (n = 40, HAMA score ≥ 27), using the mean HAMA score as the cutoff. The results demonstrated that patients in the high HAMA group exhibited significantly elevated blood SII and AISI levels, along with higher serum GFAP levels, compared to the low HAMA group (Figures 2A, B). Likewise, we classified H. pylori-positive patients into “low SAS” (n = 42, SAS score < 64) and “high SAS” (n = 37, SAS score ≥ 64) subgroups based on the mean SAS score. Consistent with the HAMA findings, patients with higher SAS scores also displayed increased SII, AISI, and GFAP levels (Figures 2C, D).
Figure 2
Further mediation analyses in H. pylori-positive patients demonstrated that serum GFAP significantly mediated the relationship between systemic inflammation indices and anxiety severity (Figure 3). Specifically, serum GFAP levels indirectly influenced the association of SII with both HAMA and SAS scores, as well as the association of AISI with HAMA scores (Figures 3A, B). Notably, GFAP also exhibited a direct mediating effect on the relationship between AISI and SAS scores, as well as between SIRI and HAMA scores (Figures 3B, C).
Figure 3
Discussion
In the present study, we mainly found that (1) H. pylori-positive patients exhibited significantly elevated HAMA and SAS scores, along with increased blood levels of SII, SIRI, and AISI compared to H. pylori-negative controls; (2) among the inflammatory indices, AISI demonstrated superior discriminative power for identifying H. pylori infection, followed by SIRI and SII; (3) significant correlations were observed between systemic inflammatory markers (SII/SIRI/AISI) and both psychological assessment scores and serum GFAP levels in H. pylori-positive patients; (4) interaction analyses revealed that GFAP significantly moderated the effects of SII and AISI on anxiety severity (HAMA/SAS scores); and (5) GFAP-mediated neuroinflammation may underlie the association between systemic inflammation and anxiety severity. Altogether, these findings indicate that systemic inflammation indices may contribute to anxiety pathogenesis in H. pylori infection and could serve as clinically useful biomarkers for anxiety detection in this patient population.
Consistent with previous findings (, ), our study demonstrated that H. pylori-positive patients exhibited significantly higher scores on both the HAMA and the SAS compared to H. pylori-negative individuals, suggesting a potential association between H. pylori infection and the manifestation of anxiety symptoms. H. pylori’s persistent colonization in the host’s stomach can trigger and sustain systemic inflammation, which may contribute to neuroinflammatory processes (, , ). Previous studies have demonstrated that elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and immune system activation can exacerbate anxiety-like behaviors (, ), suggesting a link between inflammation and anxiety. Based on these evidence, we focused on systemic inflammatory markers to evaluate the potential association between H. pylori infection and anxiety. In the present study, blood levels of three systemic inflammatory markers (SII, SIRI, and AISI) were significantly higher in H. pylori-positive patients than in H. pylori-negative individuals, supporting that H. pylori infection is associated with severe systemic inflammation. Subsequently, the correlation analyses further revealed that blood levels of SII, SIRI, and AISI were positively associated with anxiety severity (as assessed by HAMA and SAS scores) in H. pylori-positive patients, suggesting that these systemic inflammatory markers may contribute to the development of anxiety symptoms following H. pylori infection. Among other digestive system disorders (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease), elevated peripheral inflammatory responses have been also identified as a key mechanism underlying the occurrence of anxiety (). The current findings provide valuable evidence supporting the association between peripheral systemic inflammatory markers and H. pylori-related anxiety. Furthermore, ROC curve analysis demonstrated that these systemic inflammatory markers exhibited good diagnostic performance in differentiating H. pylori-positive from H. pylori-negative individuals. Hence, SII, SIRI, and AISI may serve as potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of H. pylori-positive patients with anxiety, potentially facilitating early anti-anxiety intervention following H. pylori infection.
In our study, we observed that potential interactions between serum GFAP and both SII and AISI levels could influence anxiety severity in H. pylori-positive patients. This finding suggests that systemic inflammation may contribute to anxiety through astrocyte-mediated neuroinflammation. Subsequent mediation analyses further revealed that serum GFAP potentially affected the relationship between systemic inflammatory markers and anxiety severity in these patients. Therefore, GFAP-associated astrocyte activation as a critical link may connect systemic inflammation with anxiety development in patients with H. pylori infection.
Furthermore, there is a strong association between H. pylori infection and anxiety, suggesting that anxiety may also serve as a potential risk factor for H. pylori infection. Although direct evidence linking anxiety to an increased susceptibility to H. pylori is limited, anxiety has been associated with gastrointestinal disturbances and a higher risk of various gastrointestinal disorders, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastric ulcers, and gastritis (). Given that the microbiota-gut-brain axis represents a bidirectional communication system (–), it is plausible that gut microbiota dysbiosis resulting from anxiety could compromise gastrointestinal function, thereby potentially increasing the likelihood of acquiring H. pylori infection. Meanwhile, although less likely, anxiety may also induce neuroinflammation—such as through the release of serum GFAP—which could potentially increase systemic inflammation and gastrointestinal susceptibility to H. pylori infection. Therefore, further animal studies are needed to evaluate the causal relationship between anxiety and H. pylori infection.
The present study had several limitations. (1) Our study was based on cross-sectional data, limiting our ability to assess longitudinal changes in systemic inflammatory markers. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether the observed association between these markers and anxiety persists following H. pylori eradication therapy. (2) Further animal studies are warranted to validate these findings and elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Future investigations should examine both peripheral and CNS levels of systemic inflammatory markers and GFAP in mouse models of H. pylori infection, with particular focus on whether modulation of these factors through human intervention can alter anxiety-like behaviors. (3) The systemic inflammatory response should be further characterized through comprehensive assessment of additional inflammatory mediators, including proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines.
Conclusion
The present study revealed significantly higher HAMA and SAS scores in H. pylori-positive patients, suggesting the presence of anxiety-like symptoms associated with H. pylori infection. These findings may be explained by circulating systemic inflammatory markers potentially triggering astrocyte activation, which could contribute to anxiety development in infected patients.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics statement
The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Wuxi Xishan People’s Hospital (approval number: xs2021ky025). All participants or their legal guardians provided written informed consent. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
JG: Writing – original draft. FC: Writing – original draft. BJ: Writing – original draft. BZ: Writing – original draft. XM: Writing – original draft. MW: Writing – original draft. QD: Writing – original draft. SW: Writing – original draft. XY: Writing – review & editing. EZ: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the WuXi Municipal Health Commission (No. Y20212020).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all participants in the present study for their cooperation and relevant medical staff (e.g., Mrs. Jing Hua, Mrs. Fan Lu, and Mrs. Yan Zhou) from the Neurology and Gastroenterology Department of the Wuxi Xishan People’s Hospital for their assistance in this work.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1671858/full#supplementary-material
References
1
DuanYXuYDouYXuD. Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer: mechanisms and new perspectives. J Hematol Oncol. (2025) 18:10. doi: 10.1186/s13045-024-01654-2
2
SharafutdinovITegtmeyerNLinzBRohdeMViethMTayACet al. A single-nucleotide polymorphism in Helicobacter pylori promotes gastric cancer development. Cell Host Microbe. (2023) 31:1345–1358.e1346. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2023.06.016
3
BudzyńskiJKłopockaM. Brain-gut axis in the pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. World J Gastroenterol. (2014) 20:5212–25. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5212
4
WangFYaoZJinTMaoBShaoSShaoC. Research progress on Helicobacter pylori infection related neurological diseases. Ageing Res Rev. (2024) 99:102399. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102399
5
BajJFormaAFliegerWMorawskaIMichalskiABuszewiczGet al. Helicobacter pylori infection and extragastric diseases-A focus on the central nervous system. Cells. (2021) 10:2191. doi: 10.3390/cells10092191
6
GuYZhengLKumariSZhangQLiuLMengGet al. The relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and depressive symptoms in the general population in China: The TCLSIH cohort study. Helicobacter. (2019) 24:e12632. doi: 10.1111/hel.12632
7
LabbanSAMurshidLYousef AlhazmiABafaratAYAlharbiNM. New-onset illness anxiety disorder after helicobacter pylori infection: A case report. Cureus. (2024) 16:e52613. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52613
8
PiriyapongKTangaroonsantiAMahachaiVVilaichoneRK. Helicobacter pylori infection impacts on functional dyspepsia in Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. (2014) 15:10887–91. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.24.10887
9
SobokaMGudinaEKGashawMAmareHBerhaneMDesalegnHet al. Depression among people with dyspepsia and H. pylori infection: A community based cross-sectional study in Ethiopia. PLoS One. (2022) 17:e0275424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275424
10
KabeerKKAnanthakrishnanNAnandCBalasundaramS. Prevalence of helicobacter pylori infection and stress, anxiety or depression in functional dyspepsia and outcome after appropriate intervention. J Clin Diagn Res. (2017) 11:Vc11–vc15. doi: 10.7860/jcdr/2017/26745.10486
11
TangTZhangDWangFFanTThomasAMLanXet al. Impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on the effect of hyperglycemia at admission on clinical outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy. Neuroprotection. (2024) 2:196–202. doi: 10.1002/nep3.55
12
TuzimekADziedzicEABeckJKochmanW. Correlations between acute coronary syndrome and novel inflammatory markers (Systemic immune-inflammation index, systemic inflammation response index, and aggregate index of systemic inflammation) in patients with and without diabetes or prediabetes. J Inflammation Res. (2024) 17:2623–32. doi: 10.2147/jir.S454117
13
ZhangXFuHLiJYanJHuangJXuZet al. Development and validation of a predictive model using inflammatory biomarkers for active tuberculosis risk in diabetic patients. J Inflammation Res. (2025) 18:4725–39. doi: 10.2147/jir.S512075
14
QiuJFangHLiuDLaiQXieJWangYet al. Accelerated biological aging mediates the association between inflammatory markers with Helicobacter pylori infection and mortality. J Transl Med. (2025) 23:174. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06189-9
15
UzunogluHKayaS. Does systemic immune inflammation index have predictive value in gastric cancer prognosis? North Clin Istanb. (2023) 10:24–32. doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.71324
16
ZhengJZhengLWangXMaoXWangQYangYet al. The clinical value of the combined detection of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in early diagnosis of gastric cancer. J Inflammation Res. (2025) 18:813–26. doi: 10.2147/jir.S496703
17
MazzaMGDe LorenzoRConteCPolettiSVaiBBollettiniIet al. Anxiety and depression in COVID-19 survivors: Role of inflammatory and clinical predictors. Brain Behav Immun. (2020) 89:594–600. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.07.037
18
ZhouYZhangCLiJZhengYXiaoS. Systemic inflammation mediates the association between dietary inflammation index and incident anxiety and depression in UK Biobank. J Affect Disord. (2025) 381:205–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.03.101
19
RhieSJJungEYShimI. The role of neuroinflammation on pathogenesis of affective disorders. J Exerc Rehabil. (2020) 16:2–9. doi: 10.12965/jer.2040016.008
20
HePLuXZhongMWengHWangJZhangXet al. Plasma alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 4 as an age-specific biomarker in the diagnosis and treatment of major depressive disorder. Front Psychiatry. (2024) 15:1449202. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1449202
21
HolEMPeknyM. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and the astrocyte intermediate filament system in diseases of the central nervous system. Curr Opin Cell Biol. (2015) 32:121–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2015.02.004
22
JurgaAMPalecznaMKadluczkaJKuterKZ. Beyond the GFAP-astrocyte protein markers in the brain. Biomolecules. (2021) 11:1361. doi: 10.3390/biom11091361
23
ZhaoEYuQWangMWangZJiangBMaXet al. Value of serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor and glial fibrillary acidic protein for detecting depression in patients with Helicobacter pylori infection. Neurosci Lett. (2024) 825:137687. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2024.137687
24
MaierWBullerRPhilippMHeuserI. The Hamilton Anxiety Scale: reliability, validity and sensitivity to change in anxiety and depressive disorders. J Affect Disord. (1988) 14:61–8. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(88)90072-9
25
JegedeRO. Psychometric attributes of the self-rating anxiety scale. Psychol Rep. (1977) 40:303–6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1977.40.1.303
26
ShiYSongRWangLQiYZhangHZhuJet al. Identifying Plasma Biomarkers with high specificity for major depressive disorder: A multi-level proteomics study. J Affect Disord. (2020) 277:620–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.078
27
YoudenWJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. (1950) 3:32–5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::aid-cncr2820030106>3.0.co;2-3
28
HePJiangCNiJZhangXWuZChenGet al. Identifying gut microbiota with high specificity for ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:14086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64819-6
29
HePWangFXiGLiYWangFWangHet al. Association of microplastics in human cerebrospinal fluid with Alzheimer’s disease-related changes. J Hazard Mater. (2025) 494:138748. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.138748
30
ShiYMaoHMiaoWDengJGaoQZengSet al. Potential association of neutrophil extracellular traps with cognitive impairment in cerebral small vessel disease. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2023) 78:1999–2006. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glad184
31
ShiYXuMWangFZhangXChengCHanYet al. Interaction between DHCR24 and hsa_circ_0015335 facilitates cognitive impairment in cerebral small vessel disease patients. CNS Neurosci Ther. (2024) 30:e70131. doi: 10.1111/cns.70131
32
ZhangSWuLZhangBZhuYFanYWangQet al. Impaired decision-making under risk in patients with functional dyspepsia. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. (2020) 42:771–80. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2020.1802406
33
DincăALMelițLEMărgineanCO. Old and new aspects of H. pylori-associated inflammation and gastric cancer. Children (Basel). (2022) 9:1083. doi: 10.3390/children9071083
34
YangHWeiBHuB. Chronic inflammation and long-lasting changes in the gastric mucosa after Helicobacter pylori infection involved in gastric cancer. Inflammation Res. (2021) 70:1015–26. doi: 10.1007/s00011-021-01501-x
35
LiNWangQWangYSunALinYJinYet al. Fecal microbiota transplantation from chronic unpredictable mild stress mice donors affects anxiety-like and depression-like behavior in recipient mice via the gut microbiota-inflammation-brain axis. Stress. (2019) 22:592–602. doi: 10.1080/10253890.2019.1617267
36
MunshiSLohMKFerraraNDeJosephMRRitgerAPadivalMet al. Repeated stress induces a pro-inflammatory state, increases amygdala neuronal and microglial activation, and causes anxiety in adult male rats. Brain Behav Immun. (2020) 84:180–99. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.11.023
37
BisgaardTHAllinKHKeeferLAnanthakrishnanANJessT. Depression and anxiety in inflammatory bowel disease: epidemiology, mechanisms and treatment. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2022) 19:717–26. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00634-6
38
LiuRLSongQCLiuLMYangYFZhuWH. ). Mood instability and risk of gastrointestinal diseases - a univariable and multivariable mendelian randomization study. Ann Gen Psychiatry. (2024) 23:50. doi: 10.1186/s12991-024-00537-7
39
ChenGDuXCuiJSongJXiongMZengXet al. Role of gut microbiota in ischemic stroke: A narrative review of human and animal studies. Neuroprotection. (2024) 2:120–36. doi: 10.1002/nep3.44
40
NakhalMMYassinLKAlyaqoubiRSaeedSAldereiAAlhammadiAet al. The microbiota-gut-brain axis and neurological disorders: A comprehensive review. Life (Basel). (2024) 14:1234. doi: 10.3390/life14101234
41
SimpsonCADiaz-ArtecheCElibyDSchwartzOSSimmonsJGCowanCSM. The gut microbiota in anxiety and depression - A systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. (2021) 83:101943. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101943
Summary
Keywords
anxiety, glial fibrillary acidic protein, Helicobacter pylori, neuroinflammation, systemic inflammatory markers
Citation
Gong J, Chen F, Jiang B, Zhou B, Ma X, Wang M, Dai Q, Wang S, Yang X and Zhao E (2025) Associations between blood systemic inflammatory markers and anxiety in Helicobacter pylori-infected patients. Front. Psychiatry 16:1671858. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1671858
Received
23 July 2025
Accepted
06 October 2025
Published
23 October 2025
Volume
16 - 2025
Edited by
Sasikala Muthusamy, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Gong, Chen, Jiang, Zhou, Ma, Wang, Dai, Wang, Yang and Zhao.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: En Zhao, enzhao9309@163.com; Xiaojun Yang, 329302626@qq.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.